Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

Esophagus (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 4.5 (4.5, 4.5) N/A 18,429 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.4)
Wyoming 6 4.5 (3.8, 5.3) 34 (7, 49) 33 stable stable trend 12.7 (-2.3, 23.3)
South Dakota 6 5.6 (5.0, 6.3) 7 (1, 28) 63 stable stable trend 6.5 (-0.4, 16.2)
Oklahoma 6 5.0 (4.7, 5.3) 17 (8, 30) 240 rising rising trend 4.1 (0.4, 7.8)
Illinois 7 4.9 (4.7, 5.0) 20 (14, 29) 781 stable stable trend 2.6 (-1.0, 4.7)
Kentucky 7 5.7 (5.4, 6.0) 5 (2, 10) 330 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.4, 6.5)
Rhode Island 6 5.1 (4.6, 5.6) 16 (3, 37) 75 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.6, 7.4)
Kansas 6 4.7 (4.4, 5.1) 22 (10, 38) 171 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.1, 2.3)
Arkansas 6 4.5 (4.2, 4.8) 32 (17, 43) 176 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.2, 1.8)
Tennessee 6 4.9 (4.7, 5.1) 19 (11, 30) 433 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.2, 1.2)
Iowa 7 5.7 (5.4, 6.1) 4 (2, 11) 241 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.6, 1.1)
West Virginia 6 5.9 (5.5, 6.4) 3 (1, 12) 159 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.5, 1.3)
Maine 6 6.8 (6.3, 7.4) 1 (1, 3) 144 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.2)
New Mexico 7 3.9 (3.6, 4.3) 46 (32, 49) 109 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 1.0)
Texas 7 4.0 (3.9, 4.1) 45 (39, 48) 1,199 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.2, 1.4)
Nebraska 6 4.9 (4.5, 5.3) 18 (7, 37) 119 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.3)
Minnesota 6 5.2 (5.0, 5.5) 12 (6, 22) 371 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.7)
Utah 7 3.5 (3.2, 3.8) 50 (45, 50) 101 stable stable trend 0.0 (-4.7, 1.0)
Hawaii 7 3.5 (3.2, 3.9) 48 (40, 50) 70 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.6)
Idaho 7 4.6 (4.2, 5.1) 27 (10, 44) 101 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.9)
Missouri 6 5.1 (4.9, 5.3) 15 (7, 25) 410 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.3)
North Dakota 6 4.7 (4.1, 5.4) 24 (5, 47) 43 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 1.9)
Vermont 6 5.2 (4.6, 5.9) 13 (2, 38) 49 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.3)
Alaska 6 5.5 (4.7, 6.3) 8 (1, 36) 42 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.4)
Pennsylvania 6 5.2 (5.1, 5.4) 11 (7, 18) 952 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.1)
Mississippi 6 4.6 (4.3, 4.9) 30 (14, 41) 175 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7)
Washington 5 4.8 (4.6, 5.0) 21 (13, 33) 446 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.3)
Florida 6 4.6 (4.5, 4.7) 31 (23, 35) 1,469 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
Michigan 6 5.3 (5.1, 5.5) 10 (6, 18) 716 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Alabama 6 4.4 (4.2, 4.6) 36 (23, 44) 289 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.3)
Colorado 6 4.0 (3.8, 4.3) 43 (33, 48) 264 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Montana 6 4.6 (4.1, 5.2) 29 (8, 46) 70 stable stable trend -0.7 (-6.6, 0.6)
Ohio 6 5.7 (5.5, 5.8) 6 (2, 10) 885 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.8, 1.6)
Wisconsin 6 5.3 (5.1, 5.5) 9 (5, 18) 416 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Nevada 6 4.6 (4.3, 5.0) 28 (14, 41) 175 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.1)
North Carolina 6 4.3 (4.1, 4.5) 37 (29, 44) 569 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Oregon 6 4.7 (4.5, 5.0) 23 (13, 36) 265 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
California 7 3.5 (3.4, 3.5) 49 (47, 50) 1,580 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.7)
Georgia 7 4.3 (4.1, 4.5) 38 (29, 44) 527 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
New Hampshire 6 6.2 (5.7, 6.7) 2 (1, 8) 124 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Virginia 6 4.2 (4.0, 4.4) 39 (31, 47) 444 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
New Jersey 7 4.1 (4.0, 4.3) 41 (33, 47) 493 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.0)
Connecticut 7 4.7 (4.4, 5.0) 25 (14, 38) 228 falling falling trend -1.4 (-5.6, -0.7)
Louisiana 7 4.4 (4.2, 4.7) 35 (22, 44) 253 falling falling trend -1.5 (-4.9, -0.9)
South Carolina 6 4.5 (4.3, 4.7) 33 (20, 41) 309 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.8)
Delaware 6 4.6 (4.1, 5.2) 26 (8, 46) 64 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.4)
Maryland 6 4.0 (3.8, 4.2) 44 (36, 48) 307 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.2)
New York 7 4.1 (4.0, 4.2) 42 (36, 46) 1,072 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -1.3)
Massachusetts 7 5.1 (4.9, 5.3) 14 (8, 24) 469 falling falling trend -2.2 (-8.8, -1.2)
Puerto Rico 6 2.8 (2.6, 3.0) N/A 127 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.9, -2.0)
Arizona 6 4.1 (3.9, 4.3) 40 (32, 47) 385 stable stable trend -4.2 (-9.1, 0.0)
District of Columbia 6 3.9 (3.2, 4.6) 47 (17, 50) 26 falling falling trend -4.4 (-6.4, -2.7)
Indiana 6
data not available
N/A
data not available
data not available
data not available
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/08/2024 10:51 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Data not available for this combination of data selections.
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
5 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).
7 Source: SEER November 2023 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
CI*Rank data for Puerto Rico is not available.

Return to Top