Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Colorado by County

Lung & Bronchus (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Colorado 2 N/A 37.0 (36.4, 37.7) N/A 2,421 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.4, -1.9)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 52.5 (52.4, 52.6) N/A 222,606 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.0, -3.1)
Adams County 2 Urban 46.5 (43.7, 49.5) 5 (2, 15) 212 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -1.1)
Alamosa County 2 Rural 32.1 (21.6, 46.4) 35 (4, 46) 6 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.9, 2.8)
Arapahoe County 2 Urban 37.1 (35.0, 39.2) 23 (13, 31) 257 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.2, -1.6)
Archuleta County 2 Rural 29.3 (19.4, 43.7) 38 (5, 46) 7 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.7, 2.4)
Baca County 2 Rural 61.7 (34.9, 104.4) 1 (1, 43) 4
*
*
Bent County 2 Rural 42.1 (24.8, 69.6) 13 (1, 46) 4 stable stable trend -1.9 (-7.4, 3.9)
Boulder County 2 Urban 33.1 (30.4, 35.9) 32 (21, 39) 122 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.9, 8.4)
Broomfield County 2 Urban 33.5 (28.1, 39.6) 30 (11, 42) 28 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.4, -0.3)
Chaffee County 2 Rural 28.1 (20.6, 38.4) 40 (13, 46) 10 stable stable trend -2.7 (-5.7, 0.4)
Clear Creek County 2 Urban 34.4 (22.6, 52.3) 28 (2, 46) 6 falling falling trend -4.2 (-7.4, -0.8)
Custer County 2 Rural 23.5 (13.2, 48.1) 44 (9, 47) 3
*
*
Delta County 2 Rural 38.2 (30.9, 47.1) 18 (3, 40) 22 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.0, 1.2)
Denver County 2 Urban 37.9 (35.8, 40.1) 19 (11, 30) 251 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.9, -1.9)
Douglas County 2 Urban 30.9 (28.3, 33.7) 37 (25, 41) 109 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.7, -2.1)
Eagle County 2 Rural 15.4 (10.6, 21.5) 46 (41, 47) 8 falling falling trend -4.6 (-7.0, -1.8)
El Paso County 2 Urban 37.3 (35.3, 39.3) 22 (13, 31) 284 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.0, -2.0)
Elbert County 2 Urban 41.3 (31.8, 53.1) 15 (2, 40) 14 stable stable trend -2.7 (-11.9, 0.2)
Fremont County 2 Rural 45.5 (39.1, 53.0) 6 (1, 27) 37 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.3, -0.4)
Garfield County 2 Rural 34.0 (27.9, 41.2) 29 (9, 42) 24 stable stable trend -2.4 (-4.6, 0.0)
Grand County 2 Rural 25.7 (15.9, 39.8) 42 (9, 47) 5 stable stable trend -3.7 (-8.9, 1.8)
Gunnison County 2 Rural 32.2 (20.2, 48.5) 34 (3, 47) 5 stable stable trend -3.7 (-8.6, 1.2)
Huerfano County 2 Rural 35.3 (21.9, 57.5) 26 (2, 46) 5 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.3, -0.6)
Jefferson County 2 Urban 37.9 (35.9, 39.9) 20 (11, 30) 282 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.1)
Kit Carson County 2 Rural 32.3 (18.7, 53.5) 33 (2, 47) 3 stable stable trend -1.3 (-8.9, 5.3)
La Plata County 2 Rural 27.4 (22.2, 33.7) 41 (23, 45) 21 falling falling trend -4.2 (-6.4, -2.1)
Larimer County 2 Urban 34.5 (32.0, 37.2) 27 (17, 36) 149 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.1, -0.8)
Las Animas County 2 Rural 43.4 (32.8, 57.5) 9 (1, 39) 12 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.9, 2.9)
Lincoln County 2 Rural 55.9 (34.6, 87.0) 2 (1, 43) 4
*
*
Logan County 2 Rural 41.1 (31.3, 53.4) 16 (1, 40) 12 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.4, 0.2)
Mesa County 2 Urban 43.0 (39.2, 47.2) 10 (3, 23) 98 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.7, -1.7)
Moffat County 2 Rural 50.1 (35.6, 68.8) 4 (1, 39) 8 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.6, 4.2)
Montezuma County 2 Rural 32.1 (24.8, 41.2) 36 (10, 44) 14 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.5, -1.8)
Montrose County 2 Rural 41.9 (35.5, 49.4) 14 (3, 33) 32 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.7, -1.5)
Morgan County 2 Rural 37.4 (28.9, 47.8) 21 (3, 42) 13 falling falling trend -3.1 (-6.1, -0.5)
Otero County 2 Rural 36.9 (27.6, 48.8) 24 (3, 43) 11 falling falling trend -4.5 (-7.7, -1.9)
Park County 2 Urban 28.2 (19.0, 41.3) 39 (8, 46) 9 falling falling trend -4.3 (-7.3, -1.1)
Pitkin County 2 Rural 20.8 (13.4, 31.6) 45 (27, 47) 5 stable stable trend -1.5 (-6.1, 3.9)
Prowers County 2 Rural 51.3 (36.4, 70.8) 3 (1, 37) 8 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.7, 3.8)
Pueblo County 2 Urban 45.5 (41.7, 49.6) 7 (2, 18) 110 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.3)
Rio Blanco County 2 Rural 44.9 (26.3, 72.6) 8 (1, 45) 4 falling falling trend -4.0 (-7.5, -1.0)
Rio Grande County 2 Rural 33.4 (22.6, 48.6) 31 (3, 46) 7
*
*
Routt County 2 Rural 24.6 (17.2, 34.5) 43 (18, 47) 8 stable stable trend -4.2 (-8.3, 0.6)
Saguache County 2 Rural 42.5 (24.4, 70.4) 12 (1, 46) 4
*
*
Summit County 2 Rural 14.2 (8.8, 21.9) 47 (41, 47) 5
*
*
Teller County 2 Urban 36.5 (27.6, 47.7) 25 (4, 43) 14 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.6, 0.9)
Washington County 2 Rural 42.7 (24.3, 72.3) 11 (1, 47) 3
*
*
Weld County 2 Urban 40.4 (37.2, 43.6) 17 (7, 28) 132 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.6)
Cheyenne County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Conejos County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Costilla County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crowley County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dolores County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gilpin County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hinsdale County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kiowa County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mineral County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ouray County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Phillips County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Juan County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Miguel County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sedgwick County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yuma County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/11/2026 10:17 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top