Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <50

Sorted by Recentaapc
State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 105.2 (105.0, 105.5) N/A 202,435 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.1, 0.3)
Nebraska 6 114.0 (111.2, 116.8) 7 (3, 18) 1,277 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.2, 4.0)
Iowa 7 114.2 (112.0, 116.4) 4 (3, 11) 2,095 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.9, 1.3)
Minnesota 6 114.2 (112.5, 115.8) 6 (4, 13) 3,801 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.8, 1.4)
North Dakota 6 107.3 (102.9, 111.9) 26 (8, 39) 457 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.4, 1.7)
Kentucky 7 122.7 (120.8, 124.6) 1 (1, 2) 3,328 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.6, 1.1)
Louisiana 7 109.7 (107.9, 111.4) 13 (6, 22) 3,080 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.6, 1.1)
South Dakota 6 107.8 (103.6, 112.0) 22 (6, 38) 523 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.5, 1.2)
Montana 6 109.4 (105.6, 113.2) 19 (6, 36) 649 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.3, 1.5)
Ohio 6 112.4 (111.3, 113.6) 11 (6, 16) 7,678 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.5, 1.1)
Hawaii 7 106.8 (103.7, 110.0) 21 (9, 36) 917 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.5, 1.0)
West Virginia 6 124.3 (121.3, 127.4) 2 (1, 2) 1,302 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.0, 1.0)
Alabama 6 109.2 (107.5, 110.9) 18 (12, 27) 3,163 rising rising trend 0.6 (0.3, 0.9)
Utah 7 105.3 (103.3, 107.3) 28 (16, 36) 2,130 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.6, 1.2)
Arizona 6 92.2 (90.9, 93.5) 49 (46, 49) 3,905 stable stable trend 0.5 (0.0, 1.4)
Idaho 7 100.9 (98.2, 103.6) 37 (28, 42) 1,060 rising rising trend 0.5 (0.1, 0.8)
New Mexico 7 92.3 (89.9, 94.7) 48 (42, 49) 1,132 rising rising trend 0.5 (0.3, 0.8)
California 7 93.4 (92.9, 94.0) 46 (44, 48) 23,789 rising rising trend 0.4 (0.3, 0.5)
Illinois 7 106.0 (105.0, 107.1) 23 (18, 31) 8,438 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.6, 0.6)
New Jersey 7 111.8 (110.6, 113.1) 9 (4, 14) 6,240 rising rising trend 0.4 (0.2, 0.5)
New York 7 116.0 (115.2, 116.9) 3 (3, 5) 14,019 rising rising trend 0.4 (0.2, 0.6)
Oklahoma 6 104.0 (102.1, 105.9) 36 (26, 39) 2,418 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.1, 0.9)
Alaska 6 99.3 (95.2, 103.5) 40 (31, 48) 449 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.2, 0.8)
Georgia 7 104.9 (103.8, 106.0) 30 (21, 35) 7,123 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 0.5)
Maine 6 113.6 (110.2, 117.1) 8 (3, 21) 861 rising rising trend 0.3 (0.1, 0.5)
Maryland 6 105.7 (104.2, 107.2) 32 (21, 37) 3,930 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.3, 1.5)
Wisconsin 6 107.5 (105.9, 109.1) 24 (16, 33) 3,625 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.2, 0.6)
Wyoming 6 99.4 (94.7, 104.3) 41 (27, 49) 336 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 1.0)
Colorado 6 94.4 (93.0, 95.8) 47 (44, 49) 3,445 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.1, 0.5)
Kansas 6 110.3 (108.0, 112.6) 16 (7, 27) 1,861 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 0.5)
Missouri 6 106.6 (105.1, 108.2) 29 (19, 35) 3,803 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.9, 0.9)
Oregon 6 98.4 (96.7, 100.2) 42 (38, 45) 2,538 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.2, 0.7)
Puerto Rico 6 107.4 (105.2, 109.6) N/A 1,865 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.7)
Texas 7 95.8 (95.2, 96.5) 43 (40, 45) 17,901 stable stable trend 0.1 (0.0, 0.3)
Vermont 6 115.2 (110.2, 120.4) 5 (2, 22) 403 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.4, 0.5)
Michigan 6 105.8 (104.6, 107.0) 31 (22, 36) 6,128 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.3, 0.2)
New Hampshire 6 110.6 (107.3, 114.0) 15 (5, 32) 867 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.4, 0.4)
Mississippi 6 104.9 (102.8, 107.1) 34 (22, 39) 1,840 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 0.3)
North Carolina 6 107.1 (106.0, 108.3) 27 (19, 33) 6,816 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.1)
Washington 5 100.8 (99.5, 102.1) 39 (36, 42) 4,733 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.3, 0.2)
Arkansas 6 109.1 (107.0, 111.4) 20 (11, 32) 1,925 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.0, 0.8)
Delaware 6 111.2 (107.3, 115.3) 12 (4, 33) 610 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.8, 0.4)
Virginia 6 96.3 (95.1, 97.5) 44 (41, 47) 5,084 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.2, 0.1)
Rhode Island 6 107.5 (103.9, 111.3) 25 (9, 38) 666 falling falling trend -0.8 (-3.9, -0.2)
South Carolina 6 101.5 (99.9, 103.2) 38 (35, 42) 3,026 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.9, -0.2)
Connecticut 7 107.9 (105.9, 109.9) 17 (11, 29) 2,319 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.4)
Massachusetts 7 103.0 (101.6, 104.4) 35 (27, 38) 4,357 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.6)
Pennsylvania 6 113.3 (112.3, 114.4) 10 (5, 13) 8,401 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.3)
Florida 6 110.7 (109.9, 111.5) 14 (11, 20) 13,725 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.6)
District of Columbia 6 95.6 (91.5, 99.8) 45 (38, 49) 451 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.5)
Tennessee 6 105.5 (104.1, 107.0) 33 (23, 37) 4,333 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.6)
Indiana 6
data not available
N/A
data not available
data not available
data not available
Nevada 6
data not available
N/A
data not available
data not available
data not available
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/25/2023 2:06 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
Data not available for this combination of data selections.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2022 submission.
5 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2022 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2022 submission).
7 Source: SEER November 2022 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2022 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data not available for this combination of geography, cancer site, age, and race/ethnicity.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
CI*Rank data for Puerto Rico is not available.

Return to Top