Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for North Dakota by County

Breast (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
North Dakota 2 N/A 130.3 (125.3, 135.4) N/A 561 rising rising trend 0.5 (0.1, 0.9)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 131.3 (131.1, 131.6) N/A 270,245 rising rising trend 0.6 (0.5, 0.8)
Benson County 2 Rural 185.4 (119.1, 274.8) 1 (1, 29) 5 rising rising trend 13.2 (0.1, 53.2)
Mountrail County 2 Rural 159.4 (110.1, 222.9) 2 (1, 30) 7 stable stable trend 2.4 (-1.4, 7.1)
Nelson County 2 Rural 158.7 (90.1, 269.3) 3 (1, 31) 4 stable stable trend 3.7 (-0.6, 8.9)
Emmons County 2 Rural 154.7 (93.4, 252.3) 4 (1, 31) 5
*
*
Mercer County 2 Rural 153.8 (103.3, 220.3) 5 (1, 30) 7
*
*
Foster County 2 Rural 153.1 (87.5, 253.7) 6 (1, 31) 4 stable stable trend 5.0 (-2.4, 14.7)
Sargent County 2 Rural 152.3 (89.5, 247.4) 7 (1, 31) 4
*
*
McLean County 2 Rural 146.2 (102.7, 202.7) 8 (1, 30) 9 stable stable trend 1.0 (-3.3, 5.5)
Cavalier County 2 Rural 144.8 (73.4, 256.0) 9 (1, 31) 3 stable stable trend 0.1 (-4.6, 3.7)
Pembina County 2 Rural 143.6 (94.2, 211.7) 10 (1, 31) 6 stable stable trend 3.8 (-0.2, 8.3)
Traill County 2 Rural 142.7 (98.1, 202.0) 11 (1, 31) 8 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.8, 6.5)
Pierce County 2 Rural 141.9 (80.7, 234.4) 12 (1, 31) 4
*
*
Burleigh County 2 Urban 140.1 (126.3, 155.0) 13 (4, 23) 84 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.5, 2.2)
Cass County 2 Urban 139.0 (128.1, 150.7) 14 (5, 22) 125 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.5, 1.5)
Bottineau County 2 Rural 138.1 (87.1, 209.2) 15 (1, 31) 6 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.6, 4.2)
Stark County 2 Rural 137.4 (111.9, 166.8) 16 (3, 28) 22 stable stable trend 3.7 (-5.4, 17.8)
Barnes County 2 Rural 137.0 (99.4, 185.2) 17 (1, 30) 11 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.3, 1.2)
Grand Forks County 2 Urban 132.4 (115.1, 151.5) 18 (5, 26) 47 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.3)
Ramsey County 2 Rural 128.5 (91.1, 176.5) 19 (2, 31) 9 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.6, 3.2)
Richland County 2 Rural 128.1 (97.1, 166.3) 20 (3, 30) 13 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.4, 5.3)
Morton County 2 Urban 127.5 (105.3, 153.0) 21 (5, 29) 26 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.6, 4.2)
Ward County 2 Urban 127.4 (110.6, 146.0) 22 (7, 28) 44 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.1, 2.7)
McHenry County 2 Urban 126.0 (75.8, 199.6) 23 (1, 31) 5 stable stable trend -0.7 (-5.9, 4.6)
LaMoure County 2 Rural 124.5 (67.4, 213.9) 24 (1, 31) 4 stable stable trend 0.7 (-4.1, 5.2)
Rolette County 2 Rural 124.2 (87.8, 170.7) 25 (2, 31) 8 falling falling trend -23.9 (-43.1, -1.3)
Wells County 2 Rural 119.7 (69.9, 199.8) 26 (1, 31) 5 stable stable trend 3.7 (-1.0, 9.2)
Walsh County 2 Rural 110.4 (77.4, 154.0) 27 (4, 31) 8 stable stable trend -0.1 (-7.4, 2.3)
Stutsman County 2 Rural 107.0 (83.5, 135.6) 28 (10, 31) 16 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.2, 1.3)
McKenzie County 2 Rural 104.9 (68.6, 152.7) 29 (5, 31) 6 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.7, 4.3)
Williams County 2 Rural 97.3 (76.8, 121.4) 30 (17, 31) 16 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.7, 1.5)
Ransom County 2 Rural 91.1 (52.2, 151.3) 31 (6, 31) 4 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.7, 1.7)
Adams County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Billings County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bowman County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Burke County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickey County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Divide County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dunn County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Eddy County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Golden Valley County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Griggs County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hettinger County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kidder County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Logan County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McIntosh County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oliver County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Renville County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sheridan County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sioux County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Slope County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Steele County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Towner County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/12/2026 9:35 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top