Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Colorado by County

Prostate (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Colorado 2 N/A 102.2 (100.6, 103.8) N/A 3,434 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.5, -1.1)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 116.4 (116.2, 116.6) N/A 240,633 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.8, 3.4)
Alamosa County 2 Rural 60.9 (40.0, 89.4) 50 (20, 50) 6 falling falling trend -5.9 (-10.1, -2.3)
Fremont County 2 Rural 63.5 (52.9, 76.0) 49 (36, 50) 26 falling falling trend -7.2 (-17.4, -5.0)
Yuma County 2 Rural 65.4 (40.0, 101.8) 48 (9, 50) 4 falling falling trend -5.7 (-10.0, -2.5)
Las Animas County 2 Rural 68.2 (49.4, 93.7) 47 (18, 50) 10 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.3, 0.9)
Conejos County 2 Rural 72.1 (44.1, 114.0) 46 (6, 50) 4 falling falling trend -3.5 (-6.4, -0.7)
Morgan County 2 Rural 72.9 (55.9, 93.6) 45 (19, 50) 13 stable stable trend -3.0 (-5.2, 2.9)
Clear Creek County 2 Urban 72.9 (49.0, 108.4) 44 (8, 50) 7 stable stable trend 16.1 (-10.7, 40.3)
San Miguel County 2 Rural 78.4 (50.9, 120.3) 43 (5, 50) 5
*
*
Saguache County 2 Rural 78.7 (48.5, 126.5) 42 (4, 50) 5 stable stable trend -2.9 (-6.5, 1.0)
Moffat County 2 Rural 78.9 (55.2, 110.6) 41 (7, 50) 8 falling falling trend -5.4 (-8.7, -2.4)
Logan County 2 Rural 79.5 (59.9, 103.8) 40 (10, 50) 12 falling falling trend -5.2 (-8.2, -2.7)
Kit Carson County 2 Rural 81.9 (51.4, 127.0) 39 (4, 50) 5 stable stable trend -3.4 (-7.5, 0.0)
Lincoln County 2 Rural 82.1 (48.1, 133.8) 38 (3, 50) 4 falling falling trend -6.2 (-12.0, -2.0)
Montrose County 2 Rural 82.8 (69.9, 98.0) 37 (15, 48) 31 stable stable trend 2.8 (-2.0, 13.4)
Ouray County 2 Rural 83.3 (51.9, 139.8) 36 (3, 50) 5 stable stable trend -3.3 (-7.6, 1.5)
Teller County 2 Urban 84.5 (67.2, 106.1) 35 (9, 49) 21 falling falling trend -5.3 (-6.9, -3.6)
Rio Blanco County 2 Rural 87.6 (53.7, 137.9) 34 (3, 50) 4 falling falling trend -5.6 (-9.4, -2.3)
Custer County 2 Rural 88.0 (50.4, 154.4) 33 (2, 50) 5 stable stable trend -3.5 (-7.8, 0.4)
Adams County 2 Urban 88.1 (82.4, 94.0) 32 (21, 41) 206 stable stable trend 3.1 (-1.1, 11.9)
Park County 2 Urban 89.7 (69.1, 116.5) 31 (6, 49) 17 falling falling trend -4.0 (-6.7, -0.9)
El Paso County 2 Urban 90.1 (85.7, 94.6) 30 (20, 39) 343 falling falling trend -5.6 (-8.1, -4.6)
Prowers County 2 Rural 90.1 (61.8, 127.7) 29 (3, 50) 7 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.8, 1.7)
Elbert County 2 Urban 91.2 (72.9, 113.6) 28 (6, 47) 20 falling falling trend -4.3 (-6.9, -1.5)
Otero County 2 Rural 94.3 (71.5, 122.7) 27 (5, 49) 12 stable stable trend -3.0 (-6.9, 0.3)
Mesa County 2 Urban 94.4 (86.4, 103.1) 26 (12, 38) 108 stable stable trend 6.5 (-4.1, 18.3)
Grand County 2 Rural 94.8 (70.3, 126.4) 25 (4, 49) 12 stable stable trend -2.8 (-6.7, 0.9)
Arapahoe County 2 Urban 94.8 (90.1, 99.7) 24 (16, 35) 332 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.1, 8.1)
Delta County 2 Rural 95.0 (80.0, 112.8) 23 (7, 44) 30 stable stable trend 6.8 (-3.0, 27.6)
Archuleta County 2 Rural 97.4 (75.2, 127.1) 22 (4, 47) 15 rising rising trend 21.0 (9.6, 42.4)
Phillips County 2 Rural 97.6 (56.1, 163.0) 21 (1, 50) 3 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.5, 1.6)
Broomfield County 2 Urban 97.7 (84.4, 112.6) 20 (7, 40) 41 stable stable trend -6.2 (-12.9, 0.1)
Gunnison County 2 Rural 98.3 (72.8, 130.6) 19 (3, 48) 11 stable stable trend 2.3 (-3.0, 18.3)
Pitkin County 2 Rural 98.3 (77.2, 125.0) 18 (5, 46) 16 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.3, 0.5)
Huerfano County 2 Rural 98.8 (66.6, 147.3) 17 (2, 50) 8 falling falling trend -5.0 (-9.2, -1.6)
Montezuma County 2 Rural 99.6 (81.0, 121.9) 16 (5, 43) 22 rising rising trend 8.6 (2.4, 23.7)
Lake County 2 Rural 100.6 (64.1, 152.4) 15 (2, 50) 5
*
*
Pueblo County 2 Urban 101.3 (93.0, 110.2) 14 (8, 33) 117 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.1, -2.3)
Jefferson County 2 Urban 102.8 (98.2, 107.7) 13 (9, 26) 396 falling falling trend -7.6 (-13.4, -2.3)
Rio Grande County 2 Rural 102.9 (73.6, 141.5) 12 (2, 48) 9 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.7, 3.1)
Denver County 2 Urban 105.2 (100.1, 110.4) 11 (8, 25) 351 falling falling trend -4.5 (-8.7, -1.1)
Weld County 2 Urban 105.7 (98.6, 113.3) 10 (7, 27) 178 stable stable trend 3.2 (-2.8, 16.3)
Douglas County 2 Urban 106.9 (100.3, 113.9) 9 (7, 25) 211 stable stable trend 3.1 (-5.5, 16.5)
Boulder County 2 Urban 109.4 (102.6, 116.5) 8 (6, 23) 210 stable stable trend 3.7 (-2.2, 14.7)
Eagle County 2 Rural 117.0 (100.2, 135.9) 7 (3, 29) 40 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.4, 0.6)
Garfield County 2 Rural 126.0 (108.8, 145.2) 6 (2, 21) 45 stable stable trend 3.2 (-1.9, 17.0)
La Plata County 2 Rural 129.8 (113.9, 147.6) 5 (2, 14) 54 rising rising trend 9.0 (4.7, 17.4)
Summit County 2 Rural 136.7 (114.8, 162.2) 4 (1, 16) 30 rising rising trend 11.7 (0.5, 38.2)
Larimer County 2 Urban 138.5 (131.4, 145.9) 3 (2, 7) 307 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.2, 1.2)
Chaffee County 2 Rural 158.6 (133.3, 188.7) 2 (1, 8) 30 stable stable trend 5.2 (-1.5, 19.0)
Routt County 2 Rural 180.1 (152.9, 211.5) 1 (1, 4) 35 rising rising trend 11.7 (0.7, 34.6)
Baca County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bent County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cheyenne County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Costilla County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crowley County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dolores County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gilpin County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hinsdale County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kiowa County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mineral County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Juan County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sedgwick County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/13/2026 6:09 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top