Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by Recentaapc
State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 222.9 (222.7, 223.2) N/A 734,330 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 0.0)
Utah 7 206.9 (204.5, 209.4) 42 (40, 45) 5,574 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.1, 2.2)
Connecticut 7 227.2 (225.0, 229.4) 27 (20, 33) 8,950 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.2, 2.0)
West Virginia 6 266.3 (262.8, 269.8) 1 (1, 2) 5,126 rising rising trend 0.6 (0.4, 0.7)
Iowa 7 242.9 (240.3, 245.4) 5 (4, 8) 7,750 rising rising trend 0.5 (0.4, 0.6)
Louisiana 7 252.8 (250.7, 254.9) 3 (3, 3) 11,982 rising rising trend 0.5 (0.3, 0.6)
Maine 6 240.1 (236.4, 243.9) 7 (4, 14) 3,683 rising rising trend 0.5 (0.1, 1.1)
New Mexico 7 195.2 (192.4, 198.0) 47 (45, 49) 4,041 stable stable trend 0.5 (0.0, 1.6)
Ohio 6 241.3 (240.0, 242.6) 6 (4, 8) 29,814 rising rising trend 0.4 (0.2, 0.5)
Minnesota 6 235.4 (233.5, 237.2) 12 (9, 18) 13,671 stable stable trend 0.2 (0.0, 0.4)
Vermont 6 229.3 (224.0, 234.8) 22 (10, 35) 1,614 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 2.0)
Montana 6 226.7 (222.5, 230.9) 28 (16, 35) 2,512 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.2, 0.4)
North Dakota 6 222.9 (217.9, 228.1) 35 (21, 36) 1,635 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.2, 0.4)
Oklahoma 6 228.3 (226.1, 230.5) 24 (19, 31) 8,827 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.2, 0.4)
Texas 7 209.1 (208.3, 209.9) 40 (39, 43) 57,322 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.4, 1.2)
Wisconsin 6 227.5 (225.7, 229.2) 26 (21, 32) 14,213 stable stable trend 0.1 (0.0, 0.2)
Georgia 7 234.3 (232.9, 235.6) 14 (11, 19) 25,211 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.2, 0.1)
Florida 6 237.9 (237.0, 238.9) 9 (7, 11) 52,675 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.3, 0.1)
Idaho 7 212.7 (209.6, 215.9) 38 (36, 41) 3,686 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.2, 0.0)
Maryland 6 225.6 (223.9, 227.3) 29 (24, 34) 14,807 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.1, 1.1)
Missouri 6 231.1 (229.3, 232.9) 20 (15, 24) 14,664 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.3, 0.2)
South Dakota 6 225.4 (220.8, 230.2) 30 (18, 35) 1,961 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 0.3)
Kansas 6 232.3 (229.8, 235.0) 18 (11, 24) 6,712 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.0)
North Carolina 6 239.4 (238.0, 240.8) 8 (5, 10) 25,656 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.4, 0.0)
Alabama 6 229.3 (227.4, 231.3) 21 (18, 29) 11,892 falling falling trend -0.3 (-1.1, -0.1)
Illinois 7 227.9 (226.7, 229.1) 25 (21, 30) 30,200 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.0)
Wyoming 6 204.1 (198.7, 209.6) 45 (39, 46) 1,200 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.6, 0.1)
Hawaii 7 214.7 (211.2, 218.2) 37 (35, 40) 3,073 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.0)
New Jersey 7 231.9 (230.5, 233.3) 19 (14, 23) 22,961 falling falling trend -0.4 (-0.6, -0.3)
New York 7 237.5 (236.5, 238.4) 10 (8, 12) 49,634 falling falling trend -0.4 (-0.8, -0.2)
California 7 194.7 (194.0, 195.3) 48 (46, 49) 76,033 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.6, -0.4)
Colorado 6 194.3 (192.6, 196.0) 49 (46, 49) 11,090 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.7, -0.4)
Alaska 6 206.8 (202.0, 211.6) 44 (37, 45) 1,527 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.3)
Michigan 6 223.8 (222.5, 225.1) 33 (28, 35) 23,925 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.4)
Washington 5 212.5 (211.0, 214.0) 39 (37, 40) 16,309 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.8, -0.5)
Virginia 6 207.5 (206.1, 208.9) 41 (40, 45) 18,488 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.8, -0.4)
Nevada 6 187.5 (185.3, 189.7) 50 (50, 50) 5,770 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
Rhode Island 6 224.5 (220.5, 228.6) 31 (21, 35) 2,644 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.5)
Delaware 6 233.4 (229.0, 237.9) 16 (7, 28) 2,424 falling falling trend -1.0 (-2.4, -0.6)
Kentucky 7 266.2 (264.0, 268.4) 2 (1, 2) 12,446 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.4)
Mississippi 6 242.9 (240.3, 245.5) 4 (4, 8) 7,361 falling falling trend -1.0 (-2.1, -0.1)
Nebraska 6 233.8 (230.6, 237.1) 15 (8, 23) 4,421 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.4)
District of Columbia 6 223.3 (217.9, 228.8) 34 (19, 36) 1,362 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Tennessee 6 235.4 (233.7, 237.0) 11 (9, 18) 16,732 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.4)
Massachusetts 7 215.6 (214.0, 217.2) 36 (35, 38) 16,070 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.2)
Arizona 6 195.9 (194.3, 197.4) 46 (45, 49) 13,299 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.5)
New Hampshire 6 229.2 (225.6, 232.8) 23 (14, 33) 3,619 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.8, -0.4)
South Carolina 6 224.2 (222.3, 226.1) 32 (27, 35) 11,808 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.6, -1.3)
Pennsylvania 6 233.1 (231.9, 234.3) 17 (12, 20) 32,221 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.6, -1.0)
Arkansas 6 234.5 (232.0, 237.1) 13 (9, 20) 7,069 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.6, -1.1)
Oregon 6 206.9 (204.9, 208.9) 43 (40, 45) 8,845 falling falling trend -2.6 (-5.7, -0.3)
Puerto Rico 6 201.6 (199.2, 204.0) N/A 5,942 stable stable trend -2.8 (-10.6, 5.7)
Indiana 6
data not available
N/A
data not available
data not available
data not available
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/08/2024 3:13 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Indiana

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Data not available for this combination of data selections.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
CI*Rank data for Puerto Rico is not available.

Return to Top