Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Mississippi by County

Melanoma of the Skin (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Mississippi 2 N/A 19.2 (18.5, 19.9) N/A 655 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.4, 1.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 23.1 (23.0, 23.2) N/A 91,120 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.2)
Adams County 2 Rural 10.9 (6.7, 16.9) 52 (28, 54) 4 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.5, 6.7)
Alcorn County 2 Rural 16.0 (10.8, 22.9) 38 (12, 53) 7 stable stable trend -2.5 (-6.3, 0.9)
Amite County 2 Rural 21.4 (11.7, 36.2) 24 (1, 54) 4
*
*
Attala County 2 Rural 18.6 (11.6, 28.7) 34 (4, 53) 5
*
*
Bolivar County 2 Rural 13.2 (8.0, 20.5) 45 (16, 54) 4
*
*
Clarke County 2 Rural 23.1 (14.6, 35.3) 13 (1, 51) 5 stable stable trend 0.3 (-4.4, 5.4)
Copiah County 2 Urban 22.4 (15.6, 31.4) 15 (2, 46) 8 stable stable trend 0.9 (-4.1, 6.3)
Covington County 2 Rural 22.4 (14.4, 33.7) 14 (1, 51) 5
*
*
DeSoto County 2 Urban 18.2 (15.5, 21.2) 35 (16, 43) 35 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.5, 5.9)
Forrest County 2 Urban 30.5 (25.1, 36.6) 3 (1, 21) 24 rising rising trend 4.0 (1.6, 6.8)
George County 2 Rural 28.7 (19.6, 40.5) 6 (1, 41) 7 rising rising trend 7.0 (2.6, 13.2)
Grenada County 2 Rural 20.9 (12.9, 31.9) 27 (1, 52) 5 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.5, 4.2)
Hancock County 2 Urban 18.6 (13.8, 24.8) 33 (8, 49) 11 stable stable trend -14.5 (-37.1, 2.6)
Harrison County 2 Urban 22.0 (19.3, 24.9) 18 (9, 34) 53 stable stable trend 4.3 (-0.9, 17.1)
Hinds County 2 Urban 11.4 (9.5, 13.5) 49 (39, 53) 28 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.7, 3.0)
Itawamba County 2 Rural 21.2 (14.4, 30.4) 25 (3, 49) 6 stable stable trend -0.8 (-5.2, 3.8)
Jackson County 2 Urban 21.6 (18.6, 25.1) 20 (9, 36) 38 stable stable trend -1.9 (-8.0, 0.6)
Jasper County 2 Rural 21.5 (13.1, 33.6) 23 (1, 53) 4
*
*
Jones County 2 Rural 29.3 (23.8, 35.5) 4 (1, 26) 22 stable stable trend 2.9 (-0.8, 6.9)
Lafayette County 2 Rural 22.4 (17.0, 29.1) 16 (3, 42) 12 stable stable trend 3.5 (-0.2, 8.3)
Lamar County 2 Urban 34.5 (28.5, 41.4) 2 (1, 15) 24 rising rising trend 4.5 (2.0, 7.9)
Lauderdale County 2 Rural 14.9 (11.5, 19.1) 42 (24, 52) 14 falling falling trend -14.7 (-36.9, -2.5)
Lawrence County 2 Rural 25.4 (14.5, 41.5) 10 (1, 52) 4
*
*
Leake County 2 Rural 15.3 (9.2, 24.1) 40 (10, 54) 4
*
*
Lee County 2 Rural 21.1 (17.0, 25.9) 26 (7, 42) 19 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.4, 1.4)
Leflore County 2 Rural 11.0 (6.2, 18.1) 50 (24, 54) 3 stable stable trend 1.6 (-4.2, 7.9)
Lincoln County 2 Rural 21.6 (15.5, 29.5) 21 (3, 47) 9 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.8, 3.4)
Lowndes County 2 Rural 10.9 (7.7, 15.2) 51 (34, 54) 8 stable stable trend -12.2 (-32.4, 1.8)
Madison County 2 Urban 34.8 (30.1, 40.1) 1 (1, 10) 41 rising rising trend 3.5 (1.3, 6.3)
Marion County 2 Rural 28.9 (20.6, 39.6) 5 (1, 39) 8 stable stable trend 3.4 (-1.3, 8.8)
Marshall County 2 Urban 7.9 (4.5, 12.9) 53 (40, 54) 4 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.6, 6.3)
Monroe County 2 Rural 14.2 (9.5, 20.6) 43 (17, 54) 6 falling falling trend -5.3 (-23.8, -0.1)
Neshoba County 2 Rural 19.0 (12.7, 27.3) 32 (5, 52) 6 falling falling trend -6.3 (-30.1, -0.9)
Newton County 2 Rural 19.5 (12.3, 29.4) 30 (3, 52) 5 stable stable trend 0.0 (-5.8, 6.6)
Oktibbeha County 2 Rural 15.7 (10.7, 22.4) 39 (12, 53) 7 stable stable trend -14.7 (-36.7, 0.5)
Panola County 2 Rural 12.2 (7.7, 18.5) 47 (23, 54) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-5.0, 5.2)
Pearl River County 2 Rural 24.2 (19.2, 30.2) 12 (3, 38) 17 stable stable trend 2.9 (-0.1, 6.4)
Perry County 2 Urban 26.9 (16.3, 42.4) 9 (1, 49) 4 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.7, 3.0)
Pike County 2 Rural 22.1 (16.3, 29.4) 17 (3, 44) 10 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.9, 7.2)
Pontotoc County 2 Rural 17.6 (11.7, 25.5) 36 (7, 52) 6 stable stable trend -1.0 (-5.0, 3.0)
Prentiss County 2 Rural 13.5 (8.2, 21.3) 44 (14, 54) 4
*
*
Rankin County 2 Urban 28.7 (25.2, 32.5) 7 (1, 18) 51 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.4, 4.8)
Scott County 2 Urban 11.6 (6.9, 18.4) 48 (24, 54) 4 falling falling trend -6.4 (-12.1, -2.6)
Simpson County 2 Urban 19.5 (12.7, 28.5) 31 (4, 52) 6 rising rising trend 4.3 (1.0, 8.4)
Smith County 2 Rural 25.0 (16.0, 37.7) 11 (1, 49) 5
*
*
Stone County 2 Urban 28.6 (19.1, 41.3) 8 (1, 42) 6
*
*
Tate County 2 Urban 21.6 (14.8, 30.6) 22 (2, 49) 7
*
*
Tippah County 2 Rural 19.9 (12.9, 29.7) 29 (2, 52) 5 stable stable trend -3.1 (-10.2, 0.4)
Tishomingo County 2 Rural 17.5 (10.7, 27.2) 37 (6, 54) 5 stable stable trend -1.9 (-7.0, 2.9)
Union County 2 Rural 21.9 (15.3, 30.5) 19 (2, 47) 7 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.5, 4.2)
Walthall County 2 Rural 20.0 (11.5, 32.6) 28 (1, 54) 4
*
*
Warren County 2 Rural 13.1 (9.1, 18.3) 46 (24, 54) 7 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.6, 4.0)
Washington County 2 Rural 7.3 (4.3, 11.6) 54 (43, 54) 4
*
*
Wayne County 2 Rural 15.0 (8.3, 24.9) 41 (8, 54) 3 stable stable trend -1.7 (-8.1, 4.3)
Benton County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chickasaw County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Choctaw County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Claiborne County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coahoma County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Holmes County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Humphreys County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Issaquena County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson Davis County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kemper County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Noxubee County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Quitman County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sharkey County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sunflower County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tallahatchie County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tunica County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkinson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winston County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yalobusha County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yazoo County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/11/2026 9:19 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top