Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Arkansas by County

Breast (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Arkansas 2 N/A 125.8 (123.4, 128.2) N/A 2,400 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.6, 2.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 131.3 (131.1, 131.6) N/A 270,245 rising rising trend 0.6 (0.5, 0.8)
Ashley County 2 Rural 94.5 (70.3, 124.6) 70 (15, 75) 12 falling falling trend -13.1 (-26.7, -4.9)
Lee County 2 Rural 133.3 (87.5, 195.5) 17 (1, 75) 7 stable stable trend -10.7 (-32.2, 0.6)
Johnson County 2 Rural 86.1 (66.4, 110.0) 73 (30, 75) 14 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.3, -0.1)
Ouachita County 2 Rural 104.2 (81.8, 131.3) 58 (6, 75) 18 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.6, 0.2)
Izard County 2 Rural 78.0 (52.7, 112.4) 75 (25, 75) 8 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.1, 2.0)
Fulton County 2 Rural 82.0 (56.6, 116.5) 74 (22, 75) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.8, 1.7)
Montgomery County 2 Rural 88.5 (58.8, 131.5) 72 (6, 75) 7 stable stable trend -1.0 (-5.4, 3.5)
Prairie County 2 Rural 112.9 (74.7, 165.5) 49 (1, 75) 7 stable stable trend -1.0 (-6.3, 4.1)
Craighead County 2 Urban 124.3 (111.8, 137.8) 27 (7, 56) 76 stable stable trend -0.7 (-7.9, 2.6)
Bradley County 2 Rural 97.7 (64.3, 142.5) 66 (2, 75) 6 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.7, 3.2)
Clay County 2 Rural 100.2 (74.8, 132.6) 64 (8, 75) 12 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.8, 2.8)
Arkansas County 2 Rural 116.1 (89.1, 149.3) 43 (1, 74) 14 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.5, 2.6)
Conway County 2 Rural 133.8 (106.7, 166.2) 15 (1, 66) 19 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.5, 1.6)
Nevada County 2 Rural 104.1 (69.0, 152.5) 59 (1, 75) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.8, 2.8)
Lawrence County 2 Rural 100.3 (75.4, 131.5) 63 (5, 75) 12 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.1, 2.5)
Little River County 2 Urban 101.1 (73.4, 137.1) 61 (5, 75) 10 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.8, 3.4)
Hempstead County 2 Rural 95.9 (72.7, 124.4) 68 (13, 75) 13 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.4, 5.4)
Polk County 2 Rural 95.4 (72.0, 124.6) 69 (11, 75) 13 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 1.8)
Saline County 2 Urban 123.5 (112.5, 135.3) 28 (9, 56) 100 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.8)
Columbia County 2 Rural 99.9 (76.2, 128.7) 65 (12, 75) 14 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.0, 2.8)
Poinsett County 2 Urban 133.3 (106.9, 164.5) 16 (1, 68) 20 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.6, 2.4)
Baxter County 2 Rural 121.7 (103.9, 142.2) 32 (4, 65) 46 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.8, 1.7)
Lafayette County 2 Rural 113.7 (72.4, 173.1) 47 (1, 75) 6 stable stable trend 0.0 (-4.7, 4.7)
Phillips County 2 Rural 115.7 (88.4, 149.2) 45 (1, 74) 14 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.1, 3.1)
Faulkner County 2 Urban 119.9 (108.2, 132.5) 37 (11, 61) 81 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.1)
Jackson County 2 Rural 100.7 (74.8, 133.2) 62 (7, 75) 11 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.3, 2.6)
Mississippi County 2 Rural 128.4 (108.0, 151.4) 21 (2, 63) 30 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.6, 2.0)
Hot Spring County 2 Rural 126.1 (104.7, 151.0) 24 (2, 66) 27 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.9, 2.8)
Miller County 2 Urban 105.3 (88.7, 124.3) 57 (18, 73) 30 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.2, 3.2)
Stone County 2 Rural 117.7 (88.2, 155.9) 40 (1, 74) 13 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.4, 2.2)
Madison County 2 Urban 110.6 (83.9, 143.8) 52 (4, 75) 13 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.4, 5.6)
Sharp County 2 Rural 126.3 (98.1, 161.0) 23 (1, 72) 17 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.6, 3.8)
Union County 2 Rural 120.9 (102.5, 141.9) 33 (5, 67) 34 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.1, 2.1)
White County 2 Rural 134.5 (120.0, 150.5) 14 (2, 49) 66 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.1, 2.5)
Cleburne County 2 Rural 128.4 (104.5, 156.7) 20 (1, 67) 26 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.4, 2.8)
Washington County 2 Urban 123.1 (114.3, 132.3) 30 (13, 53) 151 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.1, 1.6)
Franklin County 2 Rural 116.2 (90.0, 148.5) 42 (2, 74) 15 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.6, 4.6)
Grant County 2 Urban 107.4 (81.5, 139.3) 55 (4, 75) 13 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.8, 3.6)
Jefferson County 2 Rural 141.2 (125.1, 159.0) 8 (1, 44) 62 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.7, 2.3)
Logan County 2 Rural 138.9 (112.9, 169.8) 12 (1, 61) 22 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.9, 3.7)
Marion County 2 Rural 116.7 (89.3, 150.8) 41 (2, 74) 18 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.4, 4.1)
Woodruff County 2 Rural 101.4 (61.0, 160.2) 60 (1, 75) 5 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.8, 5.5)
Pope County 2 Rural 115.2 (100.0, 132.2) 46 (10, 68) 44 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.2, 8.1)
Garland County 2 Urban 129.5 (117.5, 142.6) 19 (4, 51) 102 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.1, 2.1)
Van Buren County 2 Rural 117.9 (88.9, 154.1) 39 (1, 74) 14 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.7, 4.0)
Cross County 2 Rural 110.1 (84.2, 142.1) 53 (3, 74) 13 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.0, 3.5)
Howard County 2 Rural 107.4 (76.2, 147.3) 54 (2, 75) 9 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.5, 5.1)
Sebastian County 2 Urban 133.0 (121.5, 145.2) 18 (4, 45) 107 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.3, 2.1)
Chicot County 2 Rural 110.7 (76.6, 156.4) 51 (1, 75) 8 stable stable trend 1.3 (-3.5, 6.1)
Crawford County 2 Urban 125.7 (110.1, 143.0) 25 (4, 59) 50 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.3, 3.0)
Desha County 2 Rural 147.3 (107.3, 197.5) 3 (1, 70) 10 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.6, 4.2)
Scott County 2 Rural 120.0 (82.7, 169.2) 36 (1, 75) 8 stable stable trend 1.3 (-3.3, 6.3)
Sevier County 2 Rural 96.5 (68.7, 131.9) 67 (5, 75) 8 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.6, 5.4)
St. Francis County 2 Rural 120.2 (94.1, 151.7) 35 (1, 72) 16 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.3, 4.0)
Yell County 2 Rural 139.4 (110.8, 173.5) 11 (1, 64) 18 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.0, 4.8)
Benton County 2 Urban 138.3 (130.0, 146.9) 13 (3, 32) 215 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.2, 2.9)
Crittenden County 2 Urban 115.8 (98.1, 135.8) 44 (7, 69) 32 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.0, 4.1)
Greene County 2 Rural 120.8 (102.8, 141.2) 34 (4, 66) 34 stable stable trend 1.5 (0.0, 3.0)
Boone County 2 Rural 142.2 (121.6, 165.6) 7 (1, 49) 38 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.1, 3.8)
Lonoke County 2 Urban 126.5 (111.7, 142.9) 22 (4, 58) 55 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.3, 7.9)
Pike County 2 Rural 141.0 (101.6, 191.5) 9 (1, 72) 10 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.4, 5.5)
Carroll County 2 Rural 149.1 (123.9, 178.2) 2 (1, 49) 30 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.1, 4.8)
Dallas County 2 Rural 122.4 (80.2, 181.8) 31 (1, 75) 6 stable stable trend 2.3 (-2.4, 7.5)
Drew County 2 Rural 124.8 (95.1, 161.0) 26 (1, 74) 13 stable stable trend 2.3 (0.0, 4.9)
Monroe County 2 Rural 112.1 (73.8, 166.0) 50 (1, 75) 6 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.7, 5.4)
Randolph County 2 Rural 118.9 (91.9, 151.8) 38 (2, 74) 15 stable stable trend 2.3 (0.0, 4.9)
Lincoln County 2 Rural 105.3 (71.9, 150.1) 56 (1, 75) 7 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.4, 5.7)
Cleveland County 2 Rural 152.9 (108.2, 211.9) 1 (1, 71) 9 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.5, 6.4)
Clark County 2 Rural 143.9 (114.1, 179.3) 5 (1, 62) 18 stable stable trend 3.6 (-1.2, 17.9)
Searcy County 2 Rural 123.4 (86.4, 174.2) 29 (1, 75) 8 rising rising trend 3.8 (0.5, 8.1)
Pulaski County 2 Urban 139.9 (133.2, 147.0) 10 (3, 26) 345 rising rising trend 4.0 (0.7, 9.2)
Perry County 2 Urban 146.6 (106.8, 197.5) 4 (1, 70) 10 rising rising trend 4.7 (0.5, 18.6)
Newton County 2 Rural 93.7 (59.3, 144.1) 71 (3, 75) 6 rising rising trend 5.3 (0.7, 25.5)
Independence County 2 Rural 142.6 (121.1, 166.9) 6 (1, 52) 34 rising rising trend 8.4 (3.1, 20.4)
Calhoun County 2 Rural 113.6 (69.8, 180.7) 48 (1, 75) 4
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/11/2026 10:07 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top