Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Arkansas by County

Melanoma of the Skin (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Arkansas 2 N/A 24.7 (24.0, 25.5) N/A 889 stable stable trend -2.6 (-6.8, 1.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 23.1 (23.0, 23.2) N/A 91,120 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.2)
Arkansas County 2 Rural 20.2 (12.6, 31.2) 39 (4, 53) 5
*
*
Ashley County 2 Rural 21.0 (13.8, 31.2) 36 (6, 52) 6 stable stable trend 3.5 (-1.2, 9.7)
Baxter County 2 Rural 22.1 (17.1, 28.3) 34 (11, 48) 17 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.5, 0.8)
Benton County 2 Urban 33.5 (30.6, 36.7) 6 (1, 16) 98 stable stable trend 3.9 (-0.5, 5.5)
Boone County 2 Rural 18.1 (12.9, 24.8) 44 (16, 52) 9 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.0, 2.7)
Carroll County 2 Rural 28.0 (20.4, 37.6) 14 (1, 45) 11 rising rising trend 5.0 (1.9, 9.3)
Clark County 2 Rural 16.3 (9.9, 25.5) 48 (14, 53) 4
*
*
Clay County 2 Rural 18.0 (10.7, 29.0) 45 (10, 53) 4 stable stable trend 4.1 (-0.6, 10.1)
Cleburne County 2 Rural 30.0 (22.0, 40.3) 11 (1, 43) 12 stable stable trend 3.7 (-0.3, 9.3)
Conway County 2 Rural 27.4 (18.9, 38.7) 17 (1, 49) 7 rising rising trend 5.9 (0.6, 14.0)
Craighead County 2 Urban 26.0 (22.0, 30.6) 23 (7, 39) 30 rising rising trend 3.1 (1.1, 5.5)
Crawford County 2 Urban 29.6 (24.1, 36.0) 13 (2, 37) 22 rising rising trend 4.5 (2.5, 7.1)
Crittenden County 2 Urban 8.9 (5.6, 13.6) 53 (47, 53) 5
*
*
Cross County 2 Rural 23.5 (14.6, 36.0) 30 (2, 52) 5 stable stable trend 1.9 (-3.2, 7.5)
Drew County 2 Rural 31.2 (20.9, 45.0) 9 (1, 47) 6
*
*
Faulkner County 2 Urban 33.7 (29.2, 38.7) 5 (1, 22) 42 rising rising trend 4.9 (2.7, 8.1)
Franklin County 2 Rural 26.4 (17.4, 38.7) 21 (1, 50) 6 stable stable trend 1.2 (-3.1, 6.1)
Fulton County 2 Rural 31.9 (18.6, 50.8) 8 (1, 51) 5 stable stable trend 3.9 (-1.1, 9.7)
Garland County 2 Urban 22.7 (19.1, 26.8) 32 (14, 45) 33 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.8, 5.9)
Grant County 2 Urban 23.7 (15.2, 35.4) 28 (2, 52) 5 stable stable trend 1.9 (-3.3, 8.6)
Greene County 2 Rural 22.6 (17.0, 29.3) 33 (8, 49) 12 rising rising trend 3.0 (0.1, 6.5)
Hempstead County 2 Rural 17.1 (10.5, 26.6) 46 (12, 53) 4 rising rising trend 4.5 (0.3, 10.0)
Hot Spring County 2 Rural 27.5 (20.7, 35.9) 16 (2, 44) 12 rising rising trend 4.8 (0.8, 10.3)
Independence County 2 Rural 27.3 (20.9, 35.2) 18 (2, 44) 13 rising rising trend 4.8 (1.9, 8.8)
Izard County 2 Rural 19.7 (12.1, 31.3) 40 (5, 53) 5
*
*
Jackson County 2 Rural 21.7 (13.7, 33.0) 35 (3, 53) 5
*
*
Jefferson County 2 Rural 18.4 (14.3, 23.3) 42 (22, 51) 15 rising rising trend 5.1 (1.4, 9.8)
Johnson County 2 Rural 29.7 (21.9, 39.7) 12 (1, 43) 10 stable stable trend 2.6 (-1.1, 7.2)
Lawrence County 2 Rural 26.1 (16.6, 39.2) 22 (1, 51) 5 stable stable trend 4.1 (-0.4, 9.7)
Logan County 2 Rural 24.9 (17.4, 34.8) 26 (2, 50) 8 stable stable trend 3.2 (-0.2, 7.3)
Lonoke County 2 Urban 35.8 (30.0, 42.3) 2 (1, 21) 28 rising rising trend 7.4 (5.6, 10.0)
Madison County 2 Urban 20.5 (13.0, 31.3) 38 (4, 52) 5
*
*
Marion County 2 Rural 12.5 (7.1, 21.3) 52 (29, 53) 4 stable stable trend -0.8 (-7.7, 6.6)
Miller County 2 Urban 15.0 (10.4, 21.1) 49 (27, 53) 7
*
*
Mississippi County 2 Rural 13.5 (9.0, 19.4) 50 (32, 53) 6 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.5, 6.5)
Ouachita County 2 Rural 17.0 (10.7, 25.9) 47 (15, 53) 5
*
*
Perry County 2 Urban 37.5 (22.6, 58.7) 1 (1, 48) 4
*
*
Poinsett County 2 Urban 30.3 (21.5, 41.5) 10 (1, 46) 8 rising rising trend 7.4 (4.4, 11.9)
Polk County 2 Rural 18.2 (11.5, 27.8) 43 (11, 53) 5 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.0, 4.7)
Pope County 2 Rural 23.5 (18.8, 29.1) 29 (9, 47) 18 stable stable trend -5.1 (-26.0, 4.3)
Prairie County 2 Rural 35.8 (19.8, 59.7) 3 (1, 50) 3
*
*
Pulaski County 2 Urban 27.0 (24.8, 29.2) 20 (9, 31) 123 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.2, 4.8)
Randolph County 2 Rural 19.5 (12.0, 30.2) 41 (6, 53) 4
*
*
Saline County 2 Urban 32.2 (28.2, 36.6) 7 (1, 22) 49 stable stable trend -2.8 (-8.7, 1.4)
Searcy County 2 Rural 35.1 (19.9, 58.2) 4 (1, 51) 4
*
*
Sebastian County 2 Urban 26.0 (22.4, 30.0) 24 (7, 38) 39 rising rising trend 4.6 (3.3, 9.1)
Sharp County 2 Rural 25.2 (16.8, 36.8) 25 (1, 50) 7 stable stable trend 2.7 (-2.0, 8.6)
Stone County 2 Rural 24.8 (13.4, 41.9) 27 (1, 53) 3 stable stable trend 4.0 (-2.3, 11.7)
Union County 2 Rural 12.5 (8.3, 18.1) 51 (35, 53) 6 stable stable trend -1.0 (-5.5, 3.5)
Van Buren County 2 Rural 27.5 (18.2, 40.5) 15 (1, 50) 7 stable stable trend 4.4 (-1.2, 12.0)
Washington County 2 Urban 23.3 (20.6, 26.3) 31 (15, 41) 54 falling falling trend -8.6 (-14.6, -0.2)
White County 2 Rural 27.2 (22.4, 32.8) 19 (4, 39) 24 rising rising trend 3.8 (1.9, 6.0)
Yell County 2 Rural 20.7 (13.1, 31.4) 37 (5, 53) 5 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.8, 6.8)
Bradley County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chicot County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cleveland County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Columbia County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dallas County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Desha County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Howard County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lafayette County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lee County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Little River County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nevada County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Newton County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Phillips County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scott County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sevier County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
St. Francis County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Woodruff County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/11/2026 10:57 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top