Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by Recentaapc

State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Utah 7 209.1 (206.7, 211.6) 42 (37, 45) 5,739 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.4, 2.5)
Minnesota 2 236.3 (234.5, 238.2) 12 (8, 16) 13,720 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.1, 2.1)
West Virginia 2 267.5 (264.0, 271.0) 1 (1, 2) 5,093 rising rising trend 0.6 (0.4, 0.7)
Iowa 7 245.1 (242.5, 247.6) 4 (4, 6) 7,806 rising rising trend 0.5 (0.4, 0.6)
South Dakota 2 227.0 (222.3, 231.8) 30 (15, 36) 1,979 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.1, 1.6)
Ohio 2 241.5 (240.2, 242.8) 6 (4, 8) 29,691 rising rising trend 0.3 (0.2, 0.4)
Alaska 2 207.4 (202.6, 212.3) 44 (37, 46) 1,522 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 2.3)
North Dakota 2 227.2 (222.1, 232.4) 29 (14, 36) 1,661 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.1, 0.5)
Vermont 2 231.2 (225.8, 236.7) 20 (8, 34) 1,620 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 1.8)
Missouri 2 235.7 (233.9, 237.4) 13 (10, 17) 14,938 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.1, 0.2)
Montana 2 224.5 (220.3, 228.7) 33 (21, 36) 2,494 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.2, 0.3)
Oklahoma 2 230.2 (228.0, 232.4) 22 (16, 30) 8,904 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.1, 0.3)
Texas 7 210.7 (209.9, 211.4) 41 (37, 43) 58,680 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.3, 1.1)
Wisconsin 2 228.4 (226.7, 230.2) 26 (20, 31) 14,256 stable stable trend 0.1 (0.0, 0.2)
Florida 2 238.3 (237.4, 239.3) 10 (7, 13) 53,526 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.3, 0.1)
Georgia 7 233.5 (232.2, 234.8) 15 (13, 21) 25,378 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.2, 0.1)
Maryland 2 225.5 (223.8, 227.2) 32 (27, 35) 14,783 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.4, 0.7)
Kansas 2 232.0 (229.4, 234.6) 19 (13, 27) 6,669 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.0)
North Carolina 2 238.6 (237.2, 239.9) 9 (6, 13) 25,744 falling falling trend -0.2 (-0.4, -0.1)
Virginia 2 208.0 (206.6, 209.4) 43 (41, 45) 18,566 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.6, 0.9)
Wyoming 2 205.4 (199.9, 210.9) 45 (37, 47) 1,198 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.5, 0.1)
Alabama 2 228.6 (226.7, 230.5) 25 (19, 31) 11,859 falling falling trend -0.3 (-0.9, -0.1)
Arizona 2 195.9 (194.4, 197.4) 49 (47, 50) 13,531 falling falling trend -0.3 (-0.5, -0.1)
Idaho 7 212.4 (209.3, 215.6) 38 (36, 44) 3,754 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.0)
Illinois 7 228.4 (227.2, 229.6) 27 (21, 31) 30,095 falling falling trend -0.3 (-1.1, -0.1)
Maine 2 239.6 (235.8, 243.3) 8 (4, 15) 3,682 falling falling trend -0.3 (-0.6, -0.1)
New York 7 237.9 (237.0, 238.9) 11 (7, 13) 49,529 falling falling trend -0.3 (-1.0, -0.1)
California 7 197.1 (196.5, 197.8) 47 (47, 49) 77,016 falling falling trend -0.4 (-0.5, -0.3)
Connecticut 7 233.0 (230.7, 235.3) 17 (12, 24) 9,108 falling falling trend -0.4 (-0.6, -0.3)
Hawaii 7 212.7 (209.2, 216.2) 37 (36, 44) 3,040 falling falling trend -0.4 (-1.0, -0.1)
New Jersey 7 232.3 (230.9, 233.7) 18 (14, 23) 23,035 falling falling trend -0.4 (-0.6, -0.2)
Colorado 2 193.9 (192.2, 195.5) 50 (48, 50) 11,120 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.7, -0.4)
Michigan 2 225.7 (224.4, 227.1) 31 (27, 34) 24,048 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.7, -0.4)
Washington 1 211.3 (209.8, 212.8) 40 (37, 43) 16,255 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.8, -0.5)
Kentucky 7 266.8 (264.6, 269.0) 2 (1, 2) 12,439 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Louisiana 7 252.6 (250.5, 254.7) 3 (3, 3) 11,885 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.3)
Nevada 2 186.1 (183.9, 188.3) 51 (51, 51) 5,830 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.4)
Puerto Rico 2 200.3 (198.0, 202.6) N/A 6,558 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.8, -0.1)
Rhode Island 2 222.9 (218.9, 226.9) 35 (25, 36) 2,623 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
Delaware 2 234.8 (230.4, 239.3) 14 (6, 28) 2,464 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.7)
New Mexico 7 196.0 (193.2, 198.9) 48 (47, 50) 4,059 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.3)
District of Columbia 2 218.7 (213.3, 224.1) 36 (30, 40) 1,330 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
South Carolina 2 223.0 (221.1, 224.9) 34 (30, 36) 11,852 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.9)
Tennessee 2 233.0 (231.4, 234.7) 16 (13, 22) 16,641 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.6)
Mississippi 2 242.1 (239.5, 244.7) 5 (4, 10) 7,317 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.8)
Nebraska 2 230.0 (226.9, 233.2) 23 (14, 32) 4,349 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.7, -1.2)
New Hampshire 2 228.0 (224.4, 231.6) 28 (16, 35) 3,612 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.0, -0.4)
Arkansas 2 239.7 (237.2, 242.3) 7 (5, 13) 7,259 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.4, -1.2)
Pennsylvania 2 230.5 (229.3, 231.7) 21 (17, 27) 31,745 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.2, -1.5)
Indiana 2 229.4 (227.7, 231.1) 24 (19, 30) 15,762 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.3, -2.0)
Oregon 2 203.9 (201.9, 205.9) 46 (44, 46) 8,698 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.5, -0.9)
Massachusetts 2 211.5 (209.9, 213.0) 39 (37, 43) 15,760 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.7, -1.3)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 02/18/2026 7:08 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (SEER areas use 20 age groups and NPCR areas use 19 age groups). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage. Due to changes in stage coding, Combined Summary Stage with Expanded Regional Codes (2004+) is used for data from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases and Merged Summary Stage is used for data from National Program of Cancer Registries databases. Due to the increased complexity with staging, other staging variables maybe used if necessary.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. The rates used in CI*Rank are all age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population using 19 age groups for SEER and NPCR areas. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

CI*Rank data for Puerto Rico is not available.

Return to Top