Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Michigan by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2018-2022

White Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Michigan 2 N/A 450.2 (448.4, 452.1) N/A 48,382 falling falling trend -0.7 (-0.9, -0.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) § 1 N/A 467.1 (466.7, 467.5) N/A 1,354,187 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.7)
Mackinac County 2 Rural 417.3 (364.9, 476.7) 61 (3, 79) 64 stable stable trend 8.3 (-0.4, 14.7)
Isabella County 2 Rural 478.8 (453.1, 505.7) 14 (1, 45) 282 rising rising trend 5.3 (1.3, 9.5)
Mason County 2 Rural 443.0 (413.2, 474.7) 39 (6, 70) 198 stable stable trend 3.5 (-0.2, 11.6)
Gladwin County 2 Rural 510.7 (477.8, 545.6) 3 (1, 28) 221 rising rising trend 3.2 (0.6, 7.7)
Midland County 2 Urban 485.7 (466.5, 505.6) 10 (2, 30) 529 rising rising trend 3.1 (1.2, 6.8)
Iosco County 2 Rural 456.0 (424.6, 489.4) 27 (3, 66) 209 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.1, 7.8)
Calhoun County 2 Urban 441.9 (426.3, 458.1) 43 (19, 61) 660 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.9, 8.3)
Barry County 2 Urban 424.9 (404.1, 446.5) 56 (26, 70) 350 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.6, 7.8)
Branch County 2 Rural 425.2 (400.3, 451.3) 55 (22, 71) 242 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.3, 5.0)
Menominee County 2 Rural 402.9 (371.3, 436.8) 66 (29, 77) 149 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.5, 3.9)
Saginaw County 2 Urban 473.7 (459.6, 488.1) 18 (5, 33) 968 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.1, 2.6)
St. Clair County 2 Urban 474.0 (460.3, 488.0) 16 (6, 34) 1,017 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.8, 3.7)
Chippewa County 2 Rural 455.2 (424.7, 487.6) 29 (3, 66) 187 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.8, 1.5)
Gratiot County 2 Rural 472.5 (444.7, 501.7) 19 (1, 54) 233 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.3)
Ogemaw County 2 Rural 490.7 (454.5, 529.4) 8 (1, 50) 173 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.9, 1.5)
Bay County 2 Urban 504.7 (487.6, 522.4) 5 (1, 17) 730 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.8)
Oscoda County 2 Rural 445.0 (391.1, 505.4) 37 (1, 75) 66 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.0)
Clare County 2 Rural 482.0 (452.7, 513.0) 12 (1, 45) 241 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.8)
Delta County 2 Rural 428.0 (402.4, 455.1) 53 (19, 71) 248 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.8)
Hillsdale County 2 Rural 449.6 (425.4, 475.0) 33 (9, 64) 287 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.6)
Jackson County 2 Urban 502.3 (487.7, 517.3) 6 (1, 17) 979 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.6)
Montmorency County 2 Rural 512.9 (456.7, 575.4) 2 (1, 53) 88 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.8)
Sanilac County 2 Rural 455.1 (429.4, 482.3) 30 (5, 62) 270 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.6)
Ionia County 2 Urban 431.6 (410.0, 454.1) 50 (22, 68) 320 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Mecosta County 2 Rural 454.2 (426.9, 482.9) 31 (4, 62) 238 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.7)
Crawford County 2 Rural 481.5 (437.7, 529.3) 13 (1, 62) 110 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Ingham County 2 Urban 440.5 (428.2, 453.1) 45 (24, 59) 1,059 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.3)
Kalkaska County 2 Urban 506.9 (466.1, 550.7) 4 (1, 45) 131 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.7)
Alpena County 2 Rural 482.3 (451.8, 514.7) 11 (1, 50) 218 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Arenac County 2 Rural 470.3 (428.8, 515.4) 20 (1, 65) 116 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 0.8)
Clinton County 2 Urban 423.2 (404.4, 442.7) 58 (28, 69) 411 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Gogebic County 2 Rural 340.5 (305.7, 379.1) 77 (66, 82) 88 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.7, 1.6)
Lake County 2 Rural 517.5 (464.1, 576.6) 1 (1, 49) 90 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.9)
Missaukee County 2 Rural 444.0 (402.9, 488.6) 38 (3, 73) 98 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Roscommon County 2 Rural 473.7 (441.3, 508.4) 17 (1, 59) 227 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Shiawassee County 2 Rural 455.6 (435.2, 476.9) 28 (9, 56) 412 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.5)
Tuscola County 2 Rural 442.2 (420.1, 465.2) 41 (14, 66) 339 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.2)
Eaton County 2 Urban 460.2 (443.2, 477.7) 25 (9, 50) 612 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Macomb County 2 Urban 493.6 (487.2, 500.1) 7 (2, 15) 4,898 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.7, -0.3)
Montcalm County 2 Urban 447.9 (427.0, 469.6) 34 (13, 62) 372 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.4)
Newaygo County 2 Rural 447.7 (423.8, 472.7) 35 (10, 64) 299 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
St. Joseph County 2 Rural 412.5 (391.1, 434.9) 62 (36, 73) 307 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.0)
Benzie County 2 Urban 464.9 (427.7, 505.1) 21 (1, 66) 142 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.2)
Lenawee County 2 Rural 409.0 (392.6, 425.9) 64 (45, 73) 520 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.1)
Monroe County 2 Urban 379.5 (366.9, 392.4) 73 (66, 77) 764 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.8)
Wexford County 2 Rural 460.1 (431.4, 490.5) 26 (3, 63) 212 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.1)
Alcona County 2 Rural 464.9 (414.7, 521.1) 22 (1, 72) 99 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 0.7)
Allegan County 2 Rural 394.6 (379.6, 410.1) 70 (57, 75) 571 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Emmet County 2 Rural 462.3 (433.3, 492.9) 24 (3, 61) 225 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.2)
Van Buren County 2 Rural 431.5 (411.4, 452.3) 51 (23, 68) 396 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.3, 0.0)
Alger County 2 Rural 409.3 (357.4, 468.2) 63 (5, 79) 56 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.7, 1.1)
Berrien County 2 Urban 442.1 (427.8, 456.9) 42 (22, 59) 821 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Charlevoix County 2 Rural 402.8 (373.5, 434.2) 67 (30, 76) 171 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1)
Cheboygan County 2 Rural 426.8 (396.7, 459.0) 54 (15, 73) 189 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
Grand Traverse County 2 Urban 452.1 (435.0, 469.6) 32 (12, 56) 598 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Ottawa County 2 Urban 387.2 (377.2, 397.5) 72 (63, 75) 1,210 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Wayne County 2 Urban 489.5 (483.7, 495.3) 9 (4, 17) 5,954 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.0, -0.6)
Antrim County 2 Rural 440.8 (408.6, 475.2) 44 (8, 70) 176 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Lapeer County 2 Urban 445.8 (428.0, 464.1) 36 (17, 60) 535 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Otsego County 2 Rural 405.5 (374.6, 438.5) 65 (25, 76) 146 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.2)
Livingston County 2 Urban 434.9 (422.9, 447.2) 48 (27, 62) 1,109 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Marquette County 2 Rural 397.7 (377.9, 418.3) 69 (49, 75) 341 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Osceola County 2 Rural 435.5 (402.4, 470.8) 47 (8, 72) 146 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.2)
Genesee County 2 Urban 423.2 (414.0, 432.5) 59 (43, 66) 1,774 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Huron County 2 Rural 433.7 (406.0, 463.1) 49 (15, 71) 223 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.4)
Leelanau County 2 Urban 429.8 (397.7, 464.6) 52 (11, 73) 185 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.3)
Manistee County 2 Rural 462.5 (429.9, 497.4) 23 (2, 62) 189 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Washtenaw County 2 Urban 442.6 (432.0, 453.4) 40 (23, 55) 1,421 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Cass County 2 Urban 391.2 (369.4, 414.2) 71 (51, 76) 277 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.2)
Oceana County 2 Rural 357.2 (327.8, 388.8) 76 (63, 81) 130 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1)
Iron County 2 Rural 369.2 (327.5, 415.7) 74 (38, 81) 78 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.7, -0.1)
Kalamazoo County 2 Urban 424.6 (412.9, 436.6) 57 (37, 67) 1,078 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Luce County 2 Rural 400.9 (340.4, 471.2) 68 (3, 80) 36 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.1, 0.3)
Ontonagon County 2 Rural 326.9 (277.3, 387.2) 79 (61, 83) 44 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.0)
Kent County 2 Urban 420.4 (412.9, 428.1) 60 (47, 66) 2,528 falling falling trend -1.4 (-3.6, -0.9)
Presque Isle County 2 Rural 439.2 (395.4, 487.5) 46 (2, 74) 105 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.2)
Keweenaw County 2 Rural 225.3 (156.3, 324.8) 83 (73, 83) 10 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.4, 1.1)
Muskegon County 2 Urban 357.8 (345.4, 370.5) 75 (72, 79) 696 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -1.1)
Schoolcraft County 2 Rural 330.0 (284.5, 382.9) 78 (65, 83) 45 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.4, -0.4)
Houghton County 2 Rural 298.7 (275.2, 323.8) 81 (77, 83) 132 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.4, -0.8)
Baraga County 2 Rural 272.4 (228.3, 324.7) 82 (77, 83) 32 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.8, -0.8)
Oakland County 2 Urban 475.8 (470.3, 481.4) 15 (10, 26) 6,150 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.6, -0.9)
Dickinson County 2 Rural 322.8 (296.2, 351.4) 80 (73, 82) 126 falling falling trend -8.3 (-15.2, -4.2)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/13/2026 11:47 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top