Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Arkansas by County

Lung & Bronchus (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Arkansas 2 N/A 70.4 (69.2, 71.6) N/A 2,818 falling falling trend -4.1 (-6.7, -1.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 52.5 (52.4, 52.6) N/A 222,606 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.0, -3.1)
Calhoun County 2 Rural 89.0 (60.7, 128.6) 12 (1, 75) 7 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.4, 5.7)
Lee County 2 Rural 60.4 (42.7, 84.1) 71 (12, 75) 8 stable stable trend -1.4 (-12.8, 4.1)
Woodruff County 2 Rural 80.8 (57.7, 111.8) 27 (1, 75) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.1, 2.9)
Dallas County 2 Rural 77.6 (55.9, 106.9) 34 (1, 75) 9 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.1, 2.4)
Lafayette County 2 Rural 75.6 (54.3, 104.8) 39 (1, 75) 9 falling falling trend -4.2 (-16.1, -1.6)
Nevada County 2 Rural 69.5 (50.2, 94.9) 54 (4, 75) 9 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.2, 1.7)
Newton County 2 Rural 63.0 (45.3, 87.6) 67 (8, 75) 9 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.8, 2.6)
Monroe County 2 Rural 80.0 (58.4, 108.9) 29 (1, 75) 10 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.7, 1.4)
Cleveland County 2 Rural 84.1 (62.0, 113.0) 18 (1, 75) 10 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.3, 5.1)
Sevier County 2 Rural 56.5 (41.9, 74.6) 73 (20, 75) 10 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.6, 1.6)
Montgomery County 2 Rural 62.6 (46.6, 84.4) 69 (9, 75) 11 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.6, 1.5)
Searcy County 2 Rural 74.2 (55.1, 99.7) 43 (3, 75) 11 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.7, 2.1)
Howard County 2 Rural 65.3 (48.8, 86.1) 63 (9, 75) 11 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.1, -0.8)
Little River County 2 Urban 60.7 (45.4, 80.2) 70 (14, 75) 11 stable stable trend -2.9 (-6.4, 0.2)
Prairie County 2 Rural 76.2 (57.3, 100.8) 37 (2, 75) 11 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.7, 3.1)
Bradley County 2 Rural 77.8 (58.8, 101.7) 32 (2, 75) 12 stable stable trend -2.4 (-18.1, 1.1)
Desha County 2 Rural 73.0 (55.5, 95.1) 46 (4, 75) 12 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.1, 2.4)
Chicot County 2 Rural 75.0 (57.4, 97.3) 40 (4, 75) 13 stable stable trend 1.0 (-3.1, 5.3)
Lincoln County 2 Rural 89.5 (69.4, 113.9) 10 (1, 69) 14 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.8, 3.7)
Pike County 2 Rural 91.9 (71.2, 117.5) 7 (1, 69) 14 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.9, 2.2)
Perry County 2 Urban 91.0 (70.7, 116.3) 9 (1, 69) 14 falling falling trend -2.8 (-14.5, -0.2)
Madison County 2 Urban 63.3 (50.0, 79.4) 66 (17, 75) 16 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.7, 3.3)
Scott County 2 Rural 109.4 (86.9, 136.8) 2 (1, 42) 17 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.3, 4.5)
Cross County 2 Rural 72.4 (57.7, 90.1) 49 (6, 75) 17 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.3, -0.7)
Fulton County 2 Rural 76.5 (60.3, 96.6) 36 (3, 74) 17 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.8, 1.8)
Izard County 2 Rural 71.5 (57.2, 89.2) 51 (7, 75) 18 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.9, 1.9)
Jackson County 2 Rural 80.2 (64.4, 99.2) 28 (3, 72) 18 falling falling trend -9.9 (-22.5, -3.3)
Yell County 2 Rural 66.1 (53.1, 81.6) 62 (16, 75) 18 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.7, -1.4)
Columbia County 2 Rural 63.6 (51.0, 78.5) 65 (18, 75) 19 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.5, 0.0)
Stone County 2 Rural 77.6 (62.4, 96.6) 33 (4, 73) 19 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.6)
Phillips County 2 Rural 82.4 (66.9, 100.9) 22 (2, 70) 21 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.4, 3.0)
Hempstead County 2 Rural 74.0 (60.5, 90.0) 45 (7, 73) 21 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.0, 1.3)
Arkansas County 2 Rural 83.2 (67.9, 101.3) 20 (2, 68) 22 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.7, 2.2)
Drew County 2 Rural 91.2 (74.5, 110.8) 8 (1, 64) 22 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.7, 1.2)
Franklin County 2 Rural 83.0 (67.7, 101.1) 21 (2, 69) 22 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.1, 2.3)
Ashley County 2 Rural 72.8 (59.6, 88.5) 47 (7, 73) 22 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.7, 2.6)
St. Francis County 2 Rural 71.4 (58.4, 86.7) 52 (9, 74) 22 stable stable trend -0.1 (-15.4, 5.3)
Van Buren County 2 Rural 74.2 (60.6, 90.8) 44 (7, 74) 22 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.3, 3.0)
Grant County 2 Urban 85.0 (69.8, 102.9) 17 (2, 66) 22 stable stable trend -14.2 (-26.3, 0.6)
Randolph County 2 Rural 87.3 (71.8, 105.6) 14 (1, 66) 23 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.7, 2.7)
Clark County 2 Rural 88.6 (73.1, 106.7) 13 (1, 64) 24 rising rising trend 2.6 (0.8, 4.6)
Clay County 2 Rural 100.9 (83.3, 121.8) 4 (1, 46) 24 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.9, 3.4)
Polk County 2 Rural 72.6 (59.7, 87.9) 48 (9, 74) 24 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.5, 1.8)
Conway County 2 Rural 78.0 (64.6, 93.8) 31 (5, 70) 25 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.8, 1.8)
Lawrence County 2 Rural 114.7 (95.9, 136.5) 1 (1, 22) 27 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.7, 2.2)
Marion County 2 Rural 81.5 (67.6, 98.3) 25 (4, 68) 28 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.1, 2.4)
Carroll County 2 Rural 62.7 (52.6, 74.6) 68 (27, 75) 29 stable stable trend -12.6 (-25.2, 0.2)
Johnson County 2 Rural 86.8 (73.2, 102.3) 16 (2, 59) 30 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.4, 1.8)
Ouachita County 2 Rural 87.2 (73.4, 103.1) 15 (2, 61) 30 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.4, 2.2)
Sharp County 2 Rural 100.4 (84.9, 118.6) 5 (1, 37) 32 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.3, 3.5)
Logan County 2 Rural 99.4 (84.4, 116.7) 6 (1, 44) 33 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.9, 1.9)
Poinsett County 2 Urban 106.8 (91.3, 124.5) 3 (1, 24) 35 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.1, 2.0)
Independence County 2 Rural 68.4 (58.6, 79.6) 58 (18, 73) 36 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.8, 0.1)
Union County 2 Rural 65.2 (55.7, 75.9) 64 (25, 75) 36 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.9, 0.0)
Cleburne County 2 Rural 81.7 (69.9, 95.5) 23 (4, 64) 38 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.3, 1.9)
Boone County 2 Rural 67.7 (58.4, 78.3) 59 (21, 73) 39 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.9)
Crittenden County 2 Urban 71.8 (62.0, 82.8) 50 (14, 72) 41 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.4)
Hot Spring County 2 Rural 83.6 (72.4, 96.3) 19 (4, 61) 41 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.2)
Miller County 2 Urban 74.4 (64.5, 85.5) 42 (12, 69) 42 falling falling trend -12.3 (-20.7, -2.3)
Mississippi County 2 Rural 89.1 (77.4, 102.0) 11 (2, 50) 44 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.2, 2.1)
Greene County 2 Rural 81.6 (71.5, 92.8) 24 (6, 62) 48 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.6)
Pope County 2 Rural 68.6 (60.6, 77.4) 57 (24, 72) 55 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.2)
Lonoke County 2 Urban 76.0 (67.8, 84.9) 38 (12, 65) 65 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.1)
Baxter County 2 Rural 74.7 (66.3, 84.1) 41 (14, 67) 66 falling falling trend -11.1 (-19.0, -2.1)
Crawford County 2 Urban 81.1 (72.5, 90.5) 26 (8, 58) 67 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.8, 1.7)
White County 2 Rural 69.4 (62.2, 77.2) 55 (23, 71) 70 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.6)
Jefferson County 2 Rural 79.7 (71.6, 88.5) 30 (10, 60) 75 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.5)
Craighead County 2 Urban 76.5 (69.6, 83.9) 35 (14, 61) 92 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.8)
Faulkner County 2 Urban 71.0 (64.7, 77.9) 53 (24, 68) 94 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.1)
Sebastian County 2 Urban 69.0 (63.3, 75.0) 56 (32, 69) 113 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.2)
Saline County 2 Urban 67.4 (61.9, 73.3) 61 (33, 70) 116 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Garland County 2 Urban 67.6 (62.1, 73.7) 60 (33, 70) 117 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.9)
Washington County 2 Urban 51.8 (47.7, 56.1) 75 (68, 75) 123 falling falling trend -4.7 (-10.0, -2.3)
Benton County 2 Urban 53.9 (50.2, 57.8) 74 (66, 75) 163 falling falling trend -7.5 (-11.2, -3.5)
Pulaski County 2 Urban 59.7 (56.6, 62.9) 72 (59, 73) 293 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -1.0)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/12/2026 4:30 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top