Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Alabama by County

Prostate (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Alabama 2 N/A 113.6 (111.9, 115.4) N/A 3,641 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.7, -2.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 116.4 (116.2, 116.6) N/A 240,633 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.8, 3.4)
Cherokee County 2 Rural 116.9 (97.4, 140.1) 30 (9, 60) 27 rising rising trend 20.8 (2.3, 35.4)
Escambia County 2 Rural 93.1 (76.3, 112.8) 54 (23, 66) 22 stable stable trend 10.4 (-3.9, 21.4)
Etowah County 2 Urban 110.8 (99.8, 123.0) 34 (19, 55) 78 stable stable trend 8.8 (-0.2, 15.8)
Mobile County 2 Urban 98.8 (93.3, 104.6) 49 (36, 59) 256 stable stable trend 6.7 (-1.3, 11.2)
DeKalb County 2 Rural 92.2 (79.9, 106.0) 57 (31, 66) 43 stable stable trend 5.0 (-0.9, 15.3)
Jackson County 2 Rural 86.9 (73.9, 101.8) 61 (35, 66) 34 stable stable trend 3.4 (-2.0, 15.9)
Colbert County 2 Urban 114.1 (99.4, 130.6) 31 (14, 55) 45 rising rising trend 2.4 (1.0, 4.0)
Montgomery County 2 Urban 154.6 (144.8, 165.0) 8 (3, 18) 194 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.2, 7.3)
Elmore County 2 Urban 145.0 (130.4, 160.8) 13 (4, 27) 78 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.6, 3.8)
Baldwin County 2 Urban 90.8 (84.4, 97.5) 59 (42, 63) 161 stable stable trend 1.3 (-3.3, 11.1)
Cleburne County 2 Rural 117.7 (90.3, 151.8) 28 (5, 65) 13 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.1, 4.4)
Macon County 2 Urban 197.5 (161.9, 239.4) 1 (1, 17) 24 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.0, 3.7)
Autauga County 2 Urban 131.0 (114.4, 149.5) 20 (6, 41) 47 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.0, 3.2)
Calhoun County 2 Urban 147.2 (134.5, 160.9) 11 (4, 23) 107 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.1, 1.9)
Crenshaw County 2 Rural 143.6 (111.0, 184.2) 14 (1, 57) 14 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.0, 4.1)
Bullock County 2 Rural 171.1 (128.0, 224.8) 5 (1, 45) 12 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.5, 3.1)
Franklin County 2 Rural 104.1 (84.7, 126.9) 42 (15, 65) 21 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.1, 3.5)
Butler County 2 Rural 139.5 (111.6, 173.1) 16 (2, 53) 19 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.1, 3.2)
Randolph County 2 Rural 120.3 (97.6, 147.5) 25 (7, 62) 21 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.6, 2.7)
Marion County 2 Rural 102.3 (83.6, 124.4) 44 (17, 65) 22 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.2, 1.4)
Winston County 2 Rural 91.5 (72.1, 115.3) 58 (20, 67) 16 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.1, 2.6)
Fayette County 2 Rural 83.1 (60.8, 112.0) 63 (23, 67) 10 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.8, 3.7)
Choctaw County 2 Rural 158.8 (126.0, 199.5) 7 (1, 39) 17 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.6, 0.1)
Hale County 2 Urban 135.3 (103.5, 174.8) 19 (2, 61) 14 stable stable trend -1.0 (-5.1, 7.7)
Walker County 2 Urban 107.7 (94.3, 122.7) 38 (19, 59) 49 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.7, 0.8)
Clarke County 2 Rural 122.2 (99.3, 149.6) 22 (6, 60) 21 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.6)
Lee County 2 Urban 121.6 (111.3, 132.6) 23 (14, 41) 110 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.9, 1.2)
Talladega County 2 Rural 102.1 (90.1, 115.3) 45 (23, 62) 57 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.9, 6.5)
Tallapoosa County 2 Rural 129.1 (112.3, 148.1) 21 (7, 46) 45 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.2, 1.1)
Monroe County 2 Rural 105.2 (82.3, 133.5) 40 (12, 66) 16 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.2, 0.8)
Wilcox County 2 Rural 173.5 (129.9, 228.0) 4 (1, 40) 12 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.0, 1.5)
Covington County 2 Rural 77.9 (63.1, 95.4) 65 (40, 67) 21 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.4, 8.5)
Marshall County 2 Rural 97.8 (86.7, 109.9) 51 (28, 62) 60 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.5)
Pike County 2 Rural 139.1 (115.3, 166.6) 17 (3, 45) 25 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.6, 1.0)
Conecuh County 2 Rural 113.3 (82.9, 153.0) 32 (5, 66) 10 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.8, 1.4)
Barbour County 2 Rural 166.2 (140.0, 196.4) 6 (1, 24) 30 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.5, 2.3)
Greene County 2 Urban 176.1 (126.9, 240.1) 3 (1, 50) 10 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.9, 1.3)
Jefferson County 2 Urban 145.0 (139.6, 150.6) 12 (6, 20) 573 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.8)
Lawrence County 2 Urban 108.0 (89.8, 129.2) 37 (15, 62) 26 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.3, -0.1)
Chilton County 2 Urban 99.5 (83.0, 118.4) 47 (22, 65) 27 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.8, -1.0)
Chambers County 2 Rural 138.5 (118.3, 161.7) 18 (3, 39) 35 stable stable trend -2.5 (-11.7, 0.0)
Perry County 2 Rural 141.1 (98.7, 197.4) 15 (1, 65) 8 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.9, 0.3)
Coffee County 2 Rural 104.5 (89.2, 121.9) 41 (19, 63) 35 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.6, -0.9)
Dale County 2 Rural 98.4 (83.3, 115.8) 50 (23, 65) 31 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.9, -0.6)
Houston County 2 Urban 117.2 (105.8, 129.5) 29 (16, 48) 83 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.9, -1.5)
Blount County 2 Urban 70.9 (59.6, 84.1) 66 (55, 67) 29 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.8, -0.7)
Cullman County 2 Rural 64.7 (55.8, 74.8) 67 (61, 67) 40 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.7, -1.0)
Limestone County 2 Urban 98.9 (88.1, 110.7) 48 (28, 63) 65 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.9, -0.5)
Coosa County 2 Rural 92.5 (67.5, 127.0) 56 (15, 67) 10 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.8, -1.0)
Morgan County 2 Urban 119.3 (108.6, 130.9) 26 (15, 44) 95 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.2, -1.7)
Geneva County 2 Urban 112.7 (92.4, 136.7) 33 (12, 62) 23 stable stable trend -3.0 (-6.6, 0.3)
Lowndes County 2 Urban 189.9 (146.2, 244.2) 2 (1, 28) 14 falling falling trend -3.0 (-14.0, -0.1)
Henry County 2 Urban 149.9 (121.5, 184.2) 10 (1, 41) 21 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.6, -0.8)
Bibb County 2 Urban 100.5 (79.1, 126.6) 46 (15, 66) 15 falling falling trend -3.2 (-6.6, -1.8)
Lauderdale County 2 Urban 87.0 (77.1, 98.1) 60 (39, 66) 58 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.0, -2.0)
Pickens County 2 Urban 110.3 (86.4, 139.7) 35 (9, 66) 15 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.7, -0.8)
Washington County 2 Rural 119.1 (92.6, 152.2) 27 (5, 64) 14 falling falling trend -3.7 (-6.6, -1.2)
Dallas County 2 Rural 120.7 (101.5, 142.9) 24 (8, 58) 31 falling falling trend -4.5 (-13.6, -2.2)
Madison County 2 Urban 78.2 (73.1, 83.6) 64 (57, 66) 188 falling falling trend -4.9 (-14.9, -3.2)
Lamar County 2 Rural 97.8 (72.5, 130.4) 52 (13, 67) 11 falling falling trend -5.2 (-12.2, -2.7)
Marengo County 2 Rural 108.2 (84.3, 137.7) 36 (10, 66) 15 falling falling trend -5.2 (-16.6, -2.0)
Tuscaloosa County 2 Urban 94.2 (86.4, 102.6) 53 (36, 63) 114 falling falling trend -6.4 (-15.2, -3.4)
Russell County 2 Urban 92.9 (78.3, 109.6) 55 (27, 66) 32 falling falling trend -6.5 (-18.9, -3.9)
Clay County 2 Rural 83.4 (60.7, 113.3) 62 (22, 67) 9 falling falling trend -7.0 (-24.2, -2.5)
St. Clair County 2 Urban 102.4 (90.8, 115.2) 43 (23, 62) 60 falling falling trend -11.1 (-17.6, -3.1)
Sumter County 2 Rural 151.8 (112.8, 201.2) 9 (1, 56) 12 falling falling trend -15.2 (-30.2, -0.9)
Shelby County 2 Urban 106.1 (98.3, 114.3) 39 (25, 55) 145 falling falling trend -20.7 (-24.8, -15.8)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/12/2026 2:06 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top