Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2013-2017

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <50

Sorted by Rate
State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,8 *** 105.4 (105.2, 105.6) 208,732 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.3, 0.2)
Kentucky 7,8 *** 123.5 (121.6, 125.4) 3,398 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.6, 1.1)
West Virginia 6,8 *** 120.1 (117.2, 123.1) 1,302 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.3, 0.8)
Pennsylvania 6,8 *** 118.2 (117.1, 119.3) 8,974 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
New York 7,8 *** 116.9 (116.1, 117.8) 14,638 stable stable trend 0.3 (0.0, 0.5)
Delaware 6,8 *** 115.3 (111.3, 119.4) 641 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.2, 1.0)
Maine 6,8 *** 114.9 (111.5, 118.4) 895 rising rising trend 0.4 (0.2, 0.6)
New Hampshire 6,8 *** 114.5 (111.2, 117.9) 932 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.3, 0.5)
Iowa 7,8 *** 113.3 (111.1, 115.5) 2,084 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.9, 1.2)
Vermont 6,8 *** 113.0 (108.1, 118.0) 410 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.6, 0.3)
New Jersey 7,8 *** 112.1 (110.9, 113.3) 6,446 stable stable trend 0.2 (0.0, 0.4)
Ohio 6,8 *** 111.9 (110.8, 113.1) 7,765 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.5, 1.1)
Connecticut 7,8 *** 111.5 (109.5, 113.5) 2,506 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Rhode Island 6,8 *** 111.2 (107.5, 114.9) 713 stable stable trend -3.9 (-7.8, 0.2)
Nebraska 6,8 *** 110.8 (108.0, 113.6) 1,228 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.5, 1.2)
Florida 6,8 *** 110.5 (109.7, 111.4) 13,336 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.2, 1.9)
Minnesota 6,8 *** 110.5 (108.9, 112.1) 3,676 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.8, 1.3)
Arkansas 6,8 *** 110.4 (108.3, 112.7) 1,945 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.8, 1.7)
Kansas 6,8 *** 108.8 (106.6, 111.1) 1,846 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.4, 0.4)
Tennessee 6,8 *** 108.7 (107.3, 110.2) 4,420 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.3)
North Carolina 6,8 *** 108.5 (107.4, 109.7) 6,838 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.3)
North Dakota 6,8 *** 108.1 (103.7, 112.8) 458 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.7, 1.8)
District of Columbia 6,8 *** 107.8 (103.4, 112.4) 485 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.8)
Louisiana 7,8 *** 107.8 (106.1, 109.6) 3,069 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.7)
Massachusetts 7,8 *** 107.2 (105.8, 108.6) 4,621 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.7)
Wisconsin 6,8 *** 106.7 (105.1, 108.2) 3,671 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.7, 0.2)
Hawaii 7,8 *** 106.6 (103.6, 109.8) 930 rising rising trend 0.6 (0.4, 0.8)
Alabama 6,8 *** 106.6 (104.9, 108.3) 3,118 rising rising trend 0.6 (0.2, 1.0)
Illinois 6,8 *** 106.6 (105.6, 107.6) 8,560 rising rising trend 0.5 (0.3, 0.7)
Mississippi 6,8 *** 106.5 (104.4, 108.7) 1,895 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.2, 0.7)
Michigan 5,8 *** 106.4 # (105.2, 107.6) 6,305 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.3, 0.2)
South Dakota 6,8 *** 106.4 (102.2, 110.6) 509 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.3, 1.4)
Missouri 6,8 *** 106.2 (104.7, 107.8) 3,817 rising rising trend 0.4 (0.1, 0.7)
Puerto Rico 6,10 *** 106.2 (104.2, 108.2) 2,218 stable stable trend -0.6 (-6.4, 5.6)
Indiana 6,8 *** 105.9 (104.5, 107.3) 4,227 stable stable trend 0.4 (0.0, 0.7)
Montana 6,8 *** 105.8 (102.0, 109.6) 612 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.2, 1.4)
Maryland 6,8 *** 105.3 (103.9, 106.8) 3,993 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.2, 0.3)
South Carolina 6,8 *** 104.8 (103.1, 106.5) 3,073 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.2, 0.2)
Oklahoma 6,8 *** 104.4 (102.6, 106.3) 2,401 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.2, 1.0)
Georgia 7,8 *** 104.2 (103.1, 105.3) 7,007 rising rising trend 0.4 (0.2, 0.5)
Utah 7,8 *** 103.9 (101.8, 106.0) 1,962 rising rising trend 1.2 (1.0, 1.4)
Washington 5,8 *** 102.4 (101.0, 103.7) 4,619 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.4, 0.2)
Oregon 6,8 *** 101.0 (99.2, 102.8) 2,500 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.2, 0.6)
Idaho 7,8 *** 99.4 (96.6, 102.2) 990 rising rising trend 0.5 (0.2, 0.8)
Alaska 6,8 *** 98.7 (94.6, 102.9) 452 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.3, 0.6)
Wyoming 6,8 *** 97.6 (92.9, 102.4) 331 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.3, 1.0)
Colorado 6,8 *** 96.1 (94.7, 97.6) 3,364 stable stable trend 0.2 (0.0, 0.5)
Virginia 6,8 *** 96.0 (94.8, 97.2) 5,104 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Texas 6,8 *** 95.4 (94.7, 96.0) 16,782 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.4, 0.0)
California 7,8 *** 92.8 (92.3, 93.3) 23,694 rising rising trend 0.2 (0.1, 0.4)
Arizona 6,8 *** 92.1 (90.8, 93.4) 3,764 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
New Mexico 7,8 *** 91.4 (89.1, 93.9) 1,130 rising rising trend 0.4 (0.2, 0.6)
Nevada 6,8 *** 90.2 (88.3, 92.2) 1,657 rising rising trend 2.6 (1.4, 3.9)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/01/2020 10:14 am.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Health Service Areas are a single county or cluster of contiguous counties which are relatively self-contained with respect to hospital care. For more detailed information, please see Health Service Area information page.
# Data do not include cases diagnosed in other states for those states in which the data exchange agreement specifically prohibits the release of data to third parties.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2017) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2019 submission.
5 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2017) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2019 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2017) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2019 submission).
7 Source: SEER November 2019 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2019 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top