Interpretation of Incidence Rates Data
Incidence Rate Report for Kansas by County
Brain & ONS (All Stages^), 2018-2022
All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages
Sorted by Recentaapc
Explanation of Column HeadersIncidence Rate (95% Confidence Interval) - The incidence rate is based upon 100,000 people and is an annual rate (or average annual rate) based on the time period indicated. Rates are age-adjusted by 5-year age groups to the 2000 U.S. standard million population.
Recent Trends - This is an interpretation of the AAPC/APC:
- Rising when 95% confidence interval of AAPC/APC is above 0.
- Stable when 95% confidence interval of AAPC/APC includes 0.
- Falling when 95% confidence interval of AAPC/APC is below 0.
AAPC/APC (95% Confidence Interval) - the change in rate over time
Other Notes- Larger confidence intervals indicate less stability of the data. This is often due to low counts that are not quite low enough to be suppressed.
- Data is currently being suppressed if there are fewer than 16 counts for the time period.
Line by Line Interpretation of the Report
Kansas2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : N/A
- Rate : The incidence rate is 6.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 6.3 to 7.1 and 217 average annual cases over 2018-2022.
- CI*Rank ⋔ : N/A
- Recent Trend : The trend is because the trend is -0.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -1.0 to 0.5.
US (SEER+NPCR)1
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : N/A
- Rate : The incidence rate is 6.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 6.2 to 6.3 and 23,548 average annual cases over 2018-2022.
- CI*Rank ⋔ : N/A
- Recent Trend : The trend is because the trend is -1.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.1 to -1.1.
Allen County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Anderson County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Atchison County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Barber County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Barton County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Bourbon County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Brown County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Butler County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Chase County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Chautauqua County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Cherokee County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Cheyenne County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Clark County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Clay County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Cloud County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Coffey County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Comanche County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Cowley County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Crawford County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Decatur County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Dickinson County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Doniphan County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Douglas County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Edwards County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Elk County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Ellis County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Ellsworth County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Finney County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Ford County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Franklin County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Geary County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Gove County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Graham County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Grant County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Gray County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Greeley County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Greenwood County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Hamilton County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Harper County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Harvey County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Haskell County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Hodgeman County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Jackson County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Jefferson County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Jewell County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Johnson County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Kearny County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Kingman County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Kiowa County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Labette County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Lane County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Leavenworth County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Lincoln County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Linn County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Logan County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Lyon County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Marion County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Marshall County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
McPherson County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Meade County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Miami County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Mitchell County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Montgomery County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Morris County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Morton County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Nemaha County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Neosho County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Ness County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Norton County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Osage County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Osborne County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Ottawa County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Pawnee County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Phillips County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Pottawatomie County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Pratt County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Rawlins County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Reno County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Republic County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Rice County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Riley County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Rooks County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Rush County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Russell County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Saline County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Scott County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Sedgwick County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Seward County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Shawnee County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Sheridan County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Sherman County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Smith County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Stafford County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Stanton County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Stevens County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Sumner County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Thomas County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Trego County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Wabaunsee County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Wallace County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Washington County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Wichita County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Wilson County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Woodson County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Rural
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Wyandotte County2
- 2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ : Urban
- Rate :
- CI*Rank ⋔ : ¶
- Recent Trend : ¶
Notes:Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/13/2026 9:14 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the
2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using
SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The
US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by
Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may
differ for selected counties.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see
malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from
National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the
CI*Rank website.
Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the
2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.
1 Source:
National Program of Cancer Registries and
Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.
2 Source:
National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).
¶ Data not available because of state legislation and regulations which prohibit the release of county level data to outside entities.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.