Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Texas by County

Colon & Rectum (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by Count

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas 7 N/A 163.5 (161.6, 165.4) N/A 5,925 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 155.0 (154.5, 155.5) N/A 81,215 falling falling trend -2.6 (-2.8, -2.3)
La Salle County 7 Rural 310.7 (177.2, 506.0) 5 (1, 172) 3 stable stable trend -2.5 (-4.8, 0.1)
Franklin County 7 Rural 157.9 (91.5, 253.9) 136 (6, 172) 3 falling falling trend -3.4 (-6.5, -0.5)
Reeves County 7 Rural 222.6 (129.3, 357.3) 26 (1, 172) 3 stable stable trend 43.4 (-1.7, 90.6)
Dawson County 7 Rural 199.4 (117.8, 316.7) 59 (2, 172) 4 falling falling trend -3.4 (-6.5, -0.9)
Haskell County 7 Rural 289.6 (171.3, 459.0) 6 (1, 171) 4 rising rising trend 5.3 (1.2, 26.1)
Runnels County 7 Rural 177.4 (105.0, 280.5) 96 (4, 172) 4 stable stable trend -1.8 (-6.8, 2.9)
Zapata County 7 Rural 202.3 (119.1, 321.9) 54 (1, 172) 4
*
*
Zavala County 7 Rural 247.6 (145.4, 396.2) 13 (1, 172) 4
*
*
Brooks County 7 Rural 316.1 (190.1, 495.1) 4 (1, 170) 4
*
*
Delta County 7 Rural 347.2 (207.2, 547.3) 1 (1, 168) 4
*
*
Duval County 7 Rural 215.7 (129.8, 336.9) 39 (1, 172) 4 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.4, 6.5)
Goliad County 7 Urban 213.1 (127.8, 336.0) 43 (1, 172) 4 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.8, 2.7)
Lamb County 7 Rural 169.6 (101.6, 265.9) 111 (4, 172) 4 stable stable trend -24.7 (-43.4, 0.3)
Pecos County 7 Rural 193.5 (116.0, 304.7) 72 (2, 172) 4 stable stable trend -3.1 (-7.1, 0.8)
San Augustine County 7 Rural 178.4 (107.4, 279.0) 95 (3, 172) 4 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.5, 0.8)
Live Oak County 7 Rural 172.7 (105.4, 267.4) 106 (5, 172) 4
*
*
Robertson County 7 Urban 117.8 (71.6, 182.9) 171 (32, 172) 4 falling falling trend -5.2 (-7.6, -3.2)
Stephens County 7 Rural 218.1 (132.4, 338.9) 34 (1, 172) 4 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.8, 0.8)
Dimmit County 7 Rural 294.0 (181.4, 450.3) 7 (1, 170) 4
*
*
Moore County 7 Rural 183.8 (112.8, 282.7) 86 (4, 172) 4 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.3, 2.7)
Red River County 7 Rural 143.8 (88.8, 220.5) 159 (14, 172) 4 falling falling trend -4.7 (-23.8, -1.5)
Jackson County 7 Rural 154.1 (96.3, 233.6) 143 (9, 172) 4 falling falling trend -7.9 (-22.5, -4.2)
Marion County 7 Rural 171.5 (106.9, 261.7) 108 (6, 172) 4
*
*
Nolan County 7 Rural 160.3 (100.1, 243.8) 131 (8, 172) 4 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.3, 2.5)
Blanco County 7 Rural 162.4 (101.2, 248.0) 125 (6, 172) 5 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.5, 2.3)
Camp County 7 Rural 212.0 (132.8, 321.4) 44 (2, 172) 5 stable stable trend -2.7 (-5.9, 0.3)
Clay County 7 Urban 206.3 (130.1, 310.4) 50 (1, 172) 5
*
*
Deaf Smith County 7 Rural 182.2 (114.8, 275.8) 89 (4, 172) 5 stable stable trend 2.9 (-2.7, 22.3)
Hamilton County 7 Rural 221.4 (139.9, 332.3) 33 (1, 172) 5 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.7, 2.3)
Madison County 7 Rural 229.8 (145.3, 345.3) 22 (1, 172) 5
*
*
Coleman County 7 Rural 249.0 (158.2, 374.5) 12 (1, 172) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.1, 2.1)
Karnes County 7 Rural 223.6 (142.1, 334.8) 24 (1, 171) 5 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.0, 0.5)
Falls County 7 Urban 165.7 (108.0, 243.3) 115 (7, 172) 5 falling falling trend -4.5 (-8.0, -1.7)
Frio County 7 Rural 249.1 (162.3, 365.7) 11 (1, 170) 5
*
*
Sabine County 7 Rural 176.5 (116.2, 257.5) 99 (6, 172) 5 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.9, -1.7)
Wilbarger County 7 Rural 222.9 (146.4, 325.6) 25 (1, 171) 5 stable stable trend -2.9 (-6.0, 0.0)
Morris County 7 Rural 223.4 (147.8, 324.3) 28 (1, 171) 6 stable stable trend -2.5 (-7.5, 2.4)
Rains County 7 Rural 202.3 (132.6, 296.7) 57 (3, 172) 6 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.4, 1.5)
Scurry County 7 Rural 226.7 (151.4, 326.5) 23 (1, 171) 6
*
*
Calhoun County 7 Rural 166.7 (112.0, 238.8) 113 (10, 172) 6 falling falling trend -3.9 (-6.9, -1.2)
Newton County 7 Rural 216.9 (145.8, 311.1) 38 (1, 171) 6
*
*
Trinity County 7 Rural 166.9 (111.8, 240.3) 112 (10, 172) 6 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.7, -0.3)
Comanche County 7 Rural 195.9 (132.8, 279.0) 65 (3, 172) 6 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.3, 1.7)
Jones County 7 Urban 201.9 (136.6, 288.2) 56 (2, 172) 6 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.0, 1.3)
Callahan County 7 Urban 220.5 (150.0, 313.2) 30 (2, 171) 6 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.3, 2.1)
Lee County 7 Rural 197.5 (134.3, 280.5) 63 (4, 172) 6 falling falling trend -3.1 (-6.2, -0.1)
Leon County 7 Rural 161.9 (110.4, 229.8) 128 (9, 172) 6 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.0, 0.2)
Titus County 7 Rural 148.1 (100.7, 210.2) 154 (21, 172) 6 stable stable trend -2.9 (-6.0, 0.3)
Willacy County 7 Rural 213.5 (145.8, 301.9) 41 (2, 170) 6 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.3, 3.9)
Freestone County 7 Rural 171.9 (118.0, 242.1) 107 (8, 172) 7 stable stable trend 1.9 (-3.0, 20.9)
Shelby County 7 Rural 163.2 (112.6, 229.0) 123 (11, 172) 7 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.3, 0.7)
Hutchinson County 7 Rural 195.2 (135.1, 273.1) 68 (3, 172) 7 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.1, -1.0)
Llano County 7 Rural 90.5 (63.0, 126.1) 172 (141, 172) 7 falling falling trend -6.1 (-8.6, -4.0)
Gonzales County 7 Rural 222.7 (155.6, 308.8) 29 (2, 169) 7 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.0, 0.0)
Gray County 7 Rural 217.9 (152.5, 301.7) 36 (3, 170) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.6, 2.6)
Young County 7 Rural 208.1 (145.9, 287.8) 47 (3, 171) 7 stable stable trend -3.0 (-6.8, 0.2)
Hale County 7 Rural 173.9 (122.8, 239.0) 103 (9, 172) 8 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.2, 2.5)
Burleson County 7 Urban 210.4 (148.8, 289.2) 46 (4, 170) 8 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.9, 0.5)
Lavaca County 7 Rural 170.5 (120.8, 233.4) 109 (13, 172) 8 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.5, -0.8)
Uvalde County 7 Rural 193.5 (137.4, 264.6) 74 (6, 171) 8 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.3, 2.2)
Austin County 7 Urban 131.4 (93.3, 180.2) 168 (49, 172) 8 stable stable trend -2.9 (-5.4, 5.9)
Bandera County 7 Urban 156.7 (111.8, 213.9) 138 (20, 172) 8 stable stable trend 4.4 (-3.1, 24.1)
Bosque County 7 Urban 185.1 (133.1, 250.8) 82 (8, 171) 8 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.6, 2.0)
Houston County 7 Rural 174.3 (125.5, 235.8) 105 (11, 172) 8 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.3, 0.8)
Panola County 7 Rural 199.0 (142.8, 270.4) 62 (5, 170) 8 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.7, -0.2)
Lampasas County 7 Urban 203.0 (146.0, 275.3) 55 (4, 171) 9 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.2, 2.3)
Tyler County 7 Rural 196.3 (141.9, 264.9) 64 (6, 170) 9 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.3, 3.5)
Bee County 7 Rural 238.5 (172.7, 321.3) 17 (1, 163) 9 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.6, 1.5)
Eastland County 7 Rural 231.2 (167.7, 310.9) 21 (1, 166) 9 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.4, 1.8)
Montague County 7 Rural 200.2 (145.2, 269.5) 58 (4, 170) 9 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.2, 0.9)
Waller County 7 Urban 147.3 (106.1, 199.3) 155 (30, 172) 9 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.2, -1.0)
Colorado County 7 Rural 193.6 (140.9, 259.7) 75 (6, 170) 9 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.6, -0.8)
Kleberg County 7 Rural 217.8 (158.7, 292.0) 37 (3, 168) 9 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.3, 0.5)
DeWitt County 7 Rural 237.9 (173.9, 317.6) 18 (1, 162) 9 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.4, 2.4)
Howard County 7 Rural 218.1 (159.1, 291.9) 35 (3, 167) 9 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.6, 0.8)
Milam County 7 Rural 188.7 (138.3, 251.4) 81 (8, 170) 9 rising rising trend 11.4 (3.8, 29.6)
Grimes County 7 Rural 183.1 (134.0, 244.8) 83 (8, 171) 10 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.7, 1.6)
Chambers County 7 Urban 199.4 (146.1, 265.7) 61 (6, 170) 10 falling falling trend -3.7 (-7.0, -0.1)
Coryell County 7 Urban 120.6 (89.2, 159.6) 170 (78, 172) 10 falling falling trend -5.1 (-7.7, -2.5)
Hockley County 7 Urban 334.6 (249.3, 439.8) 3 (1, 73) 10 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.7, 6.8)
San Jacinto County 7 Urban 182.9 (135.8, 241.4) 88 (10, 171) 10 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.7, -0.1)
Starr County 7 Rural 147.5 (110.8, 192.7) 156 (37, 172) 11 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.5, 2.5)
Limestone County 7 Rural 247.7 (186.7, 322.5) 14 (2, 147) 11 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.0, 1.7)
Kendall County 7 Urban 131.4 (99.3, 170.5) 169 (64, 172) 11 falling falling trend -4.6 (-7.2, -1.6)
Aransas County 7 Urban 179.6 (136.0, 233.0) 90 (14, 170) 12 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.9, 0.7)
Erath County 7 Rural 189.5 (143.3, 246.0) 80 (8, 169) 12 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.2, 2.0)
Val Verde County 7 Rural 178.3 (135.7, 230.2) 92 (14, 171) 12 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.8, 2.3)
Caldwell County 7 Urban 182.4 (138.5, 236.0) 87 (11, 170) 12 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.2, 1.0)
Brown County 7 Rural 154.8 (118.2, 199.3) 140 (31, 172) 12 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.6, -0.8)
Fannin County 7 Rural 194.9 (148.7, 251.1) 70 (8, 167) 12 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.6, 0.7)
Matagorda County 7 Rural 212.5 (163.1, 272.2) 42 (5, 164) 13 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.7)
Medina County 7 Urban 152.2 (116.7, 195.3) 149 (37, 172) 13 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.3, 1.1)
Palo Pinto County 7 Rural 232.4 (178.5, 297.7) 19 (3, 149) 13 stable stable trend 16.1 (-0.5, 39.1)
Wilson County 7 Urban 165.9 (127.3, 212.6) 117 (26, 171) 13 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.8, 0.7)
Gillespie County 7 Rural 166.5 (128.7, 211.8) 114 (25, 171) 13 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.2, 2.3)
Washington County 7 Rural 170.4 (131.8, 216.8) 110 (21, 170) 13 stable stable trend 5.3 (-4.6, 29.4)
Hardin County 7 Urban 148.5 (114.9, 189.1) 151 (44, 172) 14 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.3, -0.1)
Hopkins County 7 Rural 205.0 (158.9, 260.5) 52 (7, 164) 14 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.6, -0.4)
Fayette County 7 Rural 220.4 (171.6, 278.8) 31 (4, 156) 14 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.2, 0.3)
Jasper County 7 Rural 219.7 (171.3, 277.8) 32 (5, 156) 14 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.0, 0.8)
Jim Wells County 7 Rural 242.4 (189.6, 305.6) 16 (2, 132) 15 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.7, 1.3)
Anderson County 7 Rural 174.3 (136.6, 219.7) 104 (19, 170) 15 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.9, 0.1)
Hill County 7 Rural 211.3 (165.9, 265.4) 45 (6, 159) 15 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.6, 0.0)
Cooke County 7 Rural 206.7 (162.5, 259.2) 48 (6, 161) 15 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.6, 0.0)
Lamar County 7 Rural 166.0 (130.8, 207.7) 116 (27, 171) 15 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.8, -0.8)
Rusk County 7 Urban 179.0 (141.2, 224.0) 91 (19, 169) 16 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.7, -0.7)
Upshur County 7 Urban 213.8 (168.7, 267.6) 40 (5, 153) 16 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.8, 1.4)
Cass County 7 Rural 255.3 (202.3, 318.1) 9 (2, 107) 16 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.1, 1.6)
Cherokee County 7 Rural 184.1 (145.6, 229.8) 85 (14, 168) 16 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.4, 0.6)
Navarro County 7 Rural 195.3 (154.4, 243.7) 69 (10, 164) 16 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.5, -1.1)
Wharton County 7 Rural 222.3 (175.8, 277.4) 27 (4, 148) 16 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.5, 1.9)
Burnet County 7 Rural 143.8 (113.8, 179.4) 160 (53, 172) 16 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.0, -0.7)
Atascosa County 7 Urban 232.1 (184.5, 288.4) 20 (3, 128) 17 stable stable trend 3.9 (-0.8, 20.7)
Maverick County 7 Urban 256.3 (203.8, 318.2) 8 (2, 104) 17 rising rising trend 3.1 (1.6, 5.0)
Van Zandt County 7 Rural 161.3 (130.3, 197.7) 129 (30, 170) 19 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.0, -1.7)
Wood County 7 Rural 159.5 (128.9, 195.4) 132 (42, 171) 19 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.4, -0.5)
Nacogdoches County 7 Rural 204.8 (165.5, 250.7) 53 (10, 151) 19 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.4)
San Patricio County 7 Urban 190.5 (154.2, 233.0) 76 (15, 162) 20 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.3, 0.3)
Wise County 7 Urban 194.1 (156.7, 238.1) 71 (13, 159) 20 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.6)
Rockwall County 7 Urban 152.7 (123.3, 187.0) 147 (49, 171) 20 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.3, 0.2)
Kerr County 7 Rural 134.6 (109.5, 163.7) 167 (79, 172) 20 stable stable trend -2.0 (-3.9, 0.0)
Walker County 7 Rural 207.4 (168.2, 253.1) 49 (8, 156) 20 stable stable trend 13.0 (-2.3, 31.0)
Harrison County 7 Urban 175.4 (142.5, 213.7) 102 (23, 167) 20 falling falling trend -4.2 (-6.1, -2.5)
Hood County 7 Rural 143.3 (117.2, 173.5) 161 (64, 171) 21 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.6, -2.1)
Orange County 7 Urban 176.1 (144.9, 212.2) 100 (25, 165) 23 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.3, -1.2)
Midland County 7 Urban 137.7 (113.4, 165.7) 165 (77, 172) 24 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.6, -2.5)
Polk County 7 Rural 344.6 (278.5, 421.7) 2 (1, 32) 24 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.9, 3.4)
Victoria County 7 Urban 163.5 (135.4, 195.8) 122 (41, 169) 24 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.4, -2.0)
Potter County 7 Urban 159.4 (132.2, 190.6) 134 (50, 169) 25 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.1, -1.5)
Bastrop County 7 Urban 190.1 (157.5, 227.5) 79 (15, 160) 26 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.5, -0.2)
Liberty County 7 Urban 243.1 (201.3, 291.1) 15 (3, 104) 26 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.5, 1.4)
Hunt County 7 Urban 176.1 (147.4, 208.9) 97 (28, 164) 27 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.7, 0.1)
Angelina County 7 Rural 205.9 (173.3, 243.1) 51 (12, 137) 29 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 6.0)
Bowie County 7 Urban 195.9 (165.9, 229.8) 67 (16, 142) 31 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.1, -1.3)
Randall County 7 Urban 153.4 (129.9, 180.0) 145 (57, 169) 31 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.5, 12.0)
Brazos County 7 Urban 150.5 (127.6, 176.4) 150 (68, 170) 32 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.5, -1.9)
Kaufman County 7 Urban 196.5 (166.1, 231.0) 66 (16, 147) 32 stable stable trend -2.0 (-3.9, 0.2)
Henderson County 7 Rural 184.3 (156.8, 215.3) 84 (26, 154) 33 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.4, -0.6)
Guadalupe County 7 Urban 143.5 (122.5, 167.2) 158 (78, 171) 34 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.1, -1.8)
Tom Green County 7 Urban 178.2 (152.3, 207.2) 93 (35, 163) 34 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.6, -0.8)
Wichita County 7 Urban 190.6 (163.5, 220.9) 78 (23, 153) 36 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.0, -0.9)
Taylor County 7 Urban 175.7 (150.9, 203.4) 101 (34, 160) 36 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.9, -1.1)
Parker County 7 Urban 165.3 (141.7, 191.9) 119 (51, 166) 37 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.7, -0.5)
Gregg County 7 Urban 193.7 (166.4, 224.2) 73 (20, 142) 37 stable stable trend 6.6 (-3.2, 14.0)
Ector County 7 Urban 251.0 (215.9, 290.3) 10 (3, 72) 38 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.6)
Ellis County 7 Urban 165.6 (142.5, 191.4) 118 (48, 164) 39 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.2, -1.7)
Comal County 7 Urban 140.6 (121.4, 162.1) 164 (86, 170) 40 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.7, -1.2)
Hays County 7 Urban 156.9 (135.1, 181.2) 137 (55, 168) 41 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.0, 0.5)
Webb County 7 Urban 161.9 (140.4, 185.8) 127 (55, 166) 42 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 1.4)
Grayson County 7 Urban 190.8 (166.1, 218.1) 77 (25, 138) 44 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.5)
Johnson County 7 Urban 199.5 (174.2, 227.5) 60 (19, 129) 47 stable stable trend 2.8 (-1.2, 10.1)
McLennan County 7 Urban 152.6 (135.4, 171.5) 148 (77, 167) 58 stable stable trend 3.3 (0.0, 7.9)
Bell County 7 Urban 148.4 (131.7, 166.6) 152 (88, 169) 59 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.0, -2.2)
Jefferson County 7 Urban 163.7 (145.4, 183.6) 121 (61, 161) 60 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.0, -1.7)
Smith County 7 Urban 165.0 (147.3, 184.2) 120 (61, 161) 64 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.0, -1.3)
Lubbock County 7 Urban 163.1 (145.5, 182.2) 124 (61, 162) 64 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.3, -1.5)
Brazoria County 7 Urban 176.4 (158.8, 195.4) 98 (46, 149) 78 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.8, -1.6)
Nueces County 7 Urban 148.5 (133.9, 164.1) 153 (91, 167) 78 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.1, -2.6)
Galveston County 7 Urban 158.4 (142.9, 175.2) 135 (73, 163) 80 stable stable trend 1.2 (-3.6, 10.3)
Cameron County 7 Urban 178.1 (162.9, 194.3) 94 (52, 139) 102 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.5)
Williamson County 7 Urban 142.7 (130.5, 155.7) 162 (112, 169) 106 stable stable trend -1.5 (-2.8, 2.6)
Montgomery County 7 Urban 155.4 (142.8, 168.7) 139 (89, 160) 121 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.5, -1.9)
Denton County 7 Urban 135.1 (124.3, 146.6) 166 (125, 170) 125 falling falling trend -3.6 (-4.4, -2.6)
Fort Bend County 7 Urban 146.5 (134.9, 158.8) 157 (107, 166) 133 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.3, -2.5)
Hidalgo County 7 Urban 154.3 (143.5, 165.7) 142 (94, 160) 152 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.2, 7.6)
Collin County 7 Urban 140.4 (130.5, 150.9) 163 (120, 168) 156 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.7, 7.2)
El Paso County 7 Urban 163.1 (152.3, 174.4) 126 (78, 152) 174 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 3.7)
Travis County 7 Urban 153.0 (143.0, 163.5) 146 (100, 159) 187 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.6, 3.7)
Tarrant County 7 Urban 155.0 (147.8, 162.4) 141 (102, 153) 364 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 2.4)
Bexar County 7 Urban 153.9 (146.9, 161.2) 144 (104, 154) 369 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.0, -1.6)
Dallas County 7 Urban 160.5 (153.7, 167.5) 130 (94, 145) 445 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 1.8)
Harris County 7 Urban 159.9 (154.8, 165.1) 133 (99, 141) 797 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.9)
Andrews County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Archer County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Armstrong County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bailey County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baylor County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Borden County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brewster County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Briscoe County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carson County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Castro County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Childress County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cochran County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coke County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Collingsworth County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Concho County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crane County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crosby County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dallam County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickens County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Donley County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fisher County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Floyd County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gaines County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garza County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hall County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hansford County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardeman County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hartley County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hemphill County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hudspeth County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jack County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jim Hogg County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kimble County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kinney County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lipscomb County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lynn County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McCulloch County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mills County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Motley County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ochiltree County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Parmer County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presidio County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reagan County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Real County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Refugio County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Saba County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schleicher County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shackelford County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Somervell County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stonewall County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sutton County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swisher County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terry County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Throckmorton County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upton County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ward County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winkler County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yoakum County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/24/2026 5:08 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

7 Source: SEER November 2024 submission.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top