Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

Melanoma of the Skin (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name

State
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 23.1 (23.0, 23.2) N/A 91,120 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.2)
Alabama 2 21.0 (20.5, 21.6) 33 (32, 40) 1,264 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.5, 1.2)
Alaska 2 16.2 (14.9, 17.6) 48 (46, 50) 121 rising rising trend 2.2 (1.0, 3.6)
Arizona 2 32.3 (31.8, 32.9) 6 (4, 7) 2,946 stable stable trend 2.1 (0.0, 3.8)
Arkansas 2 24.7 (24.0, 25.5) 26 (19, 28) 889 stable stable trend -2.6 (-6.8, 1.2)
California 7 23.4 (23.2, 23.6) 29 (28, 30) 10,424 rising rising trend 1.3 (1.1, 1.6)
Colorado 2 22.1 (21.6, 22.7) 32 (30, 33) 1,423 rising rising trend 0.5 (0.1, 0.9)
Connecticut 7 19.2 (18.6, 19.8) 44 (41, 45) 895 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -1.0)
Delaware 2 25.3 (24.1, 26.6) 20 (15, 28) 339 falling falling trend -11.2 (-14.6, -8.6)
District of Columbia 2 9.8 (8.7, 10.9) 51 (51, 51) 66 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.2, 3.0)
Florida 2 26.2 (26.0, 26.5) 18 (16, 20) 8,071 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.5, 1.9)
Georgia 7 25.0 (24.6, 25.4) 23 (19, 27) 2,936 falling falling trend -1.3 (-3.4, -0.1)
Hawaii 7 24.9 (23.8, 25.9) 25 (17, 29) 477 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.9, 2.9)
Idaho 7 32.4 (31.3, 33.5) 5 (3, 7) 680 rising rising trend 2.1 (1.7, 2.7)
Illinois 7 23.8 (23.4, 24.1) 28 (26, 29) 3,559 rising rising trend 3.2 (2.8, 3.6)
Indiana 2 20.4 (19.9, 20.8) 39 (34, 42) 1,597 falling falling trend -5.0 (-6.8, -3.6)
Iowa 7 32.8 (32.0, 33.7) 4 (3, 7) 1,233 rising rising trend 3.4 (3.2, 3.7)
Kansas 2 28.4 (27.6, 29.3) 11 (8, 16) 948 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.0, 2.3)
Kentucky 7 28.8 (28.2, 29.5) 9 (7, 14) 1,532 rising rising trend 2.0 (1.7, 2.4)
Louisiana 7 18.7 (18.1, 19.2) 45 (42, 46) 983 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.1, 2.6)
Maine 2 27.5 (26.4, 28.7) 14 (9, 19) 530 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.9, 2.1)
Maryland 2 25.0 (24.5, 25.5) 24 (19, 27) 1,837 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.9, 2.2)
Massachusetts 2 15.6 (15.2, 16.0) 49 (48, 50) 1,359 falling falling trend -11.4 (-19.9, -6.3)
Michigan 2 20.8 (20.4, 21.2) 36 (33, 40) 2,566 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.3, 1.3)
Minnesota 2 38.8 (38.1, 39.5) 2 (2, 2) 2,574 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.1, 2.6)
Mississippi 2 19.2 (18.5, 19.9) 43 (40, 45) 655 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.4, 1.7)
Missouri 2 20.4 (20.0, 20.9) 38 (33, 42) 1,513 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.8, 1.7)
Montana 2 27.1 (25.9, 28.5) 16 (9, 21) 374 falling falling trend -5.5 (-8.6, -2.7)
Nebraska 2 28.7 (27.7, 29.8) 10 (7, 16) 631 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.9, 2.2)
Nevada 2 22.6 (21.9, 23.4) 30 (28, 32) 835 stable stable trend 0.4 (-4.2, 4.0)
New Hampshire 2 28.1 (27.0, 29.2) 12 (8, 17) 527 falling falling trend -6.1 (-11.2, -2.8)
New Jersey 7 20.7 (20.3, 21.1) 37 (33, 40) 2,382 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 0.9)
New Mexico 7 17.5 (16.8, 18.3) 47 (45, 48) 472 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.5, 7.0)
New York 7 17.8 (17.6, 18.1) 46 (45, 48) 4,405 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.1, 1.1)
North Carolina 2 28.0 (27.6, 28.5) 13 (9, 16) 3,490 rising rising trend 2.0 (1.0, 2.6)
North Dakota 2 30.0 (28.3, 31.8) 8 (5, 15) 248 rising rising trend 13.7 (8.4, 18.5)
Ohio 2 27.2 (26.8, 27.6) 15 (13, 17) 3,901 rising rising trend 2.8 (2.3, 3.4)
Oklahoma 2 21.0 (20.4, 21.6) 34 (32, 40) 948 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.6, 0.8)
Oregon 2 24.3 (23.6, 24.9) 27 (21, 29) 1,282 stable stable trend -1.9 (-7.8, 0.0)
Pennsylvania 2 20.0 (19.7, 20.3) 41 (38, 43) 3,347 falling falling trend -4.2 (-5.5, -3.0)
Puerto Rico 2 3.3 (3.1, 3.6) N/A 149 stable stable trend -0.3 (-8.7, 2.6)
Rhode Island 2 19.3 (18.3, 20.4) 42 (36, 46) 271 falling falling trend -4.5 (-8.5, -2.4)
South Carolina 2 22.4 (21.9, 23.0) 31 (30, 32) 1,441 falling falling trend -2.0 (-5.1, -0.1)
South Dakota 2 30.3 (28.7, 31.9) 7 (4, 13) 317 rising rising trend 4.3 (3.6, 5.2)
Tennessee 2 20.3 (19.8, 20.7) 40 (34, 42) 1,670 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.5)
Texas 7 15.4 (15.2, 15.6) 50 (48, 50) 4,565 rising rising trend 2.7 (1.3, 5.4)
Utah 7 42.7 (41.7, 43.8) 1 (1, 1) 1,252 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.4, 2.3)
Vermont 2 35.1 (33.3, 37.1) 3 (3, 5) 303 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.6, 2.6)
Virginia 2 21.0 (20.6, 21.4) 35 (33, 39) 2,142 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.1, 1.5)
Washington 1 25.8 (25.3, 26.3) 19 (16, 23) 2,299 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 0.6)
West Virginia 2 25.0 (24.1, 26.0) 22 (17, 28) 590 rising rising trend 5.8 (2.2, 8.4)
Wisconsin 2 25.3 (24.7, 25.8) 21 (18, 26) 1,824 rising rising trend 5.7 (2.6, 8.2)
Wyoming 2 27.0 (25.2, 28.8) 17 (8, 26) 188 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.9, 3.6)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/09/2026 1:19 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

7 Source: SEER November 2024 submission.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

CI*Rank data for Puerto Rico is not available.

Return to Top