Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for West Virginia by County

Prostate (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
West Virginia 2 N/A 104.9 (102.5, 107.5) N/A 1,415 rising rising trend 3.4 (0.6, 7.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 116.4 (116.2, 116.6) N/A 240,633 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.8, 3.4)
Raleigh County 2 Urban 93.8 (82.6, 106.3) 34 (16, 46) 54 stable stable trend 13.1 (-1.7, 24.5)
Mineral County 2 Rural 129.7 (108.4, 154.6) 4 (1, 30) 27 stable stable trend 11.4 (-1.5, 28.6)
Wood County 2 Urban 125.6 (113.2, 139.2) 8 (1, 23) 78 rising rising trend 8.7 (3.8, 17.9)
Wayne County 2 Urban 118.6 (101.6, 138.1) 12 (1, 35) 36 rising rising trend 8.1 (1.4, 23.4)
Hancock County 2 Urban 138.6 (117.8, 162.8) 1 (1, 22) 34 rising rising trend 8.0 (1.7, 22.2)
Nicholas County 2 Rural 100.5 (81.2, 123.8) 26 (3, 49) 20 stable stable trend 7.5 (-1.2, 25.5)
Wirt County 2 Urban 71.2 (41.8, 120.6) 50 (6, 55) 4 stable stable trend 7.2 (-3.9, 34.6)
Preston County 2 Urban 131.2 (111.8, 153.6) 3 (1, 26) 34 rising rising trend 6.7 (0.4, 22.4)
Brooke County 2 Urban 125.9 (103.5, 152.7) 7 (1, 37) 24 rising rising trend 6.6 (1.3, 20.0)
Monongalia County 2 Urban 109.0 (96.4, 122.8) 17 (5, 37) 59 rising rising trend 4.0 (0.7, 10.4)
Jackson County 2 Rural 120.6 (100.1, 144.7) 11 (1, 37) 25 stable stable trend 3.5 (-1.6, 15.4)
Taylor County 2 Rural 126.8 (100.7, 158.8) 6 (1, 39) 17 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.6, 4.6)
Pocahontas County 2 Rural 86.4 (58.9, 126.4) 39 (3, 55) 7 stable stable trend 0.0 (-4.7, 4.8)
Kanawha County 2 Urban 117.3 (109.0, 126.2) 14 (4, 25) 157 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.0, 5.0)
Randolph County 2 Rural 127.4 (107.4, 150.6) 5 (1, 31) 30 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.6, 3.9)
Gilmer County 2 Rural 69.2 (40.8, 112.1) 51 (6, 55) 4 stable stable trend -0.3 (-5.3, 5.0)
Pendleton County 2 Rural 104.4 (70.5, 154.7) 20 (1, 54) 7 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.6, 4.1)
Braxton County 2 Rural 99.6 (75.2, 131.5) 28 (2, 52) 12 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.3, 1.7)
Clay County 2 Urban 121.5 (87.8, 167.4) 10 (1, 49) 9 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.2, 2.7)
Berkeley County 2 Urban 108.2 (97.4, 120.0) 19 (7, 36) 81 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.3, 0.1)
Fayette County 2 Urban 88.2 (73.7, 105.1) 38 (15, 52) 28 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.6)
Grant County 2 Rural 101.9 (74.7, 138.0) 23 (1, 53) 10 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.3, 1.8)
Harrison County 2 Rural 103.3 (90.6, 117.5) 22 (7, 41) 50 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.4, 0.6)
Logan County 2 Rural 99.2 (81.9, 119.7) 29 (6, 48) 25 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.0, 1.0)
Cabell County 2 Urban 112.7 (101.1, 125.4) 15 (3, 32) 71 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.4, 0.1)
Morgan County 2 Urban 97.2 (76.5, 123.7) 31 (4, 51) 16 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.4, 1.4)
Marion County 2 Rural 112.4 (97.8, 128.7) 16 (2, 37) 45 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.3, 0.0)
Marshall County 2 Urban 108.9 (91.1, 129.8) 18 (2, 43) 28 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.8, 0.1)
Pleasants County 2 Rural 136.7 (94.6, 192.8) 2 (1, 48) 8 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.9, 1.1)
Upshur County 2 Rural 96.1 (77.2, 118.9) 32 (6, 51) 19 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.0, 0.3)
Jefferson County 2 Urban 101.7 (87.7, 117.6) 24 (7, 44) 41 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.1, -0.5)
Putnam County 2 Urban 118.3 (103.3, 135.0) 13 (1, 32) 48 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.9, 0.3)
Hampshire County 2 Urban 71.3 (55.6, 91.2) 49 (27, 55) 15 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.8, -0.1)
Greenbrier County 2 Rural 84.4 (69.6, 102.0) 41 (18, 53) 24 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.7, 0.3)
Mason County 2 Rural 91.7 (73.3, 114.1) 35 (8, 52) 18 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.7, 0.0)
Lewis County 2 Rural 96.0 (73.2, 124.7) 33 (3, 53) 13 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.6, 0.8)
Ritchie County 2 Rural 99.7 (69.2, 142.3) 27 (1, 54) 7 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.2, 0.3)
Wetzel County 2 Rural 89.1 (65.8, 119.6) 37 (5, 54) 10 stable stable trend -2.4 (-19.9, 20.0)
Ohio County 2 Urban 125.3 (107.6, 145.4) 9 (1, 30) 39 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.6, -0.5)
Webster County 2 Rural 75.5 (49.8, 113.6) 46 (7, 55) 6 stable stable trend -2.7 (-7.3, 1.7)
Barbour County 2 Rural 104.1 (79.4, 135.3) 21 (1, 51) 13 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.2, -0.6)
Boone County 2 Urban 84.1 (65.6, 107.3) 42 (13, 54) 15 stable stable trend -2.9 (-6.3, 0.5)
Monroe County 2 Rural 100.8 (76.4, 132.7) 25 (2, 52) 12 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.7, -1.1)
Summers County 2 Rural 78.8 (56.3, 110.7) 43 (10, 55) 9 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.4, -0.6)
Hardy County 2 Rural 71.7 (52.0, 98.2) 48 (21, 55) 9 stable stable trend -3.0 (-7.0, 1.2)
Tucker County 2 Rural 98.2 (68.6, 142.8) 30 (1, 54) 7 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.7, -0.3)
Wyoming County 2 Rural 68.9 (51.9, 90.9) 52 (27, 55) 12 stable stable trend -3.3 (-7.8, 0.8)
Mercer County 2 Rural 90.3 (78.0, 104.3) 36 (17, 49) 41 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.9, -1.6)
Mingo County 2 Rural 86.0 (67.5, 108.7) 40 (12, 54) 17 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.1, -1.2)
Roane County 2 Rural 77.9 (56.8, 106.1) 44 (14, 55) 10 falling falling trend -3.7 (-6.5, -1.2)
Lincoln County 2 Rural 73.1 (55.4, 95.6) 47 (23, 55) 12 falling falling trend -4.2 (-7.6, -1.2)
McDowell County 2 Rural 65.6 (47.8, 88.9) 53 (28, 55) 10 falling falling trend -4.4 (-9.3, -0.1)
Tyler County 2 Rural 50.4 (29.5, 84.3) 55 (35, 55) 4 falling falling trend -11.3 (-36.1, -3.3)
Calhoun County 2 Rural 62.8 (38.0, 105.0) 54 (18, 55) 4
*
*
Doddridge County 2 Rural 77.7 (50.4, 118.1) 45 (6, 55) 5
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/13/2026 12:24 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top