Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Texas by County

Colon & Rectum (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas 7 N/A 38.3 (38.0, 38.6) N/A 11,477 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.3, 0.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 36.7 (36.6, 36.7) N/A 145,073 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.0, -0.8)
La Salle County 7 Rural 81.4 (54.1, 117.8) 1 (1, 157) 6 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.3, 3.9)
Brooks County 7 Rural 76.1 (50.9, 109.5) 2 (1, 183) 6 stable stable trend 2.0 (-2.4, 7.4)
Kimble County 7 Rural 70.9 (40.6, 116.2) 3 (1, 193) 4 rising rising trend 16.3 (4.2, 52.0)
Jim Hogg County 7 Rural 67.2 (37.4, 110.7) 4 (1, 194) 3 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.6, 4.6)
Coleman County 7 Rural 66.9 (47.2, 93.3) 5 (1, 176) 9 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.2, 6.2)
Floyd County 7 Rural 66.1 (38.6, 105.4) 6 (1, 194) 4 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.3, 3.5)
Hockley County 7 Urban 64.5 (50.7, 81.1) 7 (1, 117) 15 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.2, 5.8)
Polk County 7 Rural 64.3 (54.4, 75.4) 8 (1, 64) 39 stable stable trend 1.5 (0.0, 3.0)
Zavala County 7 Rural 61.4 (41.6, 87.5) 9 (1, 190) 6 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.8, 4.8)
Winkler County 7 Rural 60.4 (38.0, 91.4) 10 (1, 192) 5
*
*
Dimmit County 7 Rural 59.7 (40.6, 85.2) 11 (1, 189) 6 stable stable trend 2.7 (-1.2, 7.6)
Jim Wells County 7 Rural 58.9 (49.1, 70.2) 12 (2, 96) 27 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.7, 2.8)
San Augustine County 7 Rural 58.8 (39.2, 85.8) 13 (1, 187) 8 stable stable trend 25.7 (-0.1, 46.3)
Coke County 7 Rural 58.4 (30.5, 104.2) 16 (1, 194) 3
*
*
Delta County 7 Rural 58.2 (37.3, 88.7) 14 (1, 192) 5 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.4, 4.7)
Wharton County 7 Rural 57.9 (48.8, 68.3) 15 (2, 100) 31 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.8, 2.8)
Duval County 7 Rural 57.7 (39.7, 81.3) 17 (1, 188) 7 stable stable trend 2.4 (0.0, 5.1)
Dawson County 7 Rural 57.1 (39.9, 79.3) 18 (1, 186) 7 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.4, 2.1)
Cass County 7 Rural 56.7 (46.5, 68.6) 19 (3, 130) 24 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.1, 1.7)
Limestone County 7 Rural 56.1 (44.4, 70.2) 21 (2, 154) 17 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.9, 1.7)
Montague County 7 Rural 56.1 (43.7, 71.1) 20 (2, 165) 16 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.0, 1.3)
Morris County 7 Rural 56.1 (40.1, 76.7) 22 (1, 186) 9 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.5, 2.1)
Swisher County 7 Rural 55.5 (34.1, 85.3) 23 (1, 194) 4 stable stable trend -1.2 (-6.2, 3.2)
Camp County 7 Rural 54.5 (37.6, 76.4) 24 (1, 191) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.6, 1.6)
Palo Pinto County 7 Rural 53.9 (43.5, 66.2) 25 (3, 160) 21 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.7)
Marion County 7 Rural 53.4 (35.8, 77.2) 26 (1, 192) 8 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.3, 3.6)
Haskell County 7 Rural 53.1 (33.2, 82.8) 28 (1, 194) 5 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.2, 3.4)
Ector County 7 Urban 53.0 (47.5, 58.9) 27 (10, 93) 71 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.6, 2.4)
Maverick County 7 Urban 52.9 (44.4, 62.5) 29 (5, 134) 28 rising rising trend 2.6 (1.0, 4.7)
DeWitt County 7 Rural 52.8 (41.3, 67.0) 30 (3, 166) 15 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.7, 2.6)
Liberty County 7 Urban 52.2 (45.6, 59.6) 31 (7, 121) 47 rising rising trend 3.0 (0.1, 12.2)
Clay County 7 Urban 52.2 (36.5, 73.3) 32 (1, 191) 8 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.1, 3.6)
Colorado County 7 Rural 52.1 (40.8, 66.0) 33 (3, 174) 16 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.3, 1.3)
Jasper County 7 Rural 52.0 (42.6, 63.0) 35 (5, 157) 24 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.6)
Upshur County 7 Urban 52.0 (43.3, 62.0) 34 (6, 141) 28 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.7)
Newton County 7 Rural 51.5 (37.1, 70.3) 36 (2, 189) 10
*
*
Uvalde County 7 Rural 51.2 (39.7, 65.0) 37 (3, 182) 14 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.1, 2.8)
Walker County 7 Rural 50.9 (44.1, 58.4) 38 (9, 142) 42 rising rising trend 8.7 (2.4, 20.5)
Atascosa County 7 Urban 50.5 (42.4, 59.8) 39 (9, 148) 28 rising rising trend 8.1 (2.3, 16.9)
Val Verde County 7 Rural 50.3 (41.7, 60.3) 40 (6, 165) 24 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.4, 3.6)
Gregg County 7 Urban 50.2 (44.9, 56.0) 41 (13, 113) 69 stable stable trend 10.0 (-1.6, 17.5)
Bee County 7 Rural 50.0 (39.2, 62.8) 43 (3, 184) 15 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 1.8)
Zapata County 7 Rural 49.9 (34.2, 70.3) 42 (2, 192) 7 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.6, 5.0)
Burleson County 7 Urban 49.9 (38.0, 64.7) 44 (3, 187) 13 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.8, 1.3)
Cooke County 7 Rural 49.5 (41.0, 59.4) 45 (7, 162) 26 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.4)
Kleberg County 7 Rural 49.4 (38.7, 62.0) 46 (5, 185) 15 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.4, 0.8)
Willacy County 7 Rural 49.0 (36.3, 64.5) 48 (3, 188) 10 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.3, 3.1)
Chambers County 7 Urban 48.9 (39.9, 59.4) 47 (8, 167) 22 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.7, 2.7)
Shelby County 7 Rural 48.6 (37.9, 61.7) 49 (5, 185) 15 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.5, 1.8)
Young County 7 Rural 48.5 (36.2, 63.9) 50 (3, 188) 12 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.9, 1.7)
Frio County 7 Rural 48.2 (34.3, 65.8) 51 (2, 192) 8 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.0, 5.6)
Lampasas County 7 Urban 48.1 (37.0, 61.7) 52 (4, 185) 14 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.9, 3.6)
Hopkins County 7 Rural 47.9 (39.1, 58.3) 53 (7, 170) 22 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 1.1)
Reeves County 7 Rural 47.9 (32.3, 68.5) 54 (2, 193) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.1, 3.0)
Matagorda County 7 Rural 47.7 (38.9, 58.0) 55 (7, 177) 22 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.6, 0.9)
Leon County 7 Rural 47.5 (34.6, 63.9) 56 (2, 192) 11 stable stable trend 4.4 (-1.1, 21.9)
Howard County 7 Rural 47.5 (37.8, 59.0) 57 (6, 179) 17 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.4, 2.3)
Angelina County 7 Rural 47.2 (41.4, 53.7) 58 (17, 142) 49 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 1.6)
Lynn County 7 Urban 47.2 (26.3, 78.7) 67 (1, 194) 3
*
*
Wichita County 7 Urban 47.1 (42.1, 52.6) 59 (19, 135) 68 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.6)
Eastland County 7 Rural 46.9 (35.8, 61.0) 60 (4, 189) 13 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.2, 2.2)
Sabine County 7 Rural 46.5 (33.5, 64.6) 63 (4, 192) 9 stable stable trend -4.0 (-13.9, 2.4)
Runnels County 7 Rural 46.5 (30.6, 68.1) 61 (2, 194) 6 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.4, 4.0)
Orange County 7 Urban 46.5 (40.6, 53.0) 62 (20, 158) 47 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
Franklin County 7 Rural 46.3 (31.3, 66.7) 64 (3, 194) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.8, 2.7)
Lamar County 7 Rural 46.3 (39.0, 54.6) 65 (15, 177) 31 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.2)
San Jacinto County 7 Urban 46.3 (36.5, 58.0) 69 (9, 187) 18 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.8, 1.0)
Brown County 7 Rural 46.2 (37.8, 56.1) 66 (9, 179) 24 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.3)
Callahan County 7 Urban 46.1 (33.3, 62.7) 68 (4, 192) 9 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.7, 4.6)
Fannin County 7 Rural 46.0 (37.5, 55.9) 70 (11, 183) 22 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.4, 2.2)
Nacogdoches County 7 Rural 45.9 (38.9, 53.8) 71 (18, 171) 32 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.5, 0.0)
Andrews County 7 Rural 45.5 (32.1, 62.7) 72 (4, 193) 8 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.7, 3.2)
Gonzales County 7 Rural 45.4 (33.9, 59.7) 73 (6, 192) 11 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.2, 0.4)
Madison County 7 Rural 45.3 (31.3, 63.7) 74 (3, 194) 7 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.1, 3.3)
Van Zandt County 7 Rural 45.1 (38.6, 52.6) 75 (21, 175) 37 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.5, 10.7)
Hill County 7 Rural 45.1 (36.9, 54.8) 77 (12, 183) 23 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.2, 0.6)
Calhoun County 7 Rural 45.0 (33.5, 59.4) 76 (5, 191) 11 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.6, 0.6)
Goliad County 7 Urban 45.0 (28.9, 68.7) 78 (2, 194) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.9, 2.8)
Grayson County 7 Urban 44.9 (40.4, 49.8) 79 (28, 151) 77 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Henderson County 7 Rural 44.9 (39.4, 51.0) 80 (26, 161) 54 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.2)
Bowie County 7 Urban 44.8 (39.4, 50.8) 81 (25, 160) 52 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.3, -0.8)
Kaufman County 7 Urban 44.8 (39.9, 50.2) 82 (30, 154) 64 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.1, 12.1)
Tyler County 7 Rural 44.6 (34.3, 57.5) 84 (9, 190) 14 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.6, 3.1)
Comanche County 7 Rural 44.6 (31.9, 61.1) 83 (4, 193) 9 stable stable trend -0.6 (-10.2, 1.7)
Mitchell County 7 Rural 44.5 (27.7, 68.3) 88 (1, 194) 4 stable stable trend 1.2 (-3.3, 6.4)
Bosque County 7 Urban 44.3 (33.6, 57.9) 86 (6, 190) 13 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.6, 2.5)
Wilbarger County 7 Rural 44.3 (31.1, 61.7) 87 (3, 193) 8 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.8, 0.5)
Wise County 7 Urban 44.3 (37.9, 51.5) 85 (21, 176) 36 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.8, 2.3)
Milam County 7 Rural 44.0 (34.5, 55.5) 89 (11, 189) 16 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.3)
San Saba County 7 Rural 43.8 (25.8, 71.4) 91 (1, 194) 4 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.8, 2.6)
Johnson County 7 Urban 43.8 (39.6, 48.2) 90 (37, 153) 86 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.5, 7.9)
Victoria County 7 Urban 43.5 (37.9, 49.6) 92 (29, 168) 47 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Taylor County 7 Urban 43.4 (38.7, 48.4) 93 (35, 163) 66 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.3, 0.0)
Fayette County 7 Rural 43.1 (33.8, 54.5) 95 (12, 190) 18 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.5, -0.6)
San Patricio County 7 Urban 43.0 (36.6, 50.3) 94 (25, 178) 33 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.9, -0.2)
Rusk County 7 Urban 43.0 (36.0, 50.9) 96 (21, 181) 29 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.2)
Caldwell County 7 Urban 42.7 (35.1, 51.6) 97 (17, 185) 23 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.9, 0.2)
Tom Green County 7 Urban 42.7 (37.9, 48.0) 98 (32, 166) 59 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.3)
Gray County 7 Rural 42.7 (32.2, 55.8) 99 (9, 192) 11 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.4, 0.9)
Pecos County 7 Rural 42.5 (29.3, 59.7) 100 (4, 194) 7 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.0, 2.9)
Harrison County 7 Urban 42.4 (36.2, 49.3) 102 (28, 181) 37 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.0, -0.8)
Cameron County 7 Urban 42.4 (39.6, 45.2) 101 (63, 141) 182 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.5)
McCulloch County 7 Rural 42.2 (27.1, 64.1) 103 (4, 194) 5 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.0, 5.0)
Ward County 7 Rural 42.2 (26.8, 63.1) 106 (3, 194) 5 falling falling trend -3.5 (-8.5, -1.0)
Live Oak County 7 Rural 42.1 (28.4, 60.5) 104 (5, 194) 7 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.2, 4.4)
McLennan County 7 Urban 42.0 (38.6, 45.7) 107 (53, 154) 116 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.3, 4.7)
Archer County 7 Urban 42.0 (26.3, 64.2) 105 (3, 194) 5 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.9, 5.9)
Houston County 7 Rural 42.0 (32.6, 53.5) 108 (13, 191) 14 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.9, 2.8)
Potter County 7 Urban 41.9 (36.9, 47.5) 109 (40, 176) 51 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.3)
Hamilton County 7 Rural 41.9 (27.4, 62.6) 112 (4, 194) 6 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.7, 2.9)
Waller County 7 Urban 41.8 (34.0, 50.9) 110 (23, 189) 21 stable stable trend 6.5 (-1.4, 20.9)
Hood County 7 Rural 41.6 (35.4, 48.7) 111 (32, 183) 39 rising rising trend 11.0 (0.1, 23.4)
Gillespie County 7 Rural 41.6 (32.3, 52.9) 113 (15, 191) 19 stable stable trend -9.9 (-22.9, 6.4)
Presidio County 7 Rural 41.4 (22.5, 70.1) 114 (2, 194) 3
*
*
Scurry County 7 Rural 41.3 (29.5, 56.5) 116 (8, 194) 8 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.9, 1.5)
Parker County 7 Urban 41.3 (37.0, 46.0) 115 (46, 172) 71 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.3, 0.0)
Hutchinson County 7 Rural 41.2 (30.8, 54.3) 117 (12, 192) 11 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.4, -0.3)
Galveston County 7 Urban 41.2 (38.4, 44.2) 118 (68, 158) 169 stable stable trend 3.9 (-0.7, 12.0)
Aransas County 7 Urban 41.1 (32.1, 52.4) 120 (14, 191) 17 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.1)
Jackson County 7 Rural 41.1 (28.9, 57.0) 121 (7, 194) 8 stable stable trend -3.3 (-15.8, 2.1)
Stephens County 7 Rural 41.1 (26.7, 61.3) 119 (5, 194) 5 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.4, 1.0)
Bastrop County 7 Urban 41.0 (35.6, 47.0) 122 (36, 182) 45 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.6, 0.0)
Hunt County 7 Urban 40.8 (35.7, 46.4) 123 (43, 177) 49 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.3)
Freestone County 7 Rural 40.6 (30.3, 53.5) 124 (13, 194) 11 stable stable trend 3.5 (-2.1, 24.0)
Starr County 7 Rural 40.5 (33.5, 48.5) 128 (31, 188) 24 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.2, 4.6)
Anderson County 7 Rural 40.4 (33.9, 47.9) 125 (34, 187) 28 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.8)
Refugio County 7 Rural 40.3 (24.7, 63.8) 126 (3, 194) 4 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.1, 2.7)
Karnes County 7 Rural 40.2 (27.4, 57.0) 127 (8, 194) 7 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.8, 0.3)
Lubbock County 7 Urban 40.2 (37.0, 43.6) 129 (69, 168) 122 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.9, 5.1)
Jones County 7 Urban 40.1 (29.4, 53.9) 130 (11, 193) 9 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.1, 3.2)
Deaf Smith County 7 Rural 40.1 (28.2, 55.3) 132 (9, 194) 8 rising rising trend 4.2 (0.6, 12.0)
Navarro County 7 Rural 40.0 (33.1, 48.1) 131 (27, 188) 24 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.3, -0.5)
Wood County 7 Rural 39.9 (33.2, 47.8) 133 (34, 188) 30 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.4)
Erath County 7 Rural 39.5 (31.5, 49.0) 134 (25, 191) 18 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.3, 1.3)
Washington County 7 Rural 39.4 (31.7, 48.5) 135 (27, 191) 21 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.1, -0.6)
Smith County 7 Urban 39.3 (36.0, 42.8) 136 (75, 172) 110 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.6, 4.2)
Wilson County 7 Urban 39.2 (32.4, 47.2) 137 (32, 189) 24 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 1.0)
Medina County 7 Urban 39.2 (32.4, 47.1) 138 (29, 189) 25 stable stable trend -14.8 (-31.2, 2.2)
Jefferson County 7 Urban 39.1 (35.9, 42.6) 140 (79, 174) 113 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -1.0)
Cherokee County 7 Rural 39.1 (32.4, 46.9) 141 (41, 191) 25 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.0, 2.8)
Lavaca County 7 Rural 39.1 (29.4, 51.3) 139 (15, 193) 12 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.5, -0.6)
Panola County 7 Rural 39.0 (29.8, 50.5) 142 (18, 193) 13 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.5, 0.4)
Lee County 7 Rural 38.8 (28.4, 52.3) 143 (15, 194) 10 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.4, 0.0)
Webb County 7 Urban 38.5 (34.9, 42.3) 144 (74, 179) 87 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.1, 1.7)
Brazoria County 7 Urban 38.4 (35.6, 41.4) 145 (91, 176) 145 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.1)
Burnet County 7 Rural 38.3 (31.7, 46.0) 146 (35, 190) 28 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.6)
Rains County 7 Rural 38.2 (27.0, 53.7) 147 (12, 194) 8 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.7, 1.3)
Guadalupe County 7 Urban 37.8 (34.0, 42.0) 148 (73, 184) 73 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.7)
Midland County 7 Urban 37.8 (33.4, 42.6) 150 (68, 185) 57 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.7, -0.7)
Falls County 7 Urban 37.8 (26.7, 52.1) 149 (14, 194) 8 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.9, -1.0)
Bexar County 7 Urban 37.7 (36.5, 38.9) 152 (117, 163) 748 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 2.9)
Hale County 7 Rural 37.6 (29.0, 48.0) 151 (29, 193) 13 falling falling trend -14.8 (-25.1, -1.8)
Terry County 7 Rural 37.6 (24.0, 56.1) 153 (5, 194) 5 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.0, 1.1)
Ellis County 7 Urban 37.6 (33.8, 41.7) 154 (81, 185) 76 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.2, -1.2)
Hidalgo County 7 Urban 37.3 (35.4, 39.3) 155 (111, 173) 292 rising rising trend 4.3 (2.6, 6.8)
Hardin County 7 Urban 37.3 (30.9, 44.6) 156 (49, 191) 26 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.2, 0.5)
Nueces County 7 Urban 37.1 (34.5, 40.0) 157 (95, 181) 149 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.8, -1.0)
El Paso County 7 Urban 37.1 (35.3, 39.0) 159 (113, 174) 317 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.0, 4.5)
Harris County 7 Urban 37.1 (36.3, 38.0) 158 (126, 165) 1,646 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 1.4)
Ochiltree County 7 Rural 37.1 (21.2, 60.0) 163 (4, 194) 3 stable stable trend -3.8 (-9.0, 0.8)
Tarrant County 7 Urban 37.0 (35.8, 38.2) 160 (123, 169) 767 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 3.3)
Dallas County 7 Urban 36.9 (35.8, 38.0) 161 (125, 168) 908 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 1.5)
Randall County 7 Urban 36.7 (32.4, 41.3) 162 (82, 188) 57 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.5, 10.7)
Grimes County 7 Rural 36.1 (28.1, 45.9) 164 (32, 193) 15 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.5, 1.4)
Bell County 7 Urban 35.8 (32.9, 38.8) 165 (112, 184) 119 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.2)
Red River County 7 Rural 35.7 (24.2, 51.6) 167 (16, 194) 7 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.7, 2.4)
Hays County 7 Urban 35.7 (32.1, 39.5) 166 (97, 186) 80 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.7)
Moore County 7 Rural 35.7 (24.5, 50.0) 169 (17, 194) 7 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.5, 2.6)
Kerr County 7 Rural 35.6 (29.7, 42.6) 168 (56, 193) 32 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.7, 0.9)
Nolan County 7 Rural 35.6 (24.7, 50.1) 170 (20, 194) 7 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.1, -0.3)
Titus County 7 Rural 35.5 (26.9, 46.1) 171 (30, 194) 12 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.2, 1.4)
Trinity County 7 Rural 35.4 (24.7, 50.1) 172 (17, 194) 8 stable stable trend -2.8 (-6.0, 0.2)
Montgomery County 7 Urban 35.3 (33.2, 37.4) 174 (126, 183) 232 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.0)
Gaines County 7 Rural 35.2 (23.0, 51.2) 173 (16, 194) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.7, 2.1)
Rockwall County 7 Urban 35.0 (30.1, 40.4) 175 (83, 191) 40 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.7, 0.3)
Travis County 7 Urban 34.8 (33.3, 36.5) 176 (135, 181) 403 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.1, 2.8)
Brazos County 7 Urban 34.7 (30.8, 38.9) 177 (96, 190) 61 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.2)
Williamson County 7 Urban 34.4 (32.3, 36.6) 178 (135, 186) 215 stable stable trend -3.7 (-7.2, 1.2)
Fort Bend County 7 Urban 34.3 (32.4, 36.2) 179 (139, 185) 282 stable stable trend 4.4 (-1.4, 8.3)
Robertson County 7 Urban 34.1 (23.7, 47.9) 180 (19, 194) 8 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.7, 0.6)
Lamb County 7 Rural 33.8 (22.4, 49.4) 181 (17, 194) 6 stable stable trend -0.8 (-5.2, 4.1)
Austin County 7 Urban 33.2 (25.5, 42.6) 182 (48, 194) 14 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 1.5)
Somervell County 7 Rural 33.0 (20.0, 52.0) 183 (10, 194) 4
*
*
Collin County 7 Urban 32.4 (30.9, 34.1) 184 (158, 189) 336 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 2.4)
Comal County 7 Urban 32.3 (28.9, 36.1) 185 (128, 191) 70 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.6)
Parmer County 7 Rural 31.5 (17.7, 51.8) 186 (8, 194) 3 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.4, 3.3)
Coryell County 7 Urban 31.0 (25.4, 37.4) 187 (101, 194) 22 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.9, -1.0)
Denton County 7 Urban 30.8 (29.1, 32.6) 188 (166, 192) 269 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 3.0)
Bandera County 7 Urban 30.8 (23.2, 40.8) 189 (68, 194) 12 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.1, 13.2)
Kendall County 7 Urban 30.6 (24.6, 37.9) 190 (91, 194) 19 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.8, -0.4)
Jack County 7 Rural 28.7 (16.2, 47.8) 191 (19, 194) 3 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.0, 3.1)
Blanco County 7 Rural 28.4 (19.0, 42.5) 192 (53, 194) 6 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.6, 1.6)
Llano County 7 Rural 25.5 (18.0, 35.8) 193 (104, 194) 11 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.8, -1.3)
Brewster County 7 Rural 22.2 (12.2, 38.3) 194 (71, 194) 3
*
*
Armstrong County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bailey County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baylor County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Borden County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Briscoe County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carson County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Castro County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Childress County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cochran County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Collingsworth County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Concho County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crane County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crosby County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dallam County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickens County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Donley County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fisher County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garza County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hall County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hansford County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardeman County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hartley County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hemphill County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hudspeth County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kinney County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lipscomb County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mills County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Motley County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reagan County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Real County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schleicher County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shackelford County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stonewall County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sutton County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Throckmorton County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upton County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yoakum County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/16/2026 12:47 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

7 Source: SEER November 2024 submission.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top