Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

Uterus (Corpus & Uterus, NOS) (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Name
State
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 27.4 (27.3, 27.5) N/A 56,871 rising rising trend 1.2 (1.1, 1.3)
Alabama 6 20.1 (19.4, 20.8) 49 (47, 49) 673 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.2, 2.6)
Alaska 6 27.6 (25.2, 30.1) 25 (6, 41) 109 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.2, 3.0)
Arizona 6 23.4 (22.7, 24.0) 44 (39, 47) 1,080 rising rising trend 1.7 (1.1, 2.3)
Arkansas 6 25.1 (24.0, 26.1) 38 (28, 43) 495 rising rising trend 3.0 (2.6, 4.3)
California 7 27.0 (26.7, 27.3) 27 (23, 31) 6,421 rising rising trend 1.8 (1.6, 2.0)
Colorado 6 22.4 (21.7, 23.1) 47 (43, 48) 778 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.5, 1.7)
Connecticut 7 29.3 (28.3, 30.2) 16 (9, 23) 750 rising rising trend 0.3 (0.1, 0.5)
Delaware 6 28.8 (27.0, 30.7) 18 (6, 32) 210 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.6, 1.8)
District of Columbia 6 30.1 (27.6, 32.7) 14 (2, 30) 116 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.1, 2.5)
Florida 6 25.9 (25.5, 26.3) 31 (28, 37) 4,090 rising rising trend 1.8 (1.5, 2.4)
Georgia 7 24.5 (23.9, 25.0) 39 (35, 43) 1,606 rising rising trend 2.5 (2.2, 3.1)
Hawaii 7 34.4 (32.7, 36.3) 2 (1, 6) 306 rising rising trend 1.7 (1.3, 2.2)
Idaho 7 25.3 (23.9, 26.7) 36 (24, 44) 273 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.5, 1.8)
Illinois 7 30.3 (29.8, 30.8) 12 (7, 17) 2,523 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.9, 1.4)
Iowa 7 30.5 (29.4, 31.6) 11 (4, 19) 641 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.4, 1.0)
Kansas 6 26.8 (25.7, 27.9) 28 (20, 37) 484 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.7, 1.8)
Kentucky 7 27.9 (27.0, 28.8) 22 (16, 30) 809 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.9, 1.9)
Louisiana 7 21.1 (20.3, 21.8) 48 (46, 49) 633 rising rising trend 2.2 (1.3, 4.8)
Maine 6 31.1 (29.5, 32.7) 7 (2, 19) 330 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.4, 1.2)
Maryland 6 27.6 (26.9, 28.4) 24 (18, 30) 1,140 rising rising trend 1.6 (1.1, 2.1)
Massachusetts 7 28.7 (28.0, 29.4) 20 (14, 24) 1,376 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.9, 1.2)
Michigan 6 28.8 (28.2, 29.4) 17 (14, 23) 1,995 rising rising trend 0.4 (0.1, 0.7)
Minnesota 6 30.3 (29.4, 31.1) 13 (6, 18) 1,094 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.4, 1.7)
Mississippi 6 23.6 (22.6, 24.7) 43 (36, 47) 461 rising rising trend 1.9 (1.1, 3.0)
Missouri 6 27.9 (27.1, 28.6) 23 (17, 28) 1,145 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.8, 1.4)
Montana 6 25.6 (23.9, 27.4) 34 (21, 45) 188 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.4, 1.6)
Nebraska 6 27.1 (25.8, 28.5) 26 (16, 37) 321 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.3, 4.3)
New Hampshire 6 30.5 (28.9, 32.1) 10 (3, 22) 307 stable stable trend -0.9 (-5.3, 0.3)
New Jersey 7 31.9 (31.2, 32.5) 5 (3, 9) 1,967 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.6, 1.0)
New Mexico 7 24.2 (23.0, 25.4) 40 (32, 47) 333 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.7, 1.8)
New York 7 31.2 (30.7, 31.6) 6 (4, 12) 4,169 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.6)
North Carolina 6 25.8 (25.3, 26.3) 33 (28, 38) 1,817 rising rising trend 1.6 (1.1, 2.2)
North Dakota 6 25.6 (23.4, 27.9) 35 (18, 47) 113 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.5, 1.9)
Ohio 6 30.9 (30.3, 31.5) 8 (5, 15) 2,479 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.9, 1.5)
Oklahoma 6 24.0 (23.1, 24.9) 42 (35, 46) 587 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.9, 2.1)
Oregon 6 30.0 (29.1, 31.0) 15 (6, 20) 848 rising rising trend 1.7 (1.2, 2.3)
Pennsylvania 6 32.6 (32.1, 33.1) 3 (2, 6) 3,020 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.5, 0.9)
Puerto Rico 6 31.2 (30.1, 32.3) N/A 659 stable stable trend 4.1 (-0.3, 8.8)
Rhode Island 6 28.7 (27.0, 30.6) 19 (6, 32) 217 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.4)
South Carolina 6 23.2 (22.5, 23.9) 45 (39, 47) 836 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.2, 1.1)
South Dakota 6 28.0 (25.9, 30.1) 21 (7, 37) 152 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.1)
Tennessee 6 25.2 (24.5, 25.8) 37 (30, 41) 1,135 rising rising trend 2.5 (2.2, 2.9)
Texas 7 24.1 (23.7, 24.4) 41 (37, 45) 3,823 rising rising trend 2.3 (2.0, 2.7)
Utah 7 26.2 (25.1, 27.4) 30 (22, 40) 393 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.4, 4.4)
Vermont 6 32.5 (30.1, 35.0) 4 (1, 17) 158 stable stable trend -4.1 (-10.1, 1.6)
Virginia 6 25.8 (25.2, 26.4) 32 (27, 38) 1,449 rising rising trend 1.4 (1.1, 1.8)
Washington 5 26.7 (26.0, 27.4) 29 (22, 35) 1,268 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.2, 1.3)
West Virginia 6 35.1 (33.6, 36.7) 1 (1, 3) 450 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.6, 2.4)
Wisconsin 6 30.7 (29.9, 31.5) 9 (5, 16) 1,220 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.6, -0.9)
Wyoming 6 22.6 (20.4, 25.0) 46 (31, 49) 84 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.3, 1.8)
Indiana 6
data not available
N/A
data not available
data not available
data not available
Nevada 6
data not available
N/A
data not available
data not available
data not available
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/02/2024 10:46 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Data not available for this combination of data selections.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2022 submission.
5 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2022 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2022 submission).
7 Source: SEER November 2022 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2022 data.
Data not available for this combination of geography, cancer site, age, and race/ethnicity.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
CI*Rank data for Puerto Rico is not available.

Return to Top