Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2018-2022

White Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Oklahoma 2 N/A 445.6 (442.5, 448.8) N/A 16,547 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.2, 0.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) § 1 N/A 467.1 (466.7, 467.5) N/A 1,354,187 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.7)
Washita County 2 Rural 478.1 (422.0, 539.9) 15 (1, 68) 60 rising rising trend 5.5 (0.5, 14.7)
Okfuskee County 2 Rural 479.2 (421.9, 543.2) 14 (1, 70) 54 stable stable trend 5.3 (-0.1, 11.5)
Seminole County 2 Rural 438.1 (400.5, 478.8) 45 (6, 72) 109 stable stable trend 4.6 (-1.3, 8.9)
Pushmataha County 2 Rural 441.4 (390.1, 498.9) 41 (2, 74) 62 rising rising trend 3.9 (0.1, 13.8)
Payne County 2 Rural 488.0 (463.8, 513.1) 8 (2, 38) 326 stable stable trend 3.6 (-0.5, 9.7)
Mayes County 2 Rural 475.8 (445.4, 508.1) 16 (2, 54) 203 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.4, 6.6)
Latimer County 2 Rural 496.3 (434.5, 565.9) 6 (1, 68) 54 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.2, 3.3)
Lincoln County 2 Urban 460.6 (430.8, 492.1) 29 (4, 62) 195 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.2, 3.3)
Woodward County 2 Rural 381.1 (344.9, 420.5) 72 (38, 77) 86 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.5, 8.8)
Ottawa County 2 Rural 480.2 (444.8, 518.0) 12 (1, 57) 151 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.4, 1.5)
Texas County 2 Rural 453.1 (398.6, 513.6) 34 (1, 73) 57 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.1, 2.2)
Blaine County 2 Rural 485.9 (424.0, 555.6) 10 (1, 69) 50 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 1.7)
Cotton County 2 Urban 428.2 (358.1, 509.9) 53 (1, 77) 29 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.9, 1.9)
Pawnee County 2 Urban 511.2 (464.7, 561.6) 2 (1, 45) 98 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.5, 1.6)
Woods County 2 Rural 505.6 (440.4, 578.4) 3 (1, 65) 49 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.1, 2.0)
Roger Mills County 2 Rural 462.0 (369.8, 573.0) 28 (1, 77) 20 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.2, 2.9)
Stephens County 2 Rural 469.2 (442.3, 497.4) 24 (3, 54) 256 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.3, 2.6)
Haskell County 2 Rural 453.1 (400.3, 511.8) 35 (1, 74) 61 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.9, 1.5)
Nowata County 2 Rural 465.9 (408.1, 530.9) 27 (1, 73) 51 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.3, 1.8)
Okmulgee County 2 Urban 487.8 (454.7, 522.9) 9 (1, 47) 178 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 0.9)
Marshall County 2 Rural 460.2 (414.4, 510.7) 30 (2, 69) 89 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.4)
Harmon County 2 Rural 372.6 (266.0, 517.6) 74 (1, 77) 10 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.5, 2.4)
Noble County 2 Rural 454.5 (402.9, 511.7) 33 (1, 72) 63 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.5)
Osage County 2 Urban 434.5 (407.5, 463.1) 46 (14, 69) 217 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.3)
Rogers County 2 Urban 429.1 (410.4, 448.4) 51 (28, 67) 430 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.4, 0.7)
Tulsa County 2 Urban 459.2 (451.2, 467.4) 31 (17, 42) 2,645 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.4, 1.8)
Wagoner County 2 Urban 425.6 (405.5, 446.6) 57 (27, 70) 364 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.8)
Alfalfa County 2 Rural 404.7 (340.4, 479.6) 67 (4, 77) 30 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.2, 2.2)
Atoka County 2 Rural 411.9 (365.5, 463.2) 64 (9, 76) 63 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.0)
Caddo County 2 Rural 479.4 (439.0, 523.0) 13 (1, 60) 111 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.2)
Dewey County 2 Rural 501.3 (415.0, 601.8) 5 (1, 74) 27 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.1, 2.8)
Grady County 2 Urban 447.0 (422.9, 472.3) 37 (10, 65) 276 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.7)
Kay County 2 Rural 469.7 (441.8, 499.1) 23 (3, 54) 237 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.3, 3.9)
Kingfisher County 2 Rural 474.3 (425.3, 527.9) 19 (1, 68) 75 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 0.9)
Comanche County 2 Urban 468.4 (447.7, 489.9) 26 (5, 49) 407 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.6)
Grant County 2 Rural 470.2 (384.9, 570.2) 22 (1, 76) 26 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.4, 2.0)
Beaver County 2 Rural 389.7 (318.0, 475.9) 69 (3, 77) 25 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.5, 1.8)
Ellis County 2 Rural 410.3 (329.1, 507.7) 66 (1, 77) 21 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.0, 1.5)
Harper County 2 Rural 482.3 (387.1, 599.0) 11 (1, 76) 21 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.1, 1.6)
Kiowa County 2 Rural 504.5 (437.8, 579.4) 4 (1, 67) 49 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 0.9)
Le Flore County 2 Rural 425.6 (399.6, 453.0) 58 (22, 71) 220 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.2)
Muskogee County 2 Rural 451.7 (426.7, 477.9) 36 (8, 64) 269 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.4)
Pittsburg County 2 Rural 442.3 (414.9, 471.2) 40 (10, 67) 219 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Pottawatomie County 2 Rural 468.8 (446.3, 492.2) 25 (5, 51) 348 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.6)
Carter County 2 Rural 418.2 (392.0, 445.7) 61 (24, 73) 206 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.2)
Cherokee County 2 Rural 417.5 (387.1, 450.0) 62 (21, 73) 161 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Delaware County 2 Rural 388.9 (362.2, 417.4) 70 (48, 76) 209 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.5)
Garvin County 2 Rural 471.5 (434.6, 511.0) 20 (2, 63) 133 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7)
Love County 2 Rural 358.6 (309.2, 414.8) 75 (39, 77) 41 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.4, 1.8)
McCurtain County 2 Rural 475.0 (439.0, 513.5) 17 (2, 59) 142 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 0.9)
Tillman County 2 Rural 384.3 (317.1, 463.9) 71 (5, 77) 27 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.2, 1.5)
Craig County 2 Rural 414.1 (367.8, 465.6) 63 (10, 76) 64 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 0.9)
Creek County 2 Urban 470.6 (449.1, 493.1) 21 (5, 49) 391 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Custer County 2 Rural 410.5 (374.1, 449.6) 65 (19, 76) 102 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Jefferson County 2 Rural 525.1 (443.3, 619.2) 1 (1, 68) 34 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.1)
Oklahoma County 2 Urban 444.8 (437.0, 452.7) 39 (27, 52) 2,680 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.2)
Garfield County 2 Urban 457.2 (433.2, 482.2) 32 (7, 59) 299 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.1)
Greer County 2 Rural 420.2 (348.0, 504.8) 60 (1, 77) 26 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.1, 1.7)
Johnston County 2 Rural 430.9 (374.1, 494.7) 49 (2, 76) 47 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.7)
Logan County 2 Urban 441.0 (415.3, 468.0) 42 (13, 67) 239 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.4)
McClain County 2 Urban 474.5 (445.1, 505.5) 18 (2, 57) 207 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.2)
Bryan County 2 Rural 427.3 (400.7, 455.3) 54 (21, 71) 208 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Hughes County 2 Rural 432.0 (380.1, 489.7) 48 (3, 75) 56 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.4)
Washington County 2 Rural 445.1 (420.1, 471.3) 38 (11, 65) 269 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Coal County 2 Rural 492.5 (407.9, 591.3) 7 (1, 73) 28 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.9, 1.0)
Pontotoc County 2 Rural 428.5 (397.9, 460.9) 52 (16, 72) 161 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Major County 2 Rural 376.7 (321.4, 439.7) 73 (19, 77) 38 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.6)
Cleveland County 2 Urban 423.2 (411.9, 434.8) 59 (39, 67) 1,123 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.5)
McIntosh County 2 Rural 425.8 (386.8, 468.5) 56 (9, 74) 110 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.3)
Canadian County 2 Urban 433.2 (417.6, 449.3) 47 (26, 65) 607 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Adair County 2 Rural 336.5 (292.3, 386.4) 76 (61, 77) 47 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.2)
Beckham County 2 Rural 430.2 (391.1, 472.4) 50 (8, 73) 95 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1)
Cimarron County 2 Rural 332.2 (229.5, 471.2) 77 (2, 77) 9 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.0, 1.5)
Murray County 2 Rural 389.9 (345.3, 439.4) 68 (24, 77) 64 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.9, -0.2)
Jackson County 2 Rural 426.2 (385.9, 469.8) 55 (8, 74) 90 stable stable trend -1.8 (-13.5, 1.7)
Choctaw County 2 Rural 439.0 (389.0, 494.5) 43 (2, 75) 66 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.3, -0.5)
Sequoyah County 2 Urban 438.9 (409.3, 470.4) 44 (10, 69) 178 falling falling trend -4.5 (-11.1, -0.6)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/13/2026 10:40 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top