Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Minnesota by County

Prostate (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Minnesota 2 N/A 120.3 (118.7, 122.0) N/A 4,406 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.8, 4.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 116.4 (116.2, 116.6) N/A 240,633 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.8, 3.4)
Swift County 2 Rural 112.3 (81.8, 152.7) 53 (2, 87) 9 stable stable trend 20.2 (-3.4, 40.6)
Watonwan County 2 Rural 120.9 (89.2, 161.5) 36 (1, 87) 10 stable stable trend 13.6 (-2.1, 43.4)
Cass County 2 Rural 131.0 (113.0, 151.9) 21 (2, 66) 41 stable stable trend 11.2 (-1.2, 24.8)
Polk County 2 Urban 111.9 (92.1, 135.0) 56 (8, 84) 24 stable stable trend 10.7 (-5.7, 23.9)
Chisago County 2 Urban 124.3 (108.7, 141.6) 30 (5, 69) 49 rising rising trend 7.9 (1.6, 19.4)
Clay County 2 Urban 136.5 (119.2, 155.6) 12 (1, 57) 47 stable stable trend 7.7 (-0.4, 20.3)
Blue Earth County 2 Urban 103.6 (88.9, 120.1) 67 (24, 84) 37 stable stable trend 7.2 (-4.1, 20.9)
Faribault County 2 Rural 97.0 (72.6, 128.5) 76 (9, 87) 12 rising rising trend 6.7 (1.1, 16.9)
Hubbard County 2 Rural 131.3 (108.8, 158.3) 19 (1, 74) 27 rising rising trend 6.2 (2.3, 14.7)
Aitkin County 2 Rural 122.9 (101.7, 150.1) 34 (3, 79) 25 rising rising trend 6.1 (1.5, 16.6)
Martin County 2 Rural 117.2 (94.3, 145.0) 42 (3, 83) 19 stable stable trend 6.1 (-2.5, 21.2)
Crow Wing County 2 Rural 140.3 (126.8, 155.2) 7 (2, 41) 83 stable stable trend 5.9 (-0.5, 17.9)
Douglas County 2 Rural 129.6 (112.6, 148.9) 23 (3, 66) 44 stable stable trend 5.9 (-1.5, 21.2)
Redwood County 2 Rural 128.3 (99.9, 163.3) 25 (1, 82) 15 stable stable trend 5.9 (-3.9, 24.6)
Nicollet County 2 Urban 102.3 (83.8, 123.9) 69 (18, 86) 22 stable stable trend 5.3 (-11.2, 24.6)
Otter Tail County 2 Rural 136.6 (122.6, 152.1) 11 (2, 45) 74 stable stable trend 5.3 (-6.3, 13.3)
Olmsted County 2 Urban 127.2 (117.1, 138.0) 26 (8, 55) 122 rising rising trend 5.0 (1.4, 11.2)
Washington County 2 Urban 138.2 (130.2, 146.7) 10 (4, 33) 233 rising rising trend 5.0 (2.4, 10.9)
Dakota County 2 Urban 140.1 (133.5, 146.9) 8 (3, 27) 367 rising rising trend 4.9 (2.9, 7.9)
Mille Lacs County 2 Urban 133.0 (110.2, 159.5) 17 (1, 72) 25 stable stable trend 4.9 (-2.6, 27.6)
Becker County 2 Rural 136.0 (116.9, 157.8) 13 (2, 64) 39 rising rising trend 4.2 (1.0, 10.9)
Todd County 2 Rural 114.5 (94.5, 138.2) 47 (6, 83) 25 stable stable trend 4.0 (-2.6, 19.3)
Benton County 2 Urban 117.6 (97.5, 140.7) 41 (5, 81) 26 stable stable trend 3.5 (-5.0, 16.2)
Ramsey County 2 Urban 131.5 (125.7, 137.6) 18 (9, 38) 402 rising rising trend 3.4 (1.2, 6.6)
Goodhue County 2 Rural 119.5 (103.5, 137.7) 37 (6, 76) 42 stable stable trend 3.2 (-3.6, 19.1)
Le Sueur County 2 Urban 100.2 (81.4, 122.6) 74 (19, 87) 21 stable stable trend 3.0 (-1.6, 12.3)
Mower County 2 Rural 91.3 (75.7, 109.5) 80 (36, 87) 25 stable stable trend 2.6 (-6.5, 22.7)
Hennepin County 2 Urban 115.2 (111.6, 118.8) 45 (31, 59) 847 rising rising trend 2.4 (1.0, 4.3)
Winona County 2 Rural 101.7 (86.8, 118.8) 71 (25, 85) 35 stable stable trend 2.3 (-2.7, 13.4)
Wright County 2 Urban 109.8 (99.4, 121.0) 59 (24, 76) 88 stable stable trend 1.9 (-4.4, 11.3)
St. Louis County 2 Urban 131.1 (122.9, 139.8) 20 (7, 42) 204 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.2, 8.3)
Kandiyohi County 2 Rural 112.2 (95.8, 131.0) 54 (12, 81) 35 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.0, 6.3)
Pine County 2 Rural 105.2 (87.3, 126.3) 65 (15, 85) 26 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.4, 8.5)
Sherburne County 2 Urban 113.4 (100.1, 127.9) 49 (15, 79) 59 stable stable trend 1.2 (-4.4, 15.6)
Anoka County 2 Urban 113.7 (107.4, 120.4) 48 (28, 66) 259 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.0, 4.8)
Stearns County 2 Urban 113.0 (103.5, 123.2) 52 (22, 73) 108 stable stable trend 1.1 (-3.7, 9.8)
Carver County 2 Urban 106.5 (94.8, 119.3) 64 (27, 81) 67 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.6, 6.1)
Big Stone County 2 Rural 142.7 (98.0, 206.5) 6 (1, 86) 7 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.0, 3.1)
Grant County 2 Rural 133.0 (90.8, 191.9) 16 (1, 87) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.3, 2.3)
Lyon County 2 Rural 100.9 (79.6, 126.5) 73 (14, 87) 16 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.9, 14.1)
Wilkin County 2 Rural 124.5 (84.1, 180.4) 29 (1, 87) 6 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.9, 1.7)
Pope County 2 Rural 154.4 (121.2, 195.8) 3 (1, 72) 16 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.0, 0.9)
Koochiching County 2 Rural 128.7 (101.0, 164.3) 24 (1, 80) 16 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.1, 0.8)
Murray County 2 Rural 113.4 (79.8, 159.4) 50 (1, 87) 8 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.5, 0.9)
Rice County 2 Rural 109.3 (95.5, 124.7) 60 (16, 81) 47 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.8, 0.5)
Meeker County 2 Rural 124.1 (102.5, 149.7) 31 (2, 78) 24 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.1, 0.4)
Marshall County 2 Rural 138.5 (103.0, 184.7) 9 (1, 82) 11 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.0, 0.1)
Chippewa County 2 Rural 146.4 (112.6, 188.2) 4 (1, 78) 14 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.9, 0.2)
Mahnomen County 2 Rural 168.6 (115.1, 241.9) 1 (1, 81) 7 stable stable trend -2.3 (-6.5, 1.8)
Pipestone County 2 Rural 106.8 (74.6, 150.2) 62 (2, 87) 7 stable stable trend -2.4 (-6.0, 0.9)
Renville County 2 Rural 134.7 (106.0, 169.9) 14 (1, 79) 16 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.8, 0.7)
Houston County 2 Urban 122.9 (99.4, 151.6) 33 (2, 82) 20 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.4, 0.3)
Scott County 2 Urban 106.5 (96.1, 117.9) 63 (29, 79) 84 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.1, -0.7)
Stevens County 2 Rural 124.6 (85.8, 175.5) 28 (1, 87) 7 stable stable trend -2.5 (-6.8, 1.5)
Clearwater County 2 Rural 92.3 (62.9, 133.4) 77 (6, 87) 6 stable stable trend -2.6 (-6.1, 0.5)
Jackson County 2 Rural 124.0 (91.8, 165.9) 32 (1, 86) 10 falling falling trend -2.6 (-5.1, -0.3)
Carlton County 2 Urban 121.1 (102.3, 142.7) 35 (4, 79) 31 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.8, -1.1)
Yellow Medicine County 2 Rural 130.1 (93.6, 177.5) 22 (1, 85) 9 stable stable trend -2.9 (-6.1, 0.0)
Cook County 2 Rural 134.5 (93.4, 194.8) 15 (1, 87) 8 stable stable trend -3.1 (-6.5, 0.3)
Dodge County 2 Urban 77.0 (57.0, 102.3) 87 (49, 87) 10 stable stable trend -3.1 (-6.4, 0.1)
Isanti County 2 Urban 115.0 (97.3, 135.2) 46 (8, 82) 32 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.5, -1.6)
Pennington County 2 Rural 118.0 (89.2, 154.3) 39 (2, 86) 12 stable stable trend -3.2 (-7.0, 0.2)
Roseau County 2 Rural 117.9 (90.7, 151.8) 40 (2, 86) 14 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.7, -0.9)
Wadena County 2 Rural 144.8 (114.6, 181.9) 5 (1, 72) 16 falling falling trend -3.2 (-6.4, -0.3)
Waseca County 2 Rural 99.4 (77.0, 127.3) 75 (12, 87) 14 stable stable trend -3.3 (-7.9, 0.8)
Brown County 2 Rural 92.1 (74.1, 113.9) 78 (30, 87) 19 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.4, -1.5)
Rock County 2 Urban 113.0 (80.2, 156.7) 51 (1, 87) 8 falling falling trend -3.4 (-6.4, -0.6)
Fillmore County 2 Urban 116.1 (93.9, 142.8) 44 (3, 83) 20 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.5, -1.7)
Itasca County 2 Rural 91.8 (78.7, 106.8) 79 (45, 87) 38 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.3, -1.8)
Morrison County 2 Rural 103.9 (87.1, 123.6) 66 (16, 85) 28 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.2, -2.6)
Cottonwood County 2 Rural 102.1 (74.9, 137.7) 70 (6, 87) 10 falling falling trend -4.1 (-7.1, -1.6)
Freeborn County 2 Rural 91.1 (75.1, 110.1) 81 (36, 87) 24 falling falling trend -4.1 (-5.6, -2.8)
Norman County 2 Rural 101.1 (65.4, 152.7) 72 (1, 87) 5 falling falling trend -4.2 (-8.7, -0.8)
Sibley County 2 Rural 81.0 (58.9, 109.8) 86 (28, 87) 9 falling falling trend -4.3 (-7.1, -1.8)
Lake County 2 Rural 117.1 (90.2, 152.6) 43 (2, 86) 14 falling falling trend -4.5 (-19.5, -0.5)
McLeod County 2 Rural 110.4 (93.2, 130.2) 58 (11, 83) 30 falling falling trend -4.6 (-7.1, -2.4)
Beltrami County 2 Rural 107.9 (90.9, 127.2) 61 (16, 84) 30 falling falling trend -4.8 (-8.0, -2.0)
Kanabec County 2 Rural 103.0 (79.6, 132.6) 68 (9, 87) 14 falling falling trend -4.9 (-8.1, -2.2)
Steele County 2 Rural 111.7 (93.7, 132.5) 57 (8, 83) 28 falling falling trend -5.2 (-7.4, -3.3)
Nobles County 2 Rural 89.0 (68.5, 114.2) 82 (26, 87) 13 falling falling trend -5.3 (-7.9, -3.2)
Traverse County 2 Rural 112.1 (63.9, 191.1) 55 (1, 87) 3 falling falling trend -5.3 (-11.9, -0.5)
Lac qui Parle County 2 Rural 119.4 (83.0, 170.7) 38 (1, 87) 8 falling falling trend -5.5 (-9.4, -2.3)
Wabasha County 2 Urban 84.6 (66.4, 107.2) 84 (42, 87) 15 falling falling trend -5.5 (-15.2, -2.5)
Lincoln County 2 Rural 81.9 (49.2, 132.7) 85 (6, 87) 4 falling falling trend -6.4 (-10.5, -3.4)
Kittson County 2 Rural 163.7 (107.3, 245.4) 2 (1, 84) 6
*
*
Lake of the Woods County 2 Rural 85.0 (50.5, 147.1) 83 (4, 87) 4
*
*
Red Lake County 2 Rural 124.9 (75.2, 201.2) 27 (1, 87) 4
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/13/2026 3:03 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top