Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

Prostate (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Oklahoma 2 N/A 108.0 (106.1, 109.9) N/A 2,558 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.1, 7.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 116.4 (116.2, 116.6) N/A 240,633 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.8, 3.4)
McIntosh County 2 Rural 91.6 (72.0, 116.2) 45 (8, 67) 16 rising rising trend 14.4 (1.9, 30.2)
Payne County 2 Rural 116.8 (101.6, 133.6) 10 (3, 44) 44 rising rising trend 9.7 (3.7, 19.0)
Lincoln County 2 Urban 109.3 (91.3, 130.3) 22 (3, 56) 27 stable stable trend 9.3 (-3.2, 25.8)
Seminole County 2 Rural 105.5 (83.8, 131.6) 25 (3, 63) 17 rising rising trend 9.2 (3.4, 18.5)
Osage County 2 Urban 96.6 (82.6, 112.7) 36 (10, 62) 35 rising rising trend 8.4 (3.5, 18.2)
Creek County 2 Urban 114.7 (101.4, 129.5) 14 (3, 41) 56 stable stable trend 7.1 (-1.2, 24.6)
Mayes County 2 Rural 115.6 (97.5, 136.3) 11 (2, 50) 31 stable stable trend 7.0 (-2.4, 26.5)
Woodward County 2 Rural 112.8 (88.0, 142.9) 19 (1, 62) 14 stable stable trend 6.2 (-2.9, 33.2)
Tulsa County 2 Urban 140.6 (135.0, 146.3) 3 (1, 9) 505 rising rising trend 5.5 (1.0, 16.3)
Custer County 2 Rural 114.2 (91.4, 141.1) 16 (1, 59) 18 stable stable trend 5.4 (-3.2, 24.0)
Bryan County 2 Rural 81.7 (67.4, 98.4) 58 (24, 68) 23 stable stable trend 4.9 (-4.2, 16.4)
Pittsburg County 2 Rural 101.0 (85.5, 118.7) 32 (6, 61) 31 stable stable trend 4.6 (-2.9, 19.7)
Pottawatomie County 2 Rural 96.5 (83.7, 110.8) 38 (11, 61) 43 rising rising trend 4.1 (0.8, 9.6)
Garfield County 2 Urban 109.4 (94.7, 125.9) 20 (5, 52) 41 stable stable trend 3.4 (-2.2, 14.6)
Woods County 2 Rural 152.3 (110.1, 206.9) 2 (1, 54) 9 stable stable trend 2.4 (-2.3, 16.1)
Ottawa County 2 Rural 113.4 (93.2, 137.0) 17 (2, 56) 23 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.5, 5.0)
Oklahoma County 2 Urban 115.1 (110.4, 119.9) 12 (7, 27) 484 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.5, 6.4)
Cherokee County 2 Rural 91.0 (75.8, 108.5) 47 (11, 66) 27 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.4, 10.1)
Cleveland County 2 Urban 96.5 (89.7, 103.7) 37 (21, 53) 156 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.3, 3.6)
Ellis County 2 Rural 160.6 (100.8, 248.8) 1 (1, 64) 5 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.6, 3.9)
Pawnee County 2 Urban 124.6 (97.3, 158.3) 6 (1, 55) 15 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.3, 3.4)
Latimer County 2 Rural 109.4 (76.8, 152.9) 21 (1, 67) 8 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.3, 3.7)
Caddo County 2 Rural 129.7 (104.9, 158.6) 5 (1, 45) 20 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.1)
Love County 2 Rural 73.3 (47.8, 109.1) 65 (9, 68) 5 stable stable trend -0.5 (-5.4, 5.0)
Comanche County 2 Urban 106.9 (95.4, 119.4) 24 (7, 49) 67 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 0.9)
Haskell County 2 Rural 94.3 (66.3, 131.4) 40 (2, 68) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-6.6, 5.0)
Carter County 2 Rural 99.6 (83.9, 117.7) 34 (7, 61) 30 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.6)
Tillman County 2 Rural 78.0 (46.5, 125.3) 63 (4, 68) 4 stable stable trend -1.3 (-6.1, 3.2)
Delaware County 2 Rural 84.9 (71.9, 100.2) 54 (23, 67) 32 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.7, 1.1)
Wagoner County 2 Urban 114.6 (101.8, 128.7) 15 (4, 41) 61 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.7, 1.2)
Craig County 2 Rural 119.7 (90.8, 156.0) 8 (1, 61) 12 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.4, 1.4)
Murray County 2 Rural 105.4 (78.6, 139.5) 26 (2, 66) 11 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.2, 0.7)
Johnston County 2 Rural 98.4 (68.3, 138.7) 35 (2, 68) 7 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.8, 2.4)
Rogers County 2 Urban 102.3 (91.1, 114.7) 29 (10, 54) 63 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.8, 0.1)
Grady County 2 Urban 103.8 (89.1, 120.6) 27 (6, 57) 38 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.9, -0.1)
McCurtain County 2 Rural 99.9 (81.3, 121.9) 33 (5, 65) 21 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.8, 0.7)
Stephens County 2 Rural 79.0 (65.4, 95.0) 62 (27, 68) 25 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.3, -0.8)
Blaine County 2 Rural 113.4 (78.6, 160.2) 18 (1, 67) 7 stable stable trend -2.1 (-6.5, 1.7)
Sequoyah County 2 Urban 86.9 (71.5, 105.0) 51 (16, 67) 23 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.4, 0.2)
Noble County 2 Rural 114.8 (83.4, 155.7) 13 (1, 66) 9 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.0, 0.5)
Kingfisher County 2 Rural 102.1 (75.1, 136.3) 30 (2, 67) 10 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.6, 0.7)
Le Flore County 2 Rural 74.0 (61.1, 89.1) 64 (37, 68) 24 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.4, -0.8)
Okmulgee County 2 Urban 121.2 (102.3, 142.9) 7 (1, 47) 30 falling falling trend -2.6 (-5.2, -0.2)
Marshall County 2 Rural 81.9 (59.2, 111.4) 57 (9, 68) 9 stable stable trend -2.7 (-5.7, 0.1)
Alfalfa County 2 Rural 80.7 (47.2, 132.2) 59 (2, 68) 4 stable stable trend -2.8 (-8.6, 2.3)
Kiowa County 2 Rural 118.0 (83.1, 165.1) 9 (1, 66) 8 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.6, -0.5)
Texas County 2 Rural 101.9 (75.7, 134.2) 31 (2, 67) 11 stable stable trend -2.9 (-6.3, 0.5)
Adair County 2 Rural 71.6 (51.6, 97.3) 66 (21, 68) 9 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.5, -0.6)
McClain County 2 Urban 107.7 (90.4, 127.7) 23 (4, 58) 29 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.1, -0.8)
Pushmataha County 2 Rural 79.1 (55.6, 111.7) 61 (9, 68) 7 stable stable trend -3.1 (-8.1, 1.4)
Washington County 2 Rural 91.4 (77.7, 106.9) 46 (16, 65) 33 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.3, -1.1)
Jackson County 2 Rural 82.7 (62.2, 107.9) 56 (12, 68) 11 stable stable trend -3.3 (-7.3, 0.3)
Nowata County 2 Rural 92.0 (61.5, 133.9) 44 (2, 68) 6 stable stable trend -3.3 (-8.1, 0.6)
Logan County 2 Urban 86.1 (72.2, 102.1) 52 (21, 67) 29 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.1, -2.5)
Muskogee County 2 Rural 93.5 (80.4, 108.2) 42 (13, 63) 39 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.7, -2.2)
Canadian County 2 Urban 103.2 (93.3, 114.0) 28 (10, 50) 84 falling falling trend -4.1 (-5.9, -2.3)
Choctaw County 2 Rural 93.7 (68.8, 125.8) 41 (4, 68) 10 falling falling trend -4.1 (-6.8, -1.9)
Major County 2 Rural 96.1 (63.6, 142.1) 39 (2, 68) 6 falling falling trend -4.2 (-8.6, -0.6)
Okfuskee County 2 Rural 93.1 (64.2, 131.2) 43 (2, 68) 7 falling falling trend -4.5 (-8.5, -1.1)
Garvin County 2 Rural 87.4 (68.1, 110.8) 50 (10, 68) 15 falling falling trend -4.6 (-6.5, -3.1)
Pontotoc County 2 Rural 87.7 (71.6, 106.7) 49 (13, 67) 21 falling falling trend -4.9 (-6.8, -3.3)
Beckham County 2 Rural 85.1 (63.6, 111.6) 53 (7, 68) 11 falling falling trend -5.2 (-7.7, -3.2)
Hughes County 2 Rural 68.7 (46.3, 98.8) 67 (19, 68) 6 falling falling trend -5.4 (-7.4, -3.7)
Washita County 2 Rural 79.6 (52.9, 116.3) 60 (6, 68) 6 falling falling trend -5.5 (-8.9, -2.8)
Kay County 2 Rural 89.7 (75.0, 106.8) 48 (16, 66) 27 falling falling trend -5.7 (-7.7, -4.2)
Atoka County 2 Rural 67.3 (45.8, 96.1) 68 (22, 68) 6 falling falling trend -6.4 (-11.4, -2.5)
Beaver County 2 Rural 139.0 (92.7, 204.9) 4 (1, 64) 6
*
*
Cotton County 2 Urban 84.5 (49.4, 139.5) 55 (2, 68) 4
*
*
Cimarron County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coal County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dewey County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greer County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harmon County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harper County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roger Mills County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/12/2026 8:37 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top