Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Tennessee by County

Lung & Bronchus (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Tennessee 2 N/A 66.6 (65.8, 67.4) N/A 5,999 falling falling trend -4.3 (-5.9, -2.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 52.5 (52.4, 52.6) N/A 222,606 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.0, -3.1)
Lake County 2 Rural 70.4 (47.5, 101.7) 65 (2, 95) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-5.1, 4.3)
Moore County 2 Rural 61.2 (41.8, 88.5) 87 (7, 95) 7 stable stable trend -1.5 (-6.2, 3.6)
Pickett County 2 Rural 76.4 (52.1, 111.5) 43 (1, 94) 7 falling falling trend -4.4 (-24.1, -0.5)
Van Buren County 2 Rural 73.8 (52.0, 103.9) 54 (2, 94) 8 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.6, 4.1)
Clay County 2 Rural 67.5 (48.9, 92.7) 75 (6, 95) 9 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.5, -0.3)
Perry County 2 Rural 71.3 (52.5, 96.0) 63 (3, 94) 10 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.5, 0.5)
Houston County 2 Rural 83.6 (62.7, 110.5) 22 (1, 93) 11 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.6, 4.0)
Hancock County 2 Rural 110.5 (81.6, 147.4) 3 (1, 79) 11 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.6, 4.7)
Trousdale County 2 Urban 119.5 (92.8, 151.8) 1 (1, 45) 14 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.8, 3.3)
Grundy County 2 Rural 67.5 (52.8, 85.8) 74 (8, 94) 15 falling falling trend -2.5 (-10.0, -0.5)
Cannon County 2 Urban 75.3 (59.0, 95.1) 47 (5, 94) 15 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.4, 1.3)
Stewart County 2 Urban 76.5 (60.2, 96.5) 42 (4, 93) 16 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.6, 1.4)
Lewis County 2 Rural 76.9 (60.8, 96.9) 39 (4, 93) 16 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.1, 1.6)
Meigs County 2 Rural 79.7 (62.8, 100.6) 35 (2, 93) 16 stable stable trend -2.0 (-6.9, 0.5)
Chester County 2 Urban 73.7 (58.8, 91.7) 55 (5, 93) 17 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.4, 4.9)
Crockett County 2 Urban 88.3 (70.2, 110.0) 14 (1, 86) 17 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.0, 3.4)
Sequatchie County 2 Urban 69.3 (55.2, 86.5) 66 (10, 94) 18 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.7, 2.2)
Jackson County 2 Rural 92.0 (73.6, 114.6) 9 (1, 81) 19 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.5, 1.5)
Polk County 2 Urban 66.6 (53.7, 82.3) 76 (11, 94) 19 falling falling trend -12.5 (-23.5, -4.3)
Unicoi County 2 Urban 62.4 (50.4, 77.1) 84 (24, 94) 19 falling falling trend -3.4 (-13.7, -0.4)
Haywood County 2 Rural 67.9 (54.8, 83.8) 73 (11, 94) 20 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.8, 3.2)
Bledsoe County 2 Rural 86.0 (69.6, 105.8) 19 (2, 84) 20 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.4, 3.3)
Wayne County 2 Rural 81.4 (66.1, 99.9) 27 (3, 90) 20 stable stable trend -1.5 (-14.4, 2.4)
Johnson County 2 Rural 66.0 (53.6, 81.2) 77 (14, 94) 20 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.2, 3.6)
Decatur County 2 Rural 106.0 (86.2, 129.9) 4 (1, 51) 21 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.3, 2.9)
Morgan County 2 Urban 73.0 (59.8, 88.7) 56 (7, 93) 22 falling falling trend -6.2 (-16.7, -2.1)
Fentress County 2 Rural 69.1 (56.5, 84.3) 67 (12, 94) 22 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.3, 0.1)
Benton County 2 Rural 81.6 (66.8, 99.3) 26 (3, 89) 23 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.8, 1.5)
Smith County 2 Urban 86.2 (71.0, 104.0) 18 (2, 82) 24 stable stable trend -1.8 (-8.6, 0.2)
Scott County 2 Rural 87.9 (73.0, 105.2) 16 (2, 78) 25 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.0, 0.9)
Humphreys County 2 Rural 88.2 (73.4, 105.7) 15 (2, 76) 26 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.5, 0.9)
DeKalb County 2 Rural 87.9 (73.1, 105.1) 17 (1, 78) 26 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.6, 2.2)
Lauderdale County 2 Rural 78.9 (65.6, 94.2) 36 (6, 87) 26 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.8, 1.8)
Lincoln County 2 Rural 51.0 (42.5, 60.9) 94 (70, 95) 27 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.6, -0.3)
Hardeman County 2 Rural 75.1 (62.9, 89.2) 49 (8, 90) 28 falling falling trend -5.7 (-18.1, -0.5)
McNairy County 2 Rural 70.6 (59.2, 84.0) 64 (14, 93) 28 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.5, 2.3)
Overton County 2 Rural 81.1 (68.0, 96.5) 30 (4, 87) 28 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.5, 0.9)
White County 2 Rural 67.9 (57.1, 80.5) 72 (16, 93) 29 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.3)
Macon County 2 Urban 93.1 (78.5, 109.9) 8 (1, 65) 30 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.9, 1.6)
Henderson County 2 Rural 76.1 (64.5, 89.5) 46 (8, 89) 31 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.0, 0.9)
Weakley County 2 Rural 72.0 (61.1, 84.5) 59 (13, 92) 32 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.8, 1.9)
Union County 2 Urban 114.6 (97.4, 134.4) 2 (1, 20) 34 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.7, 2.8)
Carroll County 2 Rural 81.2 (69.0, 95.1) 29 (5, 82) 34 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.0, 2.5)
Hickman County 2 Urban 99.9 (85.4, 116.5) 6 (1, 48) 35 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.6, 2.1)
Hardin County 2 Rural 79.8 (68.2, 93.3) 34 (5, 84) 36 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.8)
Marion County 2 Urban 81.4 (69.6, 94.9) 28 (5, 81) 36 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.9, 1.8)
Fayette County 2 Urban 51.2 (43.8, 59.7) 93 (77, 94) 36 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.9, 1.8)
Grainger County 2 Urban 95.7 (82.0, 111.4) 7 (1, 53) 37 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.7, 14.9)
Giles County 2 Rural 76.2 (65.4, 88.4) 44 (9, 87) 37 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
Obion County 2 Rural 80.2 (68.9, 93.1) 32 (6, 84) 38 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.7)
Cheatham County 2 Urban 76.6 (65.8, 88.8) 40 (9, 88) 40 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.6, 0.5)
Marshall County 2 Rural 91.9 (79.5, 105.8) 10 (2, 58) 41 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.3, 2.3)
Dyer County 2 Rural 82.5 (71.5, 94.9) 24 (5, 79) 42 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.5)
Henry County 2 Rural 74.9 (64.8, 86.5) 51 (12, 88) 42 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.2)
Franklin County 2 Rural 65.0 (56.4, 74.9) 78 (31, 93) 43 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 0.9)
Rhea County 2 Rural 91.3 (79.3, 104.9) 12 (2, 58) 43 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.1)
Lawrence County 2 Rural 72.7 (63.3, 83.3) 57 (16, 89) 44 falling falling trend -12.3 (-18.8, -4.1)
Claiborne County 2 Rural 91.5 (79.7, 104.8) 11 (2, 55) 45 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 0.8)
Bedford County 2 Rural 77.8 (67.9, 88.9) 38 (9, 85) 46 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.8)
Warren County 2 Rural 85.4 (74.8, 97.2) 20 (4, 68) 48 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.0, 2.5)
Cocke County 2 Rural 82.7 (72.5, 94.2) 23 (6, 75) 50 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.6, 2.2)
Gibson County 2 Urban 78.6 (69.5, 88.7) 37 (9, 78) 55 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.5)
Coffee County 2 Rural 75.2 (66.7, 84.6) 48 (14, 83) 58 falling falling trend -12.4 (-17.6, -7.8)
Dickson County 2 Urban 82.0 (72.7, 92.3) 25 (7, 70) 59 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.2)
Tipton County 2 Urban 80.2 (71.1, 90.2) 33 (7, 76) 60 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.0, 2.2)
McMinn County 2 Rural 73.9 (65.7, 83.1) 53 (17, 85) 61 stable stable trend -7.9 (-16.3, 0.3)
Putnam County 2 Rural 64.5 (57.4, 72.2) 80 (43, 93) 63 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.3, -0.5)
Roane County 2 Urban 68.3 (60.8, 76.7) 70 (30, 89) 63 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.6, -0.3)
Campbell County 2 Urban 105.9 (94.6, 118.5) 5 (1, 19) 66 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.3, 1.4)
Hamblen County 2 Urban 75.0 (67.0, 83.7) 50 (15, 81) 66 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.4)
Monroe County 2 Rural 91.2 (81.3, 102.0) 13 (3, 50) 68 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 1.6)
Robertson County 2 Urban 76.5 (68.3, 85.5) 41 (14, 81) 68 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.5)
Jefferson County 2 Urban 80.6 (72.1, 90.0) 31 (9, 72) 69 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.9, 1.5)
Carter County 2 Urban 76.1 (68.1, 84.9) 45 (13, 80) 70 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.8, 0.2)
Loudon County 2 Urban 68.0 (60.8, 76.0) 71 (29, 90) 72 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.8)
Madison County 2 Urban 57.8 (52.0, 64.1) 90 (67, 94) 77 falling falling trend -10.1 (-19.7, -1.2)
Hawkins County 2 Urban 84.3 (75.9, 93.5) 21 (6, 62) 78 falling falling trend -5.7 (-12.2, -2.3)
Cumberland County 2 Rural 60.8 (54.5, 67.8) 88 (56, 94) 78 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.3)
Greene County 2 Rural 72.0 (65.0, 79.7) 60 (24, 85) 83 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.3)
Anderson County 2 Urban 74.3 (67.4, 81.8) 52 (19, 79) 88 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.1)
Bradley County 2 Urban 61.5 (55.8, 67.6) 86 (58, 93) 90 falling falling trend -5.4 (-15.0, -0.8)
Maury County 2 Urban 68.4 (62.1, 75.1) 68 (35, 88) 92 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.3)
Williamson County 2 Urban 38.1 (34.8, 41.7) 95 (94, 95) 102 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.5, -1.9)
Sevier County 2 Rural 71.3 (65.3, 77.9) 62 (30, 83) 108 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.2)
Wilson County 2 Urban 62.9 (57.8, 68.4) 83 (56, 91) 117 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.8, -1.0)
Washington County 2 Urban 62.1 (57.1, 67.5) 85 (59, 92) 118 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.6, -0.4)
Montgomery County 2 Urban 68.3 (62.8, 74.2) 69 (39, 87) 121 falling falling trend -6.3 (-10.7, -2.4)
Blount County 2 Urban 71.6 (66.5, 77.0) 61 (31, 78) 153 stable stable trend -1.2 (-8.1, 0.5)
Sumner County 2 Urban 63.9 (59.5, 68.6) 81 (56, 89) 160 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.3)
Sullivan County 2 Urban 72.2 (67.6, 77.2) 58 (31, 78) 187 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.8, -0.1)
Rutherford County 2 Urban 63.0 (59.0, 67.3) 82 (60, 90) 195 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.3)
Hamilton County 2 Urban 60.5 (57.5, 63.7) 89 (71, 91) 303 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.8)
Knox County 2 Urban 64.6 (61.7, 67.6) 79 (61, 87) 385 falling falling trend -4.7 (-6.9, -2.7)
Davidson County 2 Urban 55.7 (53.2, 58.3) 91 (83, 94) 398 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.5, -2.2)
Shelby County 2 Urban 54.0 (51.9, 56.1) 92 (86, 94) 560 falling falling trend -1.4 (-3.0, -0.9)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/12/2026 11:23 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top