Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Tennessee by County

Prostate (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Tennessee 2 N/A 117.2 (115.7, 118.7) N/A 5,089 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.6, 0.9)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 116.4 (116.2, 116.6) N/A 240,633 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.8, 3.4)
Wilson County 2 Urban 140.7 (129.6, 152.5) 3 (1, 26) 129 rising rising trend 5.7 (0.6, 13.7)
Putnam County 2 Rural 105.4 (92.6, 119.6) 47 (16, 79) 51 stable stable trend 3.5 (-0.2, 10.5)
Franklin County 2 Rural 118.3 (101.7, 137.3) 27 (2, 70) 38 rising rising trend 3.4 (0.6, 9.5)
Hawkins County 2 Urban 82.9 (71.0, 96.6) 82 (51, 94) 37 stable stable trend 2.4 (-2.7, 13.5)
Davidson County 2 Urban 129.7 (124.1, 135.5) 15 (5, 29) 444 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.2, 6.6)
Crockett County 2 Urban 119.0 (89.4, 156.2) 26 (1, 89) 11 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.2, 5.7)
McNairy County 2 Rural 116.7 (94.8, 142.7) 31 (1, 81) 21 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.6, 4.3)
Monroe County 2 Rural 101.8 (87.4, 118.4) 54 (17, 84) 38 stable stable trend 1.2 (-3.4, 12.8)
Bedford County 2 Rural 121.6 (103.3, 142.4) 22 (1, 69) 34 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.0, 3.4)
Hamilton County 2 Urban 132.3 (125.7, 139.2) 10 (2, 28) 312 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.2, 6.2)
Johnson County 2 Rural 87.3 (66.9, 113.0) 74 (23, 95) 13 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.9, 4.5)
Unicoi County 2 Urban 81.6 (62.4, 106.3) 85 (27, 95) 13 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.3, 4.6)
Knox County 2 Urban 120.7 (114.9, 126.7) 24 (12, 42) 342 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.9, 7.2)
Blount County 2 Urban 97.8 (89.2, 107.1) 59 (35, 80) 100 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.2, 4.5)
Smith County 2 Urban 112.1 (87.0, 142.8) 37 (1, 90) 15 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.9, 3.4)
Greene County 2 Rural 96.2 (84.7, 109.1) 60 (30, 86) 53 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.7, 2.8)
Polk County 2 Urban 87.8 (66.6, 114.9) 73 (16, 95) 12 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.5, 3.6)
Rhea County 2 Rural 115.0 (95.6, 137.7) 33 (1, 79) 26 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.1, 3.1)
Humphreys County 2 Rural 132.4 (106.3, 163.7) 9 (1, 71) 19 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.5, 3.4)
Cheatham County 2 Urban 133.5 (113.3, 156.6) 8 (1, 55) 35 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.3, 2.0)
Hamblen County 2 Urban 125.3 (110.1, 142.1) 19 (1, 61) 51 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.6, 2.2)
Carter County 2 Urban 78.2 (66.9, 91.3) 88 (59, 95) 35 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.8, 3.4)
Dyer County 2 Rural 94.5 (77.6, 114.3) 64 (19, 92) 23 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.7, 2.2)
Gibson County 2 Urban 104.8 (89.4, 122.4) 50 (11, 83) 34 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.7, 2.0)
Madison County 2 Urban 130.8 (118.2, 144.5) 14 (1, 41) 83 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.4)
Sequatchie County 2 Urban 107.8 (82.9, 138.9) 42 (1, 92) 14 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.0, 3.5)
Benton County 2 Rural 130.9 (103.6, 164.5) 12 (1, 75) 17 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.7, 3.5)
Dickson County 2 Urban 125.7 (108.7, 144.7) 18 (1, 57) 42 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.9, 1.6)
Hardin County 2 Rural 83.2 (67.3, 102.7) 81 (37, 95) 19 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.4, 2.0)
Haywood County 2 Rural 137.4 (109.1, 171.7) 5 (1, 66) 18 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.0, 2.6)
Marshall County 2 Rural 134.4 (113.3, 158.6) 7 (1, 58) 30 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.4)
Maury County 2 Urban 134.5 (121.9, 148.1) 6 (1, 36) 89 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 1.2)
Washington County 2 Urban 102.4 (93.1, 112.5) 52 (28, 76) 93 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.1)
Wayne County 2 Rural 89.3 (67.1, 117.6) 72 (10, 95) 11 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.4, 3.1)
Marion County 2 Urban 114.7 (94.7, 138.2) 35 (1, 80) 25 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.9, 2.1)
Scott County 2 Rural 103.9 (81.0, 131.8) 51 (3, 91) 15 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.3, 2.6)
Williamson County 2 Urban 138.0 (129.2, 147.2) 4 (1, 23) 198 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 1.0)
Chester County 2 Urban 100.3 (75.2, 131.9) 55 (3, 93) 11 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.8, 4.2)
Henderson County 2 Rural 99.1 (79.9, 122.2) 57 (11, 92) 19 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.6, 1.6)
Lewis County 2 Rural 119.6 (90.8, 156.4) 25 (1, 88) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.5, 3.9)
Bradley County 2 Urban 90.3 (80.2, 101.4) 71 (43, 89) 61 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.7, 1.6)
Cocke County 2 Rural 106.2 (89.5, 125.6) 46 (9, 84) 31 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.3, 2.1)
Macon County 2 Urban 110.1 (87.8, 136.7) 39 (1, 88) 18 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.2, 2.1)
Claiborne County 2 Rural 117.6 (98.4, 139.9) 29 (1, 78) 28 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.9, 1.5)
Clay County 2 Rural 100.1 (68.9, 145.0) 56 (1, 95) 7 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.2, 2.8)
Campbell County 2 Urban 111.3 (95.0, 130.1) 38 (6, 76) 34 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.3, 1.6)
Henry County 2 Rural 145.3 (125.0, 168.7) 1 (1, 38) 39 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.9, 0.6)
Rutherford County 2 Urban 131.4 (123.0, 140.2) 11 (1, 31) 206 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.7)
Roane County 2 Urban 118.3 (104.5, 133.9) 28 (3, 63) 56 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.1, 1.8)
DeKalb County 2 Rural 114.0 (90.0, 143.1) 36 (1, 88) 17 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.1, 1.6)
Hickman County 2 Urban 84.3 (65.5, 107.3) 80 (31, 95) 15 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.5, 2.9)
Obion County 2 Rural 93.7 (76.4, 114.4) 66 (19, 92) 21 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.6, 1.8)
Jefferson County 2 Urban 105.4 (91.7, 120.9) 48 (16, 79) 45 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.2, 0.4)
Sevier County 2 Rural 127.4 (115.6, 140.1) 16 (2, 44) 93 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.4, 0.6)
Sumner County 2 Urban 121.7 (112.9, 131.0) 21 (7, 45) 151 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.3)
Montgomery County 2 Urban 106.7 (96.8, 117.4) 43 (21, 71) 94 falling falling trend -1.7 (-6.3, -0.4)
Grainger County 2 Urban 93.3 (74.1, 116.8) 67 (18, 94) 18 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.0, 0.4)
Lauderdale County 2 Rural 98.2 (77.2, 123.6) 58 (8, 93) 16 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.6, 1.2)
Robertson County 2 Urban 106.7 (93.0, 121.9) 44 (13, 78) 47 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.4, -0.1)
Decatur County 2 Rural 91.4 (65.3, 126.5) 69 (2, 95) 8 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.2, 0.2)
Lincoln County 2 Rural 62.3 (49.1, 78.4) 95 (72, 95) 16 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.3, 1.5)
Cannon County 2 Urban 90.4 (64.5, 124.0) 70 (7, 95) 9 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.2, 1.2)
Morgan County 2 Urban 94.8 (74.2, 120.0) 63 (12, 93) 15 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.7, -0.2)
Warren County 2 Rural 108.3 (91.4, 127.6) 41 (5, 83) 31 stable stable trend -2.0 (-15.0, 0.9)
Coffee County 2 Rural 105.3 (90.9, 121.6) 49 (14, 82) 40 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.1, 0.8)
Houston County 2 Rural 86.7 (56.7, 129.7) 75 (2, 95) 6 stable stable trend -2.1 (-6.6, 2.5)
Perry County 2 Rural 85.4 (56.8, 125.9) 78 (3, 95) 6 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.6, 1.7)
Pickett County 2 Rural 95.4 (61.0, 151.6) 62 (1, 95) 5 stable stable trend -2.1 (-6.6, 2.5)
Carroll County 2 Rural 130.9 (109.2, 156.1) 13 (1, 63) 27 stable stable trend -2.2 (-8.2, 0.5)
Fayette County 2 Urban 127.1 (110.4, 146.1) 17 (1, 57) 45 falling falling trend -2.2 (-6.3, -0.5)
Shelby County 2 Urban 141.3 (136.5, 146.3) 2 (1, 13) 700 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.4, -1.1)
Anderson County 2 Urban 120.8 (108.0, 134.9) 23 (3, 55) 67 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.2, -0.5)
Meigs County 2 Rural 77.3 (54.9, 107.8) 89 (24, 95) 8 stable stable trend -2.3 (-19.9, 3.1)
Trousdale County 2 Urban 114.7 (78.4, 162.2) 34 (1, 95) 7 stable stable trend -2.3 (-6.8, 2.6)
Giles County 2 Rural 86.3 (69.8, 106.1) 77 (32, 94) 20 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.0, 0.4)
Loudon County 2 Urban 115.2 (102.1, 130.0) 32 (6, 67) 61 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.4, -0.2)
McMinn County 2 Rural 82.6 (70.3, 96.9) 83 (47, 94) 33 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.4, 0.6)
Bledsoe County 2 Rural 84.9 (63.0, 113.5) 79 (19, 95) 11 stable stable trend -2.5 (-6.8, 2.3)
Tipton County 2 Urban 116.9 (101.4, 134.3) 30 (4, 69) 44 falling falling trend -2.5 (-5.3, -0.7)
Lawrence County 2 Rural 96.1 (80.4, 114.1) 61 (22, 90) 28 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.9, -0.4)
Overton County 2 Rural 82.6 (64.3, 105.4) 84 (31, 95) 14 falling falling trend -2.7 (-5.1, -0.3)
Moore County 2 Rural 71.4 (43.4, 115.3) 91 (14, 95) 4 stable stable trend -2.8 (-8.1, 3.1)
Grundy County 2 Rural 86.5 (62.1, 118.7) 76 (7, 95) 9 falling falling trend -3.2 (-6.1, -0.4)
Sullivan County 2 Urban 81.4 (74.3, 89.0) 86 (64, 92) 101 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.0, -1.6)
White County 2 Rural 106.2 (86.6, 129.4) 45 (4, 88) 21 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.7, -0.8)
Fentress County 2 Rural 91.8 (70.6, 118.6) 68 (12, 94) 14 stable stable trend -3.3 (-7.5, 0.7)
Stewart County 2 Urban 81.4 (58.9, 111.2) 87 (20, 95) 9 stable stable trend -3.3 (-8.3, 1.7)
Cumberland County 2 Rural 110.0 (98.5, 122.9) 40 (15, 71) 73 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.5, -2.3)
Jackson County 2 Rural 76.5 (54.8, 106.6) 90 (33, 95) 9 falling falling trend -4.1 (-7.2, -1.3)
Union County 2 Urban 94.3 (72.0, 122.1) 65 (5, 94) 14 stable stable trend -4.3 (-22.3, 2.8)
Van Buren County 2 Rural 64.3 (37.5, 108.1) 94 (26, 95) 4 falling falling trend -8.5 (-38.0, -3.1)
Hancock County 2 Rural 68.9 (39.6, 115.2) 93 (13, 95) 4 falling falling trend -10.8 (-26.2, -5.5)
Hardeman County 2 Rural 122.3 (100.3, 148.3) 20 (1, 75) 22 stable stable trend -13.4 (-24.7, 0.1)
Weakley County 2 Rural 102.0 (83.7, 123.5) 53 (10, 90) 22 falling falling trend -17.7 (-33.1, -1.4)
Lake County 2 Rural 69.9 (38.4, 119.0) 92 (9, 95) 3
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/13/2026 4:07 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top