Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Mississippi by County

Colon & Rectum (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Mississippi 2 N/A 191.0 (185.4, 196.8) N/A 903 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 155.0 (154.5, 155.5) N/A 81,215 falling falling trend -2.6 (-2.8, -2.3)
Adams County 2 Rural 168.9 (124.7, 223.7) 57 (13, 73) 10 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.5, 0.2)
Alcorn County 2 Rural 146.3 (106.8, 195.7) 66 (26, 73) 9 falling falling trend -3.2 (-6.2, -0.5)
Amite County 2 Rural 187.8 (125.2, 270.9) 45 (4, 73) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.7, 4.5)
Attala County 2 Rural 238.6 (170.0, 325.7) 15 (1, 69) 8 stable stable trend 3.7 (-1.0, 18.1)
Bolivar County 2 Rural 225.9 (169.6, 295.3) 21 (3, 68) 11 falling falling trend -4.8 (-23.6, -0.7)
Calhoun County 2 Rural 271.6 (187.4, 380.2) 8 (1, 67) 7 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.5, 5.2)
Carroll County 2 Rural 159.8 (95.9, 250.8) 61 (8, 73) 4 falling falling trend -14.0 (-28.5, -7.1)
Chickasaw County 2 Rural 267.0 (191.1, 363.1) 9 (1, 64) 8 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.2, 4.3)
Clarke County 2 Rural 213.1 (148.0, 297.2) 25 (3, 72) 7 falling falling trend -3.2 (-6.6, -0.1)
Clay County 2 Rural 241.5 (172.4, 329.1) 14 (1, 69) 8 rising rising trend 3.7 (0.1, 14.0)
Coahoma County 2 Rural 279.1 (202.1, 375.7) 7 (1, 59) 9 stable stable trend -1.2 (-5.5, 2.7)
Copiah County 2 Urban 197.5 (145.8, 261.8) 38 (5, 72) 10 stable stable trend -2.2 (-6.3, 1.8)
Covington County 2 Rural 237.3 (164.9, 330.6) 16 (1, 70) 7
*
*
DeSoto County 2 Urban 202.0 (176.4, 230.2) 33 (14, 58) 47 stable stable trend -1.5 (-2.8, 0.0)
Forrest County 2 Urban 169.6 (135.9, 209.2) 56 (20, 73) 18 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.7, 1.0)
Franklin County 2 Rural 265.8 (163.7, 408.7) 10 (1, 73) 4 stable stable trend 1.0 (-5.8, 8.5)
George County 2 Rural 176.3 (118.0, 254.6) 53 (6, 73) 6 stable stable trend -2.4 (-8.1, 3.8)
Greene County 2 Rural 201.8 (125.8, 308.2) 34 (2, 73) 4 stable stable trend -1.0 (-6.4, 5.3)
Grenada County 2 Rural 167.6 (114.6, 237.1) 58 (10, 73) 7 falling falling trend -4.2 (-8.7, -0.4)
Hancock County 2 Urban 232.3 (188.6, 283.1) 18 (4, 57) 21 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.0, 2.4)
Harrison County 2 Urban 221.5 (198.2, 246.8) 22 (9, 46) 69 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.9, 8.4)
Hinds County 2 Urban 181.1 (160.8, 203.2) 50 (25, 64) 60 falling falling trend -3.6 (-4.7, -2.6)
Holmes County 2 Urban 313.1 (223.6, 426.8) 3 (1, 49) 8 stable stable trend -2.9 (-6.9, 0.5)
Humphreys County 2 Rural 398.6 (261.7, 582.0) 1 (1, 49) 5 stable stable trend 0.1 (-5.1, 5.8)
Itawamba County 2 Rural 235.3 (173.3, 312.2) 17 (2, 68) 10 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.0, 1.0)
Jackson County 2 Urban 182.0 (157.0, 209.9) 49 (20, 67) 40 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.8, -0.7)
Jasper County 2 Rural 145.3 (92.9, 216.7) 67 (12, 73) 5 stable stable trend -3.4 (-7.1, 0.1)
Jefferson Davis County 2 Rural 136.4 (80.5, 216.8) 73 (14, 73) 4 falling falling trend -23.7 (-44.1, -5.8)
Jones County 2 Rural 137.1 (107.9, 171.8) 72 (41, 73) 15 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.6, 1.7)
Kemper County 2 Rural 196.8 (118.1, 308.4) 40 (2, 73) 4
*
*
Lafayette County 2 Rural 200.0 (154.1, 255.4) 36 (7, 72) 14 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.2, 2.8)
Lamar County 2 Urban 154.2 (119.4, 196.1) 64 (24, 73) 14 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.1, 0.0)
Lauderdale County 2 Rural 192.1 (159.6, 229.4) 42 (13, 67) 25 falling falling trend -16.6 (-27.3, -7.4)
Lawrence County 2 Rural 189.8 (115.0, 294.8) 44 (2, 73) 4 stable stable trend -0.3 (-5.8, 5.2)
Leake County 2 Rural 202.6 (141.9, 280.7) 32 (4, 73) 7 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.6, 2.5)
Lee County 2 Rural 198.7 (164.6, 237.8) 37 (10, 65) 24 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.5, 0.5)
Leflore County 2 Rural 296.8 (225.7, 383.6) 4 (1, 43) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.2, 1.9)
Lincoln County 2 Rural 187.6 (140.9, 245.1) 47 (9, 72) 11 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.1, 1.5)
Lowndes County 2 Rural 154.9 (120.4, 196.1) 63 (24, 73) 14 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.0, -1.5)
Madison County 2 Urban 141.8 (115.6, 172.1) 69 (43, 73) 22 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.3, -1.9)
Marion County 2 Rural 156.7 (109.2, 218.1) 62 (14, 73) 7 stable stable trend -1.8 (-7.3, 3.4)
Marshall County 2 Urban 211.4 (160.7, 273.1) 26 (5, 70) 12 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.9)
Monroe County 2 Rural 164.6 (123.4, 215.2) 59 (18, 73) 11 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.7, 0.3)
Montgomery County 2 Rural 197.4 (121.8, 302.7) 39 (2, 73) 4 stable stable trend -2.4 (-6.8, 1.8)
Neshoba County 2 Rural 210.6 (155.1, 279.7) 27 (3, 70) 10 stable stable trend -16.4 (-31.0, 1.0)
Newton County 2 Rural 174.2 (118.0, 248.0) 54 (7, 73) 6 stable stable trend -1.5 (-7.2, 4.5)
Noxubee County 2 Rural 200.3 (115.9, 322.3) 35 (2, 73) 3 falling falling trend -22.3 (-50.7, -1.3)
Oktibbeha County 2 Rural 161.5 (118.7, 214.9) 60 (17, 73) 10 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.4, 0.6)
Panola County 2 Rural 251.4 (194.7, 319.8) 13 (2, 58) 14 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.7, 1.5)
Pearl River County 2 Rural 183.3 (146.7, 226.2) 48 (15, 71) 18 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.8, 1.0)
Pike County 2 Rural 189.8 (145.5, 243.4) 43 (9, 72) 13 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.3, 2.2)
Pontotoc County 2 Rural 226.8 (169.6, 297.5) 20 (3, 68) 11 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.0, 2.9)
Prentiss County 2 Rural 178.0 (126.4, 243.8) 51 (9, 73) 8 falling falling trend -3.7 (-7.8, -0.1)
Quitman County 2 Rural 293.3 (165.9, 481.9) 5 (1, 73) 3
*
*
Rankin County 2 Urban 143.7 (122.9, 167.0) 68 (45, 73) 35 falling falling trend -5.1 (-10.9, -3.4)
Scott County 2 Urban 207.3 (149.2, 280.6) 29 (4, 72) 9 stable stable trend -2.4 (-6.4, 1.3)
Simpson County 2 Urban 208.1 (153.0, 276.8) 28 (4, 72) 10 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.6, 1.8)
Smith County 2 Rural 140.1 (86.5, 215.1) 71 (15, 73) 4 falling falling trend -4.9 (-9.4, -0.8)
Stone County 2 Urban 146.6 (90.0, 226.6) 65 (12, 73) 4 falling falling trend -4.1 (-7.6, -0.6)
Sunflower County 2 Rural 229.1 (164.7, 310.8) 19 (2, 69) 9 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.5, 1.7)
Tallahatchie County 2 Rural 260.4 (170.8, 380.4) 11 (1, 72) 5
*
*
Tate County 2 Urban 196.7 (141.3, 266.7) 41 (5, 73) 9 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.8, 0.4)
Tippah County 2 Rural 177.3 (120.7, 251.5) 52 (8, 73) 6 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.5, 3.6)
Tishomingo County 2 Rural 205.4 (147.0, 279.6) 30 (4, 72) 8 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.7, -0.1)
Union County 2 Rural 204.3 (148.5, 274.2) 31 (4, 72) 9 stable stable trend -2.6 (-6.0, 0.5)
Walthall County 2 Rural 219.8 (149.6, 312.2) 24 (2, 72) 6
*
*
Warren County 2 Rural 172.5 (131.3, 222.4) 55 (13, 73) 12 falling falling trend -6.8 (-20.8, -3.1)
Washington County 2 Rural 187.7 (145.9, 238.0) 46 (10, 72) 15 falling falling trend -9.4 (-17.6, -5.2)
Wayne County 2 Rural 254.1 (183.3, 343.5) 12 (1, 67) 9 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.5, 3.1)
Webster County 2 Rural 316.7 (207.9, 461.8) 2 (1, 65) 5 rising rising trend 18.6 (3.0, 57.9)
Winston County 2 Rural 140.2 (91.3, 206.2) 70 (17, 73) 5 stable stable trend -3.6 (-8.5, 0.7)
Yalobusha County 2 Rural 221.4 (145.9, 322.4) 23 (1, 73) 6 stable stable trend -1.3 (-6.5, 4.3)
Yazoo County 2 Urban 283.2 (210.0, 373.8) 6 (1, 54) 10 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.9, 4.4)
Benton County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Choctaw County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Claiborne County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Issaquena County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sharkey County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tunica County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkinson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/27/2026 10:19 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top