Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Missouri by County

Breast (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Missouri 2 N/A 136.6 (134.9, 138.3) N/A 5,358 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.7, 2.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 131.3 (131.1, 131.6) N/A 270,245 rising rising trend 0.6 (0.5, 0.8)
Daviess County 2 Rural 113.5 (74.8, 166.1) 85 (2, 112) 6 falling falling trend -8.3 (-19.0, -2.9)
Platte County 2 Urban 139.4 (126.5, 153.4) 33 (8, 75) 89 stable stable trend -5.5 (-10.1, 1.5)
Ralls County 2 Rural 88.2 (57.8, 130.1) 111 (17, 112) 6 falling falling trend -3.0 (-6.3, -0.1)
Chariton County 2 Rural 109.0 (70.4, 163.3) 91 (3, 112) 6 stable stable trend -2.6 (-6.6, 1.0)
Audrain County 2 Rural 96.1 (75.8, 120.6) 106 (46, 112) 17 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.5, 0.4)
Mississippi County 2 Rural 101.7 (72.3, 140.3) 100 (10, 112) 9 stable stable trend -1.5 (-6.0, 2.8)
Laclede County 2 Rural 96.3 (78.8, 116.8) 105 (53, 112) 23 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.0)
Reynolds County 2 Rural 112.2 (68.8, 175.7) 89 (1, 112) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-6.7, 3.9)
Newton County 2 Urban 99.2 (85.1, 115.1) 102 (59, 112) 39 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.0, 1.1)
Vernon County 2 Rural 95.4 (73.2, 122.8) 108 (40, 112) 14 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.6)
Morgan County 2 Rural 123.2 (96.6, 155.4) 64 (5, 110) 19 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.3, 1.9)
Buchanan County 2 Urban 122.5 (109.0, 137.3) 66 (23, 96) 65 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 0.9)
Pettis County 2 Rural 115.8 (97.9, 136.2) 80 (22, 107) 32 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.1)
Wright County 2 Rural 115.7 (90.0, 147.1) 81 (9, 112) 15 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.8, 1.8)
Camden County 2 Rural 107.5 (90.5, 127.1) 94 (40, 111) 38 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.3)
Madison County 2 Rural 122.4 (90.4, 163.0) 67 (3, 112) 11 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.9, 3.4)
Wayne County 2 Rural 97.1 (67.2, 137.5) 104 (11, 112) 8 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.4, 2.7)
Cole County 2 Urban 128.3 (113.9, 144.2) 54 (16, 92) 63 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.1)
Ray County 2 Urban 97.2 (75.6, 123.4) 103 (34, 112) 15 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.8, 2.4)
St. Louis City 2 Urban 124.3 (116.7, 132.2) 62 (35, 84) 217 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.4)
Phelps County 2 Rural 125.6 (106.9, 146.9) 58 (11, 101) 35 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 1.5)
Saline County 2 Rural 113.0 (88.7, 142.2) 86 (11, 112) 17 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 1.6)
Stoddard County 2 Rural 115.4 (94.4, 140.1) 82 (16, 110) 24 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.8, 2.7)
Taney County 2 Rural 101.5 (87.3, 117.6) 101 (58, 110) 42 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.3)
Gentry County 2 Rural 116.5 (72.5, 178.6) 79 (1, 112) 5 stable stable trend 0.1 (-4.1, 4.6)
Polk County 2 Urban 117.2 (95.4, 142.5) 78 (12, 109) 23 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.4, 2.6)
Sullivan County 2 Rural 112.5 (69.1, 175.3) 88 (1, 112) 5 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.8, 4.2)
Benton County 2 Rural 112.9 (87.9, 144.0) 87 (10, 112) 19 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.1, 2.4)
Greene County 2 Urban 128.6 (121.1, 136.5) 53 (29, 79) 238 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.3, 0.7)
Pike County 2 Rural 137.2 (107.1, 173.8) 41 (2, 106) 16 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.5, 1.9)
DeKalb County 2 Urban 137.5 (96.2, 191.1) 39 (1, 111) 8 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.0, 3.6)
Gasconade County 2 Rural 132.0 (102.2, 168.9) 51 (3, 109) 15 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.2, 3.0)
Stone County 2 Rural 124.4 (104.1, 148.3) 61 (8, 105) 36 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.8, 2.5)
Henry County 2 Rural 94.2 (73.4, 119.7) 110 (47, 112) 16 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.3, 3.3)
Macon County 2 Rural 141.8 (109.1, 181.9) 26 (1, 105) 15 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.5, 2.4)
Boone County 2 Urban 151.1 (139.7, 163.1) 14 (4, 47) 139 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.8, 2.0)
Butler County 2 Rural 143.6 (123.9, 165.8) 24 (3, 84) 42 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.8, 2.8)
Dade County 2 Rural 94.9 (58.8, 147.3) 109 (6, 112) 5 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.4, 4.2)
Montgomery County 2 Rural 107.3 (76.1, 148.1) 95 (7, 112) 9 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.6, 3.7)
Callaway County 2 Urban 125.4 (106.8, 146.6) 59 (11, 100) 35 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.2, 2.6)
Cedar County 2 Rural 136.0 (104.4, 175.1) 42 (2, 108) 15 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.1, 4.3)
Christian County 2 Urban 127.4 (114.0, 142.0) 56 (17, 92) 70 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.4, 1.7)
Washington County 2 Rural 124.8 (100.0, 154.4) 60 (7, 109) 19 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.8, 3.1)
Andrew County 2 Urban 127.7 (99.6, 161.8) 55 (3, 110) 16 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.6, 3.3)
Jackson County 2 Urban 138.3 (133.2, 143.5) 34 (20, 56) 601 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.3, 1.2)
Perry County 2 Rural 144.4 (116.1, 178.2) 22 (1, 93) 20 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.1, 3.7)
Adair County 2 Rural 119.0 (92.1, 151.3) 76 (5, 111) 15 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.4, 5.0)
Howard County 2 Urban 122.6 (85.9, 170.7) 65 (2, 112) 8 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.0, 4.7)
Pemiscot County 2 Rural 103.2 (76.0, 137.3) 97 (12, 112) 11 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.7, 3.1)
Randolph County 2 Rural 123.4 (98.6, 152.8) 63 (6, 109) 19 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.5, 3.2)
St. Charles County 2 Urban 144.3 (137.5, 151.3) 23 (11, 50) 363 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.1, 1.8)
St. Louis County 2 Urban 154.8 (150.4, 159.3) 13 (6, 27) 1,052 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.6, 1.1)
Dallas County 2 Urban 119.2 (90.5, 154.6) 74 (5, 112) 14 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.4, 4.4)
Lawrence County 2 Rural 107.8 (89.7, 128.6) 93 (36, 111) 27 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.3, 3.2)
Osage County 2 Urban 146.1 (109.8, 191.2) 18 (1, 108) 12 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.2, 4.5)
Pulaski County 2 Rural 138.2 (116.4, 162.8) 35 (4, 97) 29 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.8, 3.8)
Texas County 2 Rural 133.7 (107.7, 164.6) 46 (3, 105) 22 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.0, 3.8)
Cooper County 2 Urban 148.3 (116.7, 186.3) 17 (1, 101) 17 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.7, 3.9)
Livingston County 2 Rural 144.7 (113.9, 182.1) 21 (1, 99) 16 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.1, 4.3)
Maries County 2 Rural 85.1 (54.3, 129.3) 112 (27, 112) 5 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.9, 4.2)
Barry County 2 Rural 102.7 (84.5, 124.0) 98 (38, 112) 26 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.9, 3.1)
Lewis County 2 Rural 162.1 (115.7, 221.1) 7 (1, 105) 9 stable stable trend 1.1 (-8.5, 5.0)
Cass County 2 Urban 149.9 (136.8, 163.9) 15 (3, 56) 105 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.2, 2.3)
Jefferson County 2 Urban 143.1 (134.2, 152.5) 25 (9, 59) 208 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.4, 2.2)
McDonald County 2 Rural 95.9 (73.7, 123.0) 107 (40, 112) 14 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.2, 4.0)
Ripley County 2 Rural 170.8 (128.2, 223.8) 1 (1, 97) 12 stable stable trend 1.2 (-4.0, 2.8)
Webster County 2 Urban 120.0 (100.4, 142.3) 70 (13, 106) 28 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.7, 3.3)
Cape Girardeau County 2 Urban 139.9 (124.8, 156.5) 30 (6, 79) 69 stable stable trend 1.3 (0.0, 2.6)
Clay County 2 Urban 160.1 (150.9, 169.7) 9 (2, 29) 239 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.5, 2.3)
Crawford County 2 Rural 132.7 (107.4, 162.7) 49 (4, 105) 22 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.2, 3.9)
Harrison County 2 Rural 137.3 (96.5, 191.3) 40 (1, 112) 9 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.1, 4.8)
Iron County 2 Rural 119.6 (85.0, 165.6) 71 (3, 112) 9 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.8, 4.5)
Putnam County 2 Rural 137.6 (78.7, 224.3) 38 (1, 112) 4 stable stable trend 1.3 (-4.3, 6.4)
Dunklin County 2 Rural 119.5 (97.2, 145.5) 72 (10, 109) 22 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.8, 3.6)
Franklin County 2 Urban 137.9 (125.1, 151.7) 37 (9, 74) 96 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.4, 2.4)
St. Clair County 2 Rural 109.5 (74.1, 157.7) 90 (2, 112) 8 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.1, 5.1)
St. Francois County 2 Rural 138.1 (122.0, 155.9) 36 (6, 81) 57 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.1, 2.7)
Carter County 2 Rural 162.4 (105.7, 240.3) 6 (1, 111) 6 stable stable trend 1.5 (-5.5, 8.7)
New Madrid County 2 Rural 155.0 (122.9, 193.6) 12 (1, 93) 18 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.1, 4.2)
Clinton County 2 Urban 119.1 (93.5, 149.9) 75 (6, 111) 16 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.2, 4.8)
Lincoln County 2 Urban 139.5 (121.9, 159.2) 32 (4, 85) 48 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.1, 3.5)
Moniteau County 2 Urban 121.7 (90.3, 160.8) 69 (3, 112) 11 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.0, 4.4)
Marion County 2 Rural 139.8 (114.8, 168.9) 31 (2, 98) 24 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.6, 4.1)
Nodaway County 2 Rural 107.9 (82.4, 139.2) 92 (12, 112) 14 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.3, 5.2)
Bates County 2 Urban 117.6 (89.1, 152.9) 77 (6, 112) 13 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.3, 5.5)
Lafayette County 2 Urban 141.4 (119.2, 166.7) 28 (3, 90) 32 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.1, 3.9)
Warren County 2 Urban 141.3 (119.4, 166.3) 29 (3, 93) 33 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.7, 3.3)
Clark County 2 Rural 133.6 (84.9, 201.1) 47 (1, 112) 6 stable stable trend 2.0 (-2.1, 6.5)
Knox County 2 Rural 155.2 (87.4, 256.5) 11 (1, 112) 4 stable stable trend 2.0 (-4.2, 8.7)
Monroe County 2 Rural 162.0 (116.1, 221.5) 8 (1, 108) 10 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.5, 6.1)
Ste. Genevieve County 2 Rural 135.2 (106.3, 170.3) 43 (1, 106) 17 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.1, 4.3)
Grundy County 2 Rural 167.6 (120.4, 227.3) 2 (1, 102) 11 stable stable trend 2.2 (-2.5, 7.6)
Miller County 2 Rural 133.1 (107.8, 162.9) 48 (3, 104) 22 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.2, 5.2)
Howell County 2 Rural 113.7 (95.8, 134.3) 84 (26, 109) 32 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.2, 10.8)
Bollinger County 2 Urban 134.3 (99.9, 178.3) 45 (1, 110) 11 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.5, 6.4)
Scott County 2 Rural 126.4 (107.2, 148.3) 57 (9, 103) 34 stable stable trend 2.7 (-6.9, 12.8)
Carroll County 2 Rural 145.7 (103.3, 201.0) 19 (1, 110) 9 stable stable trend 2.9 (-0.9, 7.3)
Hickory County 2 Rural 134.3 (91.5, 192.5) 44 (1, 112) 9 stable stable trend 3.0 (-1.6, 7.8)
Shelby County 2 Rural 164.4 (107.0, 242.0) 5 (1, 111) 6 rising rising trend 3.2 (0.1, 6.4)
Jasper County 2 Urban 141.8 (129.6, 154.9) 27 (7, 69) 106 rising rising trend 3.4 (1.5, 9.3)
Shannon County 2 Rural 121.9 (77.5, 183.7) 68 (1, 112) 6 stable stable trend 3.5 (-0.3, 7.6)
Johnson County 2 Rural 149.5 (128.6, 172.9) 16 (2, 79) 39 rising rising trend 3.6 (1.6, 11.2)
Caldwell County 2 Urban 159.8 (113.9, 219.0) 10 (1, 107) 9 rising rising trend 4.1 (1.4, 7.2)
Dent County 2 Rural 132.7 (101.9, 170.9) 50 (2, 110) 15 rising rising trend 5.2 (0.5, 23.2)
Barton County 2 Rural 145.4 (108.0, 192.3) 20 (1, 108) 12 stable stable trend 14.6 (-0.7, 36.2)
Douglas County 2 Rural 102.1 (72.5, 141.3) 99 (8, 112) 9 stable stable trend 15.9 (-1.6, 49.4)
Ozark County 2 Rural 114.2 (78.3, 163.8) 83 (3, 112) 8 rising rising trend 17.9 (0.8, 53.1)
Oregon County 2 Rural 166.8 (117.6, 230.1) 4 (1, 108) 9 rising rising trend 18.2 (4.2, 45.9)
Linn County 2 Rural 130.7 (96.3, 174.3) 52 (1, 112) 11 stable stable trend 28.6 (-2.3, 56.4)
Atchison County 2 Rural 106.6 (61.8, 174.7) 96 (2, 112) 4
*
*
Holt County 2 Rural 167.0 (101.8, 261.2) 3 (1, 112) 5
*
*
Mercer County 2 Rural 119.4 (68.2, 201.5) 73 (1, 112) 3
*
*
Schuyler County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scotland County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Worth County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/11/2026 5:10 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top