Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Washington by County

Lung & Bronchus (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Washington 1 N/A 47.8 (47.2, 48.4) N/A 4,483 falling falling trend -4.5 (-6.1, -2.9)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 52.5 (52.4, 52.6) N/A 222,606 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.0, -3.1)
Columbia County 2 Rural 38.8 (21.5, 70.3) 31 (1, 38) 3 stable stable trend -2.0 (-8.0, 3.6)
Wahkiakum County 2 Rural 28.1 (15.8, 54.4) 38 (10, 38) 3 falling falling trend -5.3 (-10.3, -0.8)
Ferry County 2 Rural 39.7 (25.8, 61.4) 30 (2, 38) 6 stable stable trend -4.7 (-9.9, 0.1)
Adams County 2 Rural 34.8 (23.7, 49.1) 34 (9, 38) 7 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.2, 0.4)
Lincoln County 2 Rural 35.6 (24.5, 51.4) 33 (7, 38) 7 falling falling trend -3.8 (-7.9, -0.3)
Skamania County 2 Urban 41.7 (29.9, 57.9) 26 (3, 38) 9 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.3, 2.3)
San Juan County 7 Rural 29.3 (22.2, 39.4) 37 (27, 38) 12 stable stable trend -1.5 (-2.8, 0.0)
Pend Oreille County 2 Rural 47.8 (36.1, 63.3) 14 (1, 36) 13 falling falling trend -4.0 (-7.5, -0.8)
Asotin County 2 Urban 32.0 (24.4, 41.8) 36 (21, 38) 13 falling falling trend -10.4 (-33.0, -4.5)
Whitman County 2 Rural 34.7 (27.0, 44.1) 35 (17, 38) 14 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.1, 0.3)
Klickitat County 2 Rural 47.8 (38.5, 59.2) 15 (2, 34) 20 falling falling trend -14.9 (-21.8, -5.8)
Kittitas County 2 Rural 40.9 (33.7, 49.3) 27 (10, 37) 24 stable stable trend -14.2 (-29.5, 0.9)
Douglas County 2 Urban 48.0 (40.2, 57.1) 13 (3, 33) 27 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.5, 1.3)
Pacific County 2 Rural 62.7 (52.9, 74.6) 2 (1, 16) 33 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.6, -0.2)
Walla Walla County 2 Urban 37.3 (31.7, 43.8) 32 (18, 37) 33 falling falling trend -6.9 (-16.1, -3.0)
Stevens County 2 Urban 40.0 (33.9, 47.2) 28 (13, 36) 33 falling falling trend -13.5 (-27.7, -0.1)
Franklin County 2 Urban 44.7 (38.0, 52.2) 23 (7, 34) 34 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.9, -1.5)
Jefferson County 7 Rural 39.8 (33.5, 47.6) 29 (13, 37) 35 falling falling trend -4.3 (-10.8, -2.6)
Okanogan County 2 Rural 61.0 (52.8, 70.4) 4 (1, 15) 42 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.5, 2.5)
Grant County 2 Rural 46.4 (40.9, 52.6) 19 (7, 32) 52 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.9, 0.1)
Chelan County 2 Urban 47.4 (41.8, 53.6) 17 (6, 31) 55 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.0)
Lewis County 2 Rural 51.8 (46.3, 57.9) 11 (3, 24) 68 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.1, -1.3)
Mason County 7 Rural 66.9 (60.0, 74.5) 1 (1, 6) 74 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -0.9)
Island County 7 Rural 47.7 (42.8, 53.2) 16 (7, 29) 74 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.8)
Grays Harbor County 7 Rural 62.3 (56.0, 69.1) 3 (1, 10) 79 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.8, -2.3)
Clallam County 7 Rural 52.6 (47.4, 58.3) 9 (3, 22) 85 falling falling trend -3.1 (-12.9, -1.0)
Cowlitz County 2 Urban 56.9 (51.7, 62.6) 6 (2, 15) 92 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.1)
Skagit County 7 Urban 53.3 (48.8, 58.1) 8 (3, 19) 109 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.5)
Benton County 2 Urban 45.2 (41.4, 49.2) 21 (11, 31) 110 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.8, -1.6)
Yakima County 2 Urban 44.9 (41.4, 48.6) 22 (12, 31) 125 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.2, -1.5)
Whatcom County 7 Urban 45.5 (42.1, 49.2) 20 (11, 30) 135 falling falling trend -5.9 (-10.9, -2.8)
Kitsap County 7 Urban 49.5 (46.3, 52.9) 12 (8, 23) 189 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.4)
Thurston County 7 Urban 55.9 (52.5, 59.3) 7 (3, 13) 221 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.2)
Clark County 2 Urban 47.0 (44.5, 49.6) 18 (11, 26) 284 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.3, -3.0)
Spokane County 2 Urban 43.2 (41.0, 45.5) 24 (17, 31) 299 falling falling trend -6.2 (-12.9, -3.6)
Snohomish County 7 Urban 52.1 (49.9, 54.3) 10 (6, 16) 477 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.9, -1.5)
Pierce County 7 Urban 58.5 (56.3, 60.7) 5 (2, 9) 597 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.6, -2.0)
King County 7 Urban 42.3 (41.2, 43.6) 25 (21, 31) 1,004 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.0, -2.1)
Garfield County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/12/2026 6:44 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

7 Source: SEER November 2024 submission.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top