Incidence Rates Table
Incidence Rate Report for North Carolina by County
Breast (All Stages^), 2018-2022
All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages
Sorted by Count
County
|
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
|
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate † cases per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval)
|
CI*Rank ⋔ (95% Confidence Interval)
|
Average Annual Count
|
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates (95% Confidence Interval)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North Carolina 2 | N/A | 144.3 (142.9, 145.6) | N/A | 9,621 |
stable 
|
-0.3 (-1.7, 1.0) |
| US (SEER+NPCR) 1 | N/A | 131.3 (131.1, 131.6) | N/A | 270,245 |
rising 
|
0.6 (0.5, 0.8) |
| Tyrrell County 2 | Rural | 148.4 (79.3, 256.6) | 26 (1, 100) | 3 |
stable
|
2.8 (-2.0, 8.1) |
| Hyde County 2 | Rural | 88.9 (46.8, 160.6) | 98 (2, 100) | 3 |
stable
|
-1.2 (-5.8, 3.3) |
| Gates County 2 | Urban | 66.1 (41.3, 102.2) | 100 (86, 100) | 5 |
falling 
|
-3.6 (-7.5, -0.2) |
| Camden County 2 | Urban | 108.9 (76.0, 152.5) | 92 (4, 100) | 7 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-5.2, 3.9) |
| Graham County 2 | Rural | 143.8 (101.5, 200.0) | 39 (1, 99) | 9 |
stable
|
0.3 (-5.0, 3.6) |
| Alleghany County 2 | Rural | 104.5 (75.6, 143.4) | 96 (10, 100) | 11 |
stable
|
0.3 (-2.8, 3.6) |
| Clay County 2 | Rural | 101.1 (72.7, 139.9) | 97 (13, 100) | 11 |
stable
|
-25.3 (-50.5, 1.6) |
| Jones County 2 | Rural | 154.9 (112.8, 209.2) | 14 (1, 98) | 11 |
stable
|
2.4 (-0.5, 5.8) |
| Swain County 2 | Rural | 122.8 (92.4, 160.8) | 79 (2, 99) | 12 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-2.9, 2.2) |
| Washington County 2 | Rural | 134.2 (101.4, 176.2) | 64 (1, 99) | 13 |
stable
|
0.8 (-1.7, 3.4) |
| Avery County 2 | Rural | 105.8 (80.2, 138.1) | 95 (15, 100) | 14 |
stable
|
1.6 (-1.4, 4.7) |
| Pamlico County 2 | Rural | 126.9 (92.7, 171.7) | 75 (1, 99) | 14 |
stable
|
0.2 (-2.4, 2.6) |
| Perquimans County 2 | Rural | 128.6 (96.3, 169.6) | 71 (1, 99) | 14 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-4.2, 2.6) |
| Currituck County 2 | Urban | 81.0 (63.2, 102.6) | 99 (85, 100) | 16 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-2.9, 1.8) |
| Chowan County 2 | Rural | 142.8 (109.8, 183.7) | 42 (1, 98) | 16 |
stable
|
1.5 (-1.9, 5.1) |
| Mitchell County 2 | Rural | 147.9 (115.6, 187.6) | 28 (1, 97) | 17 |
stable
|
2.4 (-0.3, 5.4) |
| Caswell County 2 | Rural | 108.3 (86.3, 135.2) | 93 (31, 100) | 20 |
falling
|
-12.6 (-22.0, -1.1) |
| Greene County 2 | Rural | 169.5 (135.2, 210.2) | 2 (1, 85) | 20 |
rising
|
12.9 (3.0, 37.0) |
| Bertie County 2 | Rural | 145.6 (114.8, 182.9) | 33 (1, 97) | 20 |
stable
|
1.6 (-0.7, 3.9) |
| Northampton County 2 | Rural | 130.5 (102.8, 164.5) | 70 (1, 98) | 21 |
stable
|
0.6 (-1.7, 3.0) |
| Yancey County 2 | Rural | 146.3 (117.4, 180.9) | 31 (1, 97) | 22 |
stable
|
1.0 (-0.7, 2.7) |
| Warren County 2 | Rural | 144.0 (115.7, 178.1) | 38 (1, 96) | 23 |
stable
|
0.0 (-2.7, 2.7) |
| Hertford County 2 | Rural | 146.9 (118.9, 180.1) | 30 (1, 94) | 23 |
stable
|
0.9 (-0.9, 2.9) |
| Ashe County 2 | Rural | 111.2 (90.0, 136.6) | 90 (29, 99) | 24 |
stable
|
1.0 (-2.4, 4.6) |
| Montgomery County 2 | Rural | 120.7 (98.6, 146.9) | 82 (10, 99) | 24 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-2.2, 1.6) |
| Madison County 2 | Urban | 143.4 (117.5, 174.1) | 40 (1, 96) | 25 |
stable
|
0.6 (-1.6, 3.1) |
| Anson County 2 | Urban | 154.7 (127.2, 187.1) | 15 (1, 91) | 25 |
stable
|
2.7 (-0.5, 6.2) |
| Polk County 2 | Rural | 156.1 (126.9, 191.2) | 12 (1, 92) | 28 |
stable
|
0.5 (-2.5, 3.5) |
| Scotland County 2 | Rural | 127.0 (105.7, 151.5) | 74 (6, 98) | 28 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-2.6, 2.1) |
| Yadkin County 2 | Urban | 107.5 (89.7, 128.1) | 94 (46, 99) | 29 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-2.1, 1.7) |
| Bladen County 2 | Rural | 134.9 (113.3, 159.9) | 63 (3, 95) | 32 |
stable
|
1.0 (-1.6, 3.8) |
| Jackson County 2 | Rural | 118.8 (99.6, 140.9) | 86 (22, 98) | 32 |
stable
|
1.3 (-0.4, 3.2) |
| Pasquotank County 2 | Rural | 118.4 (99.8, 139.6) | 87 (20, 98) | 32 |
falling
|
-6.2 (-14.9, -0.5) |
| Martin County 2 | Rural | 188.8 (158.4, 223.9) | 1 (1, 48) | 33 |
stable
|
1.6 (-0.2, 3.4) |
| Alexander County 2 | Urban | 125.9 (106.6, 148.2) | 77 (9, 97) | 33 |
stable
|
1.2 (-0.5, 3.0) |
| Cherokee County 2 | Rural | 127.8 (106.5, 152.8) | 72 (5, 98) | 35 |
stable
|
0.2 (-1.6, 2.3) |
| Watauga County 2 | Rural | 115.6 (97.9, 135.8) | 89 (27, 98) | 35 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-2.2, 1.4) |
| Hoke County 2 | Urban | 133.7 (114.0, 155.8) | 68 (4, 95) | 35 |
rising
|
1.6 (0.1, 3.5) |
| Macon County 2 | Rural | 122.5 (103.5, 144.3) | 80 (15, 97) | 40 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-2.1, 0.8) |
| Davie County 2 | Urban | 135.0 (115.9, 156.7) | 62 (4, 94) | 41 |
rising
|
2.2 (0.4, 4.2) |
| Dare County 2 | Rural | 151.4 (130.0, 175.8) | 18 (1, 84) | 43 |
stable
|
0.3 (-1.3, 1.9) |
| Stokes County 2 | Urban | 119.8 (103.2, 138.7) | 85 (26, 97) | 43 |
stable
|
0.5 (-1.3, 2.3) |
| Transylvania County 2 | Rural | 127.5 (108.9, 149.2) | 73 (6, 97) | 43 |
stable
|
0.7 (-1.0, 2.6) |
| McDowell County 2 | Rural | 135.3 (116.8, 156.1) | 61 (4, 94) | 44 |
stable
|
0.2 (-1.6, 2.1) |
| Vance County 2 | Rural | 145.8 (126.0, 168.0) | 32 (2, 89) | 44 |
rising
|
2.4 (1.1, 3.9) |
| Edgecombe County 2 | Urban | 120.4 (103.9, 138.9) | 83 (24, 97) | 44 |
stable
|
0.2 (-1.3, 1.7) |
| Person County 2 | Urban | 159.3 (137.7, 183.5) | 6 (1, 78) | 45 |
rising
|
2.5 (0.3, 5.1) |
| Duplin County 2 | Rural | 136.2 (117.9, 156.7) | 58 (4, 94) | 45 |
stable
|
1.3 (-0.6, 3.2) |
| Richmond County 2 | Rural | 156.7 (136.5, 179.3) | 9 (1, 78) | 46 |
stable
|
1.5 (-0.5, 3.7) |
| Columbus County 2 | Rural | 126.6 (110.1, 145.2) | 76 (15, 96) | 48 |
stable
|
1.7 (-0.5, 4.2) |
| Lee County 2 | Rural | 120.3 (105.1, 137.1) | 84 (30, 97) | 49 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-2.1, 1.4) |
| Halifax County 2 | Rural | 139.0 (120.7, 159.5) | 50 (3, 91) | 50 |
stable
|
0.1 (-1.2, 1.4) |
| Beaufort County 2 | Rural | 150.1 (130.9, 171.7) | 23 (1, 84) | 54 |
stable
|
1.3 (0.0, 2.6) |
| Granville County 2 | Rural | 137.5 (120.9, 156.0) | 54 (5, 92) | 54 |
stable
|
1.2 (-0.6, 3.2) |
| Wilkes County 2 | Rural | 111.1 (97.4, 126.3) | 91 (59, 98) | 56 |
stable
|
0.2 (-1.6, 2.1) |
| Stanly County 2 | Rural | 136.3 (120.0, 154.4) | 57 (5, 92) | 56 |
stable
|
1.0 (-0.2, 2.3) |
| Lenoir County 2 | Rural | 150.8 (133.0, 170.6) | 20 (1, 80) | 60 |
stable
|
0.6 (-0.6, 1.8) |
| Sampson County 2 | Rural | 163.3 (144.5, 184.0) | 4 (1, 66) | 61 |
rising
|
2.8 (1.8, 3.9) |
| Franklin County 2 | Urban | 134.0 (118.7, 150.8) | 67 (9, 92) | 61 |
stable
|
1.0 (-0.2, 2.5) |
| Pender County 2 | Urban | 158.4 (140.7, 177.9) | 8 (1, 71) | 63 |
stable
|
1.7 (-0.3, 4.1) |
| Haywood County 2 | Rural | 139.3 (123.4, 157.0) | 48 (6, 89) | 69 |
stable
|
1.2 (-0.4, 2.8) |
| Rutherford County 2 | Rural | 135.5 (120.6, 151.9) | 60 (10, 91) | 69 |
stable
|
0.3 (-0.5, 1.1) |
| Surry County 2 | Rural | 130.5 (116.5, 146.0) | 69 (15, 93) | 70 |
stable
|
0.8 (-0.5, 2.3) |
| Burke County 2 | Urban | 121.8 (109.4, 135.4) | 81 (38, 96) | 79 |
stable
|
0.1 (-0.8, 1.1) |
| Carteret County 2 | Rural | 138.8 (124.0, 155.2) | 52 (6, 87) | 79 |
falling
|
-12.6 (-18.3, -7.8) |
| Wilson County 2 | Rural | 143.1 (128.8, 158.7) | 41 (4, 84) | 80 |
stable
|
0.6 (-0.4, 1.7) |
| Caldwell County 2 | Urban | 134.1 (120.6, 148.8) | 66 (13, 91) | 80 |
stable
|
0.8 (-0.9, 2.6) |
| Lincoln County 2 | Urban | 139.9 (126.4, 154.6) | 46 (6, 85) | 85 |
rising
|
1.0 (0.2, 1.9) |
| Chatham County 2 | Urban | 144.6 (130.4, 160.0) | 36 (4, 80) | 90 |
stable
|
0.8 (-0.4, 2.1) |
| Harnett County 2 | Rural | 123.6 (112.3, 135.8) | 78 (38, 94) | 91 |
stable
|
0.3 (-0.7, 1.3) |
| Nash County 2 | Urban | 145.0 (131.4, 159.7) | 35 (4, 80) | 93 |
stable
|
0.4 (-0.8, 1.6) |
| Craven County 2 | Rural | 142.6 (129.2, 157.2) | 43 (6, 80) | 97 |
stable
|
0.7 (-0.3, 1.6) |
| Rockingham County 2 | Urban | 138.7 (125.9, 152.7) | 53 (9, 84) | 97 |
rising
|
1.1 (0.1, 2.2) |
| Cleveland County 2 | Rural | 141.4 (128.4, 155.4) | 44 (6, 83) | 97 |
stable
|
1.0 (-0.2, 2.4) |
| Robeson County 2 | Rural | 145.0 (132.4, 158.5) | 34 (5, 77) | 105 |
rising
|
4.8 (2.1, 12.8) |
| Moore County 2 | Urban | 144.0 (131.1, 158.0) | 37 (5, 78) | 109 |
stable
|
0.1 (-0.8, 1.0) |
| Wayne County 2 | Urban | 152.2 (139.2, 166.2) | 17 (3, 65) | 111 |
rising
|
1.6 (0.3, 2.9) |
| Onslow County 2 | Urban | 136.6 (125.3, 148.7) | 56 (12, 84) | 112 |
stable
|
0.8 (-0.2, 1.9) |
| Orange County 2 | Urban | 150.5 (138.8, 163.1) | 21 (3, 67) | 129 |
stable
|
0.8 (-0.4, 2.1) |
| Catawba County 2 | Urban | 118.1 (108.8, 128.1) | 88 (57, 95) | 129 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-1.0, 0.8) |
| Randolph County 2 | Urban | 139.8 (128.9, 151.5) | 47 (10, 81) | 133 |
rising
|
1.0 (0.1, 2.1) |
| Rowan County 2 | Urban | 148.0 (137.0, 159.8) | 27 (5, 69) | 144 |
stable
|
-4.5 (-9.5, 0.6) |
| Henderson County 2 | Urban | 156.6 (144.5, 169.5) | 10 (1, 57) | 152 |
rising
|
1.6 (0.6, 2.7) |
| Davidson County 2 | Urban | 134.1 (124.4, 144.4) | 65 (23, 84) | 155 |
rising
|
1.3 (0.4, 2.4) |
| Pitt County 2 | Urban | 165.8 (154.2, 178.0) | 3 (1, 35) | 161 |
stable
|
1.1 (0.0, 2.4) |
| Iredell County 2 | Urban | 138.9 (129.2, 149.1) | 51 (15, 81) | 164 |
stable
|
0.9 (0.0, 2.0) |
| Alamance County 2 | Urban | 147.3 (137.1, 158.1) | 29 (5, 67) | 165 |
stable
|
1.0 (-0.2, 1.8) |
| Cabarrus County 2 | Urban | 137.4 (128.4, 146.9) | 55 (22, 80) | 178 |
stable
|
0.9 (0.0, 2.0) |
| Gaston County 2 | Urban | 135.8 (127.4, 144.7) | 59 (23, 81) | 204 |
stable
|
1.0 (0.0, 2.0) |
| Johnston County 2 | Urban | 161.2 (151.3, 171.6) | 5 (1, 39) | 205 |
rising
|
4.1 (2.7, 9.2) |
| Brunswick County 2 | Urban | 153.0 (141.8, 165.0) | 16 (3, 60) | 206 |
rising
|
1.3 (0.2, 2.6) |
| Union County 2 | Urban | 158.5 (149.1, 168.4) | 7 (2, 41) | 218 |
rising
|
2.0 (1.3, 3.0) |
| New Hanover County 2 | Urban | 150.5 (141.6, 159.8) | 22 (5, 57) | 236 |
stable
|
1.1 (0.0, 2.3) |
| Cumberland County 2 | Urban | 139.3 (131.5, 147.5) | 49 (18, 75) | 248 |
rising
|
0.9 (0.2, 1.6) |
| Durham County 2 | Urban | 149.4 (141.5, 157.7) | 25 (7, 59) | 281 |
stable
|
-1.2 (-6.0, 0.5) |
| Buncombe County 2 | Urban | 155.3 (147.1, 163.9) | 13 (3, 46) | 298 |
rising
|
0.9 (0.2, 1.6) |
| Forsyth County 2 | Urban | 141.3 (134.5, 148.4) | 45 (20, 69) | 346 |
stable
|
0.5 (-0.2, 1.3) |
| Guilford County 2 | Urban | 151.1 (145.1, 157.4) | 19 (8, 47) | 502 |
stable
|
-1.7 (-5.3, 1.1) |
| Mecklenburg County 2 | Urban | 150.0 (145.6, 154.6) | 24 (11, 44) | 898 |
rising
|
1.0 (0.5, 1.6) |
| Wake County 2 | Urban | 156.5 (152.1, 161.0) | 11 (4, 31) | 985 |
rising
|
1.1 (0.7, 1.5) |
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/12/2026 9:15 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.
2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.