Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

Brain & ONS (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 6.3 (6.2, 6.3) N/A 23,548 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.1)
Massachusetts 2 6.4 (6.2, 6.7) 25 (11, 36) 522 falling falling trend -5.0 (-8.6, -1.1)
Ohio 2 6.5 (6.3, 6.7) 22 (10, 31) 888 falling falling trend -4.0 (-7.7, -0.5)
Oregon 2 6.3 (6.0, 6.6) 29 (13, 43) 314 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.5, -1.8)
Pennsylvania 2 6.7 (6.5, 6.9) 15 (7, 26) 1,037 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.1, -1.0)
Iowa 7 6.6 (6.2, 7.0) 20 (4, 38) 242 falling falling trend -1.8 (-5.5, -0.4)
Puerto Rico 2 4.1 (3.8, 4.4) N/A 162 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.9, -0.8)
Michigan 2 6.1 (5.9, 6.3) 35 (25, 43) 718 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.9, -1.1)
South Dakota 2 5.4 (4.7, 6.1) 49 (23, 51) 52 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.1, -0.1)
Delaware 2 6.1 (5.5, 6.8) 32 (5, 50) 73 falling falling trend -1.5 (-5.5, -0.6)
Virginia 2 5.6 (5.4, 5.9) 43 (37, 50) 545 stable stable trend -1.5 (-8.6, 0.6)
Wyoming 2 5.6 (4.8, 6.5) 44 (8, 51) 38 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.2, 0.6)
Arizona 2 6.2 (5.9, 6.4) 30 (21, 42) 513 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.6, -0.8)
Kentucky 7 7.0 (6.7, 7.4) 8 (1, 23) 360 falling falling trend -1.2 (-3.3, -0.2)
Rhode Island 2 6.5 (5.8, 7.1) 24 (2, 47) 85 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Wisconsin 2 6.8 (6.6, 7.1) 13 (3, 27) 473 falling falling trend -1.1 (-3.5, -0.6)
North Dakota 2 6.0 (5.2, 6.8) 39 (5, 50) 51 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.5)
Alaska 2 5.9 (5.1, 6.8) 40 (4, 50) 45 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.9)
Georgia 7 5.9 (5.7, 6.1) 41 (31, 47) 678 falling falling trend -0.9 (-2.0, -0.6)
Texas 7 6.0 (5.9, 6.1) 38 (29, 43) 1,799 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.0, -0.7)
Maine 2 7.0 (6.4, 7.6) 10 (1, 35) 124 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
Nevada 2 5.4 (5.1, 5.8) 48 (38, 50) 189 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Oklahoma 2 6.3 (6.0, 6.7) 28 (10, 42) 277 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Colorado 2 6.1 (5.8, 6.4) 33 (20, 44) 386 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.4, -0.1)
Illinois 7 6.1 (5.9, 6.3) 34 (25, 43) 867 falling falling trend -0.7 (-2.1, -0.4)
Maryland 2 6.0 (5.8, 6.3) 37 (23, 45) 419 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Mississippi 2 5.5 (5.2, 5.9) 47 (33, 50) 183 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
California 7 5.8 (5.7, 5.9) 42 (37, 46) 2,491 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.5, -0.4)
Indiana 2 6.5 (6.3, 6.8) 23 (9, 34) 493 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.3, -0.1)
New Jersey 7 6.6 (6.4, 6.8) 21 (8, 30) 700 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.8, -0.3)
New York 7 6.2 (6.0, 6.3) 31 (24, 40) 1,408 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.8, -0.4)
South Carolina 2 6.1 (5.8, 6.4) 36 (22, 45) 372 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.2, -0.1)
West Virginia 2 7.0 (6.4, 7.5) 11 (1, 32) 151 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Arkansas 2 6.7 (6.3, 7.1) 16 (3, 35) 233 stable stable trend -0.5 (-5.2, 0.8)
Idaho 7 7.0 (6.5, 7.6) 7 (1, 31) 144 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.5)
North Carolina 2 6.4 (6.2, 6.6) 27 (16, 37) 758 stable stable trend -0.5 (-0.9, 0.0)
Washington 1 7.0 (6.8, 7.3) 6 (1, 19) 599 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
Florida 2 6.8 (6.6, 6.9) 14 (7, 23) 1,816 falling falling trend -0.4 (-0.7, -0.1)
Montana 2 7.4 (6.7, 8.1) 1 (1, 27) 97 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Tennessee 2 6.4 (6.2, 6.7) 26 (11, 37) 503 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Hawaii 7 4.2 (3.8, 4.7) 51 (50, 51) 72 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Missouri 2 6.6 (6.4, 6.9) 19 (6, 31) 471 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.2)
Alabama 2 6.7 (6.4, 7.0) 17 (4, 31) 387 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.4)
Kansas 2 6.7 (6.3, 7.1) 18 (3, 36) 217 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.5)
Louisiana 7 5.6 (5.3, 5.9) 46 (36, 50) 289 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.6, 0.3)
New Hampshire 2 7.4 (6.8, 8.0) 3 (1, 25) 124 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 1.0)
New Mexico 7 5.3 (4.9, 5.7) 50 (39, 50) 130 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.3)
Connecticut 7 7.2 (6.8, 7.6) 4 (1, 20) 306 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.4, 0.2)
District of Columbia 2 5.6 (4.8, 6.5) 45 (9, 50) 38 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 1.5)
Nebraska 2 6.9 (6.4, 7.5) 12 (1, 33) 148 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.6, 0.5)
Utah 7 7.1 (6.7, 7.5) 5 (1, 26) 220 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.4, 0.4)
Vermont 2 7.4 (6.5, 8.4) 2 (1, 36) 59 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.7)
Minnesota 2 7.0 (6.7, 7.3) 9 (1, 22) 446 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.1, 1.2)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/09/2026 2:48 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2024 submission.

2 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2024 submission).

7 Source: SEER November 2024 submission.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

CI*Rank data for Puerto Rico is not available.

Return to Top