Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for North Carolina by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2018-2022

White Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
North Carolina 2 N/A 490.4 (488.3, 492.5) N/A 46,273 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.2, 0.1)
US (SEER+NPCR) § 1 N/A 467.1 (466.7, 467.5) N/A 1,354,187 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.7)
Beaufort County 2 Rural 484.1 (455.2, 514.7) 59 (14, 90) 261 rising rising trend 3.2 (0.8, 8.1)
Anson County 2 Urban 583.3 (527.9, 643.7) 2 (1, 54) 95 rising rising trend 2.5 (1.6, 3.5)
Tyrrell County 2 Rural 632.1 (499.5, 793.4) 1 (1, 93) 19 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.5, 5.3)
Bertie County 2 Rural 531.9 (466.3, 605.9) 11 (1, 91) 60 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.5, 8.0)
Yancey County 2 Rural 499.0 (461.2, 539.7) 44 (5, 89) 152 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.0, 8.1)
Duplin County 2 Rural 505.1 (472.7, 539.5) 35 (5, 85) 212 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.5, 1.9)
Sampson County 2 Rural 561.5 (529.7, 594.9) 5 (1, 31) 260 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.4, 2.0)
Caldwell County 2 Urban 528.5 (508.3, 549.4) 15 (4, 48) 573 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.4, 1.6)
Mitchell County 2 Rural 514.8 (470.6, 562.7) 24 (2, 87) 120 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.2, 1.9)
Jackson County 2 Rural 449.4 (421.4, 479.1) 86 (40, 96) 224 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.6, 4.1)
McDowell County 2 Rural 553.1 (525.8, 581.7) 7 (1, 28) 342 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.3, 1.3)
Richmond County 2 Rural 567.9 (532.9, 604.8) 4 (1, 33) 216 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.1, 1.8)
Swain County 2 Rural 555.1 (499.2, 616.4) 6 (1, 75) 83 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.2, 1.9)
Wayne County 2 Urban 531.4 (509.1, 554.5) 12 (4, 51) 468 stable stable trend 0.8 (-4.7, 2.5)
Chowan County 2 Rural 479.7 (426.8, 538.7) 61 (3, 97) 74 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.4, 1.8)
Cleveland County 2 Rural 516.8 (496.5, 537.7) 22 (7, 60) 542 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.2, 1.1)
Haywood County 2 Rural 510.0 (488.6, 532.2) 31 (7, 70) 503 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.1, 1.5)
Johnston County 2 Urban 513.9 (498.7, 529.5) 26 (9, 57) 928 rising rising trend 0.6 (0.4, 0.9)
Pamlico County 2 Rural 514.3 (460.7, 573.9) 25 (1, 91) 95 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.5, 1.6)
Pender County 2 Urban 529.3 (503.5, 556.3) 13 (3, 59) 344 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.3, 1.6)
Person County 2 Urban 521.3 (488.2, 556.2) 17 (3, 74) 208 stable stable trend 0.6 (0.0, 1.1)
Polk County 2 Rural 442.6 (405.5, 482.9) 88 (31, 97) 152 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.6, 1.9)
Stokes County 2 Urban 486.5 (461.3, 512.9) 56 (15, 87) 315 rising rising trend 0.6 (0.2, 1.1)
Bladen County 2 Rural 472.4 (434.2, 513.6) 70 (11, 95) 133 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.3, 1.5)
Surry County 2 Rural 505.7 (484.7, 527.4) 34 (10, 73) 484 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.2, 1.2)
Union County 2 Urban 507.6 (493.6, 522.1) 32 (12, 60) 1,041 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.1, 1.2)
Columbus County 2 Rural 497.9 (468.4, 529.0) 47 (8, 85) 237 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.1, 0.9)
Jones County 2 Rural 537.6 (469.4, 614.5) 10 (1, 93) 52 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.1, 1.9)
Alamance County 2 Urban 516.0 (499.5, 532.9) 23 (9, 56) 814 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.3, 0.9)
Avery County 2 Rural 439.9 (402.7, 480.2) 89 (34, 98) 115 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 1.2)
Franklin County 2 Urban 512.7 (486.4, 540.0) 28 (6, 74) 317 stable stable trend 0.3 (0.0, 0.7)
Halifax County 2 Rural 520.1 (481.7, 561.2) 19 (2, 82) 163 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 1.1)
New Hanover County 2 Urban 489.7 (477.0, 502.8) 53 (27, 75) 1,210 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.1, 0.7)
Rutherford County 2 Rural 512.6 (490.1, 536.0) 29 (7, 68) 442 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.3, 0.7)
Vance County 2 Rural 529.1 (489.2, 572.0) 14 (1, 78) 154 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 0.9)
Yadkin County 2 Urban 486.8 (458.3, 516.9) 55 (13, 88) 245 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.5, 1.2)
Burke County 2 Urban 504.1 (484.8, 524.0) 37 (12, 70) 583 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 0.9)
Cumberland County 2 Urban 500.5 (484.8, 516.5) 43 (15, 69) 816 stable stable trend 0.2 (0.0, 0.5)
Davidson County 2 Urban 493.5 (479.1, 508.2) 52 (22, 73) 982 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.1, 0.5)
Gaston County 2 Urban 519.5 (505.9, 533.5) 20 (9, 47) 1,175 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.2, 0.7)
Martin County 2 Rural 513.5 (466.1, 565.3) 27 (2, 90) 101 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.0)
Montgomery County 2 Rural 468.5 (431.0, 509.0) 76 (15, 96) 141 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.0)
Alexander County 2 Urban 460.2 (432.3, 489.6) 81 (34, 95) 223 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.9)
Ashe County 2 Rural 451.1 (420.6, 483.6) 84 (36, 96) 198 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 1.0)
Caswell County 2 Rural 477.7 (434.5, 524.5) 65 (8, 95) 105 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.1)
Chatham County 2 Urban 479.1 (458.3, 500.8) 63 (24, 87) 489 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.4, 0.7)
Edgecombe County 2 Urban 498.3 (460.0, 539.4) 45 (5, 90) 147 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.2)
Lincoln County 2 Urban 504.0 (484.2, 524.3) 39 (10, 71) 545 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.4, 0.6)
Madison County 2 Urban 486.5 (450.2, 525.2) 57 (9, 92) 151 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 1.0)
Rockingham County 2 Urban 501.5 (481.5, 522.2) 41 (12, 74) 536 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.3, 0.5)
Transylvania County 2 Rural 430.4 (404.2, 458.2) 93 (68, 98) 262 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 0.8)
Warren County 2 Rural 462.2 (407.1, 524.7) 79 (6, 98) 70 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.2)
Macon County 2 Rural 476.3 (449.1, 505.0) 67 (20, 91) 297 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.8)
Moore County 2 Urban 504.8 (486.3, 524.0) 36 (11, 71) 670 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.7)
Pitt County 2 Urban 470.3 (451.9, 489.4) 73 (39, 89) 521 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.5, 0.5)
Stanly County 2 Rural 519.4 (495.1, 544.6) 21 (5, 66) 379 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 0.6)
Dare County 2 Rural 434.4 (407.8, 462.6) 91 (62, 97) 240 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.8)
Henderson County 2 Urban 496.9 (480.8, 513.5) 48 (16, 73) 882 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.3)
Lenoir County 2 Rural 545.2 (512.2, 580.0) 9 (1, 54) 237 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.7)
Washington County 2 Rural 431.8 (371.6, 502.4) 92 (11, 98) 47 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.5)
Wilkes County 2 Rural 462.1 (441.2, 483.8) 80 (46, 93) 424 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.5)
Cherokee County 2 Rural 450.8 (421.3, 482.2) 85 (36, 96) 230 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.3)
Hertford County 2 Rural 470.1 (411.8, 535.8) 74 (3, 98) 56 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.7)
Orange County 2 Urban 473.2 (455.8, 491.1) 69 (36, 87) 607 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.2)
Pasquotank County 2 Rural 407.1 (375.1, 441.4) 96 (73, 98) 133 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.1)
Buncombe County 2 Urban 469.0 (458.2, 479.9) 75 (55, 86) 1,604 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.6, 0.1)
Durham County 2 Urban 466.9 (452.5, 481.6) 77 (51, 88) 869 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.1)
Greene County 2 Rural 471.3 (421.4, 526.4) 72 (5, 97) 72 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9)
Randolph County 2 Urban 504.0 (488.1, 520.3) 38 (13, 67) 843 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 0.2)
Wake County 2 Urban 477.6 (470.7, 484.6) 66 (53, 78) 3,799 falling falling trend -0.3 (-0.8, -0.1)
Watauga County 2 Rural 451.9 (426.3, 478.8) 82 (46, 95) 263 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.2)
Wilson County 2 Rural 472.0 (446.2, 499.1) 71 (23, 91) 285 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Alleghany County 2 Rural 385.1 (342.8, 432.8) 97 (78, 99) 73 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 0.8)
Guilford County 2 Urban 500.8 (490.5, 511.2) 42 (21, 61) 1,997 falling falling trend -0.4 (-1.1, -0.1)
Hoke County 2 Urban 522.0 (476.9, 570.3) 16 (1, 86) 106 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.6)
Lee County 2 Rural 484.9 (458.0, 513.1) 58 (15, 89) 272 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
Iredell County 2 Urban 495.7 (481.3, 510.5) 50 (20, 71) 968 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.0)
Davie County 2 Urban 503.9 (476.6, 532.7) 40 (7, 80) 287 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.1, 0.5)
Forsyth County 2 Urban 479.5 (468.3, 490.9) 62 (42, 80) 1,545 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.7, -0.3)
Hyde County 2 Rural 475.0 (389.6, 578.3) 68 (1, 98) 25 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.5, 1.3)
Nash County 2 Urban 451.3 (428.5, 475.1) 83 (50, 95) 339 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Perquimans County 2 Rural 416.9 (370.1, 468.9) 95 (39, 98) 74 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.1)
Carteret County 2 Rural 478.7 (458.4, 499.7) 64 (24, 87) 515 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.2)
Clay County 2 Rural 434.7 (391.1, 483.2) 90 (28, 98) 94 stable stable trend -0.7 (-6.3, 0.6)
Granville County 2 Rural 511.3 (482.7, 541.4) 30 (5, 77) 265 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.1, 0.1)
Cabarrus County 2 Urban 487.1 (472.4, 502.1) 54 (28, 78) 881 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.3)
Catawba County 2 Urban 466.4 (451.8, 481.5) 78 (52, 88) 851 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.0, 0.0)
Graham County 2 Rural 443.8 (387.3, 507.6) 87 (9, 98) 53 stable stable trend -0.9 (-13.5, 2.2)
Rowan County 2 Urban 496.1 (479.7, 512.9) 49 (16, 75) 763 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.2)
Scotland County 2 Rural 520.3 (476.8, 567.3) 18 (1, 85) 121 falling falling trend -1.0 (-3.7, -0.1)
Camden County 2 Urban 367.9 (317.5, 424.5) 98 (76, 100) 41 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.4)
Onslow County 2 Urban 551.9 (532.5, 571.8) 8 (1, 23) 649 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.5, 0.3)
Robeson County 2 Rural 572.2 (539.7, 606.5) 3 (1, 25) 264 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.6, 0.7)
Brunswick County 2 Urban 506.7 (491.3, 522.5) 33 (13, 63) 1,238 falling falling trend -2.0 (-4.2, -0.4)
Mecklenburg County 2 Urban 483.3 (475.4, 491.2) 60 (44, 75) 3,004 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.6, -1.0)
Craven County 2 Rural 497.9 (477.5, 519.1) 46 (14, 78) 520 stable stable trend -2.3 (-6.0, 0.3)
Harnett County 2 Rural 495.1 (475.3, 515.5) 51 (14, 78) 495 falling falling trend -2.5 (-5.6, -0.1)
Currituck County 2 Urban 304.2 (277.0, 333.5) 99 (98, 100) 104 falling falling trend -2.8 (-8.4, -1.5)
Gates County 2 Urban 250.9 (206.9, 302.6) 100 (98, 100) 26 falling falling trend -3.6 (-8.9, -1.8)
Northampton County 2 Rural 425.3 (374.5, 483.3) 94 (28, 98) 63 stable stable trend -6.1 (-12.4, 0.4)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/13/2026 5:38 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top