Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

Esophagus (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count

State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 4.6 (4.6, 4.6) N/A 19,397 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.9)
District of Columbia 2 3.8 (3.1, 4.5) 48 (25, 51) 25 falling falling trend -4.7 (-6.7, -3.1)
Wyoming 2 4.8 (4.1, 5.6) 24 (3, 48) 36 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.6, 0.7)
North Dakota 2 4.6 (4.0, 5.2) 35 (8, 48) 43 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.7)
Alaska 2 5.6 (4.8, 6.4) 8 (1, 36) 44 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.6)
Vermont 2 5.2 (4.6, 6.0) 15 (2, 40) 51 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.2)
South Dakota 2 5.6 (5.0, 6.3) 7 (2, 27) 63 stable stable trend 4.1 (-4.4, 14.4)
Delaware 2 4.7 (4.2, 5.2) 30 (9, 46) 67 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.3)
Hawaii 7 3.4 (3.0, 3.8) 51 (46, 51) 69 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 1.0)
Rhode Island 2 5.0 (4.5, 5.5) 20 (5, 41) 74 falling falling trend -7.5 (-12.9, -3.7)
Montana 2 5.0 (4.5, 5.5) 19 (4, 41) 77 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.1, 2.3)
Utah 7 3.4 (3.1, 3.8) 50 (46, 51) 103 stable stable trend 0.0 (-4.3, 1.0)
Idaho 7 4.6 (4.2, 5.1) 32 (14, 45) 105 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.8)
New Mexico 7 4.0 (3.7, 4.4) 45 (33, 50) 114 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.3, 1.1)
Nebraska 2 4.9 (4.5, 5.3) 21 (8, 40) 117 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.0)
New Hampshire 2 5.9 (5.5, 6.4) 3 (2, 15) 123 falling falling trend -6.3 (-11.6, -1.0)
Puerto Rico 2 2.8 (2.5, 3.0) N/A 142 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.9, -1.5)
Maine 2 7.1 (6.6, 7.7) 1 (1, 2) 153 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.5, 1.2)
West Virginia 2 6.1 (5.7, 6.6) 2 (1, 9) 163 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.2, 1.3)
Kansas 2 4.7 (4.4, 5.0) 29 (15, 42) 169 stable stable trend -3.5 (-8.5, 1.4)
Nevada 2 4.7 (4.4, 5.0) 28 (15, 41) 181 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.2)
Mississippi 2 4.8 (4.5, 5.1) 25 (13, 39) 183 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Arkansas 2 4.9 (4.6, 5.2) 22 (11, 37) 193 stable stable trend 1.0 (-3.1, 3.0)
Connecticut 7 4.6 (4.3, 4.9) 33 (18, 41) 230 falling falling trend -1.2 (-3.8, -0.7)
Iowa 7 5.7 (5.4, 6.1) 5 (2, 15) 242 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.4, 1.1)
Oklahoma 2 5.1 (4.9, 5.4) 17 (7, 28) 250 rising rising trend 2.9 (0.6, 6.9)
Colorado 2 3.9 (3.7, 4.1) 46 (39, 49) 264 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Oregon 2 4.7 (4.5, 5.0) 27 (17, 38) 266 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Louisiana 7 4.6 (4.4, 4.9) 31 (18, 40) 269 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.2)
Alabama 2 4.4 (4.2, 4.7) 37 (24, 44) 295 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.2)
Maryland 2 3.9 (3.7, 4.1) 47 (40, 49) 305 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.3)
South Carolina 2 4.6 (4.4, 4.8) 34 (20, 40) 323 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.6)
Kentucky 7 5.7 (5.4, 6.0) 6 (2, 13) 332 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.5, 5.0)
Minnesota 2 5.3 (5.1, 5.5) 13 (6, 23) 382 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.7)
Arizona 2 4.1 (3.9, 4.3) 44 (37, 48) 393 stable stable trend -3.4 (-8.2, 0.4)
Wisconsin 2 5.3 (5.1, 5.6) 12 (6, 21) 425 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Missouri 2 5.2 (5.0, 5.5) 14 (7, 23) 426 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.3, 2.8)
Tennessee 2 4.9 (4.7, 5.1) 23 (15, 34) 434 stable stable trend 0.5 (0.0, 1.1)
Washington 1 4.8 (4.6, 5.0) 26 (16, 36) 451 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Virginia 2 4.3 (4.1, 4.5) 40 (31, 45) 461 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.9, 4.3)
Indiana 2 5.6 (5.3, 5.8) 9 (3, 16) 473 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.4, 0.8)
Massachusetts 2 5.2 (4.9, 5.4) 16 (9, 25) 481 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
New Jersey 7 4.1 (4.0, 4.3) 42 (37, 48) 496 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -1.0)
Georgia 7 4.3 (4.2, 4.5) 39 (30, 44) 541 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
North Carolina 2 4.4 (4.2, 4.5) 38 (30, 43) 589 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.2)
Michigan 2 5.4 (5.2, 5.6) 10 (6, 19) 738 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.0)
Illinois 7 5.0 (4.8, 5.2) 18 (14, 28) 809 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.6, 4.1)
Ohio 2 5.8 (5.6, 6.0) 4 (2, 9) 911 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.6, 3.4)
Pennsylvania 2 5.3 (5.2, 5.5) 11 (7, 18) 981 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.6, 0.3)
New York 7 4.2 (4.0, 4.3) 41 (38, 46) 1,094 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.4, 0.6)
Texas 7 4.1 (4.0, 4.2) 43 (39, 48) 1,253 stable stable trend 0.5 (0.0, 1.4)
Florida 2 4.5 (4.4, 4.7) 36 (26, 38) 1,496 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.2)
California 7 3.5 (3.5, 3.6) 49 (48, 51) 1,634 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/05/2026 1:16 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

7 Source: SEER November 2024 submission.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

CI*Rank data for Puerto Rico is not available.

Return to Top