Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Texas by County

Prostate (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Texas 7 N/A 110.7 (109.9, 111.5) N/A 16,468 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.2, 0.9)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 116.4 (116.2, 116.6) N/A 240,633 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.8, 3.4)
Andrews County 7 Rural 101.6 (70.8, 140.8) 127 (4, 198) 8 rising rising trend 25.6 (3.2, 43.5)
Comanche County 7 Rural 87.7 (64.9, 117.6) 163 (25, 200) 10 stable stable trend 17.4 (-3.6, 33.6)
Somervell County 7 Rural 158.9 (118.9, 210.1) 2 (1, 141) 11 rising rising trend 14.4 (8.3, 33.2)
Young County 7 Rural 109.8 (85.8, 139.4) 95 (4, 186) 15 rising rising trend 14.4 (1.5, 41.4)
Calhoun County 7 Rural 92.7 (71.7, 118.8) 155 (27, 197) 14 stable stable trend 12.8 (-4.3, 27.4)
Jackson County 7 Rural 104.8 (79.0, 137.3) 114 (5, 194) 11 rising rising trend 12.1 (1.4, 34.7)
Rockwall County 7 Urban 117.6 (104.7, 131.7) 61 (18, 147) 67 stable stable trend 11.4 (-0.7, 20.9)
Tom Green County 7 Urban 115.2 (104.1, 127.3) 70 (24, 137) 81 rising rising trend 10.0 (4.0, 19.0)
Wharton County 7 Rural 96.8 (80.5, 115.6) 139 (37, 185) 26 rising rising trend 8.4 (1.4, 22.1)
Gaines County 7 Rural 123.1 (88.7, 165.6) 38 (1, 190) 9 rising rising trend 8.3 (2.1, 24.3)
Titus County 7 Rural 147.1 (122.2, 175.8) 8 (1, 109) 26 stable stable trend 8.0 (-2.0, 29.3)
Llano County 7 Rural 107.7 (89.8, 130.1) 105 (17, 176) 28 rising rising trend 7.9 (1.3, 25.3)
Victoria County 7 Urban 125.9 (112.7, 140.3) 34 (8, 114) 69 rising rising trend 7.7 (2.4, 17.2)
Wise County 7 Urban 127.5 (112.2, 144.4) 31 (5, 119) 55 rising rising trend 7.5 (0.9, 21.7)
Lavaca County 7 Rural 119.4 (95.9, 147.8) 52 (3, 175) 19 rising rising trend 7.4 (0.5, 22.6)
Hill County 7 Rural 127.3 (108.7, 148.6) 32 (3, 138) 35 rising rising trend 7.3 (0.4, 24.6)
Midland County 7 Urban 94.0 (83.8, 105.0) 151 (79, 177) 69 stable stable trend 7.2 (-2.7, 14.8)
Navarro County 7 Rural 111.8 (95.7, 130.1) 87 (14, 166) 36 stable stable trend 7.2 (-0.3, 21.7)
Archer County 7 Urban 113.6 (81.2, 157.6) 74 (1, 194) 8 rising rising trend 6.7 (2.7, 20.7)
Wood County 7 Rural 138.2 (122.5, 155.9) 19 (2, 89) 60 stable stable trend 6.5 (-0.5, 19.7)
Ector County 7 Urban 100.3 (89.1, 112.5) 132 (52, 171) 65 rising rising trend 6.4 (2.4, 14.9)
Jasper County 7 Rural 151.0 (129.5, 175.7) 3 (1, 86) 37 stable stable trend 6.1 (-0.8, 23.9)
Ellis County 7 Urban 119.2 (109.3, 129.7) 54 (22, 121) 121 rising rising trend 6.0 (1.1, 12.8)
Hunt County 7 Urban 108.8 (97.2, 121.4) 101 (29, 154) 68 stable stable trend 6.0 (-2.7, 19.9)
Parker County 7 Urban 125.1 (114.9, 136.0) 35 (15, 104) 120 rising rising trend 6.0 (0.9, 15.8)
Walker County 7 Rural 116.2 (102.3, 131.6) 64 (16, 147) 55 stable stable trend 5.8 (-1.4, 20.1)
Jim Wells County 7 Rural 78.5 (62.6, 97.4) 177 (97, 200) 18 stable stable trend 5.3 (-0.4, 18.6)
Comal County 7 Urban 100.9 (92.4, 110.1) 130 (69, 161) 115 stable stable trend 5.1 (-0.3, 14.5)
Wichita County 7 Urban 114.3 (103.2, 126.3) 75 (25, 142) 83 rising rising trend 5.0 (1.3, 14.1)
Travis County 7 Urban 136.5 (131.9, 141.1) 20 (10, 39) 765 rising rising trend 4.9 (2.6, 9.3)
Aransas County 7 Urban 97.7 (80.0, 119.3) 136 (28, 189) 23 stable stable trend 4.7 (-3.2, 21.2)
Collin County 7 Urban 122.5 (118.0, 127.2) 42 (29, 83) 618 rising rising trend 4.5 (2.4, 7.8)
Jefferson County 7 Urban 123.8 (115.7, 132.4) 39 (18, 95) 184 rising rising trend 4.5 (1.4, 11.7)
Anderson County 7 Rural 100.5 (85.6, 117.3) 133 (39, 180) 35 stable stable trend 4.4 (0.0, 14.4)
Kaufman County 7 Urban 111.6 (100.1, 124.1) 86 (24, 151) 77 stable stable trend 4.4 (-0.2, 11.3)
Kendall County 7 Urban 120.5 (104.0, 139.1) 51 (9, 148) 40 rising rising trend 4.3 (1.2, 9.4)
Bastrop County 7 Urban 116.3 (104.0, 129.7) 63 (18, 139) 72 stable stable trend 4.1 (-0.5, 13.8)
Orange County 7 Urban 105.4 (92.8, 119.3) 111 (37, 170) 54 stable stable trend 4.0 (-1.4, 17.5)
Houston County 7 Rural 112.4 (91.1, 137.9) 85 (6, 179) 20 stable stable trend 3.8 (-0.7, 18.8)
Johnson County 7 Urban 127.9 (117.8, 138.8) 30 (10, 91) 127 rising rising trend 3.6 (0.8, 9.6)
Van Zandt County 7 Rural 107.7 (94.2, 122.9) 104 (24, 164) 48 stable stable trend 3.6 (-1.3, 12.5)
Trinity County 7 Rural 101.2 (78.0, 131.4) 129 (6, 192) 14 stable stable trend 3.4 (-3.2, 26.4)
Denton County 7 Urban 122.8 (117.8, 128.0) 40 (27, 82) 516 rising rising trend 3.2 (1.9, 5.4)
McLennan County 7 Urban 128.8 (120.4, 137.6) 29 (13, 79) 184 stable stable trend 3.1 (-1.4, 12.5)
Taylor County 7 Urban 113.3 (102.6, 124.9) 78 (28, 140) 85 stable stable trend 3.0 (-0.9, 13.1)
Tarrant County 7 Urban 114.7 (111.6, 117.9) 71 (53, 101) 1,155 stable stable trend 2.9 (-0.5, 8.0)
Dallas County 7 Urban 112.5 (109.7, 115.4) 84 (60, 107) 1,331 rising rising trend 2.8 (1.3, 4.9)
Cameron County 7 Urban 86.7 (81.1, 92.6) 166 (130, 179) 182 stable stable trend 2.7 (-1.4, 11.4)
Lampasas County 7 Urban 114.7 (92.5, 141.4) 62 (4, 175) 19 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.2, 12.2)
Waller County 7 Urban 132.0 (112.9, 153.5) 22 (2, 132) 37 rising rising trend 2.5 (1.1, 4.8)
Henderson County 7 Rural 119.3 (107.5, 132.2) 53 (17, 131) 80 stable stable trend 2.4 (-1.4, 12.4)
Montague County 7 Rural 112.7 (90.6, 139.5) 83 (7, 178) 19 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.5, 15.0)
Hardin County 7 Urban 108.5 (93.3, 125.6) 102 (23, 169) 39 stable stable trend 2.3 (-2.3, 12.6)
Webb County 7 Urban 86.7 (78.3, 95.7) 167 (120, 183) 84 stable stable trend 2.3 (-5.0, 17.6)
Randall County 7 Urban 130.6 (119.3, 142.6) 25 (8, 94) 106 stable stable trend 2.1 (-2.4, 11.5)
Delta County 7 Rural 141.3 (90.9, 212.9) 13 (1, 195) 5 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.3, 6.4)
Rusk County 7 Urban 112.7 (97.4, 130.0) 80 (19, 164) 40 stable stable trend 2.0 (-2.7, 15.4)
Rains County 7 Rural 142.5 (111.0, 182.2) 15 (1, 162) 16 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.6, 4.9)
Dimmit County 7 Rural 82.9 (51.0, 128.2) 173 (9, 201) 4 stable stable trend 1.7 (-5.0, 24.3)
Liberty County 7 Urban 101.6 (88.3, 116.2) 128 (39, 175) 48 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.8, 9.7)
Medina County 7 Urban 73.6 (61.0, 88.3) 184 (130, 198) 25 stable stable trend 1.6 (-3.3, 15.5)
Smith County 7 Urban 148.1 (139.1, 157.6) 7 (2, 30) 210 stable stable trend 1.1 (-3.3, 4.2)
Guadalupe County 7 Urban 95.0 (86.3, 104.4) 146 (92, 175) 92 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.3, 4.6)
Callahan County 7 Urban 120.6 (93.0, 155.4) 48 (2, 182) 13 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.0, 3.3)
Camp County 7 Rural 170.8 (133.5, 216.6) 1 (1, 120) 15 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.9, 3.1)
Grayson County 7 Urban 107.9 (98.2, 118.3) 103 (40, 148) 98 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.3, 8.4)
Montgomery County 7 Urban 97.8 (93.0, 102.9) 137 (103, 157) 333 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.2, 3.1)
Morris County 7 Rural 148.1 (113.9, 190.9) 6 (1, 151) 14 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.0, 3.3)
Falls County 7 Urban 117.4 (91.3, 149.7) 60 (3, 179) 14 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.7, 2.6)
Galveston County 7 Urban 106.5 (100.1, 113.2) 108 (64, 142) 227 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.8, 4.1)
Bailey County 7 Rural 121.8 (77.1, 183.7) 45 (1, 201) 5 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.8, 3.5)
Harrison County 7 Urban 122.5 (107.9, 138.7) 44 (7, 135) 54 stable stable trend 0.1 (-7.7, 6.9)
Starr County 7 Rural 96.0 (80.0, 114.2) 141 (42, 186) 26 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.7, 2.2)
Gregg County 7 Urban 130.0 (118.0, 142.8) 27 (7, 94) 92 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.2, 7.2)
Coryell County 7 Urban 103.5 (88.2, 120.6) 117 (21, 175) 34 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.5, 6.7)
Blanco County 7 Rural 113.8 (88.3, 147.7) 73 (2, 183) 14 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.1, 2.8)
Lee County 7 Rural 121.3 (96.2, 152.1) 47 (2, 175) 17 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.2, 2.8)
Wheeler County 7 Rural 118.5 (73.2, 185.5) 55 (1, 200) 4 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.6, 3.8)
Colorado County 7 Rural 113.7 (92.3, 139.6) 77 (5, 177) 20 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.4, 1.3)
Bell County 7 Urban 144.0 (135.6, 152.7) 11 (3, 35) 234 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.3)
Deaf Smith County 7 Rural 106.7 (78.3, 142.1) 107 (2, 194) 10 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 0.9)
Freestone County 7 Rural 127.8 (103.0, 157.6) 33 (2, 157) 19 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.3, 1.8)
Washington County 7 Rural 118.1 (100.3, 138.5) 58 (5, 157) 33 stable stable trend -1.0 (-1.9, 0.1)
Bee County 7 Rural 68.5 (50.5, 90.8) 188 (111, 201) 10 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.9, 12.6)
Runnels County 7 Rural 145.7 (110.2, 190.9) 10 (1, 158) 12 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.0, 2.8)
Madison County 7 Rural 101.5 (71.7, 139.7) 131 (5, 199) 8 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.3, 2.0)
Marion County 7 Rural 113.4 (83.8, 153.3) 79 (2, 194) 11 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.3, 1.0)
Mills County 7 Rural 112.3 (66.0, 183.9) 88 (1, 201) 4 stable stable trend -1.2 (-5.5, 3.4)
Dawson County 7 Rural 115.1 (80.2, 159.9) 67 (1, 199) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.9, 2.1)
Goliad County 7 Urban 104.6 (71.8, 151.5) 116 (2, 198) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.3, 3.1)
Cherokee County 7 Rural 131.4 (114.4, 150.3) 23 (3, 116) 45 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.1, 0.5)
Erath County 7 Rural 95.3 (77.9, 115.5) 143 (38, 189) 22 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.9, 0.2)
Mitchell County 7 Rural 112.5 (72.4, 166.8) 93 (1, 200) 5 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.8, 2.9)
Willacy County 7 Rural 94.6 (70.5, 124.5) 148 (15, 198) 10 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.2, 2.4)
Chambers County 7 Urban 137.3 (116.2, 161.3) 18 (1, 120) 33 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.2, 0.7)
Cooke County 7 Rural 109.5 (92.8, 128.6) 98 (19, 173) 33 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.3, 0.5)
Eastland County 7 Rural 98.7 (75.9, 127.1) 134 (13, 193) 14 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.8, 0.8)
Hockley County 7 Urban 130.2 (103.0, 162.8) 24 (1, 163) 16 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.1, 1.3)
McCulloch County 7 Rural 114.9 (79.8, 163.2) 72 (1, 196) 7 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.3, 1.3)
Zavala County 7 Rural 91.3 (57.3, 138.4) 158 (2, 201) 5 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.4, 2.5)
Fayette County 7 Rural 117.7 (98.3, 140.9) 59 (5, 166) 27 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.8, 0.7)
Newton County 7 Rural 118.2 (89.8, 154.6) 57 (1, 186) 12 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.0, 1.0)
Bosque County 7 Urban 110.3 (88.4, 137.3) 94 (7, 179) 19 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.7, 0.5)
Gonzales County 7 Rural 102.5 (79.0, 131.4) 126 (9, 191) 13 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.5, 1.1)
Burleson County 7 Urban 113.4 (89.8, 142.4) 76 (4, 180) 17 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.0, 0.7)
Parmer County 7 Rural 105.2 (70.0, 152.3) 115 (1, 201) 6 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.2, 0.6)
Robertson County 7 Urban 134.9 (107.1, 168.5) 21 (1, 167) 17 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.2, 0.4)
Zapata County 7 Rural 96.1 (66.0, 135.5) 142 (5, 201) 7 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.4, 0.6)
Lubbock County 7 Urban 122.0 (113.8, 130.5) 46 (23, 105) 177 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.8, -1.0)
Milam County 7 Rural 111.0 (91.1, 134.6) 92 (8, 177) 23 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.6, -0.3)
San Augustine County 7 Rural 111.0 (78.2, 156.5) 91 (1, 196) 8 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.6, 0.6)
Brewster County 7 Rural 84.4 (58.4, 120.9) 170 (15, 201) 7 stable stable trend -2.1 (-6.0, 2.8)
Grimes County 7 Rural 88.0 (70.8, 108.5) 165 (68, 197) 20 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.4, 0.4)
Clay County 7 Urban 97.0 (69.2, 134.7) 138 (5, 199) 9 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.4, 0.3)
Hutchinson County 7 Rural 116.0 (91.5, 145.6) 65 (4, 180) 16 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.0, -0.5)
Fannin County 7 Rural 102.6 (85.7, 122.2) 124 (20, 179) 27 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.7, -0.8)
Howard County 7 Rural 106.4 (85.8, 130.4) 109 (9, 186) 20 stable stable trend -2.3 (-9.7, 13.7)
Potter County 7 Urban 123.1 (110.8, 136.4) 41 (9, 126) 77 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.6, -0.9)
Williamson County 7 Urban 146.7 (140.5, 153.2) 9 (3, 29) 440 falling falling trend -2.3 (-5.1, -0.1)
Brazos County 7 Urban 119.8 (109.4, 130.8) 50 (19, 121) 105 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.3, -1.3)
Gray County 7 Rural 115.9 (90.9, 145.8) 66 (3, 179) 15 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.2, -0.7)
Hidalgo County 7 Urban 88.0 (83.7, 92.4) 162 (133, 175) 319 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.8, -0.9)
Leon County 7 Rural 94.4 (72.9, 121.8) 145 (21, 196) 14 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.1, 0.5)
Panola County 7 Rural 115.1 (92.5, 142.1) 69 (6, 173) 19 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.9, -0.8)
San Jacinto County 7 Urban 85.2 (69.1, 104.7) 171 (72, 196) 21 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.6, -1.1)
Cass County 7 Rural 111.7 (92.6, 134.3) 89 (9, 173) 25 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.4, -0.7)
Hopkins County 7 Rural 102.6 (85.5, 122.4) 123 (25, 182) 26 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.1, -0.8)
Jones County 7 Urban 84.5 (62.5, 112.2) 172 (36, 200) 10 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.5, -0.5)
Moore County 7 Rural 89.4 (64.4, 120.8) 160 (18, 200) 9 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.5, 0.4)
Terry County 7 Rural 129.1 (92.1, 176.2) 28 (1, 188) 8 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.8, 0.7)
Hays County 7 Urban 144.1 (133.7, 155.1) 12 (2, 39) 161 stable stable trend -2.6 (-7.9, 4.4)
Jack County 7 Rural 86.0 (54.0, 131.0) 169 (5, 201) 5 stable stable trend -2.6 (-7.6, 1.8)
Live Oak County 7 Rural 48.5 (30.3, 75.1) 201 (150, 201) 4 stable stable trend -2.6 (-6.1, 1.0)
Nolan County 7 Rural 110.3 (82.2, 145.8) 97 (3, 193) 11 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.5, 0.2)
Caldwell County 7 Urban 102.8 (86.3, 121.7) 121 (25, 180) 29 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.5, -0.9)
Franklin County 7 Rural 94.7 (67.9, 130.8) 147 (11, 198) 9 stable stable trend -2.9 (-5.9, 0.0)
Hale County 7 Rural 112.9 (90.9, 138.6) 82 (7, 178) 19 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.8, -0.1)
Upshur County 7 Urban 95.0 (79.5, 112.9) 144 (50, 185) 28 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.4, -1.4)
Wilbarger County 7 Rural 106.7 (77.6, 144.1) 106 (3, 196) 9 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.3, -0.5)
Swisher County 7 Rural 93.7 (57.0, 146.1) 150 (1, 201) 4 stable stable trend -3.0 (-7.0, 0.2)
Childress County 7 Rural 92.5 (55.4, 146.6) 153 (1, 201) 4 falling falling trend -3.1 (-6.3, -0.3)
Haskell County 7 Rural 89.3 (53.1, 144.8) 157 (3, 201) 4 falling falling trend -3.1 (-6.3, -0.3)
Tyler County 7 Rural 93.7 (73.8, 118.2) 152 (20, 196) 16 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.6, -0.7)
Wilson County 7 Urban 87.4 (73.6, 103.4) 164 (85, 192) 30 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.0, -1.0)
Kerr County 7 Rural 103.1 (90.4, 117.5) 120 (44, 171) 51 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.1, -2.3)
Burnet County 7 Rural 108.7 (94.7, 124.7) 99 (25, 163) 46 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.2, -1.5)
DeWitt County 7 Rural 90.6 (69.5, 116.7) 159 (32, 197) 13 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.5, -0.3)
Floyd County 7 Rural 96.0 (57.0, 154.9) 140 (1, 201) 4 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.9, -0.3)
Lamar County 7 Rural 98.2 (83.7, 114.7) 135 (45, 182) 34 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.6, -1.1)
Nacogdoches County 7 Rural 105.3 (90.7, 121.6) 112 (27, 173) 40 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.8, -1.9)
Hood County 7 Rural 106.1 (93.8, 119.8) 110 (30, 164) 58 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.2, -1.5)
Pecos County 7 Rural 57.0 (35.5, 86.4) 200 (109, 201) 5 falling falling trend -3.4 (-6.6, -0.3)
Stephens County 7 Rural 68.7 (43.7, 104.6) 189 (47, 201) 5 falling falling trend -3.4 (-6.5, -0.7)
Bandera County 7 Urban 69.5 (55.0, 88.6) 187 (135, 201) 17 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.2, -1.8)
Bowie County 7 Urban 94.2 (83.0, 106.7) 149 (71, 181) 53 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.0, -2.0)
Austin County 7 Urban 103.7 (85.7, 124.8) 118 (19, 183) 25 falling falling trend -3.6 (-4.7, -2.5)
Polk County 7 Rural 140.7 (121.3, 162.5) 14 (1, 99) 54 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.4, -2.1)
Refugio County 7 Rural 64.1 (37.9, 106.0) 194 (48, 201) 4 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.4, -1.1)
Shelby County 7 Rural 103.3 (82.2, 128.8) 119 (12, 186) 17 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.3, -1.0)
Hamilton County 7 Rural 102.7 (72.9, 144.0) 122 (3, 198) 8 stable stable trend -3.7 (-8.4, 0.6)
Limestone County 7 Rural 89.3 (69.7, 113.5) 161 (33, 197) 15 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.7, -1.9)
Brown County 7 Rural 73.7 (59.8, 90.3) 185 (125, 200) 20 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.9, -1.8)
Harris County 7 Urban 112.8 (110.7, 115.0) 81 (61, 104) 2,424 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.9, -1.2)
Presidio County 7 Rural 75.8 (45.4, 122.6) 181 (13, 201) 4 falling falling trend -3.8 (-7.3, -0.6)
Sabine County 7 Rural 111.5 (83.5, 149.7) 90 (3, 191) 12 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.8, -1.8)
San Patricio County 7 Urban 76.8 (64.6, 90.6) 180 (125, 198) 30 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.3, -2.2)
Lamb County 7 Rural 75.8 (51.0, 109.3) 183 (42, 201) 6 falling falling trend -4.0 (-6.9, -1.7)
Fort Bend County 7 Urban 125.2 (120.1, 130.5) 36 (23, 76) 520 stable stable trend -4.1 (-8.1, 1.2)
Karnes County 7 Rural 65.2 (41.7, 97.0) 192 (73, 201) 5 falling falling trend -4.3 (-7.0, -2.1)
Ward County 7 Rural 77.4 (47.8, 118.5) 179 (11, 201) 4 falling falling trend -4.4 (-7.7, -1.4)
Angelina County 7 Rural 115.7 (102.9, 129.7) 68 (19, 145) 61 falling falling trend -4.5 (-5.9, -3.2)
Uvalde County 7 Rural 65.5 (48.1, 87.3) 193 (132, 201) 10 falling falling trend -4.5 (-7.6, -1.8)
Nueces County 7 Urban 64.0 (59.1, 69.3) 195 (177, 199) 131 falling falling trend -4.6 (-5.8, -3.5)
Frio County 7 Rural 57.9 (36.3, 87.2) 198 (104, 201) 5 falling falling trend -4.7 (-7.1, -2.7)
Matagorda County 7 Rural 79.0 (63.5, 97.5) 176 (91, 198) 20 falling falling trend -4.8 (-6.2, -3.4)
Palo Pinto County 7 Rural 86.6 (69.3, 107.3) 168 (63, 197) 18 falling falling trend -4.8 (-6.8, -2.9)
Bexar County 7 Urban 83.0 (80.4, 85.7) 174 (152, 179) 793 stable stable trend -4.9 (-9.3, 0.5)
Reeves County 7 Rural 67.8 (39.4, 107.4) 191 (40, 201) 4 falling falling trend -4.9 (-9.2, -1.5)
Coleman County 7 Rural 62.0 (39.1, 98.2) 197 (89, 201) 5 falling falling trend -5.1 (-9.2, -1.9)
Red River County 7 Rural 92.6 (67.5, 126.0) 154 (11, 199) 10 falling falling trend -5.1 (-7.3, -3.3)
Brazoria County 7 Urban 124.3 (117.0, 132.0) 37 (18, 86) 238 falling falling trend -5.3 (-9.0, -0.9)
Ochiltree County 7 Rural 70.4 (42.3, 111.5) 186 (34, 201) 4 falling falling trend -5.3 (-9.2, -1.8)
Scurry County 7 Rural 122.4 (92.3, 159.3) 43 (1, 180) 12 falling falling trend -5.4 (-21.1, -1.6)
Kleberg County 7 Rural 57.5 (41.6, 77.5) 199 (143, 201) 9 falling falling trend -5.6 (-8.8, -2.8)
Val Verde County 7 Rural 75.4 (60.7, 92.7) 182 (117, 200) 18 falling falling trend -6.0 (-15.2, -4.0)
Gillespie County 7 Rural 150.9 (129.5, 175.8) 5 (1, 80) 40 stable stable trend -12.0 (-24.0, 2.2)
Atascosa County 7 Urban 61.7 (49.1, 76.5) 196 (161, 201) 17 falling falling trend -15.1 (-26.6, -2.9)
El Paso County 7 Urban 92.0 (87.7, 96.4) 156 (121, 167) 367 falling falling trend -15.9 (-22.9, -8.4)
Maverick County 7 Urban 108.7 (90.8, 128.9) 100 (16, 174) 27 falling falling trend -20.5 (-29.4, -11.2)
Carson County 7 Urban 79.8 (45.4, 133.5) 175 (5, 201) 3
*
*
Castro County 7 Rural 67.3 (38.4, 111.1) 190 (34, 201) 3
*
*
Coke County 7 Rural 100.0 (56.6, 175.9) 125 (1, 201) 3
*
*
Crosby County 7 Urban 104.7 (62.3, 168.4) 113 (1, 201) 4
*
*
Dallam County 7 Rural 110.3 (62.2, 179.4) 96 (1, 201) 3
*
*
Garza County 7 Urban 130.0 (73.2, 213.3) 26 (1, 201) 3
*
*
Knox County 7 Rural 138.1 (79.3, 230.0) 16 (1, 201) 3
*
*
Lynn County 7 Urban 119.3 (74.2, 183.9) 49 (1, 201) 4
*
*
Mason County 7 Rural 118.0 (75.9, 185.4) 56 (1, 199) 5
*
*
San Saba County 7 Rural 78.1 (46.3, 127.6) 178 (12, 201) 4
*
*
Sutton County 7 Rural 150.3 (91.3, 240.3) 4 (1, 197) 4
*
*
Yoakum County 7 Rural 139.9 (91.2, 206.1) 17 (1, 192) 6
*
*
Armstrong County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baylor County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Borden County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Briscoe County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brooks County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cochran County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Collingsworth County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Concho County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crane County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickens County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Donley County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Duval County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fisher County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hall County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hansford County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardeman County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hartley County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hemphill County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hudspeth County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jim Hogg County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kimble County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kinney County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
La Salle County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lipscomb County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Motley County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reagan County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Real County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schleicher County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shackelford County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stonewall County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Throckmorton County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upton County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winkler County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/12/2026 9:22 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

7 Source: SEER November 2024 submission.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top