Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Illinois by County

Prostate (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Illinois 7 N/A 122.0 (120.9, 123.2) N/A 9,571 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.1, 3.5)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 116.4 (116.2, 116.6) N/A 240,633 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.8, 3.4)
Henderson County 7 Rural 128.1 (87.8, 184.7) 26 (1, 99) 7 rising rising trend 14.3 (6.6, 35.1)
Fulton County 7 Rural 144.7 (124.1, 168.2) 8 (2, 62) 37 rising rising trend 11.6 (7.1, 20.0)
Stephenson County 7 Rural 103.3 (88.7, 120.1) 74 (25, 95) 38 stable stable trend 11.6 (-3.1, 23.9)
Jackson County 7 Rural 143.6 (124.9, 164.5) 10 (2, 58) 45 rising rising trend 8.2 (2.6, 20.9)
Moultrie County 7 Rural 107.5 (79.7, 142.8) 62 (4, 99) 10 stable stable trend 6.9 (-1.5, 23.8)
Hancock County 7 Rural 121.9 (96.8, 152.5) 38 (3, 94) 18 stable stable trend 6.3 (-2.8, 20.8)
Madison County 7 Urban 120.8 (113.4, 128.6) 41 (17, 64) 210 rising rising trend 5.8 (2.1, 14.6)
Williamson County 7 Rural 132.3 (117.8, 148.3) 15 (4, 63) 63 stable stable trend 5.0 (-1.0, 18.8)
Randolph County 7 Rural 115.0 (95.3, 138.0) 52 (7, 93) 25 stable stable trend 4.6 (-2.4, 18.8)
McHenry County 7 Urban 123.8 (116.7, 131.2) 34 (14, 58) 249 rising rising trend 4.4 (2.3, 7.4)
DeKalb County 7 Urban 156.3 (141.1, 172.7) 7 (1, 23) 83 stable stable trend 4.0 (-1.0, 13.0)
Lake County 7 Urban 130.6 (125.7, 135.7) 21 (12, 41) 564 rising rising trend 3.8 (2.6, 5.1)
Ogle County 7 Rural 101.1 (86.9, 117.2) 79 (32, 96) 38 stable stable trend 3.8 (0.0, 13.6)
Adams County 7 Rural 114.1 (100.6, 129.1) 57 (15, 86) 54 stable stable trend 3.4 (-2.3, 14.7)
Kane County 7 Urban 127.0 (121.2, 133.0) 28 (13, 51) 385 rising rising trend 3.4 (0.8, 9.3)
Christian County 7 Rural 130.6 (110.7, 153.5) 20 (3, 78) 32 stable stable trend 3.3 (0.0, 11.8)
Tazewell County 7 Urban 125.2 (114.9, 136.2) 31 (10, 63) 114 rising rising trend 3.3 (0.5, 8.6)
St. Clair County 7 Urban 132.0 (123.9, 140.7) 17 (8, 48) 209 rising rising trend 3.0 (0.7, 6.1)
Pope County 7 Rural 119.6 (77.5, 192.2) 45 (1, 100) 5 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.6, 7.8)
Peoria County 7 Urban 144.5 (134.7, 155.0) 9 (3, 29) 167 stable stable trend 2.6 (-1.4, 10.6)
DuPage County 7 Urban 123.6 (119.5, 127.8) 35 (21, 54) 730 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.1, 5.9)
Kankakee County 7 Urban 114.2 (103.2, 126.2) 56 (19, 82) 82 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.5, 9.0)
Cook County 7 Urban 125.1 (123.2, 126.9) 32 (22, 45) 3,698 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.2, 3.3)
Champaign County 7 Urban 124.7 (114.9, 135.1) 33 (11, 64) 127 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.5, 7.1)
Scott County 7 Rural 159.4 (102.4, 239.8) 5 (1, 99) 5 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.8, 5.0)
Brown County 7 Rural 162.3 (108.7, 233.8) 4 (1, 96) 6 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.1, 4.9)
Macoupin County 7 Urban 105.9 (90.6, 123.4) 68 (21, 95) 36 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.5, 5.8)
Cass County 7 Rural 106.4 (77.4, 143.6) 67 (5, 100) 9 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.4, 9.6)
Schuyler County 7 Rural 121.1 (84.4, 172.1) 39 (1, 99) 7 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.6, 4.1)
Marion County 7 Rural 125.5 (106.9, 146.8) 29 (5, 84) 34 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 5.5)
Menard County 7 Urban 181.1 (142.9, 227.8) 1 (1, 43) 17 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.2, 3.2)
Washington County 7 Rural 127.7 (99.0, 163.5) 27 (2, 94) 14 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.2, 3.1)
Lawrence County 7 Rural 95.0 (69.4, 127.6) 87 (12, 100) 9 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.7, 2.0)
Union County 7 Rural 102.5 (79.6, 131.0) 76 (10, 99) 14 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.8, 2.4)
Wabash County 7 Rural 83.5 (57.4, 118.9) 94 (16, 100) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.9, 3.1)
Kendall County 7 Urban 133.6 (120.0, 148.3) 13 (4, 58) 78 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.8)
Morgan County 7 Rural 129.5 (109.7, 152.3) 24 (3, 79) 32 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.6, 1.6)
Grundy County 7 Urban 131.8 (114.1, 151.8) 18 (4, 72) 42 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 1.1)
Alexander County 7 Urban 181.3 (128.7, 253.6) 2 (1, 83) 8 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.3, 2.6)
Pulaski County 7 Rural 171.8 (119.9, 242.9) 3 (1, 91) 7 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.7, 2.2)
Clinton County 7 Urban 132.2 (113.0, 154.0) 16 (3, 76) 35 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.9)
White County 7 Rural 81.6 (59.2, 111.1) 95 (34, 100) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.3, 1.0)
Carroll County 7 Rural 122.5 (97.8, 153.1) 36 (3, 94) 18 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.8, 0.6)
Pike County 7 Rural 107.1 (81.0, 139.9) 64 (6, 99) 12 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.4, 1.8)
Ford County 7 Urban 117.5 (87.8, 155.0) 48 (3, 99) 11 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.7, 1.7)
Jersey County 7 Urban 114.5 (91.6, 142.2) 55 (6, 96) 18 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.4)
Sangamon County 7 Urban 130.9 (122.0, 140.4) 19 (8, 50) 171 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.0, 0.0)
Shelby County 7 Rural 134.9 (110.9, 163.5) 12 (2, 83) 23 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.8, 0.7)
Iroquois County 7 Rural 114.6 (94.7, 138.0) 54 (8, 93) 25 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.5, 0.0)
Jasper County 7 Rural 158.6 (118.4, 209.8) 6 (1, 84) 11 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.0, 1.6)
Montgomery County 7 Rural 101.6 (82.9, 123.6) 78 (16, 98) 22 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.7, 0.3)
Bond County 7 Urban 130.3 (101.6, 165.3) 22 (1, 93) 15 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.8, 1.3)
Marshall County 7 Urban 119.3 (90.7, 155.9) 43 (3, 97) 12 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.1, 0.6)
Saline County 7 Rural 114.9 (93.0, 141.1) 53 (5, 95) 20 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.8, 0.2)
Douglas County 7 Rural 96.2 (73.6, 124.1) 86 (16, 100) 13 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.8, 0.0)
Greene County 7 Rural 140.1 (106.6, 182.2) 11 (1, 92) 12 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.9, -0.1)
Jefferson County 7 Rural 116.1 (98.2, 136.7) 51 (8, 92) 31 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.6, -0.2)
Mason County 7 Rural 125.8 (96.7, 162.5) 30 (2, 95) 13 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.9, 0.0)
McDonough County 7 Rural 107.4 (86.4, 132.5) 63 (10, 98) 19 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.4, -0.5)
Richland County 7 Rural 133.4 (105.0, 168.1) 14 (1, 91) 16 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.5, 0.6)
Will County 7 Urban 129.6 (124.4, 134.9) 23 (12, 44) 518 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -0.9)
Macon County 7 Urban 120.9 (109.8, 132.9) 40 (11, 74) 92 stable stable trend -2.0 (-3.5, 3.8)
Boone County 7 Urban 96.8 (82.5, 113.2) 84 (40, 98) 34 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.7, -0.4)
Franklin County 7 Rural 101.0 (84.8, 119.7) 80 (24, 97) 29 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.3, -1.0)
Wayne County 7 Rural 96.6 (74.1, 125.0) 85 (12, 100) 13 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.1, -0.1)
Bureau County 7 Rural 109.7 (92.0, 130.3) 60 (12, 95) 29 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.9, 0.5)
Calhoun County 7 Urban 127.6 (83.3, 194.6) 25 (1, 100) 5 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.1, 0.8)
Fayette County 7 Rural 117.0 (93.6, 145.0) 46 (4, 94) 18 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.5, -0.8)
Hamilton County 7 Rural 73.5 (44.8, 116.1) 98 (20, 100) 4 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.1, 0.7)
Livingston County 7 Rural 112.2 (94.1, 133.1) 58 (10, 94) 29 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.4, 0.0)
Mercer County 7 Urban 105.0 (81.3, 134.9) 69 (7, 99) 14 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.2, 0.9)
Vermilion County 7 Rural 119.5 (106.4, 134.0) 42 (11, 80) 63 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.6, -0.8)
Clay County 7 Rural 117.0 (88.4, 153.3) 49 (3, 97) 12 stable stable trend -2.4 (-4.8, 0.0)
Jo Daviess County 7 Rural 106.4 (87.9, 129.1) 66 (11, 97) 25 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.1, -0.6)
Knox County 7 Rural 89.3 (76.2, 104.3) 92 (52, 99) 35 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.1, -0.8)
Perry County 7 Rural 116.4 (92.8, 144.6) 50 (4, 95) 17 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.3, 0.3)
Monroe County 7 Urban 111.9 (93.8, 132.8) 59 (10, 93) 29 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.0, -1.0)
Whiteside County 7 Rural 102.5 (89.1, 117.6) 77 (28, 95) 44 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.7, -1.6)
Winnebago County 7 Urban 90.2 (84.2, 96.7) 91 (71, 96) 172 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.2, -2.1)
Cumberland County 7 Rural 91.5 (63.1, 129.9) 89 (7, 100) 7 stable stable trend -2.7 (-6.2, 0.6)
Effingham County 7 Rural 122.3 (102.9, 144.7) 37 (5, 87) 30 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.4, -1.4)
Johnson County 7 Rural 104.3 (78.5, 137.3) 72 (7, 99) 11 stable stable trend -2.9 (-5.9, 0.2)
Piatt County 7 Urban 100.6 (76.8, 130.4) 81 (10, 100) 13 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.0, -0.9)
Woodford County 7 Urban 108.0 (91.0, 127.7) 61 (15, 95) 30 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.6, -1.1)
Henry County 7 Urban 94.4 (80.9, 109.8) 88 (42, 99) 37 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.8, -1.3)
Logan County 7 Rural 102.6 (82.9, 126.1) 75 (14, 99) 19 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.6, -1.5)
Rock Island County 7 Urban 103.9 (95.0, 113.5) 73 (44, 89) 106 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.4, -1.8)
Edgar County 7 Rural 87.3 (66.5, 114.0) 93 (30, 100) 12 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.9, -0.8)
Crawford County 7 Rural 105.6 (81.6, 135.2) 65 (7, 98) 14 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.3, -1.4)
Putnam County 7 Rural 91.5 (58.1, 143.4) 90 (4, 100) 5 falling falling trend -3.5 (-6.7, -0.1)
Lee County 7 Rural 98.3 (82.0, 117.4) 83 (32, 98) 27 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.0, -2.2)
Warren County 7 Rural 78.5 (57.5, 105.6) 97 (47, 100) 10 falling falling trend -3.9 (-6.2, -1.8)
Clark County 7 Rural 70.5 (50.4, 97.3) 99 (54, 100) 8 falling falling trend -4.3 (-7.0, -1.8)
Coles County 7 Rural 78.9 (65.2, 94.9) 96 (64, 100) 24 falling falling trend -4.3 (-5.9, -2.9)
McLean County 7 Urban 99.0 (89.9, 108.8) 82 (50, 94) 92 falling falling trend -4.6 (-8.5, -3.5)
La Salle County 7 Rural 105.1 (95.1, 115.9) 71 (38, 90) 86 falling falling trend -5.8 (-11.0, -3.2)
De Witt County 7 Rural 61.9 (43.7, 86.6) 100 (75, 100) 8 falling falling trend -11.5 (-30.8, -5.4)
Massac County 7 Urban 117.4 (90.1, 151.8) 47 (2, 98) 13 falling falling trend -22.4 (-34.3, -11.2)
Gallatin County 7 Rural 118.2 (74.6, 183.7) 44 (1, 100) 5
*
*
Stark County 7 Urban 104.5 (65.6, 163.0) 70 (2, 100) 5
*
*
Edwards County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardin County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/13/2026 1:12 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

7 Source: SEER November 2024 submission.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top