Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Minnesota by County

Melanoma of the Skin (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Minnesota 2 N/A 38.8 (38.1, 39.5) N/A 2,574 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.1, 2.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 23.1 (23.0, 23.2) N/A 91,120 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.2)
Aitkin County 2 Rural 23.6 (16.1, 34.9) 74 (32, 79) 8
*
*
Anoka County 2 Urban 38.7 (35.9, 41.6) 34 (22, 53) 159 stable stable trend 2.5 (-1.0, 6.9)
Becker County 2 Rural 47.2 (37.9, 58.1) 16 (2, 58) 21 rising rising trend 5.5 (2.6, 9.5)
Beltrami County 2 Rural 36.0 (28.8, 44.6) 50 (12, 73) 19
*
*
Benton County 2 Urban 33.9 (26.5, 42.8) 54 (16, 75) 15 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.0, 6.1)
Blue Earth County 2 Urban 41.3 (34.6, 48.9) 27 (8, 61) 29 rising rising trend 4.3 (2.1, 7.1)
Brown County 2 Rural 49.2 (37.9, 62.9) 11 (1, 61) 16 rising rising trend 5.0 (2.8, 7.8)
Carlton County 2 Urban 32.6 (25.3, 41.4) 60 (17, 76) 15 stable stable trend 2.4 (-1.5, 7.1)
Carver County 2 Urban 45.6 (40.1, 51.6) 19 (6, 44) 53 rising rising trend 4.6 (3.1, 6.9)
Cass County 2 Rural 36.3 (28.5, 45.9) 48 (9, 73) 19 rising rising trend 3.9 (1.2, 7.4)
Chippewa County 2 Rural 47.0 (31.6, 67.4) 17 (1, 73) 7
*
*
Chisago County 2 Urban 36.8 (30.4, 44.1) 46 (14, 69) 25 rising rising trend 5.6 (3.1, 9.6)
Clay County 2 Urban 56.9 (48.8, 65.9) 3 (1, 23) 37 rising rising trend 8.0 (5.7, 11.5)
Cook County 2 Rural 49.3 (27.7, 82.8) 10 (1, 78) 4
*
*
Cottonwood County 2 Rural 35.6 (22.6, 53.8) 51 (3, 79) 5
*
*
Crow Wing County 2 Rural 45.6 (39.2, 52.8) 20 (4, 49) 43 rising rising trend 4.1 (1.3, 7.8)
Dakota County 2 Urban 43.3 (40.7, 46.0) 25 (14, 39) 217 stable stable trend -0.2 (-5.7, 5.2)
Dodge County 2 Urban 53.9 (41.1, 69.6) 6 (1, 51) 12 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.8, 5.6)
Douglas County 2 Rural 37.7 (30.3, 46.4) 41 (10, 70) 22 rising rising trend 3.7 (0.3, 8.0)
Faribault County 2 Rural 40.6 (28.0, 57.3) 29 (2, 76) 8 stable stable trend 3.1 (-1.7, 9.1)
Fillmore County 2 Urban 32.7 (23.5, 44.5) 58 (12, 78) 10 falling falling trend -21.6 (-37.1, -1.1)
Freeborn County 2 Rural 17.8 (12.3, 25.2) 79 (64, 79) 8 falling falling trend -9.7 (-32.8, -3.4)
Goodhue County 2 Rural 55.5 (46.9, 65.4) 5 (1, 29) 33 stable stable trend -11.6 (-27.0, 4.3)
Hennepin County 2 Urban 33.3 (31.9, 34.7) 57 (43, 64) 470 rising rising trend 3.1 (2.4, 4.0)
Houston County 2 Urban 21.8 (14.3, 32.4) 77 (43, 79) 6 falling falling trend -34.6 (-48.0, -21.1)
Hubbard County 2 Rural 38.6 (28.8, 51.1) 35 (5, 73) 13 rising rising trend 4.4 (1.2, 8.9)
Isanti County 2 Urban 38.2 (30.5, 47.2) 38 (10, 69) 18 rising rising trend 6.0 (3.3, 10.1)
Itasca County 2 Rural 40.0 (32.2, 49.2) 30 (8, 68) 22 rising rising trend 5.5 (2.2, 9.6)
Jackson County 2 Rural 44.2 (28.3, 66.3) 23 (1, 77) 6
*
*
Kanabec County 2 Rural 19.9 (12.2, 31.1) 78 (47, 79) 5
*
*
Kandiyohi County 2 Rural 44.4 (36.1, 54.0) 22 (3, 60) 23 rising rising trend 5.1 (3.2, 7.5)
Koochiching County 2 Rural 23.2 (15.0, 35.9) 76 (30, 79) 5 stable stable trend 4.8 (-0.9, 12.2)
Lac qui Parle County 2 Rural 27.4 (15.0, 48.3) 70 (9, 79) 3
*
*
Lake County 2 Rural 32.3 (20.3, 49.8) 61 (5, 79) 6 stable stable trend -19.3 (-43.2, 8.0)
Le Sueur County 2 Urban 38.9 (30.3, 49.4) 31 (7, 70) 15 rising rising trend 4.6 (2.7, 7.2)
Lincoln County 2 Rural 58.4 (34.0, 94.0) 2 (1, 76) 4
*
*
Lyon County 2 Rural 37.0 (27.7, 48.6) 45 (8, 75) 11 rising rising trend 4.3 (1.7, 7.7)
Marshall County 2 Rural 41.2 (24.8, 64.6) 28 (1, 79) 5
*
*
Martin County 2 Rural 36.2 (26.3, 49.1) 49 (7, 76) 10 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.6, 6.0)
McLeod County 2 Rural 27.4 (21.0, 35.2) 69 (34, 79) 14 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.6, 5.3)
Meeker County 2 Rural 28.8 (20.4, 39.6) 67 (21, 79) 9 rising rising trend 4.1 (0.5, 8.8)
Mille Lacs County 2 Urban 33.4 (24.9, 43.9) 55 (13, 78) 11 rising rising trend 4.7 (2.7, 7.3)
Morrison County 2 Rural 26.6 (19.9, 35.0) 71 (33, 79) 12 rising rising trend 3.1 (1.1, 5.7)
Mower County 2 Rural 24.5 (18.7, 31.5) 72 (50, 79) 13 falling falling trend -8.0 (-18.3, -3.0)
Murray County 2 Rural 34.9 (19.6, 58.0) 52 (2, 79) 4
*
*
Nicollet County 2 Urban 53.6 (43.6, 65.3) 7 (1, 39) 21 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.6, 1.2)
Nobles County 2 Rural 31.0 (21.9, 42.6) 62 (14, 78) 8 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.6, 5.4)
Norman County 2 Rural 44.2 (24.4, 73.9) 24 (1, 79) 4
*
*
Olmsted County 2 Urban 65.8 (60.5, 71.6) 1 (1, 7) 117 falling falling trend -9.7 (-15.5, -5.3)
Otter Tail County 2 Rural 48.9 (41.8, 56.9) 12 (2, 41) 43 rising rising trend 5.0 (3.2, 7.3)
Pennington County 2 Rural 38.5 (25.9, 55.4) 36 (2, 78) 7 stable stable trend 3.2 (-1.0, 8.6)
Pine County 2 Rural 29.3 (22.1, 38.4) 66 (25, 78) 13
*
*
Pipestone County 2 Rural 55.9 (36.5, 82.0) 4 (1, 71) 6
*
*
Polk County 2 Urban 37.1 (28.3, 47.8) 44 (7, 74) 13 rising rising trend 6.6 (3.6, 10.9)
Pope County 2 Rural 30.3 (18.5, 47.4) 64 (7, 79) 5 stable stable trend 4.1 (-1.2, 11.3)
Ramsey County 2 Urban 34.5 (32.4, 36.7) 53 (37, 63) 209 rising rising trend 4.8 (3.7, 6.2)
Redwood County 2 Rural 47.8 (34.3, 65.2) 15 (1, 69) 9
*
*
Renville County 2 Rural 37.4 (25.2, 53.5) 43 (4, 77) 7 stable stable trend 4.5 (0.0, 10.1)
Rice County 2 Rural 38.3 (32.2, 45.3) 37 (12, 66) 30 rising rising trend 5.4 (2.8, 9.0)
Rock County 2 Urban 33.4 (19.7, 53.2) 56 (2, 79) 4
*
*
Roseau County 2 Rural 23.5 (14.2, 36.7) 75 (28, 79) 4
*
*
Scott County 2 Urban 38.8 (34.5, 43.6) 32 (17, 60) 61 rising rising trend 3.0 (1.6, 4.8)
Sherburne County 2 Urban 38.7 (33.3, 44.7) 33 (13, 63) 39 rising rising trend 4.4 (2.6, 6.6)
Sibley County 2 Rural 29.5 (19.2, 43.5) 65 (12, 79) 6 stable stable trend 3.2 (-2.1, 10.8)
St. Louis County 2 Urban 36.5 (33.0, 40.4) 47 (23, 62) 90 stable stable trend -4.3 (-14.1, 6.0)
Stearns County 2 Urban 38.2 (33.9, 42.8) 39 (19, 60) 63 rising rising trend 10.2 (4.7, 20.4)
Steele County 2 Rural 48.1 (38.9, 58.9) 14 (2, 52) 21 rising rising trend 7.3 (4.7, 11.0)
Stevens County 2 Rural 37.7 (21.5, 61.1) 40 (1, 79) 4
*
*
Swift County 2 Rural 23.8 (13.5, 39.9) 73 (21, 79) 4
*
*
Todd County 2 Rural 42.4 (31.8, 55.3) 26 (3, 73) 13
*
*
Wabasha County 2 Urban 50.3 (38.6, 64.7) 9 (1, 57) 15 falling falling trend -18.5 (-32.9, -1.3)
Wadena County 2 Rural 45.1 (31.5, 62.7) 21 (1, 73) 8 rising rising trend 4.5 (1.8, 8.0)
Waseca County 2 Rural 32.7 (22.6, 45.8) 59 (10, 79) 7 stable stable trend -14.7 (-28.8, 2.3)
Washington County 2 Urban 51.0 (47.4, 54.8) 8 (4, 23) 159 rising rising trend 4.7 (3.4, 6.4)
Watonwan County 2 Rural 28.7 (17.5, 44.8) 68 (11, 79) 4
*
*
Wilkin County 2 Rural 48.6 (28.6, 77.9) 13 (1, 78) 4
*
*
Winona County 2 Rural 45.9 (37.9, 55.1) 18 (3, 55) 26 stable stable trend -6.3 (-17.2, 2.3)
Wright County 2 Urban 37.6 (33.3, 42.4) 42 (19, 63) 56 rising rising trend 3.9 (2.5, 5.9)
Yellow Medicine County 2 Rural 31.0 (19.4, 48.1) 63 (7, 79) 5
*
*
Big Stone County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clearwater County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kittson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake of the Woods County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mahnomen County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Red Lake County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Traverse County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/12/2026 5:23 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top