Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Iowa by County

Prostate (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Iowa 7 N/A 129.5 (127.3, 131.7) N/A 2,710 rising rising trend 3.3 (2.0, 5.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 116.4 (116.2, 116.6) N/A 240,633 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.8, 3.4)
Clarke County 7 Rural 80.7 (52.4, 120.1) 98 (34, 98) 5 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.6, -0.7)
Osceola County 7 Rural 80.8 (48.7, 129.6) 97 (21, 98) 4 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.3, -0.9)
Allamakee County 7 Rural 84.9 (63.2, 113.2) 96 (54, 98) 11 falling falling trend -6.0 (-23.5, -3.1)
Lucas County 7 Rural 86.6 (58.8, 125.8) 95 (33, 98) 6 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.9, -0.6)
Keokuk County 7 Rural 92.1 (64.3, 129.9) 94 (27, 98) 8 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.1, -0.6)
Davis County 7 Rural 92.6 (61.3, 135.7) 93 (14, 98) 6 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.3, 0.0)
Decatur County 7 Rural 92.5 (60.6, 138.0) 92 (13, 98) 5 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.4, 0.5)
Louisa County 7 Rural 93.4 (66.4, 129.7) 91 (26, 98) 8 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.5, 0.5)
Hamilton County 7 Rural 93.6 (69.7, 124.2) 90 (38, 98) 11 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.1)
Guthrie County 7 Urban 93.8 (67.1, 129.9) 89 (29, 98) 9 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.7, -1.1)
Jasper County 7 Urban 95.1 (79.2, 113.6) 88 (58, 98) 26 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.8)
Washington County 7 Urban 97.3 (77.2, 121.8) 87 (42, 98) 17 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.6)
Hardin County 7 Rural 99.7 (77.0, 128.2) 86 (29, 98) 14 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.2)
Wright County 7 Rural 101.1 (74.9, 134.8) 85 (19, 98) 10 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.4, -1.3)
Franklin County 7 Rural 103.2 (72.9, 143.4) 84 (10, 98) 8 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.0, 0.1)
Iowa County 7 Rural 103.4 (78.8, 134.1) 83 (22, 98) 13 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.4)
Van Buren County 7 Rural 105.1 (70.7, 153.3) 82 (6, 98) 6 falling falling trend -2.6 (-5.2, -0.6)
Mahaska County 7 Rural 107.2 (83.9, 135.3) 81 (20, 97) 15 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.7)
Benton County 7 Urban 109.5 (89.4, 133.4) 80 (26, 96) 22 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.9, -1.1)
Jefferson County 7 Rural 110.9 (86.7, 141.4) 79 (16, 97) 17 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.1)
Greene County 7 Rural 111.3 (79.5, 154.3) 78 (5, 98) 8 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.5, 1.6)
Winnebago County 7 Rural 112.6 (82.3, 152.2) 77 (8, 98) 10 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.6, 0.3)
Monroe County 7 Rural 112.3 (76.8, 161.4) 76 (4, 98) 7 falling falling trend -2.0 (-4.0, -0.2)
Polk County 7 Urban 112.4 (106.5, 118.5) 75 (57, 85) 291 stable stable trend 1.9 (-2.0, 7.6)
Wapello County 7 Rural 113.4 (94.8, 134.8) 74 (26, 95) 28 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
Emmet County 7 Rural 114.3 (81.6, 157.7) 73 (4, 98) 8 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -0.3)
Marion County 7 Rural 114.8 (95.9, 136.8) 72 (23, 94) 27 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.8)
Henry County 7 Rural 114.8 (90.6, 144.0) 71 (11, 97) 16 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.0, 0.0)
Fayette County 7 Rural 115.3 (91.5, 144.2) 70 (11, 96) 17 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.6, -1.0)
Kossuth County 7 Rural 115.7 (90.2, 147.6) 69 (12, 97) 15 rising rising trend 5.9 (2.0, 16.0)
Pottawattamie County 7 Urban 116.3 (104.3, 129.4) 68 (37, 88) 73 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.2)
Lyon County 7 Rural 119.0 (87.1, 159.6) 67 (5, 98) 10 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.2)
O'Brien County 7 Rural 119.9 (92.0, 154.7) 66 (6, 97) 13 stable stable trend -1.5 (-18.8, 8.4)
Dallas County 7 Urban 119.7 (105.8, 135.0) 65 (28, 87) 56 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.2)
Mills County 7 Urban 120.5 (92.9, 155.0) 64 (7, 96) 14 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.4)
Jackson County 7 Rural 121.2 (97.6, 149.8) 63 (10, 95) 19 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.5)
Wayne County 7 Rural 120.8 (82.1, 175.1) 62 (2, 98) 6 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.5, -0.7)
Lee County 7 Rural 123.3 (104.4, 145.2) 61 (17, 90) 32 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.2)
Dubuque County 7 Urban 123.5 (111.4, 136.7) 60 (29, 83) 80 stable stable trend -1.8 (-2.7, 1.0)
Montgomery County 7 Rural 123.6 (90.7, 166.6) 59 (4, 98) 10 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.0, 3.4)
Poweshiek County 7 Rural 124.8 (99.1, 156.1) 58 (7, 95) 17 rising rising trend 8.6 (0.8, 26.9)
Cerro Gordo County 7 Rural 125.7 (108.8, 144.8) 57 (15, 86) 43 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Scott County 7 Urban 126.4 (117.0, 136.3) 56 (29, 77) 143 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Jones County 7 Urban 126.6 (103.1, 154.7) 55 (7, 91) 21 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.4)
Adair County 7 Rural 128.0 (90.3, 179.0) 54 (2, 98) 8 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.4, -0.3)
Story County 7 Urban 128.2 (113.7, 144.0) 53 (17, 81) 60 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.3)
Des Moines County 7 Rural 128.5 (110.4, 149.0) 52 (11, 87) 38 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.4, 0.1)
Shelby County 7 Rural 129.0 (97.9, 168.5) 51 (3, 95) 13 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.5)
Hancock County 7 Rural 129.1 (97.5, 169.6) 50 (3, 96) 12 stable stable trend -1.5 (-2.9, 0.0)
Audubon County 7 Rural 129.5 (88.4, 188.5) 49 (1, 98) 7 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.5, 1.0)
Muscatine County 7 Rural 129.7 (111.5, 150.3) 48 (12, 84) 39 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.1)
Ringgold County 7 Rural 127.3 (82.6, 193.5) 47 (1, 98) 5 stable stable trend 2.4 (-1.4, 20.1)
Warren County 7 Urban 130.2 (113.2, 149.3) 46 (11, 84) 44 rising rising trend 9.7 (0.8, 21.7)
Page County 7 Rural 134.4 (106.6, 168.4) 45 (4, 91) 17 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 0.9)
Clayton County 7 Rural 134.7 (109.3, 165.4) 44 (4, 91) 21 rising rising trend 5.6 (1.0, 16.2)
Taylor County 7 Rural 135.6 (93.6, 193.9) 43 (1, 98) 7 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.7, 2.8)
Johnson County 7 Urban 136.2 (124.0, 149.3) 42 (14, 69) 97 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.4)
Cedar County 7 Rural 136.4 (109.9, 168.3) 41 (3, 88) 19 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.5)
Webster County 7 Rural 137.7 (117.7, 160.3) 40 (6, 80) 36 rising rising trend 7.7 (0.3, 21.8)
Woodbury County 7 Urban 137.9 (124.7, 152.1) 39 (10, 67) 85 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 3.1)
Marshall County 7 Rural 138.2 (119.0, 159.9) 38 (6, 80) 39 stable stable trend 5.8 (-1.9, 20.4)
Union County 7 Rural 139.4 (107.0, 180.0) 37 (2, 93) 13 rising rising trend 11.5 (0.5, 31.9)
Appanoose County 7 Rural 140.7 (110.6, 178.3) 36 (2, 91) 15 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.6)
Cass County 7 Rural 140.8 (109.9, 179.3) 35 (2, 90) 15 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 0.9)
Calhoun County 7 Rural 140.9 (105.6, 185.9) 34 (2, 93) 11 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.3)
Dickinson County 7 Rural 141.1 (116.4, 171.0) 33 (3, 82) 24 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Bremer County 7 Urban 142.1 (117.8, 170.5) 32 (3, 82) 25 stable stable trend 6.8 (-1.0, 24.3)
Worth County 7 Rural 142.7 (101.5, 197.5) 31 (1, 97) 8 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.1, 1.4)
Boone County 7 Urban 143.5 (119.7, 171.1) 30 (3, 81) 28 rising rising trend 3.2 (0.8, 9.0)
Humboldt County 7 Rural 144.4 (108.2, 190.8) 29 (1, 93) 11 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.4, -0.1)
Clinton County 7 Rural 144.9 (126.9, 165.0) 28 (5, 70) 50 rising rising trend 7.0 (0.7, 20.3)
Chickasaw County 7 Rural 145.4 (113.0, 185.9) 27 (1, 89) 14 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.7)
Tama County 7 Rural 145.7 (116.4, 181.0) 26 (2, 85) 18 rising rising trend 13.3 (0.8, 32.0)
Carroll County 7 Rural 146.2 (119.4, 177.8) 25 (2, 82) 22 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.7)
Mitchell County 7 Rural 146.1 (110.4, 191.2) 24 (1, 93) 12 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.1, 0.3)
Linn County 7 Urban 149.0 (140.0, 158.5) 23 (9, 45) 212 rising rising trend 8.4 (3.3, 18.2)
Buena Vista County 7 Rural 149.4 (120.9, 183.0) 22 (1, 81) 20 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.3, -1.0)
Floyd County 7 Rural 150.6 (121.4, 185.9) 21 (1, 82) 19 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.3)
Pocahontas County 7 Rural 151.0 (109.7, 206.3) 20 (1, 95) 9 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.7)
Harrison County 7 Urban 151.2 (120.2, 188.9) 19 (1, 83) 17 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.3)
Howard County 7 Rural 151.8 (114.8, 199.0) 18 (1, 88) 12 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.5, 1.8)
Sac County 7 Rural 151.5 (115.2, 197.7) 17 (1, 90) 13 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.5, 0.7)
Butler County 7 Rural 152.0 (121.0, 189.8) 16 (1, 83) 18 stable stable trend 4.2 (-2.2, 27.4)
Madison County 7 Urban 152.6 (120.9, 190.9) 15 (1, 82) 17 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.3, 0.5)
Delaware County 7 Rural 152.8 (124.7, 186.4) 14 (1, 78) 22 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.7)
Black Hawk County 7 Urban 153.2 (141.0, 166.2) 13 (4, 45) 124 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.6, 0.3)
Grundy County 7 Urban 154.9 (119.9, 198.2) 12 (1, 86) 14 stable stable trend 13.7 (-1.5, 25.3)
Palo Alto County 7 Rural 155.0 (114.4, 206.9) 11 (1, 92) 11 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.8, -0.3)
Plymouth County 7 Rural 157.8 (132.2, 187.3) 10 (1, 69) 28 stable stable trend 3.0 (-0.4, 14.4)
Sioux County 7 Rural 158.4 (134.5, 185.5) 9 (2, 64) 33 stable stable trend 2.2 (-6.1, 17.3)
Clay County 7 Rural 161.0 (130.3, 197.6) 8 (1, 75) 20 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.4, 0.0)
Buchanan County 7 Rural 161.2 (132.2, 195.2) 7 (1, 72) 23 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 7.5)
Fremont County 7 Rural 161.6 (117.1, 220.8) 6 (1, 91) 9 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.2, 3.2)
Crawford County 7 Rural 162.4 (131.0, 199.7) 5 (1, 74) 19 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.5, 0.9)
Winneshiek County 7 Rural 173.2 (145.4, 205.8) 4 (1, 55) 29 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 1.0)
Cherokee County 7 Rural 176.4 (140.2, 220.8) 3 (1, 67) 18 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.7)
Monona County 7 Rural 185.3 (143.1, 238.7) 2 (1, 65) 14 stable stable trend 10.4 (-0.1, 32.9)
Ida County 7 Rural 220.7 (166.0, 289.9) 1 (1, 49) 12 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.9, 2.7)
Adams County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/14/2026 7:20 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

7 Source: SEER November 2024 submission.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top