Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021

Black Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 447.9 (447.0, 448.8) N/A 191,594 falling falling trend -0.7 (-0.9, -0.1)
Georgia 7 463.1 (459.6, 466.5) 12 (9, 17) 15,212 falling falling trend -0.3 (-0.5, -0.2)
New York 7 433.5 (430.3, 436.7) 27 (24, 31) 14,897 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
Texas 7 457.7 (454.3, 461.2) 16 (12, 20) 14,861 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -0.4)
Florida 6 420.4 (417.2, 423.5) 32 (30, 36) 14,189 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.6)
North Carolina 6 475.1 (471.1, 479.1) 8 (5, 10) 11,598 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.8, -0.4)
California 7 411.2 (407.7, 414.8) 34 (32, 38) 10,873 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.6)
Illinois 7 470.4 (466.1, 474.8) 9 (6, 13) 9,372 stable stable trend -0.5 (-0.9, 0.3)
Maryland 6 443.5 (439.4, 447.7) 23 (19, 27) 9,269 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.7, 0.0)
Virginia 6 432.7 (428.3, 437.1) 28 (24, 32) 7,948 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.8)
Louisiana 7 496.4 (491.2, 501.6) 3 (3, 5) 7,654 falling falling trend -0.3 (-0.5, -0.1)
Ohio 6 453.0 (448.1, 457.8) 19 (14, 23) 7,108 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.4, 0.1)
Pennsylvania 6 460.8 (455.8, 465.8) 13 (9, 20) 6,823 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -1.4)
Michigan 6 448.0 (443.1, 452.9) 21 (17, 26) 6,749 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.7, -1.6)
South Carolina 6 428.1 (423.3, 433.0) 31 (25, 34) 6,470 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.6, -1.1)
New Jersey 7 467.7 (462.4, 473.1) 10 (7, 16) 6,205 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.8)
Alabama 6 430.6 (425.7, 435.7) 30 (24, 33) 6,147 falling falling trend -0.9 (-2.1, -0.6)
Mississippi 6 482.2 (476.2, 488.2) 5 (4, 8) 5,488 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.7)
Tennessee 6 446.2 (440.5, 452.0) 22 (17, 27) 5,129 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.4)
Missouri 6 459.2 (452.0, 466.4) 15 (9, 21) 3,344 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.6)
Arkansas 6 460.5 (451.4, 469.7) 14 (7, 22) 2,138 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.5, 0.5)
Massachusetts 7 419.8 (411.6, 428.2) 33 (27, 37) 2,121 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
Kentucky 7 495.5 (485.0, 506.2) 4 (3, 6) 1,836 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.0, -0.5)
Connecticut 7 464.8 (454.9, 474.9) 11 (6, 20) 1,781 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.7, 3.5)
District of Columbia 6 477.4 (467.2, 487.9) 7 (4, 13) 1,742 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.3, 3.3)
Wisconsin 6 560.2 (547.8, 572.9) 1 (1, 2) 1,717 stable stable trend 0.4 (0.0, 0.7)
Oklahoma 6 450.1 (438.8, 461.5) 20 (10, 27) 1,315 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Washington 5 438.4 (426.6, 450.5) 24 (17, 33) 1,226 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.2, 3.6)
Minnesota 6 456.3 (443.3, 469.6) 17 (7, 26) 1,138 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.2)
Nevada 6 399.9 (389.2, 410.8) 35 (34, 41) 1,132 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.6)
Arizona 6 360.5 (350.5, 370.8) 43 (39, 46) 1,071 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.2)
Delaware 6 434.3 (422.1, 446.8) 26 (19, 34) 1,035 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Colorado 6 389.9 (377.7, 402.4) 38 (35, 43) 858 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.6, -1.1)
Kansas 6 456.2 (441.2, 471.5) 18 (6, 27) 760 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Iowa 7 554.3 (529.0, 580.4) 2 (1, 2) 434 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.3)
Nebraska 6 480.1 (457.4, 503.5) 6 (3, 23) 372 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.8, -0.7)
Oregon 6 431.0 (409.6, 453.2) 29 (11, 37) 341 falling falling trend -4.9 (-7.5, -1.6)
West Virginia 6 434.8 (413.0, 457.5) 25 (10, 37) 322 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Rhode Island 6 376.8 (355.1, 399.4) 41 (35, 46) 246 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.7)
New Mexico 7 332.7 (308.9, 357.7) 46 (40, 49) 158 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.5)
Utah 7 391.3 (351.1, 434.5) 36 (17, 46) 93 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.2)
Hawaii 7 346.1 (311.8, 382.8) 45 (36, 49) 86 falling falling trend -6.0 (-13.3, -1.3)
Alaska 6 390.7 (350.3, 434.1) 37 (18, 46) 85 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.4, 0.2)
New Hampshire 6 319.7 (277.6, 365.9) 48 (37, 50) 52 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.2, -0.1)
Maine 6 369.3 (320.8, 422.5) 42 (22, 48) 51 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.4, 3.0)
Idaho 7 379.1 (319.7, 445.5) 40 (7, 49) 38 falling falling trend -9.3 (-15.4, -0.2)
North Dakota 6 322.2 (256.3, 398.4) 47 (29, 50) 35 stable stable trend 1.1 (-4.1, 9.2)
South Dakota 6 276.5 (223.9, 336.8) 49 (42, 50) 29 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.2, 0.9)
Vermont 6 358.9 (288.7, 439.7) 44 (8, 50) 23 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.2, 5.5)
Montana 6 387.5 (303.4, 485.7) 39 (3, 49) 18 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.4, 4.1)
Wyoming 6 230.4 (177.1, 293.9) 50 (47, 50) 15
*
*
Indiana 6
data not available
N/A
data not available
data not available
data not available
Puerto Rico 6
¶¶¶
N/A
¶¶¶
¶¶¶
¶¶¶
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/05/2024 3:29 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Indiana, Puerto Rico

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

¶¶¶ Data for Puerto Rico is only available for All Races (includes Hispanics). For more information see data not available.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.
Data not available for this combination of data selections.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
CI*Rank data for Puerto Rico is not available.

Return to Top