Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Nebraska by County

Colon & Rectum (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by Name

County
sort alphabetically by name descending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate †
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Nebraska 2 N/A 171.4 (164.8, 178.2) N/A 516 falling falling trend -3.7 (-4.4, -3.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 155.0 (154.5, 155.5) N/A 81,215 falling falling trend -2.6 (-2.8, -2.3)
Adams County 2 Rural 211.2 (161.1, 272.1) 13 (3, 34) 12 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.4, -0.4)
Antelope County 2 Rural 423.3 (287.0, 601.5) 1 (1, 13) 6
*
*
Boone County 2 Rural 335.1 (203.2, 519.3) 2 (1, 33) 4 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.3, 6.0)
Box Butte County 2 Rural 249.4 (158.1, 373.5) 7 (1, 37) 5
*
*
Buffalo County 2 Rural 201.5 (158.4, 252.6) 19 (4, 34) 15 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.5, -0.7)
Burt County 2 Rural 203.5 (117.4, 328.7) 17 (2, 38) 3 stable stable trend -4.0 (-9.7, 0.2)
Butler County 2 Rural 203.4 (117.6, 327.4) 18 (2, 38) 3
*
*
Cass County 2 Urban 154.7 (106.9, 216.6) 34 (9, 38) 7 falling falling trend -3.7 (-6.7, -0.9)
Cedar County 2 Rural 216.5 (128.9, 340.3) 12 (1, 38) 4 stable stable trend -0.8 (-5.7, 3.9)
Cuming County 2 Rural 270.2 (176.1, 396.6) 4 (1, 34) 5 stable stable trend -0.8 (-5.2, 3.1)
Custer County 2 Rural 209.0 (133.3, 311.8) 14 (2, 38) 5 stable stable trend -37.2 (-65.5, 0.5)
Dakota County 2 Urban 156.3 (96.2, 239.8) 33 (6, 38) 4 stable stable trend -3.6 (-9.9, 1.7)
Dawes County 2 Rural 253.6 (154.2, 392.3) 6 (1, 37) 4 stable stable trend 12.9 (0.0, 62.1)
Dawson County 2 Rural 190.6 (133.6, 263.8) 20 (4, 38) 7 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.1, 2.0)
Dodge County 2 Rural 158.5 (119.1, 206.8) 32 (11, 38) 11 falling falling trend -4.5 (-6.8, -2.8)
Douglas County 2 Urban 169.4 (156.0, 183.7) 26 (17, 33) 122 falling falling trend -3.9 (-4.7, -3.1)
Furnas County 2 Rural 295.7 (171.9, 474.4) 3 (1, 37) 3
*
*
Gage County 2 Rural 178.4 (128.0, 242.1) 24 (6, 38) 8 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.0, -1.5)
Hall County 2 Urban 189.2 (151.0, 234.1) 21 (7, 35) 17 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.6, -1.9)
Holt County 2 Rural 184.1 (111.9, 285.1) 23 (3, 38) 4 stable stable trend -3.4 (-8.9, 0.8)
Jefferson County 2 Rural 221.7 (132.7, 347.8) 10 (2, 38) 4 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.3, 2.1)
Keith County 2 Rural 167.1 (98.8, 264.6) 28 (4, 38) 4
*
*
Knox County 2 Rural 172.7 (103.2, 271.9) 25 (4, 38) 4
*
*
Lancaster County 2 Urban 130.2 (115.2, 146.7) 36 (28, 38) 56 falling falling trend -4.9 (-6.3, -3.7)
Lincoln County 2 Rural 186.5 (143.5, 238.3) 22 (6, 36) 13 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.4, -0.3)
Madison County 2 Rural 206.6 (157.5, 266.3) 16 (4, 34) 12 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.9, -0.5)
Otoe County 2 Rural 161.4 (105.4, 236.8) 30 (7, 38) 5 falling falling trend -4.0 (-7.3, -1.2)
Phelps County 2 Rural 240.7 (151.5, 363.4) 8 (1, 37) 5 stable stable trend -0.3 (-5.0, 4.6)
Platte County 2 Rural 235.8 (181.9, 300.5) 9 (2, 30) 13 falling falling trend -3.6 (-7.4, -0.2)
Red Willow County 2 Rural 168.7 (99.0, 267.6) 27 (4, 38) 4
*
*
Richardson County 2 Rural 259.1 (165.0, 387.0) 5 (1, 36) 5 stable stable trend -2.2 (-7.1, 2.0)
Saline County 2 Rural 163.6 (96.2, 260.1) 29 (4, 38) 4 falling falling trend -4.7 (-9.3, -0.9)
Sarpy County 2 Urban 161.1 (137.5, 187.5) 31 (16, 36) 34 falling falling trend -4.4 (-5.6, -3.3)
Saunders County 2 Urban 208.1 (147.6, 284.8) 15 (3, 37) 8 stable stable trend -2.6 (-6.2, 0.6)
Scotts Bluff County 2 Rural 147.7 (109.5, 194.7) 35 (14, 38) 10 falling falling trend -4.0 (-7.0, -1.6)
Seward County 2 Urban 104.5 (59.4, 170.6) 38 (20, 38) 3 falling falling trend -6.3 (-10.2, -3.2)
Washington County 2 Urban 129.6 (81.4, 195.6) 37 (13, 38) 5 falling falling trend -23.6 (-43.9, -9.5)
York County 2 Rural 220.2 (149.0, 313.4) 11 (2, 37) 6 falling falling trend -2.7 (-5.5, -0.1)
Arthur County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Banner County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blaine County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Boyd County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brown County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chase County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cherry County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cheyenne County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Colfax County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Deuel County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dixon County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dundy County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fillmore County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Frontier County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garden County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garfield County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gosper County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greeley County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hamilton County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harlan County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hayes County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hitchcock County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hooker County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Howard County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Johnson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kearney County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Keya Paha County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kimball County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Logan County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loup County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McPherson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Merrick County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morrill County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nance County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nemaha County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nuckolls County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pawnee County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perkins County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pierce County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Polk County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rock County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sheridan County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sioux County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stanton County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Thayer County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Thomas County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Thurston County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Valley County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/27/2026 2:45 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top