Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Idaho by County

Prostate (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Idaho 7 N/A 119.1 (116.2, 122.0) N/A 1,390 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.2, -1.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 116.4 (116.2, 116.6) N/A 240,633 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.8, 3.4)
Blaine County 7 Rural 143.2 (119.7, 170.9) 6 (1, 21) 28 stable stable trend 13.2 (-3.9, 36.2)
Valley County 7 Rural 157.0 (124.5, 197.7) 2 (1, 21) 19 stable stable trend 8.6 (-0.1, 33.6)
Lemhi County 7 Rural 172.3 (136.8, 218.8) 1 (1, 15) 17 rising rising trend 8.3 (1.3, 25.4)
Idaho County 7 Rural 133.7 (110.2, 162.4) 10 (1, 29) 25 stable stable trend 6.7 (-2.8, 30.3)
Bannock County 7 Urban 106.8 (93.7, 121.2) 21 (11, 36) 53 stable stable trend 4.7 (-2.4, 12.9)
Ada County 7 Urban 140.3 (134.2, 146.7) 7 (3, 13) 410 rising rising trend 3.6 (2.0, 6.3)
Payette County 7 Rural 110.6 (90.2, 135.0) 17 (5, 37) 21 stable stable trend 3.5 (-5.8, 20.7)
Caribou County 7 Rural 148.1 (99.9, 212.7) 4 (1, 38) 6 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.7, 2.4)
Power County 7 Rural 106.1 (70.0, 156.0) 20 (2, 40) 6 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.3, 4.7)
Madison County 7 Rural 116.6 (90.0, 148.5) 16 (3, 39) 14 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.9, 1.2)
Clearwater County 7 Rural 139.0 (107.1, 180.8) 8 (1, 32) 14 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.0, 0.9)
Gem County 7 Urban 127.7 (104.0, 156.4) 12 (2, 33) 21 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.7, 0.3)
Washington County 7 Rural 109.1 (81.8, 145.2) 18 (4, 40) 11 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.9, 0.6)
Boundary County 7 Rural 101.3 (74.8, 135.8) 26 (6, 40) 11 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.9, 0.9)
Latah County 7 Rural 147.2 (125.0, 172.6) 5 (1, 18) 33 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.3, 0.1)
Boise County 7 Urban 131.7 (95.9, 181.8) 11 (1, 38) 11 stable stable trend -3.0 (-5.9, 0.7)
Jefferson County 7 Urban 98.4 (77.0, 123.9) 29 (9, 40) 16 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.2, -0.6)
Franklin County 7 Urban 103.3 (74.0, 140.8) 23 (4, 40) 8 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.6, -0.7)
Owyhee County 7 Urban 108.8 (79.7, 146.3) 19 (3, 40) 10 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.9, -0.2)
Jerome County 7 Urban 94.4 (72.0, 121.8) 33 (10, 40) 13 falling falling trend -3.7 (-6.7, -0.8)
Minidoka County 7 Rural 97.1 (74.4, 124.9) 30 (9, 40) 13 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.6, -2.0)
Nez Perce County 7 Urban 117.7 (101.4, 136.2) 15 (5, 32) 38 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.8, -1.8)
Bonner County 7 Rural 96.2 (83.5, 110.8) 31 (15, 39) 46 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.8, -1.6)
Fremont County 7 Rural 94.4 (68.6, 127.7) 34 (7, 40) 9 falling falling trend -3.8 (-7.2, -0.3)
Bingham County 7 Rural 100.0 (83.6, 118.9) 27 (12, 39) 28 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.7, -2.1)
Canyon County 7 Urban 126.3 (117.5, 135.6) 13 (6, 20) 161 stable stable trend -3.9 (-7.7, 1.9)
Twin Falls County 7 Urban 99.0 (87.1, 112.2) 28 (15, 38) 52 falling falling trend -4.1 (-5.7, -2.5)
Bear Lake County 7 Rural 82.6 (49.1, 133.2) 39 (6, 40) 4 falling falling trend -4.3 (-7.6, -1.4)
Teton County 7 Rural 94.0 (64.5, 134.0) 35 (6, 40) 7 falling falling trend -4.5 (-7.1, -1.2)
Cassia County 7 Rural 83.8 (62.5, 110.1) 38 (15, 40) 11 falling falling trend -4.7 (-7.8, -1.9)
Custer County 7 Rural 95.9 (60.2, 156.0) 32 (2, 40) 5 falling falling trend -4.9 (-8.6, -1.0)
Elmore County 7 Rural 102.2 (80.7, 127.8) 25 (8, 40) 17 falling falling trend -5.1 (-14.7, -2.9)
Lewis County 7 Rural 149.1 (93.5, 235.0) 3 (1, 39) 5 falling falling trend -5.1 (-8.1, -2.6)
Benewah County 7 Rural 73.9 (51.3, 106.4) 40 (18, 40) 7 falling falling trend -5.6 (-8.1, -3.3)
Gooding County 7 Rural 88.3 (64.8, 118.2) 37 (11, 40) 10 falling falling trend -7.1 (-17.6, -4.2)
Bonneville County 7 Urban 106.3 (95.1, 118.4) 22 (12, 35) 70 falling falling trend -10.9 (-17.9, -2.3)
Kootenai County 7 Urban 103.0 (95.0, 111.5) 24 (15, 35) 130 falling falling trend -19.4 (-25.4, -12.5)
Shoshone County 7 Rural 89.1 (66.2, 119.3) 36 (11, 40) 11 falling falling trend -35.6 (-53.4, -11.5)
Adams County 7 Rural 134.7 (91.2, 201.9) 9 (1, 39) 7
*
*
Oneida County 7 Rural 127.2 (77.5, 201.5) 14 (1, 40) 4
*
*
Butte County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camas County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clark County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/12/2026 10:47 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

7 Source: SEER November 2024 submission.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top