Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for South Dakota by County

Prostate (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
South Dakota 2 N/A 132.1 (127.8, 136.5) N/A 775 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.2, 8.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 116.4 (116.2, 116.6) N/A 240,633 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.8, 3.4)
Lawrence County 2 Rural 113.4 (93.5, 137.2) 36 (15, 44) 26 rising rising trend 22.1 (6.7, 34.6)
Fall River County 2 Rural 116.6 (85.3, 162.4) 35 (6, 45) 10 stable stable trend 21.5 (-0.8, 46.4)
Day County 2 Rural 141.2 (97.5, 203.1) 21 (1, 44) 7 rising rising trend 14.9 (4.3, 34.2)
Grant County 2 Rural 146.1 (105.3, 200.1) 16 (1, 43) 9 stable stable trend 10.0 (-1.3, 33.6)
Bon Homme County 2 Rural 142.9 (101.0, 198.4) 20 (1, 43) 8 stable stable trend 9.8 (-0.7, 40.8)
Meade County 2 Urban 123.6 (101.8, 149.0) 30 (10, 42) 25 stable stable trend 8.4 (-1.0, 24.1)
Yankton County 2 Rural 144.1 (119.3, 173.1) 17 (3, 36) 25 rising rising trend 7.7 (0.3, 27.6)
Butte County 2 Rural 94.5 (66.2, 132.8) 42 (16, 45) 8 stable stable trend 7.1 (-4.6, 27.9)
Codington County 2 Rural 143.7 (120.6, 170.4) 18 (4, 35) 29 stable stable trend 7.1 (-1.0, 22.7)
Custer County 2 Urban 102.7 (76.7, 141.3) 40 (15, 45) 11 stable stable trend 5.8 (-0.6, 22.5)
Pennington County 2 Urban 106.1 (95.7, 117.4) 37 (26, 43) 85 stable stable trend 4.1 (-1.8, 19.9)
Brule County 2 Rural 137.2 (86.7, 209.2) 22 (1, 45) 5 stable stable trend 2.9 (-2.5, 23.8)
Minnehaha County 2 Urban 162.5 (150.9, 174.6) 6 (3, 19) 170 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.8, 10.4)
Dewey County 2 Rural 204.3 (125.7, 313.7) 1 (1, 43) 5 stable stable trend 1.4 (-4.3, 7.8)
Edmunds County 2 Rural 124.3 (77.3, 196.8) 29 (2, 45) 4 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.6, 5.4)
Union County 2 Urban 161.2 (128.7, 200.0) 7 (1, 33) 18 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.4, 4.3)
Miner County 2 Rural 159.7 (93.2, 271.3) 9 (1, 45) 4 stable stable trend 0.1 (-4.4, 5.0)
Tripp County 2 Rural 120.9 (79.8, 180.0) 33 (3, 45) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.9, 2.2)
Moody County 2 Rural 99.5 (62.7, 153.0) 41 (8, 45) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-5.5, 4.0)
Brown County 2 Rural 130.7 (111.2, 153.0) 26 (8, 40) 33 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.3, 1.1)
Kingsbury County 2 Rural 177.3 (123.1, 251.0) 4 (1, 40) 8 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.8, 2.2)
Oglala Lakota County 2 Rural 184.6 (123.9, 262.6) 3 (1, 41) 7 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.2, 2.4)
Beadle County 2 Rural 156.6 (126.3, 192.6) 10 (1, 34) 20 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.5, 1.2)
Todd County 2 Rural 124.5 (67.6, 206.0) 28 (1, 45) 3 stable stable trend -1.6 (-6.7, 3.6)
Lincoln County 2 Urban 131.6 (114.4, 150.6) 24 (9, 38) 45 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.6, 0.7)
Brookings County 2 Rural 149.7 (124.2, 179.0) 13 (3, 34) 25 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.9, 0.5)
Clark County 2 Rural 166.2 (101.2, 260.8) 5 (1, 44) 5 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.7, 1.5)
Hand County 2 Rural 148.7 (87.1, 245.0) 14 (1, 45) 4 stable stable trend -1.9 (-6.5, 2.6)
Charles Mix County 2 Rural 133.3 (94.9, 183.4) 23 (2, 45) 8 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.2, 0.7)
Gregory County 2 Rural 150.6 (96.7, 230.1) 12 (1, 45) 5 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.4, 0.6)
Spink County 2 Rural 130.8 (88.7, 189.4) 25 (2, 45) 7 stable stable trend -2.3 (-6.3, 1.2)
Hughes County 2 Rural 121.5 (94.7, 154.4) 32 (8, 44) 15 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.4, 0.6)
Roberts County 2 Rural 104.3 (73.6, 145.2) 39 (10, 45) 8 stable stable trend -2.5 (-6.7, 1.6)
Clay County 2 Rural 121.8 (87.1, 166.4) 31 (4, 45) 9 stable stable trend -2.7 (-5.7, 0.3)
Lake County 2 Rural 148.3 (111.4, 195.0) 15 (1, 41) 13 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.9, -0.8)
Hamlin County 2 Rural 104.3 (63.7, 163.1) 38 (5, 45) 4 stable stable trend -3.3 (-7.3, 0.4)
Turner County 2 Urban 88.6 (57.3, 132.7) 44 (15, 45) 5 falling falling trend -3.4 (-7.0, -0.1)
Deuel County 2 Rural 125.9 (78.2, 197.3) 27 (2, 45) 4 falling falling trend -3.9 (-8.6, -0.1)
Davison County 2 Rural 119.0 (94.5, 148.6) 34 (10, 44) 17 falling falling trend -4.1 (-6.0, -2.3)
Hutchinson County 2 Rural 152.2 (109.8, 208.3) 11 (1, 42) 9 falling falling trend -4.6 (-9.4, -1.0)
Walworth County 2 Rural 82.1 (47.7, 136.2) 45 (16, 45) 4 falling falling trend -5.0 (-8.8, -1.9)
Douglas County 2 Rural 187.3 (112.9, 301.0) 2 (1, 44) 4
*
*
Faulk County 2 Rural 160.0 (90.5, 278.3) 8 (1, 45) 3
*
*
Marshall County 2 Rural 90.5 (53.3, 150.0) 43 (10, 45) 4
*
*
McCook County 2 Urban 142.9 (93.4, 211.8) 19 (1, 45) 6
*
*
Aurora County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bennett County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Buffalo County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Campbell County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Corson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haakon County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hanson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harding County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hyde County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jerauld County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jones County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lyman County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McPherson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mellette County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perkins County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Potter County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sanborn County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stanley County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sully County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ziebach County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/12/2026 9:09 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top