Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Michigan by County

Lung & Bronchus (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Michigan 2 N/A 58.7 (58.1, 59.3) N/A 8,123 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -1.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 52.5 (52.4, 52.6) N/A 222,606 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.0, -3.1)
Alcona County 2 Rural 73.5 (58.9, 93.5) 13 (1, 69) 19 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.9, 0.5)
Alger County 2 Rural 52.7 (37.7, 73.6) 61 (7, 82) 9 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.2, 0.4)
Allegan County 2 Rural 50.7 (45.8, 56.0) 67 (44, 77) 84 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.6)
Alpena County 2 Rural 79.9 (68.6, 92.8) 7 (1, 38) 40 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 1.5)
Antrim County 2 Rural 51.6 (42.2, 63.1) 66 (20, 81) 24 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.0, -1.2)
Arenac County 2 Rural 79.0 (64.1, 97.3) 9 (1, 57) 22 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.8, 2.5)
Baraga County 2 Rural 43.5 (29.4, 63.8) 75 (16, 82) 6 falling falling trend -5.3 (-9.5, -1.8)
Barry County 2 Urban 53.0 (46.4, 60.5) 59 (27, 76) 48 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.3, 0.9)
Bay County 2 Urban 64.7 (59.1, 70.6) 31 (12, 53) 106 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -0.2)
Benzie County 2 Urban 56.9 (45.5, 70.9) 51 (9, 80) 19 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.2, 1.0)
Berrien County 2 Urban 67.0 (62.3, 72.0) 20 (9, 45) 158 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Branch County 2 Rural 60.6 (52.2, 70.2) 43 (10, 73) 39 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.3)
Calhoun County 2 Urban 62.2 (57.1, 67.6) 40 (15, 56) 117 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.4)
Cass County 2 Urban 58.3 (50.9, 66.5) 47 (15, 73) 49 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.5, 0.1)
Charlevoix County 2 Rural 43.0 (34.8, 53.0) 76 (46, 82) 21 falling falling trend -7.1 (-20.1, -1.7)
Cheboygan County 2 Rural 55.9 (46.6, 67.0) 52 (15, 78) 29 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.0, 1.2)
Chippewa County 2 Rural 65.2 (55.5, 76.3) 27 (6, 69) 33 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.7, 1.2)
Clare County 2 Rural 91.2 (80.0, 103.9) 3 (1, 14) 52 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.3)
Clinton County 2 Urban 40.5 (35.2, 46.5) 79 (67, 82) 44 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.7)
Crawford County 2 Rural 68.8 (54.8, 86.5) 18 (2, 73) 18 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.0, 1.1)
Delta County 2 Rural 61.4 (53.0, 71.1) 42 (10, 72) 41 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.3, 2.8)
Dickinson County 2 Rural 53.6 (44.1, 65.0) 55 (16, 80) 23 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.6, 2.4)
Eaton County 2 Urban 53.1 (47.9, 58.6) 58 (37, 75) 83 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Emmet County 2 Rural 48.6 (40.6, 58.1) 71 (36, 81) 28 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.4, 0.2)
Genesee County 2 Urban 61.4 (58.6, 64.5) 41 (24, 52) 353 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.1)
Gladwin County 2 Rural 99.8 (86.8, 114.7) 1 (1, 9) 48 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.7, 3.1)
Gogebic County 2 Rural 58.9 (46.2, 75.1) 45 (6, 79) 16 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.5, 1.8)
Grand Traverse County 2 Urban 47.9 (42.9, 53.5) 74 (48, 79) 70 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.4, 0.1)
Gratiot County 2 Rural 65.1 (55.8, 75.7) 29 (7, 66) 36 falling falling trend -9.9 (-17.3, -0.2)
Hillsdale County 2 Rural 70.6 (61.9, 80.4) 15 (4, 52) 50 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.6, 2.3)
Houghton County 2 Rural 48.9 (40.3, 59.0) 70 (31, 81) 23 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.0, 0.9)
Huron County 2 Rural 57.0 (48.2, 67.2) 50 (14, 77) 34 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.3)
Ingham County 2 Urban 52.3 (48.7, 56.1) 64 (43, 74) 163 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
Ionia County 2 Urban 65.1 (57.4, 73.7) 28 (8, 61) 54 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.3, 2.1)
Iosco County 2 Rural 79.4 (68.1, 92.7) 8 (1, 40) 41 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.9, 1.7)
Iron County 2 Rural 69.2 (54.7, 88.0) 17 (2, 73) 18 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.7, 1.3)
Isabella County 2 Rural 64.6 (56.1, 74.1) 32 (8, 66) 44 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.5, 1.0)
Jackson County 2 Urban 74.1 (69.0, 79.4) 12 (5, 28) 170 falling falling trend -1.5 (-3.2, -0.7)
Kalamazoo County 2 Urban 52.1 (48.5, 55.9) 65 (45, 74) 162 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.4, -0.7)
Kalkaska County 2 Urban 95.1 (79.3, 113.7) 2 (1, 20) 28 rising rising trend 12.4 (0.4, 22.4)
Kent County 2 Urban 52.6 (50.2, 55.1) 62 (48, 72) 390 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6)
Lake County 2 Rural 84.7 (68.1, 105.4) 4 (1, 48) 20 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.6, 1.7)
Lapeer County 2 Urban 67.0 (60.8, 73.8) 21 (9, 50) 92 falling falling trend -8.5 (-13.6, -1.7)
Leelanau County 2 Urban 32.8 (25.8, 41.9) 82 (72, 82) 17 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.5, 1.3)
Lenawee County 2 Rural 52.7 (47.5, 58.5) 60 (37, 76) 78 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.2, -0.1)
Livingston County 2 Urban 53.3 (49.4, 57.5) 56 (41, 73) 146 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -0.9)
Luce County 2 Rural 55.6 (36.8, 82.6) 53 (3, 82) 6 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.2, 0.7)
Mackinac County 2 Rural 48.2 (35.0, 66.4) 73 (10, 82) 10 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.7, -0.4)
Macomb County 2 Urban 67.1 (65.0, 69.2) 19 (14, 37) 807 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.8)
Manistee County 2 Rural 64.1 (54.1, 76.0) 33 (7, 71) 31 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.3)
Marquette County 2 Rural 50.6 (44.2, 57.8) 68 (37, 79) 48 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.6, -0.1)
Mason County 2 Rural 58.2 (48.8, 69.3) 48 (12, 76) 30 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.8, -0.5)
Mecosta County 2 Rural 62.7 (53.7, 72.9) 38 (9, 71) 38 falling falling trend -5.1 (-10.0, -2.6)
Menominee County 2 Rural 66.7 (55.6, 79.9) 22 (5, 72) 28 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.0, 4.1)
Midland County 2 Urban 60.1 (54.1, 66.7) 44 (16, 66) 75 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.6)
Missaukee County 2 Rural 63.7 (50.1, 80.5) 36 (3, 77) 16 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.0, 2.1)
Monroe County 2 Urban 52.5 (48.3, 57.0) 63 (42, 74) 120 falling falling trend -3.2 (-10.7, -1.8)
Montcalm County 2 Urban 76.8 (68.8, 85.6) 10 (3, 35) 70 stable stable trend -0.9 (-8.8, 0.8)
Montmorency County 2 Rural 74.1 (57.2, 96.8) 11 (1, 72) 15 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.7, 2.3)
Muskegon County 2 Urban 53.3 (49.1, 57.7) 57 (40, 74) 129 falling falling trend -8.8 (-14.6, -1.5)
Newaygo County 2 Rural 70.4 (62.1, 79.7) 16 (5, 51) 55 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.4)
Oakland County 2 Urban 50.4 (48.9, 51.9) 69 (56, 74) 868 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.5, -2.2)
Oceana County 2 Rural 48.3 (39.4, 59.0) 72 (28, 82) 22 falling falling trend -5.3 (-15.2, -0.2)
Ogemaw County 2 Rural 66.5 (55.6, 79.6) 23 (4, 70) 29 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.7, 0.3)
Ontonagon County 2 Rural 41.4 (28.7, 66.0) 78 (24, 82) 7 stable stable trend -3.2 (-7.4, 0.6)
Osceola County 2 Rural 73.3 (61.1, 87.6) 14 (2, 57) 27 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.9, 2.8)
Oscoda County 2 Rural 82.0 (60.7, 110.0) 6 (1, 72) 13 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.4, 2.6)
Otsego County 2 Rural 53.9 (43.8, 66.0) 54 (15, 81) 21 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.4)
Ottawa County 2 Urban 38.8 (35.9, 41.8) 81 (74, 82) 141 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.2)
Presque Isle County 2 Rural 38.9 (28.9, 53.1) 80 (48, 82) 11 stable stable trend -3.2 (-7.1, 0.0)
Roscommon County 2 Rural 83.4 (71.3, 97.6) 5 (1, 33) 43 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.4, 1.7)
Saginaw County 2 Urban 58.8 (54.8, 63.0) 46 (26, 63) 167 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.7)
Sanilac County 2 Rural 64.9 (56.5, 74.5) 30 (8, 64) 45 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.5, 2.3)
Schoolcraft County 2 Rural 62.3 (46.1, 84.9) 39 (2, 81) 10 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.4, 1.4)
Shiawassee County 2 Rural 62.9 (56.0, 70.6) 37 (11, 62) 64 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.4, 1.8)
St. Clair County 2 Urban 63.8 (59.3, 68.7) 35 (14, 52) 155 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.8)
St. Joseph County 2 Rural 65.9 (58.3, 74.5) 25 (8, 58) 56 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.9, -0.1)
Tuscola County 2 Rural 64.0 (56.4, 72.4) 34 (9, 62) 55 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.1)
Van Buren County 2 Rural 57.6 (51.4, 64.5) 49 (19, 72) 66 falling falling trend -7.7 (-15.3, -2.4)
Washtenaw County 2 Urban 42.9 (40.0, 45.9) 77 (70, 81) 178 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.0, -1.3)
Wayne County 2 Urban 66.0 (64.5, 67.6) 24 (17, 37) 1,468 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.4, -2.3)
Wexford County 2 Rural 65.7 (55.8, 77.0) 26 (6, 67) 34 falling falling trend -3.1 (-11.0, -1.1)
Keweenaw County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/12/2026 4:30 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top