Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Washington by County

Prostate (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Washington 1 N/A 105.8 (104.5, 107.2) N/A 4,994 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.5, 3.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 116.4 (116.2, 116.6) N/A 240,633 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.8, 3.4)
Wahkiakum County 2 Rural 84.3 (52.4, 142.6) 25 (1, 36) 5 rising rising trend 19.9 (10.3, 45.6)
Kittitas County 2 Rural 116.7 (99.9, 135.9) 12 (1, 23) 36 stable stable trend 11.4 (-4.5, 25.9)
Skagit County 7 Urban 115.3 (105.9, 125.5) 13 (4, 21) 116 rising rising trend 5.8 (1.5, 15.3)
Yakima County 2 Urban 107.4 (99.6, 115.5) 18 (9, 23) 148 rising rising trend 5.3 (0.9, 13.5)
Clallam County 7 Rural 129.1 (117.9, 141.5) 5 (1, 15) 106 rising rising trend 5.1 (2.2, 9.7)
San Juan County 7 Rural 133.4 (112.3, 160.1) 3 (1, 20) 31 stable stable trend 3.8 (-3.5, 16.6)
Whatcom County 7 Urban 130.5 (122.3, 139.1) 4 (1, 11) 199 stable stable trend 2.9 (-1.0, 10.8)
Pierce County 7 Urban 114.8 (110.5, 119.2) 15 (7, 19) 587 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.3, 5.7)
Snohomish County 7 Urban 110.8 (106.3, 115.3) 17 (10, 21) 526 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.3, 5.1)
King County 7 Urban 116.9 (114.1, 119.7) 11 (7, 17) 1,402 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.3, 4.3)
Benton County 2 Urban 94.4 (86.7, 102.6) 22 (18, 26) 118 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.4, 10.4)
Clark County 2 Urban 67.7 (63.6, 72.2) 30 (26, 32) 210 stable stable trend 0.3 (-4.8, 6.0)
Grays Harbor County 7 Rural 125.1 (112.7, 138.7) 7 (1, 19) 81 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.5)
Kitsap County 7 Urban 135.5 (128.0, 143.3) 2 (1, 8) 262 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.5)
Thurston County 7 Urban 116.8 (109.8, 124.2) 10 (5, 19) 220 stable stable trend -1.4 (-1.9, 0.0)
Jefferson County 7 Rural 139.9 (123.8, 158.9) 1 (1, 12) 62 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.7)
Island County 7 Rural 118.4 (107.2, 130.7) 9 (2, 21) 91 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.0)
Mason County 7 Rural 124.5 (111.5, 138.9) 8 (1, 20) 73 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -1.1)
Pacific County 2 Rural 96.2 (78.5, 118.3) 21 (7, 28) 25 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.8, 1.5)
Skamania County 2 Urban 60.9 (41.9, 88.2) 31 (23, 37) 7 stable stable trend -2.2 (-21.6, 18.3)
Walla Walla County 2 Urban 115.0 (100.5, 131.1) 14 (2, 23) 47 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.2, -1.1)
Grant County 2 Rural 112.1 (99.6, 125.8) 16 (4, 23) 62 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.7, -1.1)
Lewis County 2 Rural 82.0 (72.1, 93.1) 26 (21, 29) 53 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.3, -1.6)
Chelan County 2 Urban 127.8 (114.8, 142.1) 6 (1, 18) 75 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.5, -1.9)
Douglas County 2 Urban 106.8 (90.4, 125.5) 19 (3, 25) 31 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.9, -1.8)
Okanogan County 2 Rural 102.0 (87.8, 118.4) 20 (7, 26) 40 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.6, -2.4)
Franklin County 2 Urban 89.8 (76.5, 104.6) 23 (16, 28) 37 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.8, -2.0)
Adams County 2 Rural 89.5 (64.3, 121.3) 24 (4, 34) 9 falling falling trend -4.6 (-8.1, -1.5)
Cowlitz County 2 Urban 58.0 (50.8, 66.1) 32 (28, 35) 49 falling falling trend -4.8 (-6.7, -3.1)
Lincoln County 2 Rural 70.3 (48.9, 100.8) 27 (18, 36) 8 falling falling trend -5.0 (-9.4, -1.4)
Spokane County 2 Urban 67.9 (64.0, 72.1) 29 (25, 32) 233 falling falling trend -5.8 (-7.6, -4.3)
Stevens County 2 Urban 48.2 (39.4, 59.0) 34 (30, 37) 23 falling falling trend -7.0 (-9.3, -5.0)
Pend Oreille County 2 Rural 45.2 (29.8, 68.3) 35 (27, 37) 6 falling falling trend -7.2 (-9.2, -5.5)
Asotin County 2 Urban 57.9 (43.3, 76.9) 33 (25, 36) 11 falling falling trend -7.4 (-10.3, -5.1)
Ferry County 2 Rural 43.3 (23.8, 78.6) 36 (26, 37) 3 falling falling trend -7.8 (-11.3, -5.2)
Whitman County 2 Rural 30.4 (20.4, 43.6) 37 (34, 37) 6 falling falling trend -14.1 (-31.5, -11.1)
Klickitat County 2 Rural 68.4 (53.4, 87.6) 28 (22, 35) 15 falling falling trend -31.2 (-49.7, -11.2)
Columbia County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garfield County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/12/2026 10:53 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

7 Source: SEER November 2024 submission.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top