Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Mississippi by County

Prostate (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Count

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Mississippi 2 N/A 139.0 (136.5, 141.5) N/A 2,528 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.2, 4.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 116.4 (116.2, 116.6) N/A 240,633 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.8, 3.4)
Hinds County 2 Urban 170.1 (159.6, 181.1) 16 (5, 30) 212 rising rising trend 3.3 (0.6, 9.1)
Harrison County 2 Urban 125.6 (116.7, 135.1) 50 (36, 68) 157 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.2, 5.0)
DeSoto County 2 Urban 125.2 (115.3, 135.9) 51 (35, 69) 125 falling falling trend -8.0 (-13.8, -0.2)
Jackson County 2 Urban 115.9 (106.1, 126.4) 60 (43, 76) 110 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.1, 6.1)
Madison County 2 Urban 169.4 (154.4, 185.6) 17 (4, 36) 105 stable stable trend -5.5 (-13.5, 2.9)
Rankin County 2 Urban 111.8 (102.2, 122.1) 66 (47, 78) 104 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.6, -0.9)
Jones County 2 Rural 178.4 (160.5, 198.0) 9 (1, 32) 76 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.6, 4.6)
Lee County 2 Rural 164.6 (147.9, 182.8) 22 (4, 40) 76 stable stable trend 9.1 (0.0, 15.5)
Forrest County 2 Urban 172.2 (153.6, 192.3) 14 (2, 38) 66 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.3, 1.8)
Lauderdale County 2 Rural 132.6 (117.8, 148.9) 41 (22, 68) 62 falling falling trend -2.7 (-5.0, -0.5)
Pearl River County 2 Rural 143.7 (127.1, 162.1) 37 (12, 60) 58 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.6, 2.2)
Lamar County 2 Urban 149.8 (132.1, 169.3) 31 (9, 57) 54 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.5)
Washington County 2 Rural 179.2 (156.1, 205.1) 7 (1, 37) 48 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.3, 2.8)
Lowndes County 2 Rural 129.4 (112.6, 148.3) 44 (24, 74) 45 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.3, -0.8)
Pike County 2 Rural 184.1 (160.2, 210.8) 4 (1, 36) 45 stable stable trend 6.0 (-3.2, 25.0)
Hancock County 2 Urban 113.3 (98.0, 130.9) 65 (37, 80) 41 falling falling trend -2.5 (-8.4, -0.7)
Marshall County 2 Urban 155.6 (132.8, 181.4) 25 (4, 57) 36 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.4, 1.8)
Monroe County 2 Rural 150.3 (128.6, 175.0) 30 (6, 63) 36 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.9, 0.5)
Warren County 2 Rural 114.4 (97.3, 134.0) 64 (34, 80) 34 rising rising trend 10.7 (5.1, 20.4)
Adams County 2 Rural 154.2 (130.8, 181.1) 26 (4, 58) 34 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.6, 1.9)
Oktibbeha County 2 Rural 143.0 (121.1, 167.8) 38 (8, 69) 31 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.9, 2.6)
Bolivar County 2 Rural 175.9 (147.3, 208.6) 11 (1, 47) 30 stable stable trend -3.5 (-23.8, 2.9)
Lafayette County 2 Rural 103.5 (86.1, 123.4) 76 (42, 81) 28 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.0, -1.1)
Leflore County 2 Rural 170.4 (141.4, 203.9) 15 (1, 54) 26 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.9, 2.4)
Marion County 2 Rural 156.7 (130.3, 187.5) 24 (2, 61) 26 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.6, 5.4)
Panola County 2 Rural 114.5 (95.1, 137.2) 63 (31, 80) 26 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.5, -0.3)
Alcorn County 2 Rural 110.2 (91.6, 131.9) 70 (35, 81) 25 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.1, 1.3)
Lincoln County 2 Rural 111.6 (92.3, 134.0) 67 (32, 81) 25 falling falling trend -4.6 (-6.9, -2.5)
Copiah County 2 Urban 126.3 (104.0, 152.4) 48 (18, 79) 24 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.1, -0.8)
Simpson County 2 Urban 131.7 (108.7, 158.7) 42 (13, 77) 24 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.0, 1.6)
Sunflower County 2 Rural 167.5 (137.7, 202.0) 21 (1, 57) 24 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.3, 6.5)
Itawamba County 2 Rural 146.6 (120.3, 177.4) 34 (4, 72) 22 stable stable trend 7.9 (-7.3, 36.3)
Jasper County 2 Rural 175.9 (143.2, 214.8) 10 (1, 54) 21 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.8, 1.5)
Yazoo County 2 Urban 148.1 (120.0, 180.7) 32 (3, 71) 21 stable stable trend 3.5 (-0.8, 14.0)
Chickasaw County 2 Rural 182.4 (148.6, 222.3) 5 (1, 49) 21 stable stable trend 11.2 (-1.1, 31.0)
Holmes County 2 Urban 222.0 (180.2, 270.8) 1 (1, 32) 21 stable stable trend 8.7 (-0.3, 30.2)
Tate County 2 Urban 110.1 (89.7, 134.3) 71 (33, 81) 21 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.8, 2.5)
Neshoba County 2 Rural 121.3 (98.4, 148.2) 54 (21, 80) 21 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.5, 1.0)
Union County 2 Rural 120.4 (97.7, 147.1) 56 (22, 81) 20 stable stable trend -2.7 (-6.8, 0.9)
Coahoma County 2 Rural 179.4 (144.3, 220.5) 6 (1, 53) 20 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.3, 3.7)
Grenada County 2 Rural 141.2 (114.2, 173.4) 39 (6, 76) 20 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.6, 0.9)
Winston County 2 Rural 152.0 (123.0, 186.7) 28 (2, 70) 20 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.1, 2.1)
Covington County 2 Rural 162.9 (131.7, 199.8) 23 (1, 63) 20 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.7, 1.9)
Pontotoc County 2 Rural 108.4 (87.3, 133.3) 74 (32, 81) 19 falling falling trend -4.4 (-15.7, -1.0)
Clay County 2 Rural 146.2 (117.7, 180.4) 35 (4, 75) 19 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.7, 0.0)
Clarke County 2 Rural 153.6 (123.7, 189.9) 27 (2, 70) 19 stable stable trend -9.3 (-19.8, 0.3)
Amite County 2 Rural 173.0 (137.6, 216.5) 13 (1, 62) 19 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.9, 1.6)
Scott County 2 Urban 115.6 (92.5, 142.9) 62 (26, 81) 19 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.2, -0.9)
Walthall County 2 Rural 173.0 (138.2, 215.1) 12 (1, 61) 18 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.7, 2.6)
Wayne County 2 Rural 138.9 (110.6, 172.8) 40 (4, 78) 18 falling falling trend -13.1 (-20.8, -3.9)
Smith County 2 Rural 167.8 (132.8, 210.1) 20 (1, 65) 17 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.4, 5.7)
Tippah County 2 Rural 115.8 (90.8, 146.0) 61 (23, 81) 16 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.3, 2.2)
Newton County 2 Rural 118.6 (93.2, 149.3) 59 (21, 81) 15 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.2, 0.6)
Stone County 2 Urban 124.8 (97.3, 158.2) 52 (14, 81) 15 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.5, 1.4)
Jefferson Davis County 2 Rural 168.7 (131.4, 215.2) 19 (1, 67) 15 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.3, 2.8)
George County 2 Rural 97.4 (75.8, 123.6) 78 (39, 81) 15 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.7, 0.7)
Tishomingo County 2 Rural 110.6 (85.7, 141.3) 69 (28, 81) 14 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.1, 2.9)
Lawrence County 2 Rural 169.2 (130.3, 217.1) 18 (1, 71) 14 stable stable trend 7.8 (-2.6, 31.5)
Leake County 2 Rural 96.7 (74.5, 124.0) 79 (41, 81) 14 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.0, -0.9)
Prentiss County 2 Rural 91.4 (70.5, 116.8) 81 (45, 81) 14 stable stable trend 2.2 (-8.4, 23.6)
Perry County 2 Urban 147.0 (112.4, 190.5) 33 (2, 79) 13 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.4, 6.4)
Attala County 2 Rural 99.6 (75.8, 129.5) 77 (35, 81) 12 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.0, 2.0)
Yalobusha County 2 Rural 121.2 (91.4, 159.3) 55 (13, 81) 12 stable stable trend -2.3 (-7.0, 2.2)
Wilkinson County 2 Rural 189.1 (142.2, 248.1) 3 (1, 65) 12 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.4, 2.0)
Calhoun County 2 Rural 119.7 (89.9, 157.5) 57 (12, 81) 11 falling falling trend -7.8 (-22.0, -3.9)
Carroll County 2 Rural 118.9 (88.0, 159.7) 58 (13, 81) 10 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.9, 3.1)
Kemper County 2 Rural 151.6 (111.4, 203.7) 29 (1, 80) 10 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.0, 1.4)
Jefferson County 2 Rural 210.9 (153.8, 283.7) 2 (1, 56) 10 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.2, 4.6)
Tallahatchie County 2 Rural 124.4 (91.1, 166.6) 53 (6, 81) 10 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.9, 0.9)
Montgomery County 2 Rural 131.1 (95.2, 178.0) 43 (3, 81) 10 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.9, 2.6)
Greene County 2 Rural 110.8 (80.6, 149.1) 68 (17, 81) 9 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.2, 4.2)
Noxubee County 2 Rural 127.2 (91.0, 174.5) 47 (4, 81) 9 falling falling trend -3.5 (-6.1, -1.2)
Tunica County 2 Urban 144.9 (101.9, 201.2) 36 (1, 81) 8 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.4, 3.9)
Benton County 2 Urban 128.5 (88.5, 182.7) 45 (2, 81) 7 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.8, 4.2)
Choctaw County 2 Rural 108.8 (75.3, 154.8) 73 (15, 81) 7 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.1, 3.8)
Webster County 2 Rural 109.0 (72.6, 158.0) 72 (11, 81) 7 stable stable trend -4.0 (-8.4, 0.1)
Claiborne County 2 Rural 128.3 (85.0, 186.7) 46 (2, 81) 6 falling falling trend -5.4 (-9.9, -1.5)
Franklin County 2 Rural 95.6 (64.2, 140.5) 80 (25, 81) 6 falling falling trend -15.0 (-30.9, -8.3)
Humphreys County 2 Rural 106.8 (71.1, 157.2) 75 (13, 81) 6 stable stable trend 16.7 (-6.6, 43.1)
Quitman County 2 Rural 126.0 (82.4, 188.2) 49 (2, 81) 6 stable stable trend 2.4 (-1.5, 6.9)
Sharkey County 2 Rural 179.0 (108.1, 282.5) 8 (1, 81) 4 stable stable trend -4.3 (-9.7, 0.1)
Issaquena County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/14/2026 6:27 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top