Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

Stomach (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
State
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 6.2 (6.2, 6.3) N/A 23,883 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.7)
Alabama 6 6.4 (6.1, 6.7) 14 (7, 23) 395 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.1, 1.0)
Alaska 6 6.9 (6.1, 7.9) 6 (1, 30) 51 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.3, 1.6)
Arizona 6 5.2 (5.0, 5.4) 38 (31, 44) 463 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.1)
Arkansas 6 6.2 (5.8, 6.6) 20 (8, 29) 233 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.7, 5.5)
California 7 7.2 (7.1, 7.3) 4 (3, 7) 3,140 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.7)
Colorado 6 4.9 (4.7, 5.2) 41 (34, 47) 311 falling falling trend -1.7 (-4.9, -0.5)
Connecticut 7 7.0 (6.7, 7.4) 5 (3, 12) 327 falling falling trend -5.4 (-9.5, -1.4)
Delaware 6 6.0 (5.4, 6.6) 22 (7, 39) 78 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.5)
District of Columbia 6 6.9 (6.0, 7.9) 7 (1, 30) 48 falling falling trend -7.7 (-14.7, -3.0)
Florida 6 5.7 (5.5, 5.8) 28 (23, 33) 1,721 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.0, 0.0)
Georgia 7 6.3 (6.1, 6.5) 16 (9, 23) 727 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.1)
Hawaii 7 7.8 (7.2, 8.4) 2 (1, 7) 148 falling falling trend -3.5 (-3.9, -3.1)
Idaho 7 4.6 (4.2, 5.1) 45 (35, 49) 93 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.8)
Illinois 7 6.9 (6.7, 7.1) 8 (4, 11) 1,054 falling falling trend -0.4 (-0.6, -0.2)
Iowa 7 4.5 (4.2, 4.8) 47 (41, 49) 180 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Kansas 6 4.9 (4.6, 5.3) 42 (32, 48) 174 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.5)
Kentucky 7 6.3 (5.9, 6.6) 18 (9, 26) 342 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.1, 1.3)
Louisiana 7 6.6 (6.3, 6.9) 10 (5, 20) 368 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.8)
Maine 6 5.7 (5.2, 6.2) 27 (12, 41) 115 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Maryland 6 6.7 (6.5, 7.0) 9 (5, 16) 487 stable stable trend 0.4 (0.0, 1.0)
Massachusetts 7 6.3 (6.1, 6.6) 15 (9, 24) 543 stable stable trend -0.7 (-5.0, 2.8)
Michigan 6 5.6 (5.4, 5.8) 29 (23, 35) 718 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.9)
Minnesota 6 5.4 (5.2, 5.7) 34 (25, 41) 369 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.5, 0.7)
Mississippi 6 6.5 (6.2, 6.9) 11 (5, 23) 236 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Missouri 6 5.3 (5.0, 5.5) 37 (28, 43) 405 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.8, 3.3)
Montana 6 5.0 (4.5, 5.6) 40 (24, 49) 69 stable stable trend 0.7 (-12.4, 13.4)
Nebraska 6 5.1 (4.7, 5.6) 39 (25, 47) 116 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.3)
New Hampshire 6 5.5 (5.0, 6.0) 32 (17, 45) 99 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 1.1)
New Jersey 7 7.5 (7.3, 7.7) 3 (2, 6) 832 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.7)
New Mexico 7 6.3 (5.8, 6.7) 17 (6, 29) 164 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
New York 7 8.3 (8.1, 8.5) 1 (1, 2) 2,009 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 1.6)
North Carolina 6 6.2 (6.0, 6.4) 19 (10, 24) 788 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.2, 1.1)
North Dakota 6 4.9 (4.2, 5.6) 43 (23, 49) 44 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Ohio 6 5.7 (5.5, 5.9) 26 (22, 34) 850 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.6, -2.0)
Oklahoma 6 5.3 (5.0, 5.6) 35 (25, 43) 248 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.4)
Oregon 6 4.8 (4.5, 5.1) 44 (37, 49) 254 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Pennsylvania 6 6.0 (5.8, 6.1) 23 (17, 28) 1,026 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.7)
Puerto Rico 6 6.5 (6.1, 6.8) N/A 282 stable stable trend -4.0 (-13.2, 6.3)
Rhode Island 6 6.5 (5.9, 7.2) 12 (3, 30) 88 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.9, 0.7)
South Carolina 6 6.1 (5.8, 6.4) 21 (12, 28) 399 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
South Dakota 6 4.4 (3.8, 5.0) 49 (36, 49) 47 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.2)
Tennessee 6 5.5 (5.3, 5.8) 30 (23, 38) 461 falling falling trend -1.3 (-3.3, -0.4)
Texas 7 6.4 (6.3, 6.6) 13 (9, 20) 1,852 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.0, -0.5)
Utah 7 4.6 (4.2, 4.9) 46 (39, 49) 125 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Vermont 6 5.9 (5.1, 6.7) 25 (5, 44) 50 rising rising trend 4.2 (0.9, 16.0)
Virginia 6 5.5 (5.3, 5.7) 31 (24, 38) 557 falling falling trend -5.2 (-8.2, -1.5)
Washington 5 5.4 (5.2, 5.7) 33 (25, 40) 479 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.8)
West Virginia 6 5.3 (4.9, 5.7) 36 (23, 45) 138 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.5)
Wisconsin 6 5.9 (5.7, 6.2) 24 (16, 31) 438 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.9)
Wyoming 6 4.4 (3.7, 5.2) 48 (31, 49) 32 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.8, 1.8)
Indiana 6
data not available
N/A
data not available
data not available
data not available
Nevada 6
data not available
N/A
data not available
data not available
data not available
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/29/2024 11:34 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Indiana, Nevada

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Data not available for this combination of data selections.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data not available for this combination of geography, cancer site, age, and race/ethnicity.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
CI*Rank data for Puerto Rico is not available.

Return to Top