Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for North Carolina by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
North Carolina 2 N/A 479.0 (477.2, 480.7) N/A 61,926 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.3, 0.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 448.6 (448.3, 448.9) N/A 1,821,045 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)
Currituck County 2 Urban 303.4 (277.6, 331.0) 99 (98, 100) 115 falling falling trend -5.8 (-14.2, -2.4)
Pasquotank County 2 Rural 382.8 (358.7, 408.2) 96 (91, 98) 201 falling falling trend -5.4 (-12.8, -1.3)
Halifax County 2 Rural 485.4 (461.6, 510.3) 46 (8, 86) 349 falling falling trend -3.4 (-7.6, -0.6)
Harnett County 2 Rural 476.6 (460.3, 493.3) 59 (24, 84) 675 falling falling trend -2.3 (-5.1, -0.3)
Robeson County 2 Rural 492.5 (475.6, 510.0) 36 (11, 70) 682 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.7, 0.4)
Camden County 2 Urban 362.9 (317.3, 413.6) 98 (84, 100) 49 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.5, -0.6)
Brunswick County 2 Urban 497.9 (484.0, 512.1) 28 (10, 60) 1,362 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.1, 0.2)
Gates County 2 Urban 279.2 (242.8, 320.4) 100 (98, 100) 47 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.7, 0.2)
Catawba County 2 Urban 457.3 (444.2, 470.9) 80 (54, 90) 976 falling falling trend -1.1 (-3.2, -0.2)
Rowan County 2 Urban 484.8 (470.5, 499.5) 47 (18, 75) 928 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.3)
Cabarrus County 2 Urban 473.6 (461.2, 486.2) 61 (32, 82) 1,150 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.5)
Carteret County 2 Rural 469.4 (450.4, 489.1) 63 (23, 89) 547 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Lenoir County 2 Rural 507.3 (484.0, 531.4) 18 (3, 67) 399 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Nash County 2 Urban 434.1 (417.4, 451.4) 91 (72, 95) 554 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Perquimans County 2 Rural 409.8 (369.7, 453.8) 95 (53, 98) 94 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.6)
Randolph County 2 Urban 494.1 (479.7, 508.9) 32 (10, 64) 946 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.5, 1.0)
Rockingham County 2 Urban 493.4 (476.0, 511.3) 34 (9, 72) 672 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.4, 0.0)
Davie County 2 Urban 501.4 (475.9, 528.0) 26 (3, 77) 320 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.6, 0.4)
Durham County 2 Urban 453.4 (443.1, 463.8) 82 (62, 90) 1,570 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Alleghany County 2 Rural 372.8 (333.6, 416.4) 97 (85, 99) 76 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Craven County 2 Rural 489.8 (472.5, 507.6) 42 (10, 75) 675 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Granville County 2 Rural 532.2 (509.1, 556.2) 7 (1, 36) 427 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.8, 0.2)
Guilford County 2 Urban 485.4 (477.6, 493.4) 45 (28, 64) 3,053 falling falling trend -0.5 (-2.0, -0.2)
Iredell County 2 Urban 484.5 (471.6, 497.7) 48 (21, 73) 1,138 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.0)
Lee County 2 Rural 461.9 (440.3, 484.2) 76 (28, 93) 366 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Wake County 2 Urban 463.0 (457.3, 468.7) 74 (59, 83) 5,327 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.8, -0.2)
Watauga County 2 Rural 437.7 (413.5, 463.0) 90 (53, 96) 270 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Wilkes County 2 Rural 447.5 (428.0, 467.6) 84 (51, 94) 446 falling falling trend -0.5 (-2.5, -0.1)
Hyde County 2 Rural 466.5 (394.8, 549.4) 67 (1, 98) 35 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.5, 1.7)
Wilson County 2 Rural 458.1 (439.4, 477.5) 79 (38, 93) 485 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.4)
Buncombe County 2 Urban 464.7 (454.7, 474.9) 72 (49, 85) 1,770 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.6, 0.0)
Dare County 2 Rural 434.0 (408.6, 460.9) 92 (54, 96) 254 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.7)
Forsyth County 2 Urban 478.3 (469.3, 487.5) 57 (33, 73) 2,235 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.6, 0.0)
Graham County 2 Rural 430.4 (378.1, 489.0) 93 (12, 98) 56 stable stable trend -0.3 (-12.7, 4.4)
Hertford County 2 Rural 462.2 (426.9, 500.0) 75 (9, 95) 140 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.5)
Mecklenburg County 2 Urban 464.4 (458.5, 470.3) 73 (57, 81) 5,046 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.0)
Orange County 2 Urban 461.5 (446.5, 476.9) 77 (44, 89) 763 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.1)
Cherokee County 2 Rural 465.6 (436.6, 496.3) 70 (13, 94) 251 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.4)
Henderson County 2 Urban 481.2 (466.5, 496.3) 54 (22, 80) 935 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.6, 0.2)
Hoke County 2 Urban 484.1 (455.5, 513.9) 49 (6, 89) 237 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Scotland County 2 Rural 506.5 (476.4, 538.1) 19 (2, 79) 225 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.0)
Caswell County 2 Rural 488.1 (453.7, 524.6) 43 (3, 90) 171 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.5)
Edgecombe County 2 Urban 483.4 (459.4, 508.5) 50 (9, 88) 340 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.5)
Greene County 2 Rural 468.3 (431.2, 508.0) 66 (6, 95) 124 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Macon County 2 Rural 465.6 (440.3, 492.2) 69 (19, 93) 309 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.7)
Ashe County 2 Rural 445.6 (416.2, 476.8) 85 (31, 96) 203 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 1.0)
Chatham County 2 Urban 464.7 (446.9, 483.2) 71 (33, 89) 584 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.4, 0.4)
Jones County 2 Rural 502.4 (449.2, 561.1) 24 (1, 93) 76 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.2)
Madison County 2 Urban 480.4 (445.3, 518.0) 55 (4, 93) 155 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 1.0)
Moore County 2 Urban 503.5 (486.8, 520.7) 23 (6, 58) 782 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.7)
Stanly County 2 Rural 516.4 (494.0, 539.6) 13 (2, 54) 433 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 0.6)
Vance County 2 Rural 508.8 (481.8, 537.0) 17 (2, 72) 291 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.4, 0.5)
Warren County 2 Rural 451.7 (416.6, 489.5) 83 (17, 96) 147 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 0.8)
Cumberland County 2 Urban 478.1 (467.4, 489.0) 58 (30, 78) 1,586 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.2, 0.4)
Gaston County 2 Urban 510.0 (498.0, 522.2) 16 (6, 41) 1,445 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.3, 0.6)
Lincoln County 2 Urban 497.1 (478.7, 516.1) 30 (7, 67) 599 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.4, 0.7)
Transylvania County 2 Rural 426.7 (401.8, 453.0) 94 (66, 97) 276 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 1.0)
Alamance County 2 Urban 504.8 (491.1, 518.8) 21 (7, 54) 1,085 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.2, 0.7)
Alexander County 2 Urban 457.2 (430.7, 485.0) 81 (24, 94) 240 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 0.9)
Burke County 2 Urban 491.3 (473.6, 509.6) 38 (10, 74) 637 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 0.9)
Clay County 2 Rural 442.7 (399.8, 490.1) 87 (11, 97) 100 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.6, 2.0)
Northampton County 2 Rural 466.5 (429.1, 506.7) 68 (6, 95) 145 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.3, 0.7)
Davidson County 2 Urban 494.0 (480.8, 507.5) 33 (14, 63) 1,136 stable stable trend 0.3 (0.0, 0.6)
Franklin County 2 Urban 491.1 (470.0, 513.0) 39 (7, 79) 439 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.1, 0.8)
Montgomery County 2 Rural 460.8 (429.4, 494.1) 78 (15, 95) 179 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.5, 1.2)
New Hanover County 2 Urban 487.1 (475.6, 498.9) 44 (21, 68) 1,439 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.1, 0.7)
Person County 2 Urban 505.2 (478.0, 533.7) 20 (2, 74) 287 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.1, 0.8)
Rutherford County 2 Rural 511.7 (490.8, 533.5) 15 (3, 57) 499 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.2, 0.7)
Yadkin County 2 Urban 479.1 (452.3, 507.3) 56 (9, 89) 260 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 1.0)
Avery County 2 Rural 437.7 (401.9, 476.3) 89 (28, 97) 120 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.5, 1.3)
Bladen County 2 Rural 472.6 (443.0, 503.9) 62 (8, 93) 215 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.3, 1.2)
Chowan County 2 Rural 475.2 (432.2, 521.9) 60 (2, 95) 107 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.6, 1.5)
Columbus County 2 Rural 483.3 (460.0, 507.6) 51 (11, 85) 350 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.1, 0.9)
Onslow County 2 Urban 537.6 (521.1, 554.5) 5 (1, 19) 853 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.1, 1.0)
Pamlico County 2 Rural 491.4 (446.5, 540.6) 37 (1, 94) 114 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.4, 1.1)
Surry County 2 Rural 497.4 (477.8, 517.7) 29 (7, 70) 521 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.2, 1.1)
Union County 2 Urban 492.8 (480.4, 505.3) 35 (14, 64) 1,282 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.1, 1.0)
Johnston County 2 Urban 500.9 (487.9, 514.2) 27 (9, 56) 1,197 rising rising trend 0.5 (0.2, 0.9)
Martin County 2 Rural 518.6 (482.7, 556.7) 10 (1, 74) 182 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.1, 1.1)
Stokes County 2 Urban 481.7 (457.6, 506.9) 53 (10, 87) 334 rising rising trend 0.5 (0.1, 1.0)
Haywood County 2 Rural 504.6 (484.0, 526.0) 22 (5, 64) 520 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.2, 1.4)
Pender County 2 Urban 517.7 (495.0, 541.3) 12 (2, 55) 421 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.2, 1.4)
Polk County 2 Rural 444.4 (409.2, 482.4) 86 (22, 96) 163 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.6, 1.7)
Cleveland County 2 Rural 515.2 (497.3, 533.5) 14 (2, 45) 687 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.3, 1.1)
Wayne County 2 Urban 521.8 (504.7, 539.4) 9 (2, 35) 749 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.5, 1.2)
Jackson County 2 Rural 440.7 (415.0, 467.7) 88 (48, 96) 248 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.9, 4.3)
McDowell County 2 Rural 545.6 (519.6, 572.6) 4 (1, 26) 362 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.2, 1.3)
Caldwell County 2 Urban 522.4 (503.3, 542.2) 8 (1, 40) 615 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.3, 1.5)
Mitchell County 2 Rural 502.3 (460.2, 547.9) 25 (1, 92) 123 stable stable trend 0.9 (0.0, 1.8)
Swain County 2 Rural 546.9 (499.9, 597.5) 3 (1, 69) 108 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.1, 1.9)
Bertie County 2 Rural 468.4 (430.0, 509.6) 65 (6, 95) 129 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.0, 5.6)
Sampson County 2 Rural 517.7 (494.4, 541.9) 11 (2, 57) 395 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.3, 1.8)
Pitt County 2 Urban 469.2 (454.9, 484.0) 64 (36, 86) 851 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.1, 3.2)
Duplin County 2 Rural 490.1 (465.6, 515.7) 40 (6, 83) 328 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.7, 1.6)
Yancey County 2 Rural 490.0 (453.5, 529.1) 41 (2, 91) 154 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.4, 7.8)
Anson County 2 Urban 550.6 (512.4, 591.1) 2 (1, 47) 168 rising rising trend 2.2 (1.6, 2.9)
Tyrrell County 2 Rural 536.0 (443.9, 643.8) 6 (1, 96) 28 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.8, 4.3)
Beaufort County 2 Rural 481.9 (457.7, 507.2) 52 (9, 87) 349 rising rising trend 2.9 (0.8, 6.4)
Richmond County 2 Rural 551.0 (523.2, 580.1) 1 (1, 23) 313 rising rising trend 3.7 (1.5, 8.0)
Washington County 2 Rural 496.7 (447.1, 550.9) 31 (1, 94) 91 rising rising trend 8.6 (0.4, 14.5)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/12/2026 12:57 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top