Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

Lung & Bronchus (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oklahoma 2 N/A 62.9 (61.9, 63.9) N/A 3,081 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 52.5 (52.4, 52.6) N/A 222,606 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.0, -3.1)
Harper County 2 Rural 82.8 (49.8, 132.6) 14 (1, 72) 4 stable stable trend -0.5 (-5.8, 4.4)
Dewey County 2 Rural 70.8 (43.6, 110.4) 32 (1, 72) 4 stable stable trend 0.4 (-5.8, 6.7)
Greer County 2 Rural 58.3 (36.3, 90.1) 57 (1, 72) 4 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.4, 3.4)
Ellis County 2 Rural 71.1 (44.5, 111.5) 30 (1, 72) 5 stable stable trend -2.2 (-7.1, 2.4)
Major County 2 Rural 43.7 (27.5, 66.9) 70 (23, 72) 5 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.2, 4.4)
Tillman County 2 Rural 42.9 (27.4, 65.8) 71 (29, 72) 5 falling falling trend -4.4 (-8.0, -1.5)
Alfalfa County 2 Rural 65.2 (43.1, 96.6) 42 (1, 72) 6 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.1, 2.0)
Cotton County 2 Urban 66.1 (43.3, 98.5) 38 (1, 72) 6 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.3, 2.9)
Woods County 2 Rural 54.3 (36.2, 79.0) 64 (7, 72) 6 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.4, 1.2)
Jefferson County 2 Rural 78.0 (53.7, 111.8) 20 (1, 70) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.3, 2.4)
Blaine County 2 Rural 58.4 (41.0, 81.8) 56 (5, 72) 8 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.8, 0.5)
Coal County 2 Rural 90.1 (63.4, 126.2) 2 (1, 67) 8 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.1, 0.7)
Kingfisher County 2 Rural 37.8 (26.8, 52.3) 72 (52, 72) 8 falling falling trend -3.7 (-6.4, -1.4)
Kiowa County 2 Rural 62.9 (44.5, 87.5) 48 (2, 72) 8 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.2, 1.6)
Washita County 2 Rural 63.2 (45.9, 85.3) 46 (2, 72) 9 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.7, 2.3)
Noble County 2 Rural 56.1 (41.2, 75.5) 60 (13, 72) 10 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.0, 0.8)
Texas County 2 Rural 46.5 (34.2, 61.9) 68 (35, 72) 10 stable stable trend 11.9 (-3.4, 31.9)
Love County 2 Rural 72.4 (53.9, 95.9) 25 (1, 70) 11 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.0, 3.3)
Nowata County 2 Rural 78.3 (58.6, 103.4) 19 (1, 66) 11 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.3, 4.8)
Johnston County 2 Rural 85.3 (64.7, 110.8) 8 (1, 62) 12 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.8, 2.0)
Craig County 2 Rural 57.5 (44.0, 74.5) 58 (14, 72) 12 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.5, -0.3)
Hughes County 2 Rural 72.4 (55.9, 92.7) 26 (1, 68) 13 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.8, 0.7)
Woodward County 2 Rural 50.4 (39.0, 64.4) 66 (29, 72) 13 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.9, 1.2)
Okfuskee County 2 Rural 83.3 (64.5, 106.5) 12 (1, 61) 14 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.3, 3.5)
Atoka County 2 Rural 71.2 (55.2, 90.8) 28 (1, 68) 14 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.5, 4.0)
Latimer County 2 Rural 89.5 (69.6, 114.5) 3 (1, 54) 14 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.4, 3.2)
Choctaw County 2 Rural 63.1 (48.9, 80.6) 47 (8, 71) 14 falling falling trend -4.2 (-6.8, -2.0)
Jackson County 2 Rural 47.9 (37.4, 60.5) 67 (38, 72) 15 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.0, -1.9)
Custer County 2 Rural 44.8 (35.0, 56.5) 69 (46, 72) 15 falling falling trend -10.4 (-31.3, -1.8)
Haskell County 2 Rural 86.6 (67.9, 109.6) 5 (1, 57) 15 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.4, 2.8)
Pushmataha County 2 Rural 85.7 (67.5, 108.3) 6 (1, 56) 16 stable stable trend 5.0 (-3.1, 25.8)
Murray County 2 Rural 76.0 (59.9, 95.8) 22 (1, 66) 16 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.5, -0.2)
Adair County 2 Rural 64.3 (50.9, 80.3) 45 (7, 69) 16 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.2, 1.9)
Beckham County 2 Rural 64.7 (51.4, 80.5) 44 (6, 70) 17 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.5, 2.4)
Pawnee County 2 Urban 89.0 (72.5, 108.7) 4 (1, 46) 21 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.2, 4.0)
Marshall County 2 Rural 82.9 (67.7, 101.1) 13 (1, 52) 22 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.3, 1.8)
Caddo County 2 Rural 70.4 (58.2, 84.6) 35 (4, 65) 24 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.1, 0.1)
Seminole County 2 Rural 71.1 (58.8, 85.6) 29 (4, 65) 24 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.2)
Garvin County 2 Rural 70.7 (58.5, 84.9) 34 (4, 65) 25 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.6, 1.2)
McIntosh County 2 Rural 82.4 (68.5, 98.8) 15 (1, 51) 28 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.5, 1.4)
McClain County 2 Urban 59.4 (50.3, 69.9) 53 (22, 69) 31 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.4, -1.3)
Pontotoc County 2 Rural 65.0 (55.3, 76.0) 43 (15, 66) 33 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.6)
McCurtain County 2 Rural 84.0 (71.9, 97.7) 11 (1, 43) 36 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.5, 0.5)
Lincoln County 2 Urban 75.5 (64.9, 87.5) 23 (3, 53) 38 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.8, 0.8)
Ottawa County 2 Rural 92.0 (79.2, 106.5) 1 (1, 29) 39 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 0.8)
Logan County 2 Urban 61.1 (52.7, 70.6) 52 (19, 68) 40 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.9, 0.2)
Carter County 2 Rural 65.8 (57.0, 75.6) 40 (16, 65) 42 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.4, -1.0)
Bryan County 2 Rural 69.3 (60.2, 79.6) 36 (8, 60) 42 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.4)
Stephens County 2 Rural 65.4 (56.7, 75.1) 41 (16, 65) 43 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.7)
Okmulgee County 2 Urban 84.7 (73.7, 97.0) 9 (1, 39) 44 falling falling trend -1.5 (-4.5, -0.5)
Osage County 2 Urban 61.5 (53.5, 70.6) 50 (24, 67) 44 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.7, 0.6)
Kay County 2 Rural 72.0 (62.6, 82.5) 27 (6, 55) 45 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.6, 0.3)
Sequoyah County 2 Urban 81.2 (70.9, 92.8) 17 (1, 44) 46 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.5, 0.9)
Garfield County 2 Urban 58.7 (51.3, 67.0) 55 (30, 68) 46 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.9, 0.6)
Mayes County 2 Rural 84.1 (73.4, 96.1) 10 (1, 37) 47 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.1)
Payne County 2 Rural 58.9 (51.5, 67.2) 54 (29, 68) 47 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.9, -0.4)
Delaware County 2 Rural 61.5 (53.8, 70.4) 49 (22, 68) 47 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.4, -0.6)
Le Flore County 2 Rural 70.8 (61.9, 80.7) 33 (8, 57) 48 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.5, -0.1)
Cherokee County 2 Rural 80.7 (70.8, 91.7) 18 (2, 43) 50 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.4)
Washington County 2 Rural 66.3 (58.3, 75.2) 37 (16, 63) 51 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.7)
Grady County 2 Urban 71.0 (62.4, 80.5) 31 (8, 57) 52 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.3)
Pittsburg County 2 Rural 81.2 (71.5, 92.0) 16 (2, 42) 53 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.7, 0.6)
Wagoner County 2 Urban 56.0 (49.8, 62.8) 61 (36, 69) 61 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.3, -1.0)
Muskogee County 2 Rural 77.5 (69.3, 86.4) 21 (4, 45) 68 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.5)
Creek County 2 Urban 74.0 (66.6, 82.1) 24 (7, 47) 76 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.5)
Rogers County 2 Urban 61.4 (55.3, 68.0) 51 (28, 65) 76 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.2)
Pottawatomie County 2 Rural 85.3 (76.9, 94.4) 7 (1, 30) 78 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.5)
Comanche County 2 Urban 65.9 (59.6, 72.7) 39 (21, 59) 84 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.2, 0.3)
Canadian County 2 Urban 53.8 (48.8, 59.1) 65 (45, 69) 89 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.4, -0.8)
Cleveland County 2 Urban 55.1 (51.5, 58.9) 62 (46, 68) 180 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.2, -1.3)
Tulsa County 2 Urban 54.7 (52.3, 57.2) 63 (50, 67) 415 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.5, -1.8)
Oklahoma County 2 Urban 56.7 (54.4, 59.0) 59 (47, 65) 490 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.5, -1.7)
Beaver County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cimarron County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harmon County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roger Mills County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/12/2026 3:39 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top