Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Missouri by County

Prostate (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Count

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Missouri 2 N/A 102.1 (100.7, 103.5) N/A 4,073 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.8, 4.5)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 116.4 (116.2, 116.6) N/A 240,633 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.8, 3.4)
St. Louis County 2 Urban 119.0 (115.2, 122.9) 16 (10, 32) 780 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.1, -1.2)
Jackson County 2 Urban 89.9 (85.7, 94.2) 66 (47, 78) 368 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.9, 8.8)
St. Charles County 2 Urban 105.9 (100.1, 111.9) 36 (22, 57) 270 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.4, -1.4)
Greene County 2 Urban 117.0 (109.8, 124.5) 20 (9, 41) 206 stable stable trend 4.4 (-0.8, 14.0)
St. Louis City 2 Urban 105.2 (98.1, 112.6) 38 (20, 60) 183 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.9, -1.5)
Jefferson County 2 Urban 100.0 (92.7, 107.8) 44 (26, 69) 153 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.4)
Clay County 2 Urban 77.3 (70.8, 84.2) 86 (62, 102) 111 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.6, 9.9)
Boone County 2 Urban 102.1 (92.8, 112.1) 42 (18, 71) 94 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.2, -0.6)
Jasper County 2 Urban 118.6 (107.1, 130.9) 17 (5, 48) 82 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.0, 2.7)
Cape Girardeau County 2 Urban 151.4 (136.2, 168.0) 2 (1, 15) 75 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.7, 2.7)
Franklin County 2 Urban 98.9 (88.7, 110.0) 46 (22, 77) 74 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.9, -1.9)
Cole County 2 Urban 137.0 (122.7, 152.7) 6 (1, 27) 70 rising rising trend 5.3 (1.7, 13.8)
Christian County 2 Urban 102.1 (90.2, 115.2) 41 (13, 75) 56 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.7, -1.4)
Buchanan County 2 Urban 108.4 (95.6, 122.4) 33 (9, 68) 55 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.6)
Cass County 2 Urban 76.0 (66.9, 86.1) 92 (58, 105) 53 stable stable trend 4.7 (-1.1, 18.2)
St. Francois County 2 Rural 121.7 (107.1, 137.9) 13 (3, 49) 53 rising rising trend 2.6 (0.5, 8.9)
Taney County 2 Rural 113.2 (99.3, 128.8) 27 (6, 63) 50 rising rising trend 7.3 (1.2, 23.5)
Platte County 2 Urban 76.7 (67.1, 87.4) 88 (54, 104) 49 falling falling trend -5.8 (-17.3, -3.5)
Newton County 2 Urban 119.7 (104.8, 136.4) 15 (4, 58) 49 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.7, 4.2)
Stone County 2 Rural 110.0 (94.2, 128.7) 31 (7, 74) 40 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.4, 0.2)
Camden County 2 Rural 81.5 (70.0, 95.2) 79 (42, 104) 39 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.7, -0.5)
Lincoln County 2 Urban 94.7 (80.9, 110.4) 54 (16, 94) 37 stable stable trend 4.3 (-1.6, 16.5)
Scott County 2 Rural 146.6 (125.6, 170.3) 3 (1, 30) 36 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.5, 2.5)
Butler County 2 Rural 116.2 (99.0, 136.0) 22 (3, 68) 33 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.0, 2.0)
Barry County 2 Rural 111.4 (94.4, 131.1) 29 (5, 75) 32 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.4, 2.0)
Callaway County 2 Urban 100.1 (84.5, 117.9) 43 (11, 92) 31 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.7, 8.2)
Pettis County 2 Rural 97.0 (80.8, 115.6) 49 (13, 96) 26 falling falling trend -3.5 (-8.3, -2.0)
Webster County 2 Urban 105.7 (88.0, 126.1) 37 (7, 85) 26 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.3, -0.3)
Stoddard County 2 Rural 120.3 (99.8, 144.3) 14 (2, 66) 25 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.9, 2.4)
Warren County 2 Urban 92.3 (76.2, 111.2) 60 (14, 99) 24 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.4, -1.9)
Phelps County 2 Rural 83.0 (68.5, 99.8) 76 (32, 105) 24 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.6, -1.1)
Marion County 2 Rural 122.2 (100.6, 147.5) 12 (1, 68) 24 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.4, 3.6)
Johnson County 2 Rural 79.5 (65.3, 96.0) 84 (38, 107) 23 stable stable trend 6.5 (-6.9, 28.2)
Pulaski County 2 Rural 108.6 (88.9, 131.2) 32 (3, 86) 22 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.8, -0.4)
Dunklin County 2 Rural 116.6 (95.1, 142.0) 21 (2, 80) 21 rising rising trend 7.7 (1.3, 23.6)
Ste. Genevieve County 2 Rural 143.1 (116.0, 175.4) 5 (1, 53) 21 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.3, 5.5)
Perry County 2 Rural 145.1 (117.8, 177.6) 4 (1, 47) 20 rising rising trend 9.3 (2.2, 30.2)
Polk County 2 Urban 92.9 (75.4, 113.6) 57 (14, 101) 20 stable stable trend 3.4 (-3.2, 18.4)
Benton County 2 Rural 83.7 (67.8, 104.4) 74 (27, 106) 20 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.5, -1.4)
Howell County 2 Rural 70.1 (56.8, 86.1) 100 (57, 109) 20 falling falling trend -3.4 (-7.1, -0.2)
Audrain County 2 Rural 114.3 (90.5, 142.8) 25 (1, 91) 18 stable stable trend -2.7 (-5.6, 0.0)
Laclede County 2 Rural 74.5 (59.7, 92.3) 93 (45, 109) 18 falling falling trend -4.4 (-6.7, -2.5)
Lawrence County 2 Rural 71.2 (57.1, 88.0) 97 (53, 109) 18 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.4, -0.3)
Morgan County 2 Rural 90.9 (72.9, 113.3) 64 (11, 104) 18 falling falling trend -2.7 (-5.4, -0.1)
Lafayette County 2 Urban 76.2 (61.0, 94.4) 90 (38, 109) 18 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.8, 0.3)
Miller County 2 Rural 96.0 (76.5, 119.5) 51 (10, 101) 17 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.3, 2.8)
Texas County 2 Rural 77.3 (60.5, 97.9) 87 (35, 108) 15 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.5, -0.6)
Henry County 2 Rural 81.3 (62.7, 104.5) 80 (21, 109) 14 falling falling trend -4.0 (-6.8, -1.7)
McDonald County 2 Rural 92.5 (71.3, 118.4) 58 (9, 106) 14 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.7, 3.6)
Adair County 2 Rural 92.4 (71.2, 118.5) 59 (11, 105) 13 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.1, 0.4)
Saline County 2 Rural 87.4 (67.0, 112.5) 68 (10, 108) 13 stable stable trend 3.8 (-2.2, 18.0)
Cooper County 2 Urban 110.6 (84.9, 142.4) 30 (1, 96) 13 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.1, 1.8)
Wayne County 2 Rural 129.7 (99.8, 168.3) 8 (1, 82) 13 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.9, 6.0)
Mississippi County 2 Rural 151.9 (116.8, 195.3) 1 (1, 63) 13 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.4, 5.0)
Gasconade County 2 Rural 96.5 (73.7, 125.7) 50 (7, 104) 13 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.4, -0.9)
Washington County 2 Rural 72.2 (55.0, 93.7) 96 (31, 110) 13 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.3, 1.5)
Randolph County 2 Rural 79.0 (60.1, 102.2) 85 (27, 108) 12 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.9, -0.2)
Andrew County 2 Urban 91.5 (69.4, 119.3) 62 (8, 108) 12 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.6, 0.7)
Osage County 2 Urban 122.5 (93.0, 159.5) 11 (1, 92) 12 falling falling trend -3.2 (-6.3, -0.1)
Wright County 2 Rural 91.4 (69.4, 119.0) 63 (8, 107) 12 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.2, 0.8)
Dallas County 2 Urban 83.6 (63.3, 109.7) 75 (14, 108) 12 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.7, -1.1)
Pike County 2 Rural 97.9 (74.1, 127.3) 48 (5, 105) 12 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.6, 2.1)
New Madrid County 2 Rural 99.8 (75.4, 130.7) 45 (5, 104) 12 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.4, 0.6)
Crawford County 2 Rural 65.0 (48.8, 85.7) 105 (52, 110) 11 falling falling trend -6.3 (-8.6, -4.3)
Madison County 2 Rural 127.4 (95.3, 167.7) 9 (1, 86) 11 stable stable trend 1.5 (-20.4, 26.2)
Clinton County 2 Urban 68.9 (51.5, 91.1) 101 (42, 110) 11 falling falling trend -5.9 (-18.6, -3.6)
Ray County 2 Urban 60.0 (44.5, 80.0) 108 (61, 110) 11 falling falling trend -3.9 (-6.9, -1.2)
Barton County 2 Rural 113.2 (83.5, 151.7) 26 (1, 99) 10 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.9, 2.4)
Moniteau County 2 Urban 98.2 (72.5, 130.6) 47 (3, 106) 10 stable stable trend -1.4 (-6.0, 3.4)
Bollinger County 2 Urban 117.2 (85.9, 158.0) 19 (1, 103) 10 stable stable trend 12.5 (-1.7, 37.7)
Nodaway County 2 Rural 73.7 (54.2, 98.7) 94 (26, 110) 10 stable stable trend -3.0 (-6.6, 0.2)
Linn County 2 Rural 103.4 (75.8, 139.6) 40 (2, 105) 10 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.9, 0.9)
Monroe County 2 Rural 115.5 (84.4, 157.6) 23 (1, 101) 9 rising rising trend 11.8 (0.8, 28.5)
Cedar County 2 Rural 76.0 (55.4, 103.5) 91 (21, 110) 9 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.5, 1.5)
Ripley County 2 Rural 111.7 (81.5, 151.2) 28 (1, 102) 9 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.9, 2.1)
Vernon County 2 Rural 66.7 (48.3, 90.4) 103 (38, 110) 9 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.3, 0.7)
Pemiscot County 2 Rural 95.5 (68.9, 129.8) 52 (4, 108) 9 stable stable trend 1.2 (-3.1, 5.9)
Iron County 2 Rural 114.7 (82.3, 157.8) 24 (1, 102) 9 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.6, 3.4)
Bates County 2 Urban 67.5 (47.9, 93.4) 102 (38, 110) 8 falling falling trend -3.8 (-7.7, -0.6)
Montgomery County 2 Rural 93.7 (66.2, 130.4) 55 (3, 109) 8 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.5, 0.5)
Douglas County 2 Rural 70.7 (49.7, 99.9) 99 (30, 110) 8 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.5, 0.2)
Livingston County 2 Rural 84.0 (59.3, 116.5) 73 (9, 110) 8 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.6, 1.4)
Howard County 2 Urban 104.1 (73.2, 145.5) 39 (1, 108) 8 stable stable trend -2.8 (-6.0, 0.2)
Lewis County 2 Rural 106.1 (74.7, 148.1) 35 (1, 108) 8 rising rising trend 15.2 (6.1, 49.5)
Ozark County 2 Rural 79.8 (56.0, 115.4) 83 (12, 110) 8 falling falling trend -3.2 (-6.5, -0.1)
Hickory County 2 Rural 73.6 (51.1, 109.2) 95 (20, 110) 7 stable stable trend 14.8 (-3.3, 38.3)
Macon County 2 Rural 60.5 (42.1, 85.5) 107 (54, 110) 7 stable stable trend -2.5 (-6.3, 1.0)
Reynolds County 2 Rural 123.6 (84.9, 178.5) 10 (1, 106) 7
*
*
Grundy County 2 Rural 86.9 (59.4, 124.9) 70 (7, 110) 7 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.2, 1.1)
Ralls County 2 Rural 76.5 (51.7, 111.4) 89 (11, 110) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.9, 3.4)
Clark County 2 Rural 117.6 (79.7, 170.4) 18 (1, 107) 6 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.7, 5.8)
Oregon County 2 Rural 87.1 (59.0, 127.1) 69 (4, 110) 6
*
*
Dent County 2 Rural 51.1 (34.5, 74.7) 109 (70, 110) 6 falling falling trend -3.9 (-8.0, -0.3)
Maries County 2 Rural 82.8 (55.9, 121.5) 77 (8, 110) 6 stable stable trend 0.2 (-4.2, 5.2)
Caldwell County 2 Urban 86.9 (58.3, 126.8) 71 (4, 110) 6 falling falling trend -7.5 (-12.8, -5.1)
Harrison County 2 Rural 90.4 (60.4, 133.0) 65 (3, 110) 6
*
*
Shannon County 2 Rural 93.5 (60.9, 140.9) 56 (1, 110) 6 stable stable trend 1.6 (-4.2, 8.6)
Carroll County 2 Rural 81.6 (53.2, 122.3) 78 (6, 110) 5 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.5, 1.3)
Chariton County 2 Rural 81.0 (52.3, 123.4) 81 (6, 110) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.9, 1.8)
Dade County 2 Rural 70.9 (46.0, 108.9) 98 (18, 110) 5 falling falling trend -5.5 (-7.5, -3.9)
Daviess County 2 Rural 80.6 (51.9, 121.8) 82 (7, 110) 5
*
*
Holt County 2 Rural 133.7 (86.4, 205.1) 7 (1, 108) 5 stable stable trend 4.7 (-3.5, 35.9)
DeKalb County 2 Urban 63.8 (40.9, 95.6) 106 (31, 110) 5
*
*
Carter County 2 Rural 106.2 (65.4, 167.5) 34 (1, 110) 4
*
*
Shelby County 2 Rural 94.8 (57.8, 149.9) 53 (1, 110) 4 stable stable trend -2.8 (-6.3, 0.3)
St. Clair County 2 Rural 45.1 (27.8, 73.3) 110 (74, 110) 4 falling falling trend -5.7 (-10.7, -1.8)
Sullivan County 2 Rural 89.2 (54.5, 141.4) 67 (1, 110) 4
*
*
Gentry County 2 Rural 91.6 (55.5, 145.3) 61 (1, 110) 4
*
*
Putnam County 2 Rural 86.8 (52.0, 143.0) 72 (1, 110) 4
*
*
Atchison County 2 Rural 66.4 (37.8, 115.5) 104 (14, 110) 3 falling falling trend -3.7 (-7.3, -0.6)
Knox County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mercer County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schuyler County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scotland County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Worth County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/14/2026 1:16 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top