Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Tennessee by County

Colon & Rectum (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Tennessee 2 N/A 38.8 (38.1, 39.4) N/A 3,214 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.3, 0.5)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 36.7 (36.6, 36.7) N/A 145,073 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.0, -0.8)
Cannon County 2 Urban 65.7 (50.0, 85.1) 1 (1, 54) 12 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.2, 3.9)
Trousdale County 2 Urban 63.5 (43.9, 88.9) 2 (1, 86) 7 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.1, 2.0)
Pickett County 2 Rural 60.4 (34.8, 98.9) 3 (1, 93) 4 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.5, 5.6)
Macon County 2 Urban 59.3 (47.5, 73.3) 4 (1, 55) 18 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.7, 3.2)
Grundy County 2 Rural 58.8 (43.7, 77.7) 5 (1, 75) 11 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.9, 2.2)
Marion County 2 Urban 58.7 (48.3, 70.8) 6 (1, 50) 24 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.4, 3.4)
Haywood County 2 Rural 57.1 (43.6, 73.7) 7 (1, 75) 13 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.1, 2.6)
Polk County 2 Urban 55.7 (43.2, 71.3) 8 (1, 74) 15 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.8, 3.6)
Humphreys County 2 Rural 54.7 (41.9, 70.5) 9 (1, 79) 14 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.4, 3.8)
Lake County 2 Rural 53.1 (33.4, 81.4) 10 (1, 93) 5 stable stable trend 2.8 (-2.5, 9.7)
Cheatham County 2 Urban 53.0 (43.5, 63.9) 11 (1, 62) 24 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.3, 2.4)
Dickson County 2 Urban 52.8 (45.0, 61.6) 12 (2, 51) 34 stable stable trend 8.7 (-1.3, 16.6)
Houston County 2 Rural 51.4 (35.0, 74.1) 13 (1, 93) 7 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.1, 1.8)
Fentress County 2 Rural 51.3 (39.6, 66.0) 14 (1, 83) 15 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.9, 1.1)
Overton County 2 Rural 49.8 (38.8, 63.2) 15 (1, 85) 15 falling falling trend -7.7 (-18.0, -1.4)
Clay County 2 Rural 49.7 (33.5, 72.9) 16 (1, 93) 6 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.0, 2.6)
Carroll County 2 Rural 48.3 (38.5, 60.0) 17 (2, 83) 19 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.4, 2.4)
Franklin County 2 Rural 47.9 (39.9, 57.2) 18 (3, 73) 28 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.2, 1.6)
Marshall County 2 Rural 47.1 (38.0, 57.9) 19 (3, 83) 20 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.5, 1.7)
Perry County 2 Rural 47.1 (30.6, 70.0) 20 (1, 93) 6 stable stable trend -1.0 (-5.6, 3.5)
Henderson County 2 Rural 46.9 (37.5, 58.2) 21 (3, 87) 18 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.3, 1.9)
White County 2 Rural 46.9 (37.1, 58.7) 22 (3, 87) 17 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.6, 2.1)
Wayne County 2 Rural 46.4 (34.7, 61.4) 23 (2, 91) 11 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.9, 1.3)
Jackson County 2 Rural 46.2 (32.5, 64.7) 24 (1, 93) 8 stable stable trend -2.6 (-6.5, 1.3)
Scott County 2 Rural 46.1 (35.0, 59.8) 25 (2, 91) 12 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.5, 1.7)
Crockett County 2 Urban 45.4 (32.2, 62.6) 26 (1, 93) 8 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.4, 5.1)
Fayette County 2 Urban 45.2 (37.3, 54.3) 27 (6, 83) 27 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.2, 0.9)
Decatur County 2 Rural 44.9 (31.5, 63.1) 28 (1, 93) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.5, 1.4)
Lauderdale County 2 Rural 44.9 (34.6, 57.4) 29 (3, 92) 14 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.2)
Tipton County 2 Urban 44.8 (38.0, 52.6) 30 (7, 79) 32 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.8, 0.9)
Hardeman County 2 Rural 44.5 (34.7, 56.5) 31 (3, 92) 15 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 0.8)
Chester County 2 Urban 44.5 (32.4, 59.7) 32 (2, 93) 9 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.2, 4.2)
Cocke County 2 Rural 44.3 (36.1, 53.9) 33 (6, 86) 23 stable stable trend 11.6 (-0.9, 21.3)
Weakley County 2 Rural 43.2 (34.3, 53.8) 34 (6, 90) 18 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.2, 0.9)
Warren County 2 Rural 43.2 (35.4, 52.3) 35 (7, 88) 23 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.1, 0.1)
Montgomery County 2 Urban 43.0 (38.7, 47.6) 36 (16, 72) 79 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.7)
Coffee County 2 Rural 42.9 (36.2, 50.5) 37 (9, 85) 31 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.8, 1.1)
Sequatchie County 2 Urban 42.6 (31.2, 57.3) 38 (3, 93) 10 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.4, 5.2)
Lincoln County 2 Rural 42.5 (34.2, 52.4) 39 (6, 90) 20 stable stable trend -3.7 (-21.8, 2.3)
Lewis County 2 Rural 42.5 (28.9, 60.7) 40 (1, 93) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.5, 3.7)
Benton County 2 Rural 42.5 (31.4, 56.9) 41 (3, 93) 11 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.1, 2.6)
McNairy County 2 Rural 42.3 (33.3, 53.4) 42 (6, 91) 16 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.6, 1.8)
Sevier County 2 Rural 42.0 (37.0, 47.6) 43 (15, 78) 57 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.9)
Hawkins County 2 Urban 41.8 (35.6, 48.9) 44 (13, 86) 35 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.1, 0.7)
Robertson County 2 Urban 41.8 (35.7, 48.6) 45 (12, 87) 36 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.4)
Roane County 2 Urban 41.8 (35.3, 49.2) 46 (11, 86) 34 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.1, 0.6)
Hardin County 2 Rural 41.7 (32.5, 53.0) 47 (6, 92) 16 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.3, 1.5)
DeKalb County 2 Rural 41.6 (31.1, 54.8) 48 (5, 93) 11 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.8, 0.9)
McMinn County 2 Rural 41.5 (34.9, 49.0) 49 (12, 87) 31 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.4)
Madison County 2 Urban 41.3 (36.1, 47.0) 50 (16, 83) 50 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.6)
Meigs County 2 Rural 41.3 (28.8, 58.0) 51 (2, 93) 8 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.6, 3.1)
Grainger County 2 Urban 41.1 (31.5, 53.0) 52 (5, 93) 14 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.5, 0.4)
Shelby County 2 Urban 41.0 (39.2, 42.9) 53 (31, 63) 406 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.4, 2.7)
Greene County 2 Rural 40.9 (35.3, 47.2) 54 (15, 86) 41 falling falling trend -9.0 (-18.1, -3.8)
Gibson County 2 Urban 40.8 (34.0, 48.8) 55 (10, 90) 26 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.3)
Smith County 2 Urban 40.5 (29.5, 54.5) 56 (4, 93) 10 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.2, 0.3)
Bledsoe County 2 Rural 40.0 (28.5, 55.3) 57 (4, 93) 8 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.9, 1.6)
Hickman County 2 Urban 39.5 (30.1, 51.0) 58 (9, 93) 13 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.3, -1.3)
Dyer County 2 Rural 39.2 (31.3, 48.5) 59 (11, 92) 18 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.3, 1.5)
Putnam County 2 Rural 38.9 (33.2, 45.4) 60 (19, 90) 35 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.1, -0.7)
Cumberland County 2 Rural 38.5 (32.5, 45.5) 61 (19, 91) 39 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.8, 0.3)
Sumner County 2 Urban 38.5 (34.9, 42.3) 62 (27, 84) 89 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.2)
Giles County 2 Rural 38.2 (29.9, 48.4) 63 (12, 93) 16 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.3, -0.5)
Hamilton County 2 Urban 38.2 (35.6, 40.9) 64 (37, 80) 173 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 3.6)
Rhea County 2 Rural 38.1 (30.0, 47.9) 65 (12, 93) 16 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.0, 0.2)
Bedford County 2 Rural 38.0 (30.9, 46.3) 66 (15, 92) 21 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.5, -0.9)
Sullivan County 2 Urban 37.5 (33.9, 41.5) 67 (32, 87) 85 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Lawrence County 2 Rural 36.9 (29.9, 45.0) 68 (18, 93) 21 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.2, 0.5)
Claiborne County 2 Rural 36.9 (29.1, 46.3) 69 (14, 93) 17 falling falling trend -2.5 (-5.1, -0.1)
Hancock County 2 Rural 36.9 (21.1, 61.2) 70 (2, 93) 3
*
*
Rutherford County 2 Urban 36.8 (33.8, 40.1) 71 (40, 87) 114 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.5)
Loudon County 2 Urban 36.5 (30.2, 43.9) 72 (20, 93) 29 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.4, 10.5)
Morgan County 2 Urban 36.4 (27.0, 48.3) 73 (11, 93) 11 falling falling trend -4.3 (-7.5, -1.5)
Campbell County 2 Urban 36.3 (29.4, 44.5) 74 (20, 93) 21 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.7, 1.6)
Obion County 2 Rural 36.2 (28.6, 45.5) 75 (16, 93) 16 falling falling trend -5.1 (-16.2, -3.2)
Henry County 2 Rural 36.0 (28.4, 45.1) 76 (18, 93) 18 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -0.4)
Anderson County 2 Urban 35.8 (30.7, 41.6) 77 (29, 92) 38 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.3, -0.6)
Stewart County 2 Urban 35.6 (24.4, 50.7) 78 (7, 93) 7 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.8, 0.6)
Knox County 2 Urban 35.5 (33.3, 37.9) 79 (54, 88) 195 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -1.0)
Maury County 2 Urban 35.5 (30.7, 40.7) 80 (35, 92) 43 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.5, -0.7)
Jefferson County 2 Urban 35.2 (29.1, 42.2) 81 (27, 93) 26 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.2)
Bradley County 2 Urban 35.0 (30.6, 39.9) 82 (40, 92) 48 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.0, 0.1)
Johnson County 2 Rural 34.7 (25.1, 47.4) 83 (14, 93) 9 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.4, 1.6)
Davidson County 2 Urban 34.5 (32.5, 36.6) 84 (59, 88) 240 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.7, -1.5)
Blount County 2 Urban 33.4 (29.7, 37.6) 85 (50, 92) 63 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.8)
Wilson County 2 Urban 33.4 (29.5, 37.6) 86 (49, 92) 58 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.9, -1.2)
Washington County 2 Urban 32.9 (29.0, 37.3) 87 (50, 93) 55 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.2)
Hamblen County 2 Urban 32.4 (27.0, 38.6) 88 (39, 93) 26 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.4, 0.4)
Monroe County 2 Rural 31.8 (26.0, 38.8) 89 (40, 93) 22 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.6, 0.2)
Williamson County 2 Urban 30.4 (27.5, 33.6) 90 (72, 93) 83 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.1, 5.8)
Unicoi County 2 Urban 30.1 (21.6, 41.5) 91 (26, 93) 9 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.4, 2.2)
Carter County 2 Urban 28.0 (23.0, 33.9) 92 (66, 93) 24 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.4, -1.1)
Union County 2 Urban 28.0 (19.1, 39.8) 93 (28, 93) 7 stable stable trend -3.1 (-7.3, 0.9)
Moore County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Buren County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/17/2026 4:24 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top