Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Illinois by County

Melanoma of the Skin (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Illinois 7 N/A 23.8 (23.4, 24.1) N/A 3,559 rising rising trend 3.2 (2.8, 3.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 23.1 (23.0, 23.2) N/A 91,120 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.2)
Brown County 7 Rural 53.5 (32.0, 84.7) 1 (1, 84) 4
*
*
Piatt County 7 Urban 49.4 (36.3, 65.9) 2 (1, 54) 11 rising rising trend 4.7 (2.3, 8.0)
Menard County 7 Urban 47.3 (33.0, 66.1) 3 (1, 66) 8
*
*
Putnam County 7 Rural 46.6 (24.9, 79.8) 4 (1, 91) 3
*
*
Pike County 7 Rural 46.3 (32.7, 63.6) 5 (1, 66) 9 rising rising trend 7.7 (4.6, 12.4)
Mason County 7 Rural 45.1 (31.2, 63.5) 6 (1, 76) 8 rising rising trend 4.2 (1.0, 8.4)
Washington County 7 Rural 44.3 (31.6, 60.8) 7 (1, 74) 9
*
*
Mercer County 7 Urban 43.1 (30.4, 59.6) 8 (1, 78) 9 stable stable trend 3.1 (-0.7, 7.9)
Clinton County 7 Urban 41.8 (33.6, 51.4) 9 (1, 54) 20 rising rising trend 6.4 (4.4, 9.4)
Stark County 7 Urban 41.4 (22.5, 71.1) 10 (1, 91) 3
*
*
Clay County 7 Rural 41.4 (28.0, 59.1) 11 (1, 84) 7 rising rising trend 5.9 (3.7, 8.9)
DeKalb County 7 Urban 40.9 (35.4, 47.0) 12 (2, 39) 41 rising rising trend 5.9 (4.2, 8.6)
Tazewell County 7 Urban 40.6 (36.2, 45.5) 13 (3, 34) 66 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.5, 4.6)
Franklin County 7 Rural 40.0 (32.2, 49.3) 14 (1, 56) 20 rising rising trend 4.9 (2.6, 7.9)
Cumberland County 7 Rural 39.9 (25.0, 60.6) 15 (1, 87) 5
*
*
Adams County 7 Rural 39.4 (33.3, 46.4) 16 (2, 46) 34 rising rising trend 4.8 (3.0, 7.2)
Bureau County 7 Rural 39.1 (30.8, 49.1) 17 (2, 63) 18 rising rising trend 4.2 (1.4, 8.3)
Douglas County 7 Rural 38.9 (28.7, 51.8) 18 (1, 74) 10
*
*
Vermilion County 7 Rural 38.7 (33.1, 45.0) 19 (3, 46) 38 rising rising trend 6.0 (3.9, 9.0)
Effingham County 7 Rural 38.5 (30.4, 48.2) 20 (2, 65) 17 rising rising trend 4.1 (1.9, 7.3)
Woodford County 7 Urban 38.4 (30.5, 47.8) 21 (2, 65) 18 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.2, 5.4)
Hancock County 7 Rural 37.7 (27.8, 50.6) 22 (1, 76) 11 rising rising trend 4.1 (1.0, 8.4)
Monroe County 7 Urban 37.3 (29.3, 46.9) 23 (2, 67) 16 rising rising trend 3.2 (1.3, 6.0)
Marion County 7 Rural 37.2 (29.6, 46.1) 24 (3, 69) 18 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.3, 4.9)
Shelby County 7 Rural 36.8 (26.8, 49.6) 25 (1, 83) 11 rising rising trend 6.0 (2.2, 12.1)
Champaign County 7 Urban 36.8 (33.1, 40.9) 26 (8, 45) 74 rising rising trend 3.8 (2.2, 5.9)
Ogle County 7 Rural 36.1 (29.7, 43.5) 27 (3, 63) 24 rising rising trend 3.4 (1.5, 6.0)
Sangamon County 7 Urban 36.0 (32.5, 39.7) 28 (10, 46) 87 rising rising trend 6.1 (5.0, 8.1)
McLean County 7 Urban 35.7 (31.7, 40.0) 29 (8, 50) 62 rising rising trend 2.2 (1.3, 3.4)
Henry County 7 Urban 35.4 (28.7, 43.3) 30 (4, 67) 22 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.2, 3.8)
Fulton County 7 Rural 34.5 (26.9, 43.7) 31 (4, 77) 15 rising rising trend 3.8 (1.5, 6.7)
McHenry County 7 Urban 33.4 (30.7, 36.3) 32 (17, 50) 121 rising rising trend 3.7 (2.3, 5.7)
Moultrie County 7 Rural 32.9 (21.5, 48.2) 33 (2, 90) 6
*
*
Jefferson County 7 Rural 32.7 (25.6, 41.2) 34 (4, 79) 16 rising rising trend 3.5 (1.0, 6.8)
Carroll County 7 Rural 32.4 (23.4, 44.6) 35 (4, 86) 9 rising rising trend 10.1 (5.2, 33.1)
Logan County 7 Rural 32.4 (24.3, 42.5) 36 (5, 84) 11 stable stable trend 5.3 (-3.8, 20.4)
Ford County 7 Urban 31.9 (20.8, 47.1) 37 (2, 90) 6
*
*
Lake County 7 Urban 31.6 (29.8, 33.4) 38 (28, 53) 253 rising rising trend 6.3 (5.3, 8.0)
Knox County 7 Rural 31.5 (25.5, 38.4) 39 (11, 78) 22 rising rising trend 3.0 (1.4, 5.0)
Iroquois County 7 Rural 31.3 (23.2, 41.5) 41 (6, 87) 11 rising rising trend 4.8 (2.3, 8.4)
Perry County 7 Rural 31.1 (22.1, 42.7) 40 (4, 88) 9 rising rising trend 3.6 (0.9, 7.2)
Bond County 7 Urban 30.7 (20.5, 44.4) 42 (3, 91) 6 rising rising trend 4.3 (1.5, 8.1)
Macon County 7 Urban 30.7 (26.3, 35.5) 43 (17, 72) 40 rising rising trend 2.8 (1.0, 5.0)
Macoupin County 7 Urban 30.6 (24.4, 38.0) 44 (12, 82) 19 stable stable trend 2.4 (0.0, 5.3)
Stephenson County 7 Rural 30.1 (23.8, 37.7) 45 (12, 84) 18 rising rising trend 6.2 (3.1, 10.9)
Henderson County 7 Rural 29.9 (16.1, 52.8) 48 (1, 91) 3
*
*
Peoria County 7 Urban 29.8 (26.5, 33.4) 46 (26, 69) 64 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.8, 3.6)
Kendall County 7 Urban 29.5 (25.4, 34.2) 49 (22, 75) 38 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.6, 4.9)
Jasper County 7 Rural 29.5 (17.6, 47.4) 47 (2, 91) 4
*
*
Williamson County 7 Rural 29.4 (24.3, 35.4) 50 (17, 82) 25 stable stable trend -4.3 (-15.9, 3.0)
Jersey County 7 Urban 29.1 (20.5, 40.3) 51 (6, 90) 8 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.8, 7.2)
Hamilton County 7 Rural 28.7 (15.6, 49.1) 52 (2, 91) 3
*
*
Christian County 7 Rural 27.9 (21.2, 36.3) 53 (12, 88) 13 rising rising trend 4.0 (1.9, 6.8)
Madison County 7 Urban 27.7 (25.1, 30.5) 54 (36, 74) 90 rising rising trend 3.5 (2.5, 4.7)
La Salle County 7 Rural 27.1 (23.2, 31.4) 55 (32, 82) 39 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.4, 1.9)
Montgomery County 7 Rural 27.0 (19.6, 36.5) 56 (11, 90) 10 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.0, 4.9)
Fayette County 7 Rural 26.9 (18.8, 37.5) 57 (9, 90) 8
*
*
Grundy County 7 Urban 26.6 (20.9, 33.4) 60 (21, 88) 16 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.4, 4.9)
Greene County 7 Rural 26.6 (16.5, 41.4) 58 (5, 91) 5 stable stable trend 3.7 (-0.8, 10.8)
Jackson County 7 Rural 26.6 (20.7, 33.7) 59 (21, 88) 15 rising rising trend 3.0 (0.5, 6.3)
Crawford County 7 Rural 26.5 (17.9, 38.1) 61 (8, 91) 7
*
*
Marshall County 7 Urban 26.5 (16.0, 41.8) 62 (4, 91) 5
*
*
Jo Daviess County 7 Rural 25.5 (18.7, 34.8) 63 (18, 90) 11 rising rising trend 3.1 (1.5, 5.1)
Randolph County 7 Rural 25.4 (18.7, 33.8) 64 (20, 91) 11 rising rising trend 2.6 (0.4, 5.3)
Coles County 7 Rural 25.3 (19.6, 32.3) 65 (26, 89) 15 rising rising trend 3.8 (0.4, 8.4)
Livingston County 7 Rural 25.3 (19.1, 32.9) 66 (24, 90) 12 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.3, 4.9)
Kane County 7 Urban 25.2 (23.4, 27.1) 67 (49, 80) 146 rising rising trend 3.7 (2.9, 5.0)
St. Clair County 7 Urban 25.0 (22.5, 27.8) 68 (46, 83) 76 rising rising trend 4.1 (2.9, 5.7)
DuPage County 7 Urban 24.6 (23.3, 26.0) 69 (54, 80) 277 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.8, 3.5)
Rock Island County 7 Urban 24.5 (21.3, 28.1) 71 (44, 86) 46 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.1, 3.7)
Lee County 7 Rural 24.5 (18.4, 32.1) 70 (24, 90) 12 rising rising trend 2.9 (0.5, 6.1)
Richland County 7 Rural 23.9 (14.9, 36.5) 72 (10, 91) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.4, 3.5)
Boone County 7 Urban 23.6 (18.4, 29.8) 73 (34, 90) 15 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.5, 5.8)
Whiteside County 7 Rural 23.4 (18.8, 29.0) 74 (37, 89) 19 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.4, 3.4)
Saline County 7 Rural 23.0 (15.9, 32.3) 75 (23, 91) 7 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.6, 7.0)
Wayne County 7 Rural 22.9 (14.2, 35.1) 76 (15, 91) 5
*
*
McDonough County 7 Rural 22.9 (15.7, 32.3) 77 (23, 91) 7 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.1, 2.3)
Morgan County 7 Rural 22.8 (16.8, 30.5) 78 (28, 91) 10 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.2, 5.2)
Winnebago County 7 Urban 22.8 (20.5, 25.3) 79 (56, 86) 79 stable stable trend -0.8 (-6.1, 1.6)
Johnson County 7 Rural 22.7 (13.3, 36.5) 81 (11, 91) 4 falling falling trend -3.0 (-6.3, -0.1)
Warren County 7 Rural 22.5 (14.1, 34.4) 80 (17, 91) 5 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.9, 1.7)
De Witt County 7 Rural 22.2 (14.1, 33.9) 82 (20, 91) 5 stable stable trend 2.7 (-1.9, 8.8)
Kankakee County 7 Urban 21.8 (18.2, 25.9) 84 (50, 90) 28 rising rising trend 3.2 (0.9, 6.0)
Will County 7 Urban 21.7 (20.2, 23.3) 83 (66, 87) 165 rising rising trend 3.3 (2.7, 4.0)
Cass County 7 Rural 20.2 (11.5, 33.2) 85 (19, 91) 3 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.4, 6.5)
Clark County 7 Rural 20.2 (12.1, 32.0) 86 (22, 91) 4 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.1, 3.8)
Edgar County 7 Rural 19.5 (11.6, 31.1) 87 (27, 91) 4
*
*
Union County 7 Rural 18.6 (11.6, 28.9) 88 (33, 91) 5
*
*
Lawrence County 7 Rural 18.0 (10.4, 29.2) 89 (33, 91) 4 stable stable trend 0.2 (-4.2, 5.2)
Cook County 7 Urban 16.2 (15.8, 16.7) 90 (83, 91) 963 rising rising trend 2.8 (2.3, 3.3)
White County 7 Rural 15.4 (8.5, 26.3) 91 (44, 91) 3
*
*
Alexander County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gallatin County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardin County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Massac County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pope County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pulaski County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schuyler County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scott County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wabash County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/16/2026 7:13 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

7 Source: SEER November 2024 submission.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top