Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report for Michigan by County

Brain & ONS (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
sort alphabetically by name descending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate †
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Michigan 2 N/A 6.1 (5.9, 6.3) N/A 718 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.9, -1.1)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 6.3 (6.2, 6.3) N/A 23,548 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.1)
Allegan County 2 Rural 7.6 (5.6, 10.1) 5 (1, 33) 10 stable stable trend 1.3 (-3.2, 6.2)
Bay County 2 Urban 7.3 (5.2, 10.0) 9 (1, 35) 9 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.6, 1.8)
Berrien County 2 Urban 5.8 (4.3, 7.7) 25 (4, 36) 11 falling falling trend -4.4 (-8.3, -2.1)
Calhoun County 2 Urban 5.5 (3.9, 7.5) 29 (4, 37) 9 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.7, 0.5)
Cass County 2 Urban 5.2 (3.0, 8.5) 33 (2, 37) 4 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.5, -0.4)
Clinton County 2 Urban 7.7 (5.3, 10.8) 4 (1, 35) 7 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.8, 3.3)
Eaton County 2 Urban 5.3 (3.6, 7.6) 30 (4, 37) 7 falling falling trend -3.7 (-7.3, -0.6)
Emmet County 2 Rural 9.3 (5.3, 15.3) 1 (1, 37) 4
*
*
Genesee County 2 Urban 6.2 (5.2, 7.3) 22 (5, 33) 29 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 0.9)
Grand Traverse County 2 Urban 7.1 (5.0, 9.9) 11 (1, 35) 8 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.5, 3.3)
Hillsdale County 2 Rural 6.0 (3.4, 9.9) 23 (1, 37) 4 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.5, 3.6)
Ingham County 2 Urban 7.2 (5.9, 8.8) 10 (1, 30) 21 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.4, -0.3)
Ionia County 2 Urban 5.0 (3.0, 8.0) 34 (3, 37) 4 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.1, 0.9)
Isabella County 2 Rural 6.8 (4.1, 10.8) 14 (1, 37) 4 stable stable trend 1.8 (-4.9, 9.4)
Jackson County 2 Urban 6.4 (4.8, 8.3) 19 (2, 35) 13 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.0, 0.6)
Kalamazoo County 2 Urban 6.3 (5.0, 7.8) 20 (4, 35) 17 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.4, -0.1)
Kent County 2 Urban 5.8 (5.0, 6.7) 26 (9, 34) 41 falling falling trend -12.4 (-22.8, -1.7)
Lapeer County 2 Urban 3.9 (2.4, 6.1) 37 (14, 37) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-5.8, 3.8)
Lenawee County 2 Rural 6.5 (4.5, 9.2) 17 (1, 37) 7 falling falling trend -28.5 (-49.2, -0.9)
Livingston County 2 Urban 6.7 (5.2, 8.4) 15 (2, 34) 16 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.0, 1.5)
Macomb County 2 Urban 6.6 (5.9, 7.4) 16 (5, 27) 68 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.2)
Marquette County 2 Rural 7.3 (4.8, 10.8) 8 (1, 36) 6
*
*
Midland County 2 Urban 8.4 (5.9, 11.7) 2 (1, 33) 8 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.2, 3.6)
Monroe County 2 Urban 5.6 (4.1, 7.5) 28 (5, 37) 10 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.4, 3.0)
Montcalm County 2 Urban 6.0 (3.8, 9.0) 24 (1, 37) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.7, 2.5)
Muskegon County 2 Urban 4.0 (2.8, 5.5) 36 (22, 37) 8 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.4, -1.5)
Newaygo County 2 Rural 7.0 (4.2, 11.1) 12 (1, 37) 4 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.5, 4.7)
Oakland County 2 Urban 6.9 (6.3, 7.6) 13 (4, 23) 104 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Ottawa County 2 Urban 5.7 (4.6, 7.0) 27 (7, 36) 18 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.9, 0.2)
Saginaw County 2 Urban 6.4 (5.0, 8.1) 18 (3, 35) 15 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.0, 2.7)
Sanilac County 2 Rural 8.4 (4.9, 13.4) 3 (1, 37) 4 stable stable trend -2.7 (-7.2, 1.3)
Shiawassee County 2 Rural 7.5 (4.9, 10.9) 7 (1, 36) 6 stable stable trend -0.6 (-5.2, 3.9)
St. Clair County 2 Urban 7.5 (5.8, 9.6) 6 (1, 31) 15 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.2)
St. Joseph County 2 Rural 5.2 (3.0, 8.3) 32 (2, 37) 4 stable stable trend -3.0 (-9.2, 2.6)
Van Buren County 2 Rural 4.4 (2.7, 7.0) 35 (8, 37) 4 stable stable trend -2.0 (-7.1, 2.7)
Washtenaw County 2 Urban 6.2 (5.2, 7.5) 21 (5, 34) 25 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.4, -0.4)
Wayne County 2 Urban 5.2 (4.7, 5.7) 31 (21, 35) 104 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
Alcona County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alger County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Alpena County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Antrim County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Arenac County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baraga County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Barry County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Benzie County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Branch County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Charlevoix County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cheboygan County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chippewa County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clare County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Delta County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickinson County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gladwin County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gogebic County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gratiot County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houghton County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Huron County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iosco County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iron County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kalkaska County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Keweenaw County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Leelanau County 2 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Luce County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mackinac County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Manistee County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mecosta County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menominee County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Missaukee County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montmorency County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oceana County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ogemaw County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ontonagon County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Osceola County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oscoda County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Otsego County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presque Isle County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roscommon County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schoolcraft County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tuscola County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wexford County 2 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/12/2026 12:20 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top